Frisco ISD has proposed a new 2024 Bond Vatre which the district and the so called “Vote For Frisco ISD PAC” are pushing hard for. They want us to vote on four (4) propositions that they claim will fund important projects. What is a VATRE? A VATRE is triggered when a board adopts a tax rate that exceeds the district’s voter-approval tax rate (VATR). The VATR is determined for each district by a statutory formula and is the highest tax rate a board can adopt without holding an election. A district’s adopted tax rate has two components: its debt service rate or its interest and sinking (I&S) rate, and its maintenance and operations (M&O) rate.
While a bond election authorizes the issuance of bonds to generate funds for a district’s buildings and infrastructure and to be repaid from I&S revenue, a VATRE approves an increase in the district’s M&O tax rate, which can only be used for items related to programs and people, such as teacher salaries and stipends, training programs, educational programs, and other student activities, such as extracurricular programs. Confused yet?
The school district and the Vote For PAC are selling it to you on the basis that the priority has shifted from building new schools to maintaining the district’s existing facilities. A key piece of the proposed bond is refreshing aging schools and the supposedly includes a refresh for 20 Frisco ISD campuses that are 25 years old. The VATER portion according to the district’s website is needed to increase teacher pay and be more competitive. The district claims this will affect every campus, but they promised similar things in the 2018 bond, and we question if the money was used as they promised. Now they are back, asking us to trust them again but remember they DO NOT HAVE TO USE IT FOR THE REASONS THEY ARE ASKING FOR NOW. That means you can vote for it and then they can change how they or what they use the money for just like they did in 2018.
Getting the information out to the public about the upcoming propositions is not cheap. In fact, principals and the district are trying every avenue possible to get the information out, from using the PTA’s to hold informational sessions to ADVERTISING! Community Impact is one of the largest community papers for Frisco and for a long time we have thought they are in bed with Frisco political powers. We have never seen them write a hard-hitting story or an investigative story, instead most of the articles are “watered down” informational pieces. We have always had one burning question when it comes to Community Impact, how much does it cost to advertise during campaign season. I mean we know Jeff Cheney can afford it because he always owns the back cover for his business – but at what cost?
We started looking into these questions awhile back and set what we had found to the side until we saw a post on social media asking, “How much did Frisco ISD pay for the four-color glossy sticky notes located front and center in the recent Community Impact?” The paper has several different avenues of advertising such as an insert, sticky notes, direct mail postcards, online presence, and in-paper display ads. If our research is right, we can tell you!
We were sent a copy of their Frisco Elections Advertising PDF and according to the document, Community Impact goes out to 85,264 mailboxes in Frisco and their online presence in Frisco hits about 10,176 daily subscribers. Not bad coverage for a city with voter apathy! You can also bet they are working their inside connections in the Desis community as they alone can decide this vote.
Drum Roll Please…… Sticky Notes cost $0.15 each! If the district did 85,264 sticky notes to the Frisco readers, then the district spent $12,789.60 for one paper. Additionally, inserts are $0.15 each, sticky/insert combo is $0.25/set, and direct mail postcards are $0.26 each. If they decided to use the website ads on communityimpact.com it would cost $300/month per market for 30 days. If they choose to advertise via the morning impact email newsletter that goes out to 10,176 subscribers, it will cost $500 for the top of the newsletter and $450 for the middle of the newsletter.
We have a lot of questions:
Should the district be paying $13k for advertising when there is a Vote For PAC who has organized?
Are they advertising clearly, correctly and honestly? For example, on the districts website it reads “100% of bond funds stay in the district and is not subject to recapture by the state.” Will it really stay “IN THE DISTRICT” such as our schools and facilities, or will any of it (even $1 dollar) go to one of the public-private partnerships they have? You might have heard the City of Frisco approved a $182 million renovation for Toyota Stadium, but did you know Frisco ISD pays part of that bill? The recent headlines don’t alert you that the ISD is paying part of that BIG BILL!
