Putting out the Political Flames

We are glad the municipal election season is over, and life is getting back to normal, or as normal as it can be.  Proposition A which was for Civil Service was, came down to a difference of 665 votes.  That is not a landslide win, and it should speak volumes to the Frisco City Council and City Management to do better.  On Proposition B, which was for Collective Bargaining, it came down to a difference of 2,383 votes.  City leaders and the Safety Frisco First PAC did a good job of scaring voters that if it passed our Firefighters would become a group of “Greedy Bastards” and bankrupt the city.

Residents spoke and while most conveyed their support to the Firefighters, they didn’t feel Civil Service and Collective Bargaining were the right way to go about it.  According to several voters we talked to, they believe the residents need to help fight for change at city hall and demand more from our city leaders.  WHERE ARE THOSE RESIDENTS NOW?  Did any of those who came out to vote, go home, and take the time to email the city leadership?  Probably not!   Did anyone write an email to city leaders expressing concern about the City Manager who is the reason we ended voting on these issues.  Probably not!  

We still continue to think about the call for “more staffing” and wonder do we have a staffing issue? Did you know that over the last four years the city applied for several grants related to staffing? 

What is a SAFER Grant?  The Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grants (SAFER) was created to provide funding directly to fire departments and volunteer firefighter interest organizations to help them increase or maintain the number of trained, “front line” firefighters available in their communities.  The goal of SAFER is to enhance the local fire departments’ abilities to comply with staffing, response and operational standards established by the NFPA which stands for the National Fire Protection Association’s codes and standards.

At the 01/18/2022 council meeting the council voted on an agenda item #21 authorizing the City Manager to submit a SAFER grant application in the amount of $5,420,500 over a three-year performance period for STAFFING that would help fund 15 Firefighter/Paramedic positions needed to staff a fourth Truck Company assigned to Fire Station 9.  The memo we found was from Mark Piland to then City Manager George Purefoy, Deputy City Manager Henry Hill and the entire council.  The resolution says duly passed and approved on the 18th day of January 2022.   

The application states “Due to this rapid growth, the City’s ability to build and staff new fire stations and apparatus is limited. The City has committed to building a new fire station, Fire Station #10 and additional apparatus, such as a fourth Truck and additional Medic, but needs federal assistance to on-board additional firefighters to staff this apparatus. Without this funding, it takes our fire crews longer to establish effective response forces according to NFPA 1710 standards which increases the likelihood of property damage and risk to the fire crews. Without this funding, our response times will increase due to the first due truck not being within close proximity to the rapid areas of development that would need an aerial ladder response.

It goes on to say, “During 2020, the city began construction on 13 multifamily housing and completed 7 multifamily housing units that were already under construction for a grand total of over 26,000 units. The City houses 22 specialty care facilities to include nursing homes, free standing nursing facilities and adult living communities. Within the last 2 years, we have had 6 new high rises completed and we have 3 high rise buildings currently under construction. This additional funding will allow for a fourth fire truck to be put into service which will increase our NFPA 1710 standards for response to a high-risk structure to include multifamily housing, specialty risk structures and high-rise buildings. NFPA 1710 recommends that an agency place 42 or 43 personnel on a fire at a high-rise structure. The department is currently staffed to respond with 34 personnel.”

Yet the City Council and City Management Say, “We don’t have a staffing issue.”

We were also surprised to see at the 04/04/2023 council meeting the council voted on an agenda item #23 authorizing the City Manager to submit a SAFER grant application in the amount of $8,894,880 for a three-year grant performance period for STAFFING.  The memo written by Interim Fire Chief, Lee Glover goes on to say, “if awarded, the FY22 SAFER Grant Program would provide funding for 24 Firefighter/Paramedic positions consistent with the Fire Department’s current five-year staffing plan.”

We pulled up the application and pulled some highlights.  The first one states, “Over the past year, our department has seen the 90th percentile response times for first arriving fire/EMS apparatus in these areas increase to nearly ten minutes and NFPA 1710 single-family dwelling full alarm assembly time increase to over 20 minutes, well beyond the NFPA 1710 recommendations.”   The second highlight states, Without the assistance the city will likely be unable to simultaneously bear the cost of constructing two new fire stations and staffing/equipping firefighters, which would negatively impact Frisco FD’s ability to provide appropriate and timely emergency response and assembly of the recommended effective response force.”

The application goes on to say, “The Frisco Fire Department continues to experience increasing call volume and faces new risks.  The total call volume for the department has increased by 76.7% since 2015.”  It continues, “The Professional Golfers’ Association (PGA) of America relocated to Frisco in 2022. While Frisco has experience with large special events, these attendance numbers are more than double the size of current venues in Frisco. In addition, Universal Parks and Resorts recently announced the opening of a new theme park scheduled to open in 2026. A new 2,500-acre development in northern Frisco is underway, with 14,000 homes and apartments planned, as well as commercial and retail development. These developments, events, and venues are new risks for the Frisco Fire Department in an area not close to an existing fire station which have resulted in significantly increased response times over the past few years.”  

