Campaign Finance Failure

UPDATE 4/8/26: Per a Facebook Post by Mark Hill For Frisco Mayor he turned in his campaign finance report on time and had the date-stamp to prove it. Hill says the report just had not been uploaded to the city website. We asked him for a copy of the date-stamp in our comment but have yet to receive it. If this is the case, we question how the city secretary who makes an estimated $157,000, made that mistake by not uploading the report. The city is well aware all eyes are on elections and these reports so that is a big error on the cities part.

There’s an old saying: the little things tell you everything.

We looked at the most recent 30-Day Campaign Finance Report for the candidates. The most noticeable problem is that 3 of the candidates did not comply with “STATE LAW” to file their reports. Another candidate turned in their report 4 days late. For the 3 who filed no report, how can residents trust you to run a billion-dollar city budget?

Sreekanth Reddy – Candidate for Place 5

Matthew Chalmers – Candidate for Place 6

Mark Hill – Candidate for Mayor

Rod Vilhauer – Candidate for Mayor (turned in 4 days late)

Let’s be clear—this isn’t complicated. This isn’t obscure. This isn’t optional. If you run for office, you file your campaign finance reports. On time. Every time.

A Pattern, Not a One-Off

While we are upset that these candidates missed the deadline, we are more focused on Mark Hill because he has a pattern of behavior when it comes to his campaign finance reports. This isn’t the first time questions have been raised. In our previous blog, “Who Failed the Campaign Finance Reality Check,” we outlined concerns about missing or non-compliant filings tied to Hill’s campaign activity, including:

  • July 2024
  • January 2025
  • July 2025

Now, here we are again.

The 30-day pre-election report—due April 2nd—has come and gone, and once again, the question lingers:

Where is the report?

The Resume vs. The Reality

Hill’s campaign messaging paints an impressive picture:

  • Former Frisco ISD Trustee
  • Experience balancing a billion-dollar budget
  • Service on economic development committees
  • Studied finance at Texas A&M
  • Practicing attorney

That’s a résumé built on fiscal responsibility and governance. Which makes this all the more puzzling.

Because if you understand budgets…
If you understand compliance…
If you understand finance…

Then you understand deadlines.

So What’s the Problem?

Campaign finance reporting isn’t a suggestion—it’s a legal requirement designed to ensure transparency for voters.

It tells the public:

  • Who is funding a campaign
  • Where the money is going
  • Whether influence is being bought or earned

And yet, voters are left asking:

  • Why do these reports keep going missing?
  • Who is responsible—the candidate or the treasurer?
  • And why hasn’t this been corrected after prior scrutiny?

Yes, a treasurer is listed—Srini Raghavan—but let’s not play bureaucratic hot potato. At the end of the day, the candidate’s name is on the ballot.

Leadership Starts with Accountability

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: Running a city like Frisco requires managing timelines, budgets, and compliance across multiple departments, projects, and stakeholders. If a campaign can’t consistently meet basic state filing requirements…

What does that say about readiness to run a city?

The Bottom Line

This isn’t about paperwork.

It’s about discipline. It’s about transparency. It’s about trust.

Because if you’re asking voters to trust you with hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars, the bare minimum expectation is this:

You can file a report. You can meet a deadline. You can follow the rules.

Anything less isn’t just an oversight. It’s a warning sign.

Disclaimer: This blog includes satire, parody, and comic relief.  It contains summarized accounts created solely for humor and commentary.  Any resemblance to real events is either coincidental or intentionally satirical.  Reader discretion — and a sense of humor — are advised.

Rate Hikes & Red Flags: What’s Really Happening in Frisco Utilities Department?

Frisco Chronicles filed numerous PIRs related to the Utility Billing Department today.  A full copy of the requests can be found at the bottom of this blog.  The reason for filing these PIRs, is because over the last year we have had several anonymous tips of alleged allegations or infractions.  Due to the accusations, Frisco Chronicles is requesting more details.

