Bill’s Revenge Tour

by | Apr 22, 2026 | Politics

Is it news—or is it a well-timed swing of the political hammer?

Funny how certain blogs suddenly find their investigative spirit the moment early voting begins. Not last month. Not after the election. Right now—when voters are paying attention and impressions are fragile. That kind of timing might be coincidence… in the same way a thunderstorm just happens to roll in right as you forget your umbrella.

What are we looking at here? A fact-driven piece meant to inform the public? Or a carefully stitched narrative designed to nudge voters in a very specific direction? Because there’s a difference between shining a light and aiming a spotlight.  One reveals. The other performs.

We had no intention of talking about the petitioner again, but that has now changed because her friend’s blog chose to rehash the story and the petitioner shared it with her own page Frisco Residents Who Cares Facebook page with her commentary.  If they want to talk about it then they should expect others to.

BACKGROUND:

Recently I received a letter from the petitioner’s attorney saying that if we agreed to a few items the petitioner would agree to resolve the issue without filing a lawsuit.  We responded to Ryan D. Martin of Clark Hill on April 9 via email.  We heard nothing since then until The Chihuahua’s Blog Post appeared rehashing the whole issue that had so offended the petitioner.

Side Note: Clark Hill is the firm that David Ovard is a Litigator for.  If that name sounds familiar it should, he and his wife are good friends with Mayor Jeff Cheney and his wife Dana Cheney.  Ovard was credited for being the reason the Frisco PGA came to Frisco.  He is very connected to Frisco’s inner circle and many developers.

Rule 408 Communication – From Ryan D. Martin of Clark Hill

The letter starts off, that the petitioner is ready to move forward with a lawsuit since I have still not removed the content in question.

FACT: If there is an open action by the petitioner or threat of a lawsuit, I cannot remove content as it is my legal obligation is to preserve evidence in anticipation of the litigation.  Deleting or altering the content could raise issues of spoilation.  

FACT: As we stated in our deposition, if the petitioner would like us to remove some offensive 3rd party comments not made by us or a specific post for a valid reason all she had to do was email me and ask.  However, she did not do that she chose to go the route of court preceding’s.

The letter continues that the petitioner may be willing to resolve the issue if we agreed to a few requests. The request made in this letter is as follows:

1. Permanent removal of all Blog posts on FCW’s internet website, all posts on FCW’s Facebook pages, all NextDoor posts, all Reddit posts and all comments related to the foregoing regarding Petitioner. Without limitation to the foregoing, the Blog posts on FCW’s internet website to be removed include:

a. Heit’end Controls

b. Heit-end Victim Card

 c. Heit’end Stupidity

 d. The Finale of Tea Time

e. When Hurt Feelings File Petitions

 f. Denton Co. Republicans Targeted

g. Noskin Law Firm, PLLC – Press Release

h. Unsigned, Sealed … Creepy

2. Rename all Facebook pages and any other social media platform groups that utilize or reference the “Frisco Residents Who Care” name or moniker; and

3. Payment of Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($50,000.00) to “Petitioner”.

Our Response: 

In a good-faith effort to resolve this matter, I am willing to consider the following limited accommodation, contingent upon a full and final resolution. I agreed to the removal of certain blog posts that I directly control on my website and any associated comments on those blogs posts. Along with limited edits or redactions where appropriate, without any admission of liability.  

I stated I was willing to fully remove Heit’end Controls, Heit’end Victim Card, and Heit’end Stupidity.  Why would I agree to that?  Because I really don’t care, the petitioner is not that important to me.

As for the other requests:

“The Finale of Tea Time” – I am willing to remove references to your client, provided she removes public accusations she has made, or accusations by others on her page (FRWC) against third parties such as Sangita Datta and Kelly Karthik. 

“When Hurt Feelings File Petitions” – I decline. The underlying material stems from your client’s own Rule 202 filing, which made the matter public.  

“Denton Co. Republicans Targeted” – This was only posted briefly; I reserve the right to republish should this litigation continue.  

         Note: After the recent Chihuahua’s blog post – I reposted portions of it.

“Noskin Law Firm, PLLC – Press Release” – I decline. This relates to public filings that stem from your client’s own Rule 202 filing, which made the matter public.  I reserve my first amendment right to respond.  