Fire Chief Lee Glover now says, “we don’t have a staffing issue.” 

On a side note, we hope all the developers who donated $10,000 to fight the firefighters now realize the city is not prepared, they flat our said so in a federal grant.

As a resident, why do I feel like I need a shower and we are being blatantly lied too somehow!  During the election Mark Piland said as the former Fire Chief he advocated over and over for staffing.  Then we see this application by Lee Glover in 2023 which talks about how all the new development has put new risk for the FD and resulted in “SIGNIFICANTLY” increased call times.  Most glaring is his statement “we have seen NFPA 1710 single-family dwelling full alarm assembly time increase to over 20 minutes, well beyond the NFPA 1710 recommendations.”  Less than a year later we are hearing the complete opposite from Chief Lee Glover and every single member sitting perched up on the city pulpit.  

For the last few weeks, we watched the Safety-First Frisco PAC scorch any ground left between the city and the firefighters. They implied they were Greedy Bastards, basically attacked their character, willingness to work, called them lazy, liars and power hungry.  It was a nuclear response to an already tense relationship.  Meanwhile over at the police department, Chief Shilson’s wife Jana Shilson is advocating with the PAC on social media.  At the Fire Department, Chief Lee Glover’s wife Jamie Glover is also advocating with the PAC on social media.

On the other hand, the firefighters are scared they will suffer repercussions for being on the front lines of this fight for the propositions. The firefighter’s message has never changed which centers around staffing and the fact they have no confidence in city leadership or their Chief to do what is right.  City leaders continue to try and blame this on former leadership which has nothing to do with it. The former leadership fought with them and for them at the polls, right next to them. Come May 5th, the firefighters said win or lose, if you the resident calls, we your Frisco Firefighters will answer that call and risk our own lives to make sure you the citizen is safe.”  We ask again, what’s next?   Where do we go from here?

A starting point is every resident should be asking the following questions of our City Leadership: The City Council, The Mayor Jeff Cheney, City Manager Wes Pierson and his staff and Fire Chief Lee Glover:

If we don’t have a staffing issue, then why did you “THE CITY” apply for several SAFER FEMA grants specifically for STAFFING? 

Were you honest on the FEMA Safer Grants?  If yes, then you have been lying to residents.

Were you honest to residents and lie on the FEMA Safer Grant?  If yes, who thought it would be a good idea to lie on a federal grant application?

The 2023 SAFER grant says without assistance the city will likely be unable to simultaneously bear the cost of constructing two new fire stations and staffing/equipping firefighters, which would negatively impact Frisco FD’s ability to provide appropriate and timely emergency response and assembly of the recommended effective response force.” If that is the case, then why does the city continue to offer developers incentives to do business here, why did we build a 60+million-dollar library, and why are we considering a performing arts center? It sounds like we are broke or destitute.

The fact is only after the grants were denied did the city say we are fully staffed, trust us everything is okay, just trust your city leadership.  Well, I don’t trust you….AT ALL!  Will residents really get involved and express their concern to city leadership about what is happening in our city and demand they find a resolution to these issues or will we see the Fire and Police Association back on the ballot in two years fighting for Civil Service, again!

“Let no man’s ghost return to say his leadership and training let him down.”  – A Firefighter

Frisco: Bought & Paid For

We have wondered for years how these political endorsements and donations work in the City of Frisco.  We have pointed out that council members donate to each other, that they take rather large donations from developers, and that it all gives off the wrong appearance to the public.  We have been met with such resistance to the suggestion that this city is bought and paid for, and the victims are the residents, just living their lives paying taxes.  All we have wanted is for the residents to have a voice and a right to vote for what they want in this city, something that terrifies our council and city management.  So how are things bought and paid for, well grab some popcorn because we are about to tell you.

Let’s start with Safety First Frisco, a PAC, set up to oppose Proposition A & B for Civil Service and Collective Bargaining put forth by the men and women who serve our city in the Fire Department every day. The PAC was set up by members of our city council (Bobblehead Bill Woodard), Former City Manager George Purefoy and Mike Simpson, Dick Peasley, and many more of the Cheney klan. Then add to that our current council members (minus Brian Livingston) who are out block walking, holding community events, and taking to social media to oppose the propositions and take jabs at our firefighters while trying to tell us how to vote.  Yes, I know they will say we are crazy!

Well, this morning we pulled down the Safety First Frisco campaign finance report which was filed 3 DAYS LATE.  What we saw was chilling, appalling, disturbing, and intimidating.   We talked about how the PAC was set up in our earlier blog, The Secret PAC. Today’s campaign finance report shows that from 1/1/2024 to 3/25/2024 the PAC took in $105,201.32 which breaks down to $22,950 in monetary political contributions, $12,251.32 in non-monetary contributions (in-kind), and $70,000 in monetary contributions from CORPORATIONS OR LABOR ORGANIZATIONS.  Stop and read that again and let it percolate that in 2 months a PAC took in $105,201.32.

