Jared Elad – City Council Place 4

Candidate Information

Full Name: Jared Elad

Campaign Website and Social Media Links:

JaredForFrisco.com

Facebook.com/JaredForFrisco

Occupation and Background: Financial Advisor – I own my own Wealth Management Firm

Why are you running for Frisco City Council?

I’m running for Frisco City Council because I think we need to start serving the residents of Frisco more effectively, instead of serving the developers and Frisco elite. We need to slow down the density and address the traffic issues, as well as focus on public safety. I also want to focus more on fiscal responsibility and transparency and less on vanity projects such as the PAC and Universal.

Community and Development

What are your top three priorities for Frisco’s growth and development?

Slow down density/halt building apartment complexes; Focus on responsible, community friendly development on the east side; Address traffic in a meaningful way

How do you plan to balance economic growth with maintaining community character?

I’d like to focus more on smaller projects for the community and not so many mega projects. And, I’d like to focus on attracting more small businesses to Frisco.

What is your stance on residential and commercial zoning changes?

Not sure I understand the context of the question

How will you ensure that infrastructure keeps pace with growth?

I think we need to slow down the growth and let the infrastructure catch up. Future projects should have a plan for infrastructure built in at the beginning. And, it must be adhered to.

Density continues to be a hot discussion for Frisco Residents.  Cheney even did a video on Density seven years ago when running for Mayor.  He said in that video that the resident’s ultimate concerns was the concept of density and what the ultimate build out population number should be. 

At build out the city’s comprehensive plan allows a maximum capacity of up to 350 thousand residents (building with maximum density).  He then said in his campaign video that is not what people move to Frisco for, and he believed to maintain quality of life the population target goal should be around 280,000.  He continued, we need to build out with world-class level developments with more open space, less multi-family all over the city and an overall less dense environment.  In the last two years Cheney has changed his tune and said, “Density is a political dog whistle used at election time for political mailers.”  

What is stance on Density?

Density is a real issue for Frisco citizens. Many have cited this as a reason for leaving. And, it’s creating quality of life issues for everyone. The only way to address it is to slow down the growth and determine what the right population number is for Frisco. 350k residents seems too high.

Fiscal Responsibility and Budgeting

What would be your approach to managing the city’s budget while ensuring essential services are maintained?

First, make sure that essential services are covered. We need to take care of our fire and police departments as well as other city services. Beyond that, all expenditures need to be thoroughly and reasonably evaluated to determine if they are necessary.

Do you believe Frisco’s current property tax rates are sustainable?  Would you support any changes including cuts, increases or adjustments to the current property tax rates? Why or why not?

No. Residents can’t afford their property taxes based on the appreciation of their valuations. Even when the city and Frisco ISD lowers the tax rate, residents still don’t see it as their tax bill gets higher every year. I would be for reducing the rate but that isn’t enough.

What are your funding priorities for public safety, education, and infrastructure?

Public safety should be fully funded including additional police officers to handle the increased issues that will come with Universal (traffic, crime). See my previous comments about infrastructure.

How would you plan to handle Frisco’s increasing debt and financial obligations?

The debt can be handled by not taking on any more of it. The addiction to debt/bonds needs to stop to ensure the financial health of the city for years to come. TIRZ money can be used to pay debt obligations.

In December of 2021, the Mayor, Jeff Cheeney had to vote in a rare tie breaker vote in regard to an employee Health Clinic operated by Premise Health.   At the time city staff shared the results of a survey which collected responses from 684 of 1,239 city employees.  Out of those 684, a total of 89.75% said they were likely or somewhat likely” to use the clinic for urgent care needs.  Only 64.7% said they were likely to “somewhat use” the clinic as their primary care provider. 

Estimated expenses in the clinic’s first year total over $1.44 million, according to the proposed five-year budget. Those expenses include salaries, insurance, management/implementation fees and equipment purchases.  The clinic’s fifth-year budget is listed at more than $1.31 million. It was projected that the clinic will operate at a loss in its first three years.  The estimated cost for the first five years was $6.28 million.  At the time there was a concern about how many years it could take to break even on the investment and how many employees would use the option.  

At the five-year mark if the clinic is still not breaking even would you support closing the Employee Wellness Clinic or continue to operate at a loss?

Yes, I would support closing the clinic if it’s not at break even.