The department is run April Spann – Revenue Collections Manager, and according to OpenGovPay her annual salary in 2024 was $139,363.  We also heard that Angela Dowd or Dowell from HR recently moved over to the department even though she has no experience and is paid exceptionally well also.

Allegation #1:  Millions of Gallons of Water are “NOT ACCOUNTED FOR”

If this is true, how would the city bill for that water?  Who would they bill?  Is this the real reason in 2025 the City of Frisco recommended raising our water / sewer rates?   Was this an attempt to bill or make up for the lost revenue in millions of gallons of water?  Is this why there was a panic and opposition to any upgrades to the Utility Billing system?

In September of 2025, city staff recommended a 9% increase to water rates and a 15% increase to sewer rates to cover increased operational costs. Fees for environmental services such as recycling will increase by $1 for residents and 5% for businesses. Storm water rates are also set to increase by 20% which became effective January 1, 2026. 

Why the Increase?  Brett Petersen (budget strategic planning manager) explained that the North Texas Municipal Water District’s capital needs and regional debt service are driving a portion of the increases. Staff cited proposed FY26 utility adjustments are necessary to support planned expansions at the Panther Creek and Stewart Creek wastewater treatment plants and new transmission costs. He also noted the proposed addition of 7.5 full-time equivalents (FTE) to the utility fund and about $590,000 in new and replacement capital.

Allegation #2: Recently an “INVESTIGATION” was done into the staff leadership of that department.

Allegedly the entire staff within the department was interviewed for the investigation.  Accusations include management not knowing how to run the department, being a bully, and possibly being racist towards staff and customers.  Allegedly the department has very high turnover because the manager drives employees away.  There is also a preference for only hiring black employees over hiring the most qualified candidate.  Other allegations include when customers asked for a payment plan or were at risk of being cut off, she would overturn judgements for black customers only.  Finally, there is a lack of experience, items not being recorded or accounted for, and no training for employees.

The Result: Allegedly after the investigation was closed the Billing Supervisor and Assistant Revenue Manager were fired.  At that time, Angela Dowd or Dowell from Human Resources, who has no experience, was transferred over to the Utility Department to be the Assistant Manager in Revenue Collections even though she had zero experience or qualifications.  Why? Allegedly it was to protect her from being fired in HR.

Same Story, Different Department

The highest salary for a city employee in 2025 was $469,030.  The average salary for city employees in 2025 was $72,002, which is 4% lower than the USA average but 28% higher than the Texas state average.  The median salary for city employees in 2025 was $66,551, which is 28.2% higher than the Texas state median.

That means the salary range for city employees typically falls between $20,481 and $113,856.  The top 10% of highest-earning employees have salaries ranging from $143,765 to $469,030. Those are some good salaries, and most employees don’t leave a high paying job without reason.  In this economy, it is not easy to find jobs with some of those salary ranges. 

We have reported issues in several departments across the city in the last few years including the Fire Department, Human Resources, Public Works and now Utilities.  Why do similar accusations keep coming up repeatedly just in different departments?  If you have a problem with one person, chances are it’s them (not you).  If you have a problem with several people, all the time then you need to stop and look in the mirror because the problem is most likely you! 

The City of Frisco has the same problems (just a little different in nature) in each department.  Problems from bad leadership, preferential treatment, retaliation, intimidation, racism, and sexual affairs.  How many investigations has this city done in the last 5 years into city departments.  It seems to me quite a few and that can only mean there is a lack of leadership and management across the city.   All of this, and it does not even include the alleged issue into the Meter Change Out Program.  Where will it end? We will report back whatever we learn from the recently filed PIRs. However, we expect the city will try to delay and send the request to the Attorney General just like they did with the Employee Health Clinic. Transparency at its best!

Get Out & Vote

We are about to elect a New Mayor, and two new city council members.  This is important because we need really people in this city who will hire a city manager who can take care of these issues and create a work environment our employees deserve.  Pay attention to these candidates running for office and do your research!  It is vital to our city employees and residents that change happens. 