Where, oh where, did the monetary political contributions come from:

Bill Woodard For Frisco: $1000.00

Craig and Kathryn Hall (Hall Group – Developers): $10,000

Jeff Brawner and R.J. Grogan (Law Partners): $500 each

Kyle Wilks – President Wilks Development of Firefly Park Project: $10,000

Where, oh where, did the non-monetary (in-kind) contributions come from:

George Purefoy, former City Manager: $4000 for Polling Expense

Bill For Frisco Campaign: $8000 for Polling Expenses, and $54.92 for Printing Expenses, $39.50 for Website Expenses, $206.22 for Printing Expenses, and $59.53 for Website Expenses.

Where, oh where, did the monetary contributions from a CORPORATION OR LABOR ORGANIZATION come from:

Mario Sinacola & Sons Exc, Inc: $10,000 (they have active contracts with developers & the City of Frisco)

K-N Ventures (aka Fehmi Karahan of Fields Development): $10,000

Columbus Realty Partners (aka, Staubach, Richard Reupke, Robert Shaw & Fields Development): $10,000

Rudco Land, LLC (aka Trey Sibley III or Hillwood Properties – Fields Development): $10,000

Hunt Funding Group (aka Hunt – Fields Development): $10,000

CrossTie Capital (aka Philip Rose – Fields): $10,000        *click the name to read our last blog.

Chief Partners III, LP (aka William Vanderstraaten – Fields): $10,000

It is important to note that any of the names above that are underlined, DON’T LIVE IN FRISCO.  Yes, they have a development here, but they are not Frisco Residents.   

What does all this money mean?  It means Frisco was bought and paid for by DEVELOPERS!!!!  These same people who run the same corporations have donated to almost every one of our council members, some more than others (meaning Cheney).  Just look at Keating and Pelham’s current campaign finance reports, the same names appear across the board. 

Ask yourself, why are current council members so OPPOSED to the Frisco Fire Fighters Association, which has been around since 1997, but they all took ENDORSEMENTS & MONEY OR IN-KIND DONATIONS from them when running for office?  The firefighters spent about $10,000 on Bill Woodard and about $8,000 on Laura Rummell.  They have paid for signs and billboards for the candidates they have endorsed.  Now, they want you to believe the Frisco Fire Fighters and the ASSOCIATION are trying to RUIN AND DESTROY FRISCO? 

We have been to a few events now and the message from the Fire Fighters has been consistent at each one.  If you don’t like Prop B, then don’t vote for it, but please understand why they are pushing for Prop A and consider voting Yes for Prop A.  They also have said that come May 5th when the election is over, they will still show up at your door and be here to service the citizens of Frisco the same way they have all these years.  That begs the question, how is our City Council serving the citizens?  Wait, they don’t care about what citizens want.  Yet when you follow the Safety-First Frisco website or Facebook page all they have done is attack with absolute hate and anger our firefighters, our former Fire Chief, and yet they claim they love them.  It feels very personal, to be honest.

They are serving themselves!  Bobblehead Bill wants his bikes, trikes, and trails.  Tammy wants her performing arts center.  Keating stands up for Veterans which we respect but outside of that he is just there for the photo opp and to be a cool kid.  Laura Rummell claims to be the pet advocate, yet she has done nothing.  Brian maintains his concerns about density and resident welfare.  Lastly, for years, rumors have followed Mayor Jeff Cheney or should we say Real Estate Broker Jeff Cheney that he has used his position as Mayor to further his own business and personal wealth.  For years, Jeff Cheney has denied over and over any wrongdoing, favoritism, or personal benefits from his relationships.  All his loyal subjects fall in line and defend him and say it is just a COINCIDENCE.

In closing, we saw a post from Brian Livingston earlier about how he is not very confident that his discussion regarding lobbying restrictions will pick up any traction, well duh!  He is not sure why the transparency of money movement between lobbyists, clients, and politicians is a concern for some people.  We assume that “some people” he is referring to is the Frisco City Council and City Management. The same council member who when he endorsed Mark Piland for Mayor in 2022, was later removed from all committees as well as his campaign manager.  Revenge or just COINCIDENCE.

Ask yourself one question, who is the real bad guy here?

Make It Look Pretty

On October 30, 2023, we published our blog Another One Bites The Dust which was about Fire Chief Lee Glover killing the Squad Unit and Blood Program.  Generally, Squad which is a 2-person group, responds to all high acuity EMS calls and critical care calls, as well as all structure fires in a city.  It is like no other unit in the department and when in trouble if you have a need for the most advanced or technical medical procedures in the field, they are the team you want at your front door.  It must have ruffled a few feathers at city hall because Bobblehead Bill was quick to act as the mouthpiece for the city and troll social media to tell us we were wrong. 