Should the city be in the business or running an Athletic Center, Performing Arts Center, or any other type of business model that mirrors a commercial business which has annual operational costs paid for by tax dollars?  

No

Transparency and Accountability

How will you ensure transparency in your decision-making process and open communication between the city council and residents?

I will explain my decisions on key votes so that the community understands my reasoning. I will also make myself available to meet with residents by hosting regular town halls and I will also listen when community members speak at city council meetings and read their emails.

Currently only the city council meeting is aired live, however many residents believe they should have access to live meetings for the different boards and commissions as well as well as the published minutes of the meetings should be more detailed as to what was discussed. 

Do you support more increased public access to city council meetings, boards and commission meetings?

 Yes

What steps would you take to improve access to meetings, meeting minutes and public records?

I would see what other cities do and replicate the good ideas in Frisco by submitting a proposal for change.

What is your definition of conflict of interest?

A conflict of interest is when someone could potentially benefit from actions or decisions made in an official capacity.

Do you support implementing a stricter ethics policy that puts a check on the influence of money in local politics which would require council members to recuse themselves from votes that could benefit donors who contributed more than $1000 or $2500.00 to a political campaign?   

Yes

Do you believe active members of the city council should be on the front lines advocating as “private citizens” for Propositions on the ballot during local elections?

No

Community Services and Quality of Life

What are your plans for enhancing public parks and recreation on Frisco’s East Side of the DNT?

If Brinkmann Ranch is to be entirely sold, I would work to ensure that some of the land be allocated for public use. The city could require the developers who purchase the land to fund the project/s. That is probably the best location. I would like to see some of the land kept for the cows to graze as that is part of Frisco’s history.

How do you plan to address traffic congestion across Frisco?

Work to ensure the traffic signals work more effectively. Remove concrete medians where the left turn lane traffic spills into the center lane regularly (at DNT and Eldorado for example).

Do you think Frisco has a public transportation need? No

How will you engage with and listen to diverse voices of the community?

See question 1 in the previous section

Public Safety

What measures will you take to ensure Frisco’s Police and Fire Department remain well-funded?

I will ask the departments what they need, validate that by looking at other city models and then advocating for funding.

For years the Frisco Firefighters Association has taken to the citizens input pulpit asking for more staffing (specifically going from a 3 Man Truck to a 4 Man Truck).   Turnover has been high recently with Firefighters taking retirement and then going to work for other cities who are more supportive of their First Responders.

Do you support increased staffing and moving to a 4 Person Truck?  Yes

What will you do to start repairing the relationship with our first responders to stop the turnover, so they stay here in Frisco, and we don’t lose that much needed experience and wisdom.

I will meet with the fire fighters regularly and listen to their concerns. I will also ensure that retention is improved by implementing a target and holding the city manager and fire chief responsible for achieving it. I would start with a 2% decrease in turnover and go from there.

As Frisco continues to grow, do you believe Frisco’s current policies on crime prevention and emergency response are sufficient? Why or why not?

I don’t think we are staffed appropriately for Universal and need to evaluate what is needed before situations escalate. The recent stabbing of a Frisco ISD student shows that this is not the same city it was a few years ago. We need to staff for the situations we encounter today.

Would you support removing Animal Services “out” from under Public Safety and turning it into its own department?

Yes

Residents have been advocating for an animal shelter (instead of the partnership with Collin County) and the city keeps stalling, saying they are open to one with a public-private partnership.   Do you believe Frisco should have its own Animal Shelter and Education Center?  Do you believe it is a city service, or should it be a public-private partnership?

Yes, and yes it Is a city service?

Closing Statements

Is there anything you would like us to know about you that we have not asked?

Do you have any final messages for the voters?


Curtains Up, Candidates Take Center Stage

Back on May 14, 2024, we filed our first PIR related to a performing arts center.  We asked for all the studies and documents related to those reports from consulting groups or third parties like Frisco ISD or Hall Group.   

On May 24, 2024, we got a tip from an inside source and we released breaking news in a Facebook Post that Craig Hall backed out from the Performing Arts Center at Hall Park.  Today we ponder, did he know something about the project, or how the scope of the project was changing that we didn’t at the time?  Possibly, but looking back we think he was a smart man for getting out along with Frisco ISD at the time. 