Disclaimer: This blog includes satire, parody, and comic relief.  It contains summarized accounts created solely for humor and commentary.  Any resemblance to real events is either coincidental or intentionally satirical.  Reader discretion — and a sense of humor — are advised.

Copy of Frisco PIR’s Filed April 4, 2026

Pursuant to the Texas Public Information Act, I am requesting access to and/or copies of the following records related to the Utility Billing Department and Revenue Collections Division:
Internal Investigations
Any and all records, reports, findings, summaries, or communications related to investigations conducted within the Utility Billing / Revenue Collections Division within the past 3 years.
This includes complaints, interview notes, conclusions, and any disciplinary recommendations or actions taken.
Personnel Actions
Records reflecting terminations, resignations, retirements, or reassignments of employees within the Utility Billing / Revenue Collections Division during the past 3 years, including but not limited to supervisors and management-level staff.
Documents explaining the reasons for such personnel actions, where available.
Organizational Structure & Hiring
Current and past organizational charts for the Utility Billing / Revenue Collections Division.
Job descriptions, qualifications, and hiring criteria for management positions within the division.
Records related to recent hiring decisions for supervisory or management roles (last 5 years).
Customer Account Policies & Enforcement
Policies and procedures governing utility disconnections, payment plans, and account adjustments.
Any internal audits, reviews, or reports evaluating how these policies are applied.
Aggregate data (no personal identifiers needed) showing approval/denial rates for payment plans or disconnection decisions over the past 3 years.
Employee Complaints / Workplace Environment
Records of formal employee complaints, grievances, or HR reports related to workplace conduct, management practices, or department leadership within the Utility Billing / Revenue Collections Division.
Any employee climate surveys or internal assessments conducted in the past 3 years.
Communications
Emails or internal communications among department leadership, HR, and executive staff referencing:
Department performance
Employee concerns
Investigations or complaints
(Limit to the past 3 years to reduce scope if needed.)

Why Frisco Always Smells Like Roses in the Dallas Morning News

Alright, grab your popcorn —this one has all the makings of a classic Frisco Chronicles feature: money, media, and that familiar scent of roses wafting through the pages of the Dallas Morning News.

All Good in the Frisco Hood: Brought to You by… Medium Giant?

By now, longtime Frisco residents have noticed a curious phenomenon. Whenever the Dallas Morning News (DMN) writes about Frisco, the city sparkles. Streets are shinier. Leadership is visionary. Problems? What problems? If Frisco had potholes, DMN would probably call them “community engagement craters designed to slow traffic and save lives.”

Which raises the obvious question: why does Frisco always smell like roses in the DMN? Not weeds. Not smoke. Roses.

For years, residents have speculated. Maybe DMN is afraid of being cut off from exclusives. Maybe access journalism is alive and well. Or maybe—just maybe—it’s about the oldest motivator in local government and media alike:  Money.

Enter Stage Left: Medium Giant

Here’s where things get interesting. A sharp-eyed reader recently connected a few dots that deserve a closer look. The Frisco Economic Development Corporation (FEDC) has entered into several contracts over the years with a company called Medium Giant.

Whose Medium Giant, you ask?

They’re an “integrated creative marketing agency.” Which is marketing-speak for we make things look good. Even better? Medium Giant just happens to be the sister company of the Dallas Morning News.

Cue the dramatic music. So now the question isn’t why DMN never seems to publish critical reporting on Frisco or its leadership. The question becomes: would they dare?

Follow the Money (Because It Always Tells a Story)

When we reviewed city check registers, we noticed multiple payments over the years made to Medium Giant. Not chump change. Not lunch money.  Not “oops, forgot to expense that Uber.”

The total?  $2,105,631.76

That’s over two million dollars paid by Frisco entities to a company tied directly to the same organization responsible for shaping Frisco’s public narrative in one of North Texas’ largest newspapers.

Now, we’re not saying this proves corruption. We’re not saying there’s a secret smoky backroom with editors and city staff clinking champagne glasses.  We’re not even saying there’s an explicit quid pro quo.

