Note: We had no intention of discussing the previous legal proceedings and the petitioner in those proceedings, however Bill Woodard left us no choice due to his slanderous accusations that are unfounded and without merit.  He opened this can of worms and we will respond to his claims and defend those who have been brought into this for no reason.

If transparency were a sport, the latest post by Bobblehead Bill Woodard aka The Chihuahua would be competing in interpretive gymnastics—lots of movement, impressive flexibility, and just enough flair to make you forget to ask what stuck in the landing.

At first glance, the piece presents itself as a sober “summary of facts” surrounding the Heit/FWB matter. But read a little closer and it starts to feel less like journalism and more like a carefully plated entrée of implication, innuendo, and selective storytelling—served with a garnish of court documents for credibility. That’s not illegal. It’s not even uncommon. But readers should approach with eyes wide open.

Because when a blog post blends verifiable legal proceedings with vivid personal detail, speculation about networks of people, and a one-sided narrative arc, the question isn’t just what is being said, it’s why it’s being said this way, right now.

Before anyone takes this post as gospel, here are a few reasons you shouldn’t. Stop, pause, raise an eyebrow, and rely on your common sense:

• Selective storytelling: When one individual is framed as a community pillar and another is reduced to their worst alleged moments, that’s not balance—it’s narrative construction.
• Timing: Publishing a so called “fact summary” in the middle of early voting isn’t neutral, it is purposeful to influence votes.  
• Dressed in Speculation: Create a long list of names and imply they are all connected.  Then imply their involvement by framing they “may have been involved” statements to create the appearance of a network when there isn’t one.  
• Emotional Manipulation of Facts: Include graphic or highly personal details (such as a criminal record from 20+ years ago) to shape reader bias.  
• Illusion of Transparency: Provide documents to make it appear legit, but the actual interpretation of those documents is not objective or complete.  It is one sided by a man with a petty desire to keep control.

None of these means’ readers should ignore the post. It means you should be aware that presentation matters just as much as content, and that motives, like facts, deserve scrutiny.

Readers should be asking themselves, why now?   Is it a coincidence that it connects several current candidates for office? Is it a coincidence that it connects anyone who has spoken out against the city or previously run for office to Frisco Chronicles?   Is it a coincidence that it every name is a conservative Republicans from Denton, County?

The Answers

Why Now?  Power.  Frisco Insiders like Bobblehead Bill are losing their relevance.  Out with the old, in with the new.  They are losing the power they have held to make decisions and without that power what do they have?  Nothing. 

Coincidence That It Connects to Current Candidates?  No!

There’s an old trick in politics—if you can’t win the argument in the present, go rummaging through the past and hope for something, anything, still smells bad enough to distract the room. The Chihuahua’s post leans heavily on that playbook, dressing it up as “transparency” while serving readers a reheated plate of old material filled with speculation and conveniently timed outrage, so you won’t vote for change. 

The Chihuahua’s post shows how desperate they are to get you to vote for the status quo like Mark Hill, John Keating, and Laura Rummel.  That is how they maintain 4 votes which continues to give them “CONTROL.”

Coincidence that It names anyone who has spoken out against the city. No!

Usually, those strong enough to speak out or question the status quo, are the ones they fear the most.  Why?  If they present facts, then others start to see the light and ask questions.  The goal for them is to stop the questions – just look away -there is nothing to see here.

Conservatives Under Attack

If you’re a conservative in North Texas, your name may already be on a list.

Michael Quinn Sullivan. Thomas Fabry. Carrie de Moor. Rudy de Moor. Erin Anderson. Kelly Karthik. Shona Sowell. Andrew Cucci. Senators Drew Springer and Brent Hagenbuch. Brian Livingston. Dan Stricklin. Michelle Milholland. Mark Eisemann. David Redding. Casey Waits. Millie Rhoades. Stephen John Sullivan. Tony Ortiz. John Stammerich. J. Aiden Gray. Patrick Wamhoff. Melinda Preston. Jennifer White. Cassidy Johnson. Dawn Buckingham. Rick Perry. Greg Abbott. Texas Scorecard. Current Revolt.  This is just the beginning!

What do all these names have in common?  They are local conservative Republicans. Texas Scorecard and Current Revolt are conservative news sources. And every single one of them was brought up in my first deposition in August 2025 at Clarke Hill law offices in Frisco as well as listed in the petition filed by the Petitioner.

Now tell me—why would the names of so many Republicans come up in a deposition about my little blog, Frisco Chronicles Whistleblower? 

I showed up expecting to answer questions about my articles on the Petitioner but instead, they grilled me on every potential republican relationship they think I have, asking the same questions multiple ways to try and trip me up. That’s the game: catch you in a “lie.”

It didn’t matter that I have receipts: website ownership, domain, hosting. They wanted and hoped for a bigger fish.  Even though I was nursing a hangover, I answered honestly just like my lawyer told me to.  Did they trip me up, yes probably asking the same question 100 different ways over 6 hours.  The grand reveal they were hoping for fell short like a bad one-night stand.  I get it!

The Twist

Next came the Motion for Contempt and Motion for Sanctions filed by the Petitioners Attorney.  Again the motion drags in more names of conservative republicans like Shannon Greer, Andrew Cucci, Thomas Fabry, Brian Livingston, Dan Stricklin, Tony Ortiz, Patrick Wamhoff—and even cites a City Council meeting (Exhibit 28) identifying Melinda Preston (current Denton GOP Chair), David Rettig (Precinct Chair & Mayor elsewhere), Jennifer White (Precinct Chair), Cassidy Johnson (Precinct Chair – Collin County), and more.