On May 30, 2024, we received a letter from the city secretary that, due to confidentiality issues, the City has chosen to seek a ruling from the Attorney General regarding a portion of the responsive documents.  We were not surprised!  Now we want you to STOP AND THINK ABOUT … what did they not want the public to see it?  For a city telling you this FCFA project is the cherry on top of the city, why do they continue to delay and withhold information?  As a voter, if that does not concern you, it should!

At the February 7th City Council Meeting future candidates took to citizens input under Agenda Item 38 (starting at the 2:25:00 mark).

First up, Jared Elad, candidate for City Council Place 4.  Elad stated he had been a resident for 11 years, and he first became aware of this project when he learned the city’s partnership with Frisco ISD fell through due to disagreements over the scope of the project.  Frisco ISD is moving forward with a 55-million-dollar facility as we speak to serve its students. 

Elad stated he was concerned about Frisco residents maintaining and operating this project in perpetuity.  He said it had been stated that this project could cost up to $6 million per year to maintain and he asked the council and the city if they had really done their analysis to make sure it won’t go higher than that?  He finds it even more concerning that we are in a partnership with Prosper ISD, which limits the location options since it will have to be within Prosper ISD boundaries.  He said that boundary limitations will make the project less accessible to most Frisco Residents.  Elad asked why the city was unable to reach an agreement with Frisco ISD, and why it could not have been reworked to serve the Frisco residents better.  Now we are left with not 1 but 2 Frisco Performing Arts Centers that the Frisco residents will have to support. 

Another concern of his was the city signing a letter of intent with Broadway Access – he noted that a letter of intent is not binding.  Without a signed agreement, there is no guarantee that this partnership will come to fruition.  That could leave Frisco residents with a facility to maintain and a facility that won’t meet its projected potential revenue.  Elad went on to say it has been reported that the Dallas Performing Arts Center is struggling financially as we speak, due to the pandemic and the nature of consumers’ habits changing. He looked at the council and asked, “What makes us think we can do better?” 

As for the jobs, he said it will only create a minimum number of jobs, other than the construction phase.  While he appreciates the other public-private partnerships like The Star and Frisco PGA, he believes this one will go too far with the potential cost burden it will put on Frisco residents.  He closed, asking the council to reconsider the priorities for Frisco and to make sure we are fiscally responsible.

Next up was Burt Thakur, candidate for City Council Place 2.  He said he absolutely loves the arts, supports the arts, and believes in the power of the arts to change people.  He talked about how when he was in the military, he would use the power of books to transform himself in other places, giving his mind some peace. He said the question of whether we like or support the arts is not what is in front of us at this moment. 

The question before us today is are we being financially responsible, and do we have the right priorities in line.  Are we good stewards of taxpayer dollars?  Thakur went on to say that on Friday the proposed number was $360 million, then a few days later the number was adjusted to $340 million.  Then he pointed out, if you take the graphic in the presentation, that ads up to $380 million.  Why are we being given vague ranges with an 80 million dollar variance for the cost? Where are the specifics?

Thakur brought up his concern regarding the yearly O&M (operational/maintenance) costs potentially facing Frisco residents.  Can we justify this when we, as a city, have other pressing needs that are unfunded?  He also touched on the Frisco ISD theater and said, with one already in progress, how is there not a way to find a potential to combine the two and mitigate risk?  Thakur mentioned how police and fire have all asked for additional staffing, which costs a fraction of the yearly operational costs, yet the city can’t find the money for that.  We don’t have a proper animal shelter, nor do we have a building for our Veterans. We need a space for the local VFW and other Veteran organizations to meet.  Thakur said he loves the arts, but he believes in responsible governance, and he asked the council to work smarter, take a step back, and make sure we are funding our needs first.  Thakur closed with; We owe it to the people of Frisco to prioritize wisely.

Next up Josh Meek, candidate for City Council Place 4.  Meek started by voicing his support agenda item 38 & 39.  With the amount of time, money and resources invested in this project we need to reach an answer.  He then said that answer needs to come from no one else but Frisco citizens. He hopes that the council allows citizens to vote sooner, rather than later because prolonging it could have increased costs.  