“Unsigned, Sealed … Creepy” – I decline.  I have already limited identification by using initials; I will not remove the document image.  

2. “Frisco Residents Who Care” Name 

I deny your demand to rename Frisco Residents Who Cares Freedom Chatter and any social media platforms.  Your client has not demonstrated any legally enforceable trademark or exclusive right to the phrase “Frisco Residents Who Care.” As such, there is no legal basis for this demand. 

3. Monetary Demand: For $50,000 is rejected. 

Mr. Martin I am a single dad of a disabled son who drives for Uber.  I sometimes barely get by.  I don’t have $50,000 and I am not paying anyone to exercise my Freedom of Speech. There has been no showing of damages to support such a figure. If litigation proceeds, I will assert my rights under the TCPA, including seeking dismissal and recovery of my previous attorney’s fees, costs, and sanctions as permitted under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 27.009. 

In response to my email, I heard nothing!  The claims that I did not try to resolve this with the petitioner are completely untrue and false.

Goal of The Chihuahua’s Blog

Before even diving into the blog ask yourself if he got this information over a month or two ago from the courts, why is he just now publishing it?  His first blog attacked the Colberg’s and now he is going after everyone else. It is to change your vote to Cabal Candidates aka Frisco Insiders so they can maintain control of this city?   

Screenshot

The end goal of Bobblehead Bill is to call in to question anyone they can to diminish their credibility.  Bill Woodard supports Mark Hill and Laura Rummel so his report is clearly biased as you break it down.  Now look at those who shared it to their mass following – who do they support? 

Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot

Should we publish pictures of all those who liked his Revenge Tour Blog?  If we did, you would see the names of everyone who supports Mark Hill, John Keating and/or Laura Rummel for Council and Sree and Dynette for Frisco ISD.  Want Proof?

Step by Step Review of The Chihuahuas Rumor Mill Blog Post

Claim 1: Last year we wrote numerous (at least 8) lengthy blog posts either specifically about the petitioner and the Frisco Residents Who Cares Facebook page.

Fact: We wrote 3 articles about the Petitioner called Heit’end Controls, Heit’end Victim Card, and Heit’end Stupidity. 

The others were about another topic and the underlying material stemmed from the petitioners’ own Rule 202 filing or because she made a public statement on an issue.

The petitioner is a public person so if she comments on something she cannot expect to be exempt from being questioned.  As we said in the previous blog, that means that out of the 267+blogs we have posted less than .02% of our time has been spent on her. 

Question: If the petitioner feels so defamed and harassed, why would she let her friend rehash it in a blog?  Why are the petitioner and her friends continuing to give it life and legs? 

FRWC Facebook Pages

The Chihuahua mentions several Facebook pages with a similar moniker to the petitioners. 

Frisco Residents Who Argue – has nothing to do with me

Frisco Residents Who Are Really, Really Good Looking – has nothing to do with me

Frisco Resident Who Actually Care – has nothing to do with me

Frisco Residents Who Care For The Uncensored – has nothing to do with me

Frisco Residents Who Care Freedom Chatter – After several people got deleted and removed from the petitioner’s group of 20K people simply for being conservative I started the Freedom Chatter and turned it over to admins.  I do not have any daily input on the page and just set it up so residents had somewhere to go and communicate.

FACT: None of these pages have anything to do with Frisco Chronicles Whistleblower

3RD Party Comments

Next the Chihuahua addresses 3rd party comments such as:

“Groomer, Racist, Fascist” – 3rd Party Blog Comment made on one of our blogs by Flaming Moderate on April 6th 2025

“Biggest Chunk of Excerment and Sad Pathetic Piece of Trash”

(1) She is the biggest chunk of human excrement in the City of Frisco”;

(2) “Frisco’s useless idiot”;

(3) “Petitioner is a damn idiot”;

(4) “She is a sad pathetic piece of trash”;

(5) “She is a damn idiot. She’s a left winged, socialist, Trump derangement syndrome, idiot.”

These comments are on a Facebook Page called What’s on your mind Collin and Denton County which is administered by Mark Eisenmann.  The statements were also written by Mark Eisemann.  