What we are saying is this: If you were the DMN, would you risk torching a relationship connected—directly or indirectly—to a $2 million revenue stream by publishing hard-hitting, unvarnished reporting about Frisco’s leadership, finances, or controversies?

Hit Pieces for Some, Rose Petals for Others

What makes this dynamic even more eyebrow-raising is DMN’s recent track record. The paper has shown it’s perfectly willing to publish aggressive, sometimes glowing-less-than-rose-scented coverage of candidates who fall outside the Frisco inner circle.

Just ask: Jennifer White, Mark Piland, John Redmond

Funny how the gloves come off for political outsiders, but stay neatly folded when it comes to City Hall, current council members, and current city leadership.

Journalism, Marketing, or a Blurred Line?

Let’s be clear: Medium Giant being a marketing firm isn’t inherently wrong. Cities hire marketing agencies all the time. But when the marketing arm and the newsroom live under the same corporate roof, the public has every right to question whether the coverage they’re reading is journalism… or brand management.

Because from where residents sit, the pattern looks less like watchdog reporting and more like: “Frisco: Presented by Medium Giant, distributed by DMN.”

Final Thought

Transparency isn’t just about open records and posted agendas. It’s also about who controls the narrative—and who’s being paid behind the scenes while that narrative is shaped.

Two million dollars isn’t small change. It’s not accidental.  And it certainly isn’t irrelevant.

So the next time you read a glowing DMN article telling you everything in Frisco is just peachy, ask yourself: Is this news… or is this advertising with better grammar?

Disclaimer: This blog includes satire, parody, and comic relief.  It contains summarized accounts created solely for humor and commentary.  Any resemblance to real events is either coincidental or intentionally satirical.  Reader discretion — and a sense of humor — are advised.

Who Hit ‘Send’? Meadow Hill Estates Residents Ask How Their Emails Became Campaign Ammo

Frisco Chronicles has received multiple complaints from residents of Meadow Hill Estates after an email landed in what appears to be every single email inbox in the community. The message, sent from a Gmail account — StopMillerAutomotive@gmail.com — urged residents to vote in the Frisco Special Election for Ann Anderson.

The writer of the email openly states “I spoke to this candidate about our issue” which is problematic since he never gave the other candidate a chance to share their view on the community’s issue. Based on one conversation with only one candidate you then send an email to your entire community telling them how to VOTE? Did the writer of this email do any research into other projects where citizens objected to something nearby their home and if Ann Anderson supported it.

For example, Universal Kids! Ann Anderson spoke on 2/7/2023 in FAVOR of Universal Studios. She ignored the numerous residents who lived in Cobb Hill and throughout Frisco, that came out and said they did not want a theme park that close to their community because of the noise, traffic and potential crime it could bring. Ask residents today if it has affected their home values in that community and how many Airbnb’s now exist there. She said at the forum the other day we need to be mindful of where we place projects near communities and used the hospital power plant as an example, yet she was in Favor of Universal Kids which is going to have roller coasters looking into people’s backyard! Her words and actions – DON’T MATCH!

That raised an obvious question residents can’t shake: How does a random Gmail account suddenly have the private email addresses of an entire neighborhood?

Not a Guessing Game — It’s a Privacy Issue

Residents aren’t speculating for sport. They’re concerned because there are only a few realistic ways someone could obtain a complete HOA email list:

  • Through HOA records
  • Through property management systems
  • Through board-level access to resident data

Those email addresses are not public information. They are collected for official HOA business, not political campaigning.

From the complaints we received, many residents believe the sender may be a current HOA board member or someone with inside access to HOA records.

The Meadow Hills Estates Facebook Page Raises More Questions

Adding fuel to the fire, residents pointed us to the Meadow Hill Estates Facebook page, which states it is “run by volunteers.” That page has posted about Miller Automotive on December 10, 2025 and several other times throughout the past year.

The overlap between the campaign email content and the Facebook posts has residents asking whether the same individual — or group — is behind both. And if so, how much access do they really have?