Meek went on to say Frisco is ultimately a destination location and he thinks that it would be a far, far oversight to not explore the potential we have when it comes to partnering with Broadway.  Meek said he has two boys and when Hamilton came out, they looked at traveling halfway across the country to have that experience so why would he not allow this to be in his own backyard.  When you start to break it down a big part of what has made us successful is that we have created these areas for people to visit and experience.  He believes that this should go to the ballot.  He said we have four districts that cover Frisco so while many are asking why we not partnered with Frisco ISD, maybe we should be asking why we have not partnered with the other ISDs and should we more in the future (Lewisville ISD, Little Elm ISD, Prosper ISD).  Meek said he is on the CDC Board, and he has had the opportunity to see the benefits we will have from this.

Besides the council meeting we got an email from another candidate, Jerry Spencer, candidate for Frisco City Council Place 4.  He wrote; I am opposed to the Arts Center in its current form. I especially do not like taking money from economic development and community development. I want to get away from this sports/tourism obsession and go after emerging technology/medical research, etc., with the sales tax money. Instead of Sport City USA, we need to re-brand ourselves Brain City USA! I have no problem with a REGIONAL Arts Center. Let’s do one with Plano, McKinney, Allen and Denton. It will take some work, but with effort it can be done. Then, we spread the costs over 1 million people, rather than the 235,000 in Frisco. The per capita costs would come way down.  In closing, my website will be up in a few days

Lastly, while he is not running now he did run in 2024, we want to recognize that John Redmond spoke at the council meeting in early February.  He said, in theory, he liked the idea of the Performing Arts Center.  However, he feels we have spent tons of bond for a community theater and spent the last focused on a highly commercial, very large-scale performing arts center.  Redmond went on to say he believes these decisions have been made based on the input of a very small select group of people and not based on the voice of Frisco residents.

Whistleblower Opinion Time: While many will say Whistleblower hates the arts, that is simply not true.  My son was in community theater since middle school.  We had to take him to other cities to do community theater shows.  What we support is a community theater venue for our residents and nearby visitors.  We don’t support a monstrosity theater built for Broadway shows and concerts.  I asked my son the other day what do you think about this Broadway thing in Frisco?  He said dad Broadway isn’t just about the performance it is about New York, the lights, the theaters, the city itself creates the experience of Broadway.  Seeing Lion King in Dallas or Fort Worth doesn’t elicit the same response as you traveling to New York and encapsulating the entire experience of Broadway.  We agree with him! 

We appreciate hearing from the candidates because we believe they will be the future of this city.  We believe if residents rise and vote for change, we could see different things coming from the council pulpit.  One thing never escapes us, why did Frisco ISD and Craig Hall backout?  What did they know or what did they see change that they didn’t agree with?  We have analyzed this project in every way we can and a few points keep popping up:

1. Frisco has a lot going on right now with the Frisco PGA, Fields build-out, Universal, Toyota Stadium overhaul, downtown revitalization, Grand Park, and more.  So many of these things have not been finished, and now we are going to start another project. Are we overextending ourselves and soon to hit a bubble of sorts?

2.  Where is the HEART of Frisco?  Every city has an area that is the original heartbeat of the city.  Where is that for Frisco?  We lost the heartbeat of our rich history that dates back to the late 19th century.  Initially, a railroad stop, and hub for the railway, we lost that cultural historical heritage instead of building around it and putting it into everything we do.  Wouldn’t it be cool if you could take the local railway as our public transportation from downtown up to the PGA for dinner, then over to the theater for dinner? 

It could have been awesome, but instead we just set up a museum to hold pictures of our heritage and how many people actually visit that each year.  The reason some of these cities the Chamber visited on their “Leadership Travel” were so great is because they built around their history.  Instead, Frisco just built over it!

3. The location of PAC being at 380 and the DNT, so it is in Prosper ISD boundaries, which does limit the access to Frisco residents. How could we not have solidified a deal with Craig Hall, who was offering the land as a donation? The land they are proposing we use today for this project was purchased years ago by the city with the intent to sell it one day. Why? They knew it would be worth millions along the 380 / DNT corridor. Taxpayers paid for that land! It was not free to the city! We spent money back then to make money today to help pay off our debt obligations.  

4.  EDC & CDC: Where did that money come from?  Sales Tax!  They want you to believe this is not your money, it’s all those tourists who come here.  Do you grocery shop here, eat here, buy gas here?  If you do, then you are paying for it!

What was it designated for?  Community Development and Economic Development  – it was not originally intended for a Performing Arts Center.  If you read the slide about the Frisco Model vs Venue Management Model you will see the private partners in the sports model operate these partnerships without on-going operational funding from the City.  These are partners like the PGA, Omni, The Cowboys all with strong financial backing.   