The Chihuahua states these comments have been left up till this day.  He is correct due to ongoing litigation I must preserve evidence.  As for the other comments, I have no control over that page, I have no control over those comments, so the petitioner should talk to the person who does.

The Court Case

The Chihuahua gives his summary of the court proceedings based on his interpretation of court records.  We have addressed this in other blogs and the press release by our Attorney at the time which is posted on our website.

Yes, I use plural pronouns and created a persona – that is not a crime.  Last I heard democrats love pronouns.  I guess it is okay for them to use pronouns, but I can’t.

No, I don’t recall who sent me the Tammy Tapes and what software I used to take out the voice.  I tried several different ones until I figured it out. 

As for the material I obtained from FRWC Facebook page run by the petitioner, I don’t remember who sent them to me and one of them I accessed using a fake screen name for a day. 

Court Hearing Attendance

The Chihuahua lists out several names of people who attended the court hearing. 

The names mentioned include Shannon Greer, Vijay Karthik, Kelly Karthik, Patrick Wamhoff, Jackie Wakin, and Steve Noskin (outside of representation) have nothing to do with Frisco Chronicles.  Why would the Chihuahua name them?  Because they are all connected to current people running for a position on council or the ISD board, either by marriage or support of a candidate. The Chihuahua’s goal was to discredit them in order to hurt those running for a seat so Frisco Insiders can maintain control.

Publishing a list of people who simply attended a hearing and then implying they support a particular side crossed from reporting into speculation—and that’s where it gets risky. Showing up in a courtroom doesn’t equal endorsement; people attend for all kinds of reasons—curiosity, professional interest, civic awareness, even coincidence. When a blog blurs that line, it invites readers to draw conclusions that aren’t supported by facts, effectively assigning motives and affiliations to private individuals without their consent.

I have said since I started my blog that the Frisco Insiders attack anyone who speaks out against them at city council or online.  They try to reduce the opposition by disparaging them and tearing them down.  This blog proves just that by inviting readers to draw conclusions that aren’t supported by facts, effectively assigning motives and affiliations to private individuals without their consent. Their goal?  To damage reputations, chill public participation, and create an environment where people think twice before observing or engaging in civic processes for fear of being labeled or targeted. In a system that depends on transparency and public access, turning attendance into implied allegiance doesn’t just mislead—it discourages the very openness it claims to value.

Next up the Chihuahua names Brian Livingston (current council) and Dan Stricklin (former council member) and states I said in the deposition that they provided information to FWB.  This question was asked late into the 6-hour day during the deposition, and I was tired and confused by how they asked the questions.  If you have never been deposed, you would not understand.

Brian Livingston has never provided information to Frisco Chronicles other than responding to my request for comments on articles via email.  Dan Stricklin is a fan but that is it! 

Why would the Chihuahua post a former councilman’s criminal record from 20+ years ago?  What does it have to do with Frisco Chronicles, the court case or the blog he is writing?   Nothing!  It was soley to damage his reputation!

This also proves my point that the current Frisco Insiders & Leaders attack and try to intimidate anyone that speaks out or supports another view.  The end goal for them is to always damage reputations, chill public participation, and create an environment where people think twice before observing or engaging. 

This started with Mark Piland when he first ran for office and the city council voted to release his HR File days before the final vote in an election.  They have continued to attack others in the same way.  It is about control of the status quo.

Testimony of Chris Fields and Brian Livingston

We reached out to Shannon Greer for comment, and this is her response, “From the day this blog was created I have been accused of being the Whistleblower.  At one point, the mayor even called my boss claiming that I write a blog and that I come to citizens input act inappropriate and file a lot of PIRs, etc.  Why would he call my boss? Probably because I am vocal about the city having the need for an animal shelter and issues that I disagree with and they want me to shut up and go away. 

As for the statements that I bragged about being the Frisco Chronicles Whistleblower, yes one time at a dinner with Brian and Chris, held downtown at the local Taco Joint after several drinks I jokingly said it was me.  We were talking about Frisco Chronicles, and I expressed my frustration with the constant accusations and said I should just take credit for it and jokingly said It’s me, I am the whistleblower.  We all laughed and I said I was kidding and that was it.