HOA Data Is Not Personal Property

Here’s the part that matters most. If a board member obtained residents’ email addresses solely because of their position, those addresses are HOA property, not personal contacts. Using them for anything outside official HOA business — especially electioneering — is widely considered improper and, in many cases, explicitly prohibited.

HOA board members have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the association — not personal political agendas.  Using confidential resident data to influence a city election crosses a line that residents say should never be blurry.

Texas Attorney General Complaint Incoming

According to one Meadow Hill Estates resident, a formal complaint is being filed with the Texas Attorney General regarding the use of private HOA data for political purposes. That makes this more than neighborhood drama — it’s a legal and ethical issue.

We Reached Out to 4Sight Property Management

Frisco Chronicles contacted 4Sight Property Management, which oversees Meadow Hill Estates, asking the following: Did your company approve or authorize this email?  Do you have rules or policies governing how HOA board members may use resident contact information?  What safeguards exist to prevent misuse of confidential HOA data?  We are currently awaiting their response and will update readers when one is received.

The Bigger Question

This isn’t about whether someone supports Ann Anderson or opposes Miller Automotive.  It’s about trust.  Residents trusted their HOA to safeguard their personal information — not turn it into a campaign mailing list.  We hope Ann Anderson herself did not know about this email because if she did that it could be problematic also. 

Until someone explains who hit “send” and how they had the power to do it, Meadow Hill Estates residents are left wondering whether their HOA is protecting them… or politicking with their privacy.

Stay tuned. Frisco Chronicles will follow this story wherever it leads.

Disclaimer: This blog includes satire, parody, and comic relief.  It contains summarized accounts created solely for humor and commentary.  Any resemblance to real events is either coincidental or intentionally satirical.  Reader discretion — and a sense of humor — are advised.

Frisco HR Shake-Up: Leadership, Loyalty, and the Limits of Free Speech

Oh, Frisco… where the City’s HR Department isn’t about human resources so much as it is about covering resources.

This week City Manager Wes Pierson dropped a long-winded HR love letter into inboxes, trying to explain away the latest drama inside the City of Frisco’s Human Resources Department. Think of it as a Hallmark card written by a bureaucrat: “We value you, we support you, ignore the gossip, let’s hold hands.” Sweet, right? Except the subtext was basically: “Don’t read FriscoChronicles, don’t ask questions, and for the love of God, don’t expect HR to actually help you.”  The letter, which was supposed to be a healing session really just raised troubling questions about leadership, transparency and employee silence being threatened.

Let’s unpack this.

The Email: A Leadership Reset—or a Power Grab?

Some might say the HR Department turned into an episode of Real Housewives of Frisco over the last year.  According to Pierson, HR was dealing with “internal issues” that boiled over into fractured leadership between former HR Director Lauren “Sassy” Safranek and Assistant Director Jacinta Shanks. A complaint about Shanks allegedly creating a racially hostile work environment brought everything to a head. Pierson claims the complaint didn’t hold up under investigation but it still “highlighted unprofessional boundaries.”  Are we surprised by the investigation outcome, No.  Most investigations that occur within the city “don’t hold up.” 

The official email spin?

  • Both Safranek and Shanks are now gone.  Translation: Both Safranek and Shanks were escorted off the stage. Cue the applause track.
  • Employees are told the shake-up is for the greater good.  Translation: “She didn’t technically break the law, but she definitely acted like she was auditioning for Mean Girls 3.”
  • And in comes Kathy Shields as Interim HR Director—someone Pierson calls “an experienced HR leader” who will “steady the ship.”

But here’s the kicker: Kathy Shields isn’t some neutral, outside expert parachuted in, to clean house. She’s a longtime friend and ally of Safranek. And she’s not new to controversy, either.

Kathy Shields: The Investigator Who Finds Nothing

Before this promotion, Shields led the investigation into Public Works—a department that’s had multiple accusations reported through the city’s own HR hotline. Those complaints ranged from hostile workplace issues to favoritism and management misconduct. And yet, somehow, Shields found nothing wrong.  Bullying? Nothing wrong. Retaliation? Nothing wrong. Management misconduct? Guess what—nothing wrong! A spotless record in a department where employees have been whispering for years.  In our opinion, she could walk into a five-alarm fire with bodies on the floor and conclude it was just “a warm team-building exercise.”