In the Frisco Center For Arts model we have no idea who the Private Operator will be.  The financial model is DEPENDENT on overall financial milestones for fundraising.  What happens if the economy goes to crap and people are not donating – who covers that cost then?  You…and me!  It also states the private partner operates with LIITED ON-GOING OPERATIONAL FUNDING from the city.   We agree with the candidates why so VAGUE – where is the CERTAINITY?  Why are you asking us to vote on so many “What If’s?”  Words like dependent, limited, don’t make me feel comfortable.

Lastly, will it deplete the CDC and EDC money for other potential projects?  Okay it brings construction jobs here during development – are you in construction?  It will have a few salary jobs to run the theater but will the hourly jobs to clean it, be an usher or attendant help you pay for your million-dollar house?  What jobs will this bring to Frisco that are viable economic jobs that people can live on in Frisco?  None!  What happens if we ever faced another Pandemic?  During that time a survey showed that the Dallas Arts suffered a $67.7 Million dollar loss.  Who will pay for it then? 

Mayor Cheney and his protégés Tammy Meinershagen, Bill Woodard, John Keating, and Laura Rummel must have every project be so great, so grand!  It’s like they all suck on the same bottle of whiskey every night and pass the blunt until they have the same stories lined up.  Time to say enough, otherwise we might be setting ourselves up for some hard times ahead in Frisco.  Slow down, smell the roses!  Fix the infrastructure and stop lying to citizens.  Life would be so much better.

WWE Raw – In Their Own Words (Pt. 2)

Oh, isn’t it just delightful how those oh-so-wise words we toss around like confetti have a remarkable talent for circling back and sinking their teeth into our proverbial posteriors?  Leaders must know that every quote and comment can suddenly boomerang back with the precision of a guided missile, leaving them with nothing but a bruised ego and a newfound appreciation for silence. Ah, the sweet symphony of irony, where every syllable becomes a potential landmine in the minefield of conversation.

Over and over in this election, we have heard about the “Turnover Rate” in the Frisco Fire Department.  We wanted to research it but without the data from the city, it is hard to tell how many good men and women have come and gone.  What we do know is what is being told to us by our city leaders, but we were curious why the numbers keep changing.  Angelia likes to throw out percentage rates when she talks, for example, the turnover rate in our FD is only 2%.   

We are curious if that is 2% compared to other departments in the city.  Is that 2% compared to other Fire Departments?  Is that 2% compared to some other data?  We don’t know!  Then we received a text from the Vote No PAC, you know the one that is run by active Councilman Bill Woodard. As we started reading through the text, we saw the words union, union, union which is an obvious attempt to create fear as we said in our last blog.  Then we get to the last sentence which states “Frisco Firefighters have a 1% turnover rate.  Don’t be misled by Union lies and fear tactics!”

First, who is trying to mislead us?  It is the city offering up different numbers to the same argument, not the firefighters.  It is the city offering up a playbook of confusion as they like to call it, not the firefighters.  We ask you, who do you believe?

We continued our journey going through weeks of material online that we could find when we came across this little nugget.  At the SLAN Community Forum, a firefighter asked our current council members, now that the firefighters have asked several times for a “meet & confer” when the last time or how many times have you visited or stopped by a fire station.  According to someone we emailed back and forth with who attended the event, they told us when the question was asked it changed the whole feeling in the ballroom, you heard a few oohs and aahs, and the audience waited on pins and needles for Keating and Pelham’s response.

Before we go any further, remember at the Frisco Chamber Forum Keating said true leaders admit to their mistakes (keep that in your back pocket).  Keating starts to answer the question and he tells a story about the FD saving someone’s life recently, and then he talks about how if they hold events sometimes, they drop off the leftover food at the closest station.   Then he said in the spirit of the question he would say probably…probably…probably (watch the video).  PROBABLY MR. KEATING?

Then he goes on to say what could I do better, and talks about grocery stores, and how we get people from other cities who love to come here and think it’s remarkable the community is behind them.  Keating continued to go on and it was painful for everyone, I am sure.  At some point all we heard was Blah, Blah, Blah, and after it was over realized that was the most painful yet comical 2:15 minutes to listen to.  To say Keating was anything other than a bumbling idiot would be a lie.