Between our entire group of friends we have all guessed who it could be. I have always said I thought it was more than one person, but I have never said anything about a fall guy.  I learned the identity of the Whistleblower after the deposition was completed when he called me.  Why, Bill Woodard even mentions that I support the same political candidates as Wamhoff and the Karthik’s is beyond me and has nothing to do with Frisco Chronicles or related to his blog post.  As for Fields and Livingston’s testimony, I have no idea what they testified to as I was not there. Any future questions of my involvement can go through my attorney.”

Dropping More Names

The Chihuahua continues in his blog by saying during discovery, “WHICH IS STILL BEING VETTED” has indicated that other residents maybe involved and drops a list of names. 

That’s a line most responsible journalists are very careful not to cross. Listing names while admitting the information is “still being vetted” flips the burden of proof on its head—once a name is published, the damage is already done, even if the claim later turns out to be wrong. Without confirmation, it moves from reporting facts to broadcasting suspicion, which can unfairly harm reputations and expose those individuals to public backlash for something that hasn’t been established. At best, it’s reckless; at worst, it suggests an intent to cast as wide a shadow as possible and let implications do the work that evidence hasn’t yet done.

Bill Woodard should be ashamed of himself and the fact that he dropped these names shows this is not about journalism, it is about REVENGE and CHANGING YOUR VOTE in this election.  Proof?  The post has been shared 16 times, and one of those that shared it is own First Lady of Frisco Dana Cheney.  Yep, she dropped it to her mass followers, why?  Does the first lady think it is okay to share NON-VETTED INFO?  This smells of a large conspiracy to write an article that calls into question anyone associated to candidates they don’t support so that they look guilty by affiliation with the end goal to help their candidates like Mark Hill, John Keating, Laura Rummel, Sree and Dynette for ISD Board.  It is the Frisco Cabal Insider Playbook!

FACT: NONE OF THESE PEOPLE OUTED BY BILL WOODARD ON HIS REVENGE TOUR ARE INVOLVED WITH FRISCO CHRONICLES INCLUDING:

Dan Stricklin, Shannon Greer, Patrick Wamhoff, Jackie Wakin, Kelly Karthik, Vijay Karthik, Stephanie or Jared Elad, Mark Eisenmann, Steve Noskin (outside of being my lawyer), Star Patriots, a PAC run by Steve Noskin, Julie Harville, Michelle Milholland, Sarah Rouse, J. Aidan Grey, Melanie Jones, Kellie Morris. Carrie De Moor, Ram Mehta, Muni Janagarajan, Casey or Angela Waits.

Any statement, accusation or implication that they are connected to Frisco Chronicles is FALSE and a part of the Bill Woodard Revenge Tour Playbook to discredit Frisco Leaders, Candidates and Residents who are not afraid to speak out and do the right thing.

Violent Criminal Record

The Chihuahua then goes on to question my name and layout my criminal record from 20+ years ago.  My legal name is Hal Craig Douglass.  Sometimes I go by Hal, sometimes I go by Craig.  IS THAT A CRIME?

When creating the page, I created a “persona” as I said in my deposition such as Sybil-Watkins Douglass.  I did so in order to protect myself when filing for the PIR’s to maintain my anonymity.

Writers, performers, and commentators have been using personas for centuries. It serves real purposes: creative freedom, protection, satire, and sometimes just better storytelling. In journalism and political writing, pseudonyms are often used to separate the message from the messenger—or to avoid backlash.  

As for the domestic violence charges in my past, both my wife (now my ex-wife) and I were in the wrong and we both took classes through the court and pleaded nolo contendere which means we did not admit guilt.  We have a great relationship today and have raised two kids together.  To bring up my records 20+ years later and call me a Violent Criminal is libel and defamatory.  What happened then has nothing to do with today or my blog in any way.

IN CLOSING

Lastly, I have not talked about the fact that the petitioners’ filings have cost me thousands of dollars for attorneys.  The petitioner took the route of the Rule 202 hearing because if she had sued me in court, I would have filed an Anti-Slap suit in return. 