We took his statements and submitted a PIR the next day for the proof to back up his comments which he spewed all over the North Texas Politics Facebook page. On November 15th we received a letter back from the city with a PIR Invoice for $90 dollars.  It is the breakdown that we found interesting of those charges:

Labor: Identify Search Terms / Set Up Search / Download / Export Emails:  $3.75

Labor: Compile / Review /Conversion / and Redactions of Emails:  $41.25

Labor: Fire / HR Department Records Collections: $30.00

20% Overhead: $15.00 for a GRAND TOTAL OF $90.00

We paid and then waited for our files.  Now in a new year, still waiting, we emailed the city on January 1 2024, asking when we should expect our files.  The next day we got an email back from the city that read, The City of Frisco has reviewed its files and has located documents responsive to your request. HOWEVER, DUE TO CONFIDENTIALITY, the City has chosen to seek a ruling from the Office of the Attorney General regarding the release of a portion of the responsive documents. The remaining responsive documents are available.  They also mentioned some figures we asked for were released in a different PIR that we chose not to pay another $100 dollars for.

What did $90 buy us?  There was a PDF which contained 15 or so emails, two additional outlook message attachments, copy of the blood contract, two excel spreadsheets that contained the hiring/history breakdown and the call count.  That’s it … because the rest (which we don’t know what that is) has been sent to the AG. 

Question 1: Did the city charge us for a copy of the blood contract that Bobblehead Bill offered to send out to anyone who emailed him for free without a PIR?  Question 2: WHAT IN THE HELL COST $90.00?  We have paid $30 for way more information than this in the past.

Woodard’s Statement: The blood transfusion program isn’t going away; in fact it’s expanding.  We use data to analyze the best use of resources.  Right now, Squad sits almost all the time. 

Fact or Fiction:  We asked for the study or data they used to make their decision and the response we received was, “There are no records responsive to a “Study.”  Then they said it was the number break-down for blood products administered and the number of squad responses that the department reviews for decision-making.   

The breakdown for the Blood Administration” since 2018 is as follows:  1 in 2018, 5 in 2019, 12 in 2020, 5 in 2021, 10 in 2022 and 13 in 2023 (through 11/1/23).   Initially looking at the blood administration program the numbers are going up each year.  While it is not tons of patients it is showing a trend that is going up, not down.

As for the Squad response breakdown the numbers provided to us by the city are 1502 in 2021, then 1103 in 2022, and 538 in 2023 through 11/1/23.   Initially looking at the numbers it would appear Squad calls are going down just like Woodard stated, but we were curious what happened that resulted in 565 fewer calls on one of the busiest apparatuses in a growing city.  

We of course went digging for the answer and we learned there are several call types for example, unresponsive, unconscious patient, medical emergency 1 and 2 calls.  The call type determines which apparatus responds.   Several whistleblowers sent us information on an email by Fire Chief, Lee Glover’s where he gives direction shortly after being named Fire Chief to start taking Squad off certain types of calls to reduce the numbers which makes them look EXPENDABLE.  If you look at the call history SQUAD was removed from all ME 1 and ME 2 calls in district 4 and then they were removed from all unconscious and unresponsive calls for the entire city.  WELL, WELL, WELL now that explains how calls for SQUAD dropped over 565 calls in less than a year.   Maybe that is what Glover’s email meant when he said “Make It Look Pretty”

Woodards Statement: In 2024 we expect to add this program to every ambulance we have, further expanding the program. 

Fact or Fiction: We asked about the costs and how they planned to fund the personnel training and the cost for every ambulance to be outfitted to carry the blood products.  The response from the city was, “Paramedics will be trained in blood administration in an on-duty rotation at no added cost to the city and that blood will be carried on two vehicles with trained personnel every day.”  We were not provided with any details on the cost to retrofit any apparatuses to carry blood. 

Woodards Statement:  We have been working with our medical director (as well as any other required parties) to ensure the program is run appropriately and has all the proper staffing.  He also posted a picture of section 2.2 of a blood contract acting as if that was the guarantee they had.

Fact or Fiction:  We asked for any communications between the city, blood bank, and medical director discussing the EXPANSION of the blood program.  We were provided no communications between the city and their Medical Director where they discuss expanding the program and discussions to ensure the “program runs appropriately” as Bobblehead Bill stated.

We also asked for a copy of the approval letter from the blood bank and/or hospital where they guarantee to give more blood to more vehicles.  The city provided us a signed 2018 Blood Contract and the signed 2023 Amendment.  The 2018 Contact clearly states in the “SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT” the city is to store a certain amount of blood and plasma in AN AMBULANCE UNIT in a continuously monitored refrigerator.  In the section he posted “SUPPLY OF BLOOD PRODUCTS” it states it will provide what the city needs, however due to the unpredictable nature of the demands for blood products, the hospital can NOT GUARANTEE the city availability for ALL OR ANY PORTION of the blood products to be supplied.    Hey Bill, it says an ambo unit meaning singular (aka 1) and did you read “No Guarantee.”