Next to the microphone was Angelia Pelham who quickly said she stopped by Station 6 to ask the question why they wanted to unionize.  She said she didn’t get a lot of responses because “PEOPLE WERE NOT VERY COMFORTABLE GIVING DETAILS.”  Well first, that is probably true since they don’t trust the leadership of which she is a part.  Second, THEY CAN’T TALK TO YOU IN UNIFORM MS. PELHAM ABOUT POLITICS, and you as a councilwoman should have known that.  Then her voice goes up a few octaves and in somewhat of a scolding manner she says I have talked to your brothers and sisters at Mochas and Javas or Starbucks across the street asking them when this is over how do we move forward.  Then she threatened to “IF I HAVE TO CALL THEM OUT I WILL” which immediately told me everything.  That is why the firefighters are afraid of retaliation for talking or using it against them when convenient for your political playbook. 

Here is what residents should be concerned about, first her arrogant and cocky attitude.  When you lose on May 4th what happens on May 5th?  Can you foresee the future Ms. Pelham until the polls close and votes are cast for you to assume they are going to lose makes an ass of you.  Then she says, “YOU WANT WHAT YOU WANT” and no one is willing to budge and someone in the room must be the adult to get past this.  Ms. Pelham, it sounds like you want what you want.  Do you even realize it came across as you were scolding a group of 15 to 20 grown men and woman firefighters in the open public of a ballroom shaking your hand or fist?  Lastly, you stated if you want to talk to me, I will meet with you at Mochas and Javas after you just threatened to call them out.  Why would anyone ever want to come to you?  Why would any of our first responders ever think they can trust you? 

In the race between Pelham and Redmond, we believe Redmond won the forum in one statement.

What our leaders need to remember is the practice of the “Golden Rule” which is treating others as you’d like to be treated.  It is a powerful tool for anyone seeking to understand the essence of empathetic and respectful interactions.  When you apply the principle, you pave the way for open, judgment-free communication, fostering a space where everyone feels valued and heard.  Right now, I don’t think the employees or the residents of this city feel they have conversations grounded in mutual understanding and kindness with any of our city leaders.  Now we will see if Pelham’s crystal ball works or if she will need to return it for a new one on Saturday, May 4th.

Breaking The Political Rules

Campaigning has begun and we are excited to see how the next few months play out. We thought we should educate ourselves on the rules, so we read city’s Political Campaign Sign policy listed on the city website.   

Rules 1 & 4 are pretty clear so we decided to look at the candidates social media pages and election websites.   

Rule 1: Political signs cannot be placed on any City of Frisco, Community Development Corporation (CDC), or Economic Development Corporation (EDC) property or in a City of Frisco easement.

Rule 4: The City of Frisco logo cannot be used in any way for campaigning including on political signs. 

John Redmond website appears to only be one page and has a short intro to who he is and his campaign logo.  We could not find any social media pages for him.  – Passed Inspection

Mark Piland website does not include pictures of political signs on city property, and it does not contain the official city logo.  In a review of his social media, we did not see any violations either.  – Passed Inspection

Angelia Pelham currently holds Place 3 and serves as Deputy Mayor Pro Tem.  Her website passed inspection.  However, her social media did not!  On January 17th she held a filing party at city hall.  She had several supporters come join her and there are numerous pictures of her and supporters holding Pelham campaign signs on city property and more so in the rotunda of city  hall!  That is a clear violation of Rule 1 even if it was temporary.  The photos also violate Rule 4 regarding the city logo not being used for campaigning because clearly in several photos the official city logo can be spotted.  It became campaigning when she turned into a filing party, had her political signs and several supporters wearing t-shirts.  The photos appear on her political Facebook page as well as personal page and on Instagram.

We liked her campaign video, she looks good in red and has a catchy slogan.  We are a little curious about one portion of the video which shows her standing at the back of the room with Frisco Public Safety officers from both the PD and FD.  The video is tagged in the corner with her campaign logo which could give people the impression she is endorsed by either public safety group, which she is not.  The picture includes Mark Piland who has announced he is running for Place 1 which made us curious how he feels his likeness in her video?  Lastly, when the photo was taken we were pretty sure none of them knew down the road it would be used for campaign video.  We are not sure if there is any violation here according to campaign rules or city rules, however one would think before using someone’s likeness, out of respect, you might want to ask them if they are okay with it.  Many police departments have rules about offices being photographed and for the purposes they can be used for.