It is not a crime for someone to support my site, or a go fund me for legal funds. The petitioner in this case posed a GFM for Karmelo Anthony to 20k people – but that was no problem?  It is not a crime to be a fan of the truth which scares the hell out of sitting council and former council members.  I am probably the most hated person in Frisco for telling the truth.  That’s okay! 

Every article I have written is based on PIRs, we have shown the documents, and if they have come into question, we have corrected them.  I stand behind my blog 100%.

Screenshot

The end goal of Bobblehead Bill is to call in to question anyone so they can to diminish their credibility.  The fact is Bill supports Mark Hill and Laura Rummel and so do those who shared and liked the post. Should we publish pictures of all those who liked his Revenge Tour Blog?  If we did you see names that constantly attack anyone who speaks out on social media against Cheneyville and The Frisco Way.  Should we do the same to them that they try to do to those of us who tell the truth or stand up for truth?

Don’t fall for the playbook – go and vote to change Frisco for the better.

For Legal Purposes I must post this Disclaimer: This blog includes satire, parody, and comic relief.  It contains summarized accounts created solely for humor and commentary.  Any resemblance to real events is either coincidental or intentionally satirical.  Reader discretion — and a sense of humor — are advised.

Why Frisco Always Smells Like Roses in the Dallas Morning News

by | Jan 17, 2026 | Angelia Pelham, Bill Woodard, Brian Livingston, Burt Thakur Place 2, City Council, Jared Elad, John Keating, Laura Rummel, Mayor Jeff Cheney, Politics

Alright, grab your popcorn —this one has all the makings of a classic Frisco Chronicles feature: money, media, and that familiar scent of roses wafting through the pages of the Dallas Morning News.

All Good in the Frisco Hood: Brought to You by… Medium Giant?

By now, longtime Frisco residents have noticed a curious phenomenon. Whenever the Dallas Morning News (DMN) writes about Frisco, the city sparkles. Streets are shinier. Leadership is visionary. Problems? What problems? If Frisco had potholes, DMN would probably call them “community engagement craters designed to slow traffic and save lives.”

Which raises the obvious question: why does Frisco always smell like roses in the DMN? Not weeds. Not smoke. Roses.

For years, residents have speculated. Maybe DMN is afraid of being cut off from exclusives. Maybe access journalism is alive and well. Or maybe—just maybe—it’s about the oldest motivator in local government and media alike:  Money.

Enter Stage Left: Medium Giant

Here’s where things get interesting. A sharp-eyed reader recently connected a few dots that deserve a closer look. The Frisco Economic Development Corporation (FEDC) has entered into several contracts over the years with a company called Medium Giant.

Whose Medium Giant, you ask?

They’re an “integrated creative marketing agency.” Which is marketing-speak for we make things look good. Even better? Medium Giant just happens to be the sister company of the Dallas Morning News.

Cue the dramatic music. So now the question isn’t why DMN never seems to publish critical reporting on Frisco or its leadership. The question becomes: would they dare?

Follow the Money (Because It Always Tells a Story)

When we reviewed city check registers, we noticed multiple payments over the years made to Medium Giant. Not chump change. Not lunch money.  Not “oops, forgot to expense that Uber.”

The total?  $2,105,631.76

That’s over two million dollars paid by Frisco entities to a company tied directly to the same organization responsible for shaping Frisco’s public narrative in one of North Texas’ largest newspapers.

Now, we’re not saying this proves corruption. We’re not saying there’s a secret smoky backroom with editors and city staff clinking champagne glasses.  We’re not even saying there’s an explicit quid pro quo.

What we are saying is this: If you were the DMN, would you risk torching a relationship connected—directly or indirectly—to a $2 million revenue stream by publishing hard-hitting, unvarnished reporting about Frisco’s leadership, finances, or controversies?

Hit Pieces for Some, Rose Petals for Others

What makes this dynamic even more eyebrow-raising is DMN’s recent track record. The paper has shown it’s perfectly willing to publish aggressive, sometimes glowing-less-than-rose-scented coverage of candidates who fall outside the Frisco inner circle.

Just ask: Jennifer White, Mark Piland, John Redmond

Funny how the gloves come off for political outsiders, but stay neatly folded when it comes to City Hall, current council members, and current city leadership.

Journalism, Marketing, or a Blurred Line?