One word comes to mind: TARGETED.

At this point they were asking the judge to depose Brian Livingston (current Republican councilman), Dan Stricklin (former councilman), Shannon Greer (Republican precinct chair and animal activist and my own attorney. 

The Claims & My Responses

Claim #1: I perjured myself and withheld information the court ordered.
Response: False. I answered truthfully like my attorney advised me to.

Claim #2: My attorney is secretly part of the “organization” because of his political affiliations.
Response: False. Steve Noskin is my attorney, nothing more.

Yes, my attorney is active in local politics, but to leap from that to “he runs Frisco Whistleblower” is pure fiction, false and libel!

Does this sound targeted to you?  The document reads “In light of the fact Steve Noskin is extremely active in politics with a focus on local elections including but not limited to: formerly twice being a political candidate in Frisco; adamantly supporting candidates in each Frisco election; vehemently supporting two candidates who provided information to the Respondent organization; his role as an administrator for Parents of FISD Facebook page and Star Patriots Facebook page; and his active participation in Frisco Conservatives, Star Patriots and Families 4 Frisco PAC, Steve Noskin’s involvement with the Respondent organization is consistent with the Respondent organization’s reason for targeting Petitioner Heit and her Facebook group “Frisco Residents Who Care”   

Claim #3: My attorney and Shannon Greer conspired with me to give false testimony.
Response: False

Yes, I know Shannon Greer and many other people in this document.  Some I know well, others I may have met in passing at an event for a few seconds, and some I don’t know at all.  Because she attended a hearing as spectator does not connect to collusion. 

Claim #4: I must be running a conspiracy because I use words like “us” and “we” which is plural terminology.
Response: False.

Writers, performers, and commentators have been using personas for centuries, and not just to be mysterious or dramatic. It serves real purposes: creative freedom, protection, satire, and sometimes just better storytelling. In journalism and political writing, pseudonyms are often used to separate the message from the messenger—or to avoid backlash. That’s not new; it’s basically how the Federalist Papers were published, under the name “Publius.”

There’s no “secret team of minions” hiding in my closet.

Claim #5: Councilmen Brian Livingston and Dan Stricklin must be involved.
Response: False.

Claim #6: I couldn’t explain how I post blogs, so I must be hiding something.
Response: False.

After 227+ posts, it’s mechanical. I “just know” how to do it. Like driving to a friend’s house—you know the way but can’t always give perfect step-by-step directions. That doesn’t mean there’s a conspiracy.

Fast Forward to The Chihuahua’s Breaking Blog

Bobblehead Bill adds more names to the list of Republicans being called into question.  He tries to expand the web of “CONNECTIONS” by calling out new names in addition to names from the case.  What do the new names have in common?  They are currently candidates, the spouse of candidates, or supporters of the candidates in the current election for City Council and Frisco ISD.

Conservatives Should Be Outraged & Concerned

Why are Denton GOP leaders, conservative mayor and council members, precinct chairs, and media outlets being dragged into depositions and the Chihuahua’s blog?  

The answer is simple, it’s about shutting down free speech, it is about attacking the credibility, integrity and character of the individuals to influence voters and maintain CONTROL.  It is about dragging names through the mud and most of all shutting down conservative free speech—in Frisco and Denton County.

They’re mad voters rejected the ISD bond, the Performing Arts Center, and elected two hard Republicans to city council. The welcome mat hasn’t exactly been rolled out for those two, has it? So now the strategy is: smear, intimidate, and silence conservatives and cause voters to pause and rethink about voting for change.

By dragging names through public depositions and blogs, they create the illusion of scandal. That’s the hit job.

The Chihuahua Barked at The Wrong Mailman

When you peel back the dramatics wrapped in legal language to sound authoritative all you have is padded opinion with speculation, insinuation, and a carefully curated list of names of political convenience. It is designed to look like journalism, but it veers into advocacy as the tone shifts from the court case to the individuals. Clearly the Chihuahua’s selective and subtle drop of my “criminal background” is character framing designed to dehumanize me and be inflammatory. It has nothing today with the case he is talking about. Are you the same person today as you were twenty years ago?

Next, he adds guilt by association using narrative stacking. You pile up names, relationships, and suggestions until the reader fills in the gap emotionally. His speculation presented as facts shows he lacks credibility. Did he reach out to me for a comment before writing his blog? No!

At the end of the day use your common sense, is the journalism or revenge reporting?

As for the current legal proceedings we responded to the petitioner’s attorney. Crickets! If the petitioner wants to end this, we can make some adjustments to the blogs, but her attorney needs to confirm to us that it is over, so we don’t interfere with an ongoing legal proceeding. We have written 227+ blogs now, 3 are about the petitioner and 2 mention the petitioner in a paragraph.  That is less than .02% of our time spent on the petitioner. 

I stand behind every blog I wrote. I have filed Public Information Requests and documented everything I have published through sources.  This is not personal for us.  We had no intention of making a public statement about the proceedings, but the Chihuahua seem to know a lot about the case that is not public, so we were left no choice but to comment.

Let me say it again: it’s just me. No secret cabal, no Republican plot. Just a blogger behind a keyboard.  

Pay Attention Denton County Republicans and Republican Organizations _ You should be alarmed that free speech is being targeted and that you could be next. This is about keeping Frisco blue. VOTE FOR CHANGE! TAKE BACK FRISCO!

For legal purposes I must add this disclaimer:  This blog could include satire, parody, and comic relief.  It could contain summarized accounts created solely for humor and commentary.  Any resemblance to real events is either coincidental or intentionally satirical.  Reader discretion — and a sense of humor — are advised.