Lastly, we looked a John Keating’s website.  He currently serves Place 1 and is the Mayor Pro Tem.  We could not view his social media because has blocked us across all channels.  Keating’s website is in clear violation of Rule 4.   As soon as the page loads you see a picture of Keating with the slogan Promises Made Promises Kept and behind it is a watermark of the official City of Frisco Flag.  Then if you scroll down, right after he asks you for your money, you can clearly see the official city logo.   

On the “About John” page it shows him standing in the Frisco City Council Chamber up on the dais.  This picture was taken on December 4, 2018, the night the council approved a plan for the PGA of America.  The picture appears in an article for the Dallas Morning News.   

The last page titled “The Mission” has a picture of Keating with the official city of Frisco Logo right behind him, which is again, a clear violation of Rule 4.   Then under Public Safety he has a picture with Chief Shilson, Frisco PD which mislead residents of an endorsement that he does not have.   Now the picture with Shilson may not be a violation but is misleading.

When it comes to campaigning, rules should be taken very seriously.  We could understand how first-time candidates can make mistakes, but if they are running it is their responsibility to know the rules.  As for the Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Angelia Pelham, and Mayor Pro Tem John Keating, they have no excuse.  If they are serving in the Deputy Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor Pro Tem positions then clearly they should know the rules.  Keating has been around since 2011, off and on and if he doesn’t know the rules by now then we may have bigger issues.    We go back to why are there rules for thee but not for me?  I can guarantee if some of the previous candidates who ran for office committed these violations we would not hear the end of it. The city should also be accountable to uphold their own rules! Email the city council and ask them to uphold to the city rules now and in the future.

Political Campaign Sign Regulations: 

TxDot Campaign Sign Regulations (PDF)

City of Frisco Electioneering Ordinance (PDF)

City of Frisco Sign Ordinance (PDF)

Fire Station Political Sign Boundaries (PDF)

John Redmond – Frisco Place 3

Well we love a good boxing match and now we have one! Today we came across an announcement that John Redmond is running for City of Frisco – Place 3 against Angelia Pelham! He was once quoted as saying he wants to be a good civil steward here in the City of Frisco. We can’t wait to learn more about what issue or hot buttons he believes the city is facing. For now we at Frisco Chronicles can’t wait to learn more about this candidate!

OCTOBER 27, 2023 – John Redmond is announcing his candidacy for Frisco City Council. Service does not come without sacrifice. And service to others is what those that run for office are called to do. 6 years ago Redmond ran for City Council in the most contested field in Frisco history. Taking the lessons of that election while remaining engaged and active, Redmond brings deep commitment to the betterment of our community and a wealth of experience and passion for positive change. Redmond stated, “I am announcing my intent to run for Frisco City Council. As a vibrant, diverse and ever-evolving community, we will run a clean and dignified race to serve the people of Frisco. We will remind elected officials that they work for their constituents and should govern as they campaign. Together through teamwork, innovation and community engagement, we will address whatever challenges remain before us while we embrace the opportunities that lie ahead”. Redmond4Frisco will be grounded in fiscal responsibility and accountability, free enterprise and support for small businesses, law and order and the true support of public safety personnel. With a long list of potential platforms, Redmond said that a ‘listening campaign’ would begin immediately to understand all of the issues that Frisco citizens actually hold dear. “From traffic, to infrastructure, to apartments and density, the overall development (and/or re-development) of Frisco, public safety, city staff and its’ leadership, art venues, animal shelters and more…while some things change, many political topics here in Frisco remain the same”. Frisco residents are encouraged to get involved, ask questions and share ideas with Redmond as he embarks on this journey to serve the community. To learn more about John and the campaign, visit www.Redmond4Frisco.com

For media inquiries or interview requests, please contact: Chris Fields campaign@redmond4frisco.com About John Redmond: John Redmond is the Co-Founder and President of InspectIR Systems. A Frisco-based company, for the last 6 years, InspectIR has been focused on innovation and research, delivering breath-based devices and solutions to provide more equitable diagnostics and screening at or near the point of care. With more than 25 years of experience in Fortune 500 companies, John is a human capital expert in the technology and consulting industries with leadership positions in talent acquisition and diversity and inclusion. John has a BS in Business Administration/Marketing from the Gies School of Business at the University of Illinois. Married with two (2) adult children, John has been a Frisco resident for over 18 years.

Redmond For Frisco