Let’s be clear: Medium Giant being a marketing firm isn’t inherently wrong. Cities hire marketing agencies all the time. But when the marketing arm and the newsroom live under the same corporate roof, the public has every right to question whether the coverage they’re reading is journalism… or brand management.

Because from where residents sit, the pattern looks less like watchdog reporting and more like: “Frisco: Presented by Medium Giant, distributed by DMN.”

Final Thought

Transparency isn’t just about open records and posted agendas. It’s also about who controls the narrative—and who’s being paid behind the scenes while that narrative is shaped.

Two million dollars isn’t small change. It’s not accidental.  And it certainly isn’t irrelevant.

So the next time you read a glowing DMN article telling you everything in Frisco is just peachy, ask yourself: Is this news… or is this advertising with better grammar?

Disclaimer: This blog includes satire, parody, and comic relief.  It contains summarized accounts created solely for humor and commentary.  Any resemblance to real events is either coincidental or intentionally satirical.  Reader discretion — and a sense of humor — are advised.

Who Hit ‘Send’? Meadow Hill Estates Residents Ask How Their Emails Became Campaign Ammo

by | Jan 16, 2026 | Ann Anderson, Candidates, City Council, Developements, Elections, Elections & Campaigns, Frisco Special Election January 2026, Mark Piland For Place 1, Political Candidates, Politics, Universal Kids

Frisco Chronicles has received multiple complaints from residents of Meadow Hill Estates after an email landed in what appears to be every single email inbox in the community. The message, sent from a Gmail account — StopMillerAutomotive@gmail.com — urged residents to vote in the Frisco Special Election for Ann Anderson.

The writer of the email openly states “I spoke to this candidate about our issue” which is problematic since he never gave the other candidate a chance to share their view on the community’s issue. Based on one conversation with only one candidate you then send an email to your entire community telling them how to VOTE? Did the writer of this email do any research into other projects where citizens objected to something nearby their home and if Ann Anderson supported it.

For example, Universal Kids! Ann Anderson spoke on 2/7/2023 in FAVOR of Universal Studios. She ignored the numerous residents who lived in Cobb Hill and throughout Frisco, that came out and said they did not want a theme park that close to their community because of the noise, traffic and potential crime it could bring. Ask residents today if it has affected their home values in that community and how many Airbnb’s now exist there. She said at the forum the other day we need to be mindful of where we place projects near communities and used the hospital power plant as an example, yet she was in Favor of Universal Kids which is going to have roller coasters looking into people’s backyard! Her words and actions – DON’T MATCH!

That raised an obvious question residents can’t shake: How does a random Gmail account suddenly have the private email addresses of an entire neighborhood?

Not a Guessing Game — It’s a Privacy Issue

Residents aren’t speculating for sport. They’re concerned because there are only a few realistic ways someone could obtain a complete HOA email list:

  • Through HOA records
  • Through property management systems
  • Through board-level access to resident data

Those email addresses are not public information. They are collected for official HOA business, not political campaigning.

From the complaints we received, many residents believe the sender may be a current HOA board member or someone with inside access to HOA records.

The Meadow Hills Estates Facebook Page Raises More Questions

Adding fuel to the fire, residents pointed us to the Meadow Hill Estates Facebook page, which states it is “run by volunteers.” That page has posted about Miller Automotive on December 10, 2025 and several other times throughout the past year.

The overlap between the campaign email content and the Facebook posts has residents asking whether the same individual — or group — is behind both. And if so, how much access do they really have?

HOA Data Is Not Personal Property

Here’s the part that matters most. If a board member obtained residents’ email addresses solely because of their position, those addresses are HOA property, not personal contacts. Using them for anything outside official HOA business — especially electioneering — is widely considered improper and, in many cases, explicitly prohibited.

HOA board members have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the association — not personal political agendas.  Using confidential resident data to influence a city election crosses a line that residents say should never be blurry.

Texas Attorney General Complaint Incoming

According to one Meadow Hill Estates resident, a formal complaint is being filed with the Texas Attorney General regarding the use of private HOA data for political purposes. That makes this more than neighborhood drama — it’s a legal and ethical issue.