As for the 2023 Amendment, it is simply an updated FEE SCHEDULE meaning the cost the city has to pay for the blood and plasma product.  Then it states the remaining terms and conditions of the contract from 2018 will continue in full force and effect, unchanged.  Well, Well, Well Bobblehead Bill… there is NO GUARANTEE THEY WILL SUPPLY BLOOD FOR EVERY AMBO.   Did we read that right?  Prices for blood and plasma have gone up considerably and now we are talking about carrying it on every ambo instead of 1 or 2 specialized Squad Teams.  In a nutshell it means more taxpayer money, more taxpayer money, and more taxpayer money.  Besides the cost increasing for carrying the product that has a shelf life which means it has to be switched out, we also now have to retrofit ambos/vehicles and train more personnel.  It sounds like we are wasting money when what we have currently is working.

In closing, it looks like Bobblehead Bill needs to do more research!  There is no guarantee in writing that the hospital will agree to expansion or that they will guarantee you any product.  Why would we retrofit any apparatus or vehicle on a “WHAT IF THEY GIVE US BLOOD MENTALITY.” The DRASTIC DROP in the Squad response numbers can be related to Glover removing them from certain calls.  Why would he do that?  According to insiders he has hated this program since its inception back in 2018.  The city wants to sell you on that this is a good decision, however if you ask a firefighter, what might they say?   Let’s just say it is your life on the line, are you willing to give up a dedicated team to critical care that literally could mean life or death?

Other Links and Resources: Squad and Blood

City of Frisco & the Secret PAC

The holidays are over and 2024 is here and we have continued our deep dive into the misdealings of the City of Frisco.  We keep finding these little or maybe not so little nuggets of information that are cause for question and concern. Perhaps this will tie you over as we continue to investigate and verify our new leads.

In 2023 we saw several posts about the Frisco Firefighters Association regarding staffing, Assistant Chief Kraemer being fired after 27 years with the city, and the filing for Collective Bargaining and Civil Service.  To say our interest was piqued is an understatement, we knew we had to investigate.

We decided to go back and read some of those old posts by the city and the FFA but we were surprised to see…many of them disappeared.  We don’t know if anyone else noticed, but the Frisco Communications Dept. took down the city’s posts and propaganda videos that were paid for by taxpayers’ dollars, and the council’s open letter to residents damning the Frisco Fire Association for daring to gather signatures to place Civil Service and Collective Bargaining on the May ballot.  They even deleted citizens’ comments in the posts from the late summer and fall.  

Now, the naysayers will say the city didn’t delete anything, but they did.  The proof is in the city’s posts where the links no longer work.  For example, John Keating posted, “This isn’t a political battle or one for financial gain. It’s a powerplay by those who serve themselves, and do not have the best interests of Frisco at heart. They have misrepresented our city staff and leadership and our beloved Frisco Fire Department!”  Then you have George Purefoy’s statement with a link that reads “unavailable.”  Even Bobblehead Bill Woodard had to get in his two cents.  

According to insiders the FFA never wanted to go in this direction, but they feel the city management and the city council didn’t follow through on the promises they made to silence them.  In the past, the FFA threatened similar action when they felt that their concerns for safety were being ignored.  Fast forward to today, what has changed since then?  Insiders tell us they don’t trust Fire Department leadership, the city, or the council.  On top of breaking promises, ignoring the results of climate studies done over the years, many feel the city used the FFA to oust the Fire Chief and an Assistant Chief who were threatening to file complaints on the city.  The cherry on top is when the city ignored the Mayor’s Study asking the FFA if they would like Interim Chief Glover as their permanent chief. Despite the over 200 firefighters that said NO, they still hired him. This is the same chief that the city sent down to Austin to speak AGAINST Texas House Bill 471, protecting our first responders.

Now we know, you are wondering, why are we going over this again?  Well, we learned the city HAD TO TAKE DOWN the propaganda they posted because it was a No-No (illegal) so they scrubbed their social media. What would they do?  How would they fight against civil service and collective bargaining?

Well, we found a new nugget which is quite disheartening. On November 8th, papers were filed for what they call a Specific-Purpose Committee or PAC—Political Action Committee. It appears the city recruited former Mayor Mike Simpson (who endorsed Mayor Cheney) to appoint Richard Peasley as treasurer of a PAC called Safety First Frisco. The description reads, “Citizens opposing Civil Service and Collective Bargaining in Frisco, TX.”

This smells like shit and is clearly a move by the City of Frisco to get a highly respected Frisco resident to spin their story. I’ve met Mayor Simpson a couple of times. He wouldn’t remember me and my wife, but I certainly admired his leadership back then. I can’t help but think he might change his tune if he really knew the whole story. Can someone send him a link to our page?

Before deciding either way at the ballot box, talk to the Frisco Fire Association.  I am generally not for unions and civil service, but learning most of the cities around us are Civil Service and that collective bargaining is the only thing that will protect them from a corrupt city making decisions that can literally kill them. My wife and I will be voting YES for them.  Either way you can bet we will be following the campaign contributions for this NEW PAC! I have a feeling that is going to offer up a lot more nuggets.

Other Links and Info For Reference:

Frisco Fire Association Staffing Video

According to Star Local Media, here are what those terms mean, according to state law:

  • Civil service: A system with a three-citizen commission to assess the hiring, firing and promotion of firefighters. Under Frisco’s current system, city officials have that power.