That is right, $77 million of the $182 million comes from the public-private partnership TIRZ for the City of Frisco and Frisco ISD. They just did stadium improvements in 2016 for Toyota Stadium. I thought the point of all these public-private partnerships was to make money not just spending it. They also have a TIRZ / public-private partnership for the PGA Golf Course, Ford Center, Expansion of Dr. Pepper Arena, etc. Read more about it on their website.
While they are claiming 100% of the bonds are staying in the district, they are not telling you the VATRE is subject to recapture. According to Community Impact, “the new tax rate would generate an additional $11.5 million in revenue for the district. In total, the increase would generate $19.5 million in revenue, but $8 million would go to the state in recapture.” But they are not advertising that, are they? FISD voters last approved raising the M&O portion of the tax rate by $0.13 per $100 valuation in 2018.
We are just diving into the ISD stuff but as of right now we are not sold on voting for this bond/vatre. Just a few concerns include, we question if Waldrip the Super Intendent is the right might to lead the district as the last city he was in didn’t want him. We also don’t trust the school board President who has a history of personal financial problems to oversee tax dollars. We also don’t believe Frisco ISD is being smart, transparent or effective with the money they have now and we are unsure if throwing more money in the pot is the best solution. Last but not least our ISD needs to explain if any of this money will ever be used for public-private partnerships because if it will that makes it a no for us!
We will be back as we keep diving into this!
They are doing EXACTLY the same thing in Tatum ISD, and actually lying to people about it being a tax increase.
BONDS = TAXES
If Frisco ISD can afford to put a dome on a soccer field, then it can afford a great many things- like give teachers meaningful pay increases and hire full time teachers vs. long term subs. Guess why it’s cheaper to hire a long term sub– you guessed it, doesn’t cost the district any $$ to pay benefits. I’m not criticizing the subs themselves but rather the financial condition which constrains hiring more teachers. OH- and did I mention the district is looking at reducing teacher headcount and increasing class sizes again? Now ask me how I know this….and I’ll tell you I am married to a Frisco teacher. I will not vote for any bond increases until AFTER teacher pay and staff levels are addressed.
We would love for you to email us at FriscoWhistleBlower@protonmail.com
We have some private questions we would like to ask you.
As the spouse of a Frisco ISD employee, I hear about the levels of mismanagement on a regular basis. The number of unnecessary administrators is one such example. Also, the millions of dollars wasted on the Carnegie curriculum blows my mind. Students are not “future ready.” and graduate from Frisco ISD lacking necessary skills (including personal responsibility & consequences). College professors laugh when students ask about a retest or “waterfalling” grades.
Our neighbors are both teachers across the street, we hear it to! We are a town and school district of nice amenities but we don’t live in our amenities, we live in our homes and our kids spend half their lives in a classroom not an aquatic center.
I’m already thinking about leaving Frisco. If any one of these four propositions pass, I will expeditiously take my family out of this town. This isn’t the place I moved to 20 years ago.
We have actually considered that also! Sad to see how much control our developers have over the city versus the residents. It is not affecting schools as well.
You are so correct on that point. I moved to Frisco in ‘94. Some of the decisions being made by the powers that be are embarrassing at best.
Keep in mind that these $1.1 Billion in bonds are financed for 30 years. Today’s rate for a 30 year bond = 4.446%
Amortization over 30 years will bring the total payments right around $2 billion total. Divide that $2b by number by the roughly 84,000 households in Frisco (population = 236,754 according to friscotexas.gov with around 2.8 residents on average per household). If these bonds pass it will mean $23,653 per household over the course of the next 30 years.
Also, the voting station I visited last week (and every time I drove by for the past week) had two women (in Frisco ISD t-shirts) standing as close as legally possible to the station urging people to “support” these propositions as voters made their way in. They need to focus on their SPENDING. Frisco voters gave them the middle finger in 2016, hoping we are smart enough to do so again in 2024.