We Reached Out to 4Sight Property Management

Frisco Chronicles contacted 4Sight Property Management, which oversees Meadow Hill Estates, asking the following: Did your company approve or authorize this email?  Do you have rules or policies governing how HOA board members may use resident contact information?  What safeguards exist to prevent misuse of confidential HOA data?  We are currently awaiting their response and will update readers when one is received.

The Bigger Question

This isn’t about whether someone supports Ann Anderson or opposes Miller Automotive.  It’s about trust.  Residents trusted their HOA to safeguard their personal information — not turn it into a campaign mailing list.  We hope Ann Anderson herself did not know about this email because if she did that it could be problematic also. 

Until someone explains who hit “send” and how they had the power to do it, Meadow Hill Estates residents are left wondering whether their HOA is protecting them… or politicking with their privacy.

Stay tuned. Frisco Chronicles will follow this story wherever it leads.

Disclaimer: This blog includes satire, parody, and comic relief.  It contains summarized accounts created solely for humor and commentary.  Any resemblance to real events is either coincidental or intentionally satirical.  Reader discretion — and a sense of humor — are advised.

Unsigned, Sealed…Creepy? 

by | Jul 8, 2025 | City Council, Elections, Politics

Something curious is making its way through the quiet cul-de-sacs and HOA-lined streets of Frisco, Texas. No, it’s not another pizza coupon or a glossy mailer featuring a smiling city councilmember holding a bulldozer. This is something far more… poetic. Mysterious. And, depending on your reading, slightly unhinged.

We’re talking about the letters—written in a flowing, subtle cursive that feels like a mash-up between Jane Austen and a B-movie villain monologue. One such letter arrived in the mailbox of a former council member.  Then, they texted it to a friend, and the friend asked, “Can we send this to Frisco Whistleblower?”  Next thing you know, we have a “You’ve Got Mail!” notice!

It opens like this:

Well, well, well… Thought you were being careful, didn’t you? A whispered word here, a sneaky move there — so subtle, so clever. But here’s the thing, darling: nothing stays hidden forever. Especially not when we’re all watching.

Ah, the classic tone of someone who just finished binge-watching House of Cards and decided to give the calligraphy font a whirl.

The second paragraph sharpens the tone, sharpening its verbal knives:

We know what you’ve been doing. All the schemes, the backdoor deals to collaborate or protect, every dagger wrapped in a smile. You thought you would get away. But the cracks are showing, and the truth? It’s crawling right up behind you.

If this sounds like something you’d expect from a disgruntled screenwriter trying to get back at a former HOA president, you’re not alone.

It continues:

Whispers have become conversations. Conversations are turning into confessions. And let’s just say … receipts have a way of resurfacing when you least expect them. Even with VPNs and modern methods to shield oneself. Tick-tock. Your time is almost up. And when the fallout comes? No one will be left to clean up your mess. Actions have consequences, sweetheart. And yours are finally catching up, courtesy of JH. We might not know her, but we love her. XOXO – Frisco.

Cue dramatic music.  Okay, we actually laughed instead.

Now, about that name-drop. We’re confident JH didn’t co-sign her name or give approval to someone to use her name in what could best be described as a mash note from a petty godmother of vengeance. But hey, this is Frisco, where political affection and shade often share the same cocktail napkin.

Will she sue them? Try to depose whoever’s scribbling love threats with a cursive fine point font? Probably not. Especially if the sender is a devoted admirer of her work and is just a few unsent letters away from crafting a shrine.

Here at Frisco Whistleblower, we believe in publishing our letters, not licking stamps to send thinly veiled threats via the U.S. Postal Service. Our readers? They email us and comment openly, and don’t hide behind RBG stamps. They don’t channel Emily Dickinson meets Dexter in cursive and drop lingering lines in the mail.

But this strange week isn’t just about letters. It’s also been one filled with Hikois being written (shoutout to whoever resurrected that word) and declarations of love for local political figures being sealed with metaphorical kisses.

If you do receive one of these letters, we encourage you to:

  1. Keep the letter and envelope.
  2. File a report with Frisco PD.
  3. Consider reading it aloud with dramatic lighting and a glass of wine on Facebook Live, because, frankly, it’s kind of a performance art piece.