“What civil service does is eliminate favoritism,” FFFA Secretary Treasurer Dustin Allen said.

  • Collective bargaining: A system allowing both the fire department and the police department to become their own bargaining agents when it comes to agreements on wages, staff numbers and recruitment.

“That allows the [departments’] association to, as a collective, sit down and meet and discuss working conditions with the city or city management,” Allen said.

Day 7: The Valve Report

Mack Borchardt began his career in the Fire Service in 1973 as a volunteer firefighter.  In 1981, after serving with the McKinney FD, Borchardt became the city administrator in Frisco and the Fire Chief of the Volunteer Frisco FD.  In 1987, Mack Borchardt had input on the hiring of the new City Manager, George Purefoy.  Shortly after Purefoy became city  manager he named Borchardt as Frisco’s first Fire Chief since the fire department had grown from a volunteer force to a department with 150 full time employees.  You can imagine the loyalty these two have to each other, as they came up together in this city and worked side by side for years.

In 2011, Borchardt received the 2011 Fire Chief of the Year award from the Texas Fire Chief’s Association.  That is why it is a little shocking that in the Fall of 2011 the city did a Climate Survey in the department that came out Jan 6, 2012.  The report was not good, and it said in order for the “people issues” to be resolved the department needed to change from a negative, hostile, retaliatory environment to a positive, more supportive  one that encourages communication.  It said the city must make changes and it started at the top by bringing in new management. 

The decision was made that Borchardt had to go, and a new Chief was coming.   Borchardt turned in his resignation letter Feb 23, 2012, to his good friend George Purefoy.  However, Borchardt was not going anywhere!  His buddy and good friend George Purefoy created a position for him at city hall right next to him in the City Managers officer.  In his severance agreement it states Borchardt on or before January 1, 2013, will be REASSIGNED by George from Fire Chief to Fire Programs Consultant reporting solely to the City Manager King George or his successor.  The job was guaranteed until Feb 15, 2015.  It is important to note he is still there today in a six-figure job doing who knows what with a city vehicle.  King George his friend and confidant took care of him. 

Why is the relationship between King George and Mack Borchardt important?  When the city hired Mark Piland as Borchardt’s replacement it rubbed those loyal to Mack Borchardt in the department the wrong way.  Folks like Assistant Chief Lee Glover and Barry Dixon in Fire Fleet Management.  See their loyalty was always going to be with Mack which Piland did not know at the time, but it really left him a sitting duck. 

Why are these relationships important to the Valve Report?  Well, we are about to tell you. Snowmageddon 2021 was unforgettable for many Texas residents.  Record breaking below freezing temperatures for nine plus days killed more than 200 people and resulted in millions being without power or water for days.   In Frisco, starting February 15, the Fire Department responded to 162 calls in 7 hours which is 3 to 4 times more than the average call volume in a 24-hour period.  Then came the news that Frisco FD was fighting the Circa Apartment fire that lasted over 36 hours.  Over 260 units were affected by the fire, four Frisco Firefighters were transported to local hospitals with minor injuries.  The FD had never experienced a fire of this magnitude, then add in record breaking temperatures.

As life started to return to normal the Frisco Fire Department had two parallel reports working in the department.  The first was the Mayday Report which was supposed to be a learning tool for the department related to the Circa Fire.  The other was a report called the Valve Report and if you are anything like us, you are asking the same question we did.  What is a Valve Report?   Well, during Snowmageddon several of the fire trucks suffered freeze damage to the valves, piping and pumps on the apparatus vehicles.   

In an April 19, 2021, email to Henry Hill, George Purefoy the City Manager writes “I’ve heard that numerous fire trucks suffered freeze damage during the severe winter storm in February. It is my understanding that in the past, lines were emptied of water to protect the valves from freezing and the resulting damage; however, during this most recent event apparently that wasn’t done on the vast majority of the fire engines. I’d like to see a report which details the damage/cost to repair and, if accurate, what procedure(s) will be put in place to help keep this type of damage from occurring again.”  Henry Hill replies we will investigate what  occurred and get back to you.  Then King George replies “It is my understanding that it was extensive and supposedly only one truck was drained as had been the practice in the past.”

To many, this might look like a normal email, but it is not!  King George starts by saying I’ve heard…heard from who?  Then he says it is his understanding that in the past, lines were emptied, how did he know that?  How does he know what was or was not done in the most recent event?  How would he know it is extensive and that only one truck was supposedly drained?  How did he know the past practice of the department?  The answer is Mack Borchardt, who was getting full reports and secret emails from Assistant Chief Lee Glover.  No wonder why Assistant Chief Lee Glover was put in charge of the Valve Report for the department.

On April 27, 2021, the first draft of the Valve Report was done, and several insiders told us Piland was not happy because Glover had not talked to anyone in operations before writing it up or sending it out.  Piland felt the report needed to be fair and accurate which required feedback from those on the front line at the stations and those within operations, not just Fire Fleet Management, Barry Dixon (a Borchardt loyalist).