Now we’re supposed to believe this same person who will restore credibility to HR? Forgive us if we’re skeptical. When the investigator is friends with the very people under scrutiny, it doesn’t look like oversight, it looks like protection.

The Email’s Tone: Encouragement or Inappropriate Threat?

Pierson’s email was drenched in positivity but tucked between the lines was the pep talk that reek of PR Control tries to wrap everything in positivity.

“I encourage us all to use our time and energy to support one another, serve our community, and continue to build an organization we can all be proud of.”

Nice words. But then comes the subtle jab:

“While outside voices may seek to focus on rumor or sensationalism, what matters most is the meaningful work we do together every day.”

Translation? “Stop reading FriscoChronicles. Those bloggers are the real villains here!”  Ignore what you might read on the blog.  Don’t listen to the outside noise. Trust us instead.

Except here’s the problem: When employees feel unheard, disrespected, or retaliated against, where else can they go besides outside voices?  When the very department tasked with protecting employees—HR—has been accused of circling the wagons to protect leadership, how can staff trust the system?  Trying to frame outside commentary as “rumor” or “sensationalism” feels less like reassurance and more like a warning shot.  

Let’s talk about the city’s “Core Values” referenced by City Manager Wes Pierson.  One is integrity, which is honesty, trustworthiness, ethical behavior and always doing the right thing on the city website.  Integrity is the foundation of all other core values. 

Another one is “Our Employees” who we support, develop, and reward the contributions, diversity and talents of all employees.  Really?  Does this email sound like you support and develop your employees? 

And when a city official suggests that sharing information with others violates “our core values,” it starts sounding a lot like an overreach into free speech rights. Employees don’t surrender their First Amendment protections when they clock in at City Hall. 

The Real Question: Who Holds HR Accountable?

Let’s be clear: HR is supposed to be the place where employees feel safe, heard, and protected. Instead, in Frisco it’s more like:

  • HR Hotline = Suggestion Box at a mafia club
  • Investigations = “Magic Eraser” for management screw-ups
  • Leadership changes = Musical chairs with the same old players

If your boss harasses you, retaliates against you, or ignores you, don’t worry—HR will investigate, declare “nothing to see here,” and send you back to work with a smiley face sticker.  If HR investigations are compromised by friendships, if complaints are routinely dismissed, and if leadership emails frame whistleblowers and bloggers as troublemakers, then what’s left?

HR is supposed to be the department that listens to employees, investigates fairly, and upholds ethical standards. In the City of Frisco, it looks more like a PR machine for management—a department where loyalty matters more than integrity.

So, what do employees do when the “system” is dirty? When internal complaints vanish into thin air, when investigations return with “nothing to see here,” and when leadership paints critics as nuisances?

They speak out. They share their stories. They find outside platforms—like this one—because silence only protects those in power.

Final Thought

Frisco’s HR Department doesn’t need a “new leader.” It needs an exorcism.

Until then, employees will keep doing what they’ve been forced to do: whisper, leak, and share their stories elsewhere. Because when the system is this dirty, outside voices aren’t a nuisance; they’re a lifeline.

Wes Pierson’s email may have been intended as reassurance, but instead it raises more questions than answers. With Kathy Shields at the helm, and the HR department’s credibility already on life support, employees are right to wonder: Is anyone in Frisco HR truly on their side?

So yes, Wes, people are going to talk. And if that “disappoints” you?  Good. Maybe disappointment is exactly what City Hall needs.  Until we see transparency and accountability, this isn’t an HR “reset.” It’s just business as usual with a new nameplate on the door.

Disclaimer: This blog includes satire, parody, and comic relief.  It contains summarized accounts created solely for humor and commentary.  Any resemblance to real events is either coincidental or intentionally satirical.  Reader discretion — and a sense of humor — are advised.