And now, to close this odd dispatch from the frontlines of Frisco mailboxes, we leave you with a poem — a collection of words that mean everything and nothing, much like the letters themselves:

A Poem of Unknown Words
The ink remembers what the lips forget,
Dandelion silence in a whisper-net.
Shadow sewn to sunshine’s hem,
Pages curled like lies at 10 p.m.

Umbrella thoughts in moonlit code,
Spoken softly down Morse Road.
Blink twice, and secrets bloom —
In cursive threats and sweet perfume.

Sleep tight, Frisco. The letters are watching.

“Silence, Shame, and the Swift Vanishing Truth Bomb”

by | May 28, 2025 | Candidates, City Council, Elections, Ethics Complaints, Gopal Ponangi, Gopal Ponangi, John Keating, Mayor Jeff Cheney, Political Candidates, Politics

Well, Frisco…we didn’t have this one on the bingo card today.  The soap opera that is Frisco politics just added another act, and this one had all the flair of a daytime drama mixed with a deleted tweet. Today, we were all witnesses to what could’ve been a turning point — or at the very least, a moment of reckoning. That is, until it vanished faster than ethics at a campaign fundraiser.

This morning, Marcia Locke, fiancée of Councilman John Keating, broke her silence on the now-infamous Toxic Tammy Tapes. You know the ones — the recordings that have been circulating through local inboxes and Facebook threads like wildfire through a dry prairie.

Not only did she break her silence, but boy did she come in swinging a bat that was on fire. In a now-deleted social media post, Locke took to her page and finally addressed what we’ve all been talking about in hushed tones and wide-eyed reactions:

“I can no longer accept the pressure to stay silent,” she began. “I am not okay with what has been thrown at myself or my family… Politics is one thing… Being a person of integrity is a requirement of an elected official… and I have to speak my truth.”

 Let’s pause for applause. 👏👏👏

But then Marcia didn’t stop there. She went full-on mic drop mode, calling out Councilmember Tammy Meinershagen directly:

“Tammy, you were exposed!!!”

Then—like a twist in a Netflix docuseries—she receipts us. Locke posted a screenshot from our very own comment section, a post from a reader named Rick, thanking him for telling the truth.

“Accountability is not persecution,” Locke wrote. “Those were your actions, your words, your choice, and your consequences. I look forward to early voting tomorrow!”

🔥 Mic. Drop.  Honestly? It felt bold. It felt brave. It felt truthful.

Ladies and gentlemen, for a few shining hours, we thought finally, someone with firsthand knowledge, courage, and ties to the inner circle was willing to stand up, take the heat, and say what needed to be said.

We were so floored we even commented on the post ourselves—respectfully, of course. We said we were glad she spoke out and told her truth, but also disappointed it took this long. After all, when the house is burning, it doesn’t help to show up with a water hose two years later.  But then…

Poof!!! The Post Was Deleted.

Gone. Like it never existed. No follow-up. No explanation. Just silence.

And now, we’re left wondering: What happened?

  • Did a certain councilman, mayor or city manager make a phone call?
  • Did someone remind her of who’s pulling the marionette strings on the cabal puppets?
  • Was there pressure from a political ally?
  • Did the local Cabal whisper in her ear?
  • Or did someone with influence promise support… in exchange for silence?

Who knows? But what we do know is this:

For one minute, Marcia had the guts and glory to speak up—and then someone, somewhere, convinced her to un-speak.  That’s not transparency. That’s political puppetry. And it reeks.  It is the clearest sign yet of the power behind the scenes in Frisco politics.

If politics is theater, then this was the deleted scene they didn’t want you to see. Which only confirms what many in Frisco already suspect—truth is dangerous here, and the pressure to suppress it comes fast and hard.  We can vouch for that as we were served papers ourselves today.  More details to come about that!

We applaud Marcia for finding her voice, even if it was just for a few hours. We hope she finds it again. And next time, we hope she doesn’t give it up so easily.  Because, like she said, “integrity is a requirement of elected officials.”  That must mean that the silence in the face of corruption isn’t just disappointing, it’s complicity.  We will be reminding you of John Keating’s silence when he jumps to run for Mayor in a year!