We were told from two inside sources Piland asked Assistant Chief, Cameron Kraemer to reach out to the stations and operations and get feedback on the original draft so that both sides would be represented.  This report was emailed to Mark Piland on May 5, 2021.  In fact, the report mentions the procedure for draining the pumps has been taught  and successful for many years and is documented in an internal training bulletin in 2016.  It also noted due to the high volume and the constant exposure these apparatuses had to history making extreme freezing temperatures contributed to the damage.

Then through our PIR we found two emails from Lee Glover to Mack Borchardt titled Pump Info.  The first was on April 29 and simply says, “Enjoy the read!”  Hmm, I wonder what Glover meant by that.  Then the second email was on May 17, 2021, and has no message just an attachment titled Department Memo Fire Apparatus Valve Damage 04272021.  So, two emails from Assistant Chief Lee Glover to his buddy, the man he considers the CHIEF which only undermines Piland.

Piland then asked Vetterick to take both drafts and merge them into one report so that all sides were represented in the report which created the final version that was emailed to Mark Piland from Deputy Fire Chief, Scott Vetterick on May 18, 2021.  Was this report acceptable to King George and his minion Henry Hill, well of course not!  That would be too easy.

Fast forward to June 25 King George sends out an email to a few different people asking them for feedback or advice on any changes.  The first email was sent to Mack Borchardt and Henry Hill at 10:35 am and the second email was sent to Ron Patterson at 11:10 am.  What could he possibly be asking for feedback on, well it is a letter to Chief Piland.  Interesting King George goes to his buddies, confidants, and everyone else but the active current Fire Chief himself, Mark Piland. 

The email King George sent makes it clear he is not happy with the final memo submitted.  Our guess is because it was not written by Borchardt.  What does the final draft look like, well we can only guess like the one we attached.  The damage was going to cost the city hundreds of thousands of dollars between parts and hours to replace.   A few insiders told us Glover did a hastily report that put the blame on the fireman.  We asked them why Glover would do that, and we were told to protect Barry Dixon (Borchard/Glover loyalist).   According to a fleet expert it was Dixon who wanted steel and brass ball valves which were known to freeze.  We were also told Glover sent his report to Borchardt and Purefoy instead of proper channels through the Fire Chief, Mark Piland .  Why? Because he did not like that Piland asked him to get more perspective for the report. 

Add to that we were told a complaint was filed against Barry Dixon in Fleet Management some time ago for falsifying records and for filing a false complaint on a fire captain.  According to several inside sources Dixon was caught red-handed, but Glover came to the rescue to SWEEP, SWEEP, it under the Aladian flying carpet.

In closing, what did we learn from the Valve Report?  It was another tool to try and undermine, discredit, and lay blame on Fire Chief, Mark Piland.  Other than that, we learned nothing.  One thing is clear, Mark Piland had a hard time because he was never going to be given the respect from the Frisco Insiders at city hall.  He simply was not Mack Borchardt and from everything coming out it appears there was a concentrated effort to undermine him and disrespect him from HR all the way to the City Manager’s office.   A city insider told us Purefoy never wanted Piland or any other Fire Chief there, he wanted Borchardt, but his hands were forced.   

The question we have is WHAT DOES MACK BORCHARDT ACTUALLY DO?  We know he played Fire Chief behind the scenes of the actual Fire Chief while Piland was there.  My guess is he is doing the same with Glover.  He was supposed to be over Exide and well that has not gone well.  So, what is he making $200K+ dollars a year doing for the city?   Now that Glover is Fire Chief do you think he enjoys happy hours with Borchardt?  We are betting they do!  The good old boy network is very alive and well at city hall.  Just look at George Purefoy now, he has opened a consulting firm with Ron Patterson. 

To see all the documents we obtained in our PIR: Valve Report Documents

Dragnet (Part Duex)

Imagine you live in a city where the newly elected female mayor calls a press conference to make an extraordinary announcement regarding a new recruiting policy for the police department.  Shortly into her speech she says the police department must accept ALL willing recruits meaning anyone, regardless of colour, gender, height and weight as long as they can attend and pass a 14-week course in the academy.  A large number of candidates immediately come forward, sign up, and next thing you know they are standing before the Captain and Lieutenant of  the academy.   They are greeted by their instructors who say, “My name is Captain Harris! In case you missed it, this is Sergeant Callahan! We are the meanest instructors here. We’ve got you because you are the worst people here. You are “D” Squad; “D” for “dirtbags”. When I say: “Hey, dirtbags!” that means you. You people are going to hate my guts for the rest of your lives. I am going to make you sorry that you ever came here.” The group of misfit recruits work hard and train hard in order to prove themselves capable of carrying the badge.  Funny thing is they end up succeeding despite and because of their eccentricities.  Well, that is the plot of the very first Police Academy movie in 1984 which grossed $149.8 million worldwide.  The series of films would become one of the most popular “police movie” franchises in history grossing another $387 million for the sequels.  It was simple slap-stick humor, usually based on simple characterizations and physical attributes of the “underdogs” struggling to prove themselves even though they faced constant opposition from those who ran the academy.   My favorite scene of all time is when Hightower gets a driving lesson on how to drive so he can pass the police exam. 

Any who, in Dragnet (Part 1) we went over the 27 recommendations from the Three-Year Strategic Staffing Plan for the Frisco PD and now we want to tell you about a few points that my wife and found interesting in the study.  First, police calls are rated on a scale of Priority One to Three.  Priority 1 calls are crimes in progress and incidents that put citizens at risk.  Priority 2 calls are to ensure situations don’t escalate into a more serious incident.  Priority 3 & 4 calls are non-critical.  In 2019, the city had 595 Priority 1 calls and they expect that number to be over 900 calls in the next 3 years.  The average response time in 2019 for a Priority 1 call was 5.25 minutes.  Priority 2 calls had an average response time of 6.48 minutes and in 2019 they had 21, 571 calls.   In regard to calls, the study said “Frisco PD patrol staffing increases are necessary to increase the capacity of the FPD Patrol Division to absorb the expected increases in calls for service to decrease response times for calls.  With these changes, FPD patrol will align with contemporary patrol staffing standards and be able to accommodate modern police service demands.”

Another key point relating to patrol was “ The City of Frisco needs to make steady progress towards the goal of adding 42 patrol officers over the next 3 years. Without additional staffing, the FPD Patrol Division will not be able to absorb the expected increases in calls for service, increase self-initiated activities, or decrease response times without negatively impacting other patrol performance objectives (e.g., immediate availability and patrol visibility).”

Second, the study looked at the Traffic Division which handles hit and run accidents, traffic enforcement and accident investigation.  The study said, “As the population of the City of Frisco continues to grow and more visitors come to enjoy its entertainment venues, additional traffic officers are needed.”

Third, when it comes to investigations we learned investigators assigned to the Crimes Against Children Unit was assigned an average of 13.6 new cases per month in 2018, an average of 20.5 new cases per month in 2019, and an average of 25.8 new cases per month in 2020. The number of new cases assigned to Crimes Against Children has substantially increased; almost doubling from 2018 to 2020.  I will be curious to see the average number of cases per month once the Universal Kids theme park opens.  It is important to point out that the study said there is not a national standard on the number of new cases that should be assigned to an investigator each month.  The general standard used by the study is 12 cases per month for violent crimes (which covers crimes against children / persons).

Last, we learned that the Detention Division and the Communications Divisionat the time of the study operated with the minimum staffing level 24/7/365.  More shocking was the Training Unit currently pulls their certified TCOLE instructors from their regular responsibilities as a patrol officer, investigator, or other role within the department to provide the in-service training. The study pointed out that with the size of FPD, this is an inefficient process and impacts the staffing levels within divisions and units from where the trainers are drawn. If the Training Unit is sufficiently staffed, it can provide all in-service training for FPD personnel.

In a city with a population of 227,426 residents, should we be concerned about staffing levels in two of the most crucial departments in this city?  Absolutely we should be concerned about that!  In fact, an insider told us that Purefoy didn’t care too much for Chief Piland because at internal meetings he would constantly try to address staffing issues and was quickly shot down by the then city manager.  All we hear from top city officials, the mayor and some council members are the slogan “SAFEST CITY” and we that could be true right now, but what about the future?   The question everyone should be asking themselves is will we be the safest city 10 years from now.  More importantly, why does it seem as if city management at city hall is operating with a reactive management style meaning reacting to problems as they arise vs proactive management which is where we see ahead, anticipate problems, and take steps to prevent the problems from happening?   Was the city proactive in taking steps to meet the 27 recommendations in the study over the last 3 years?   If not, why? 

Frisco is an amazing city and all we want is for it to stay that way.   We must ask how is it we have all this money for incentives, developments, TIRZ and public/private partnership opportunities but we can’t find the money to fix staffing issues?   Why is it we can find money in the budget for two more Assistant City Managers?   If those questions don’t make you stop and think, then maybe this will. Imagine it is 12:30 am and one of our police officers answers the call for a disturbance in a Home Depot parking lot and upon the officer attempting to make contact with the subject, the man produced a gun and opened fire, striking our officer in the chest just outside of his vest.  As he lays there he knows he is going to die so he calls out on the radio, “118, tell my family I love them.”  Communications responds, “I can’t copy.”  The officer responds one final time, “118, tell my family I love them.”  That is what happened to Officer Dia in Toledo and there is nothing to say it can’t happen here.  What if one of our fire fighters goes into the burning flames of a Frisco home to rescue a child and the next thing you hear is the PASS device sending out distress signals.  Those signals mean that a fire fighter is motionless and probably trapped or deceased.  The flames at this point are out of control and it is clear we have a firefighter down.   Will it take losing one of our own before we before residents wake up and demand more answers?  When does the city decide to step up to the plate, be transparent about our staffing levels and do the right thing?  Is it too late?

Our question is, would they still both endorse Mayor Cheney today? They didn’t in the recent election so it makes you wonder, why?