Day 6: Breaking The Law

You are probably wondering why we are dropping tidbits each day.  Well, that is because each of these items is leading up to our big reveal timeline of corruption.  We need you to first understand the different incidents, so it all makes sense when we tie it together with a pretty bow.

Speaking of incidents, remember in Jeromy Porters exit interview notes which Wes Pierson took down he had number 3:  Drinking (only while traveling).  Well, he is referring to Lee Glover and his desire for the bottle which is a hidden secret that is not so hidden.   Now, we had already heard of several Glover “incidents’ from whistleblowers before ever seeing Porters exit interview notes.  His notes only added to the confirmation of what we had previously received and been told.

In fact, before we ever knew of Porters exit interview, we had already filed a PIR (Public Information Request) in Oct 2023.  It reads “Lee Glover – Complaint regarding behavior being drunk on 2022 Wisconsin Trip.  Copy of all emails between city management officials and firefighter officials.  Copy of all emails regarding this incident that were sent to or from Henry Hill.  Copy of formal complaint made to HR and the city.  Copy of complaint or HR documents related to the complaint.”   Imagine our surprise when we received a response back on 11/2/23 there were NO RESPONSIVE RECORDS.   Do you believe the city, because we didn’t!

We have been playing PIR GATE with the city for a while now, so we knew the reply they provided was a clear LIE.  The city was NOT COMPLYING WITH STATE LAW TO RELEASE PIR’S SO WE REFILED IT ON 11/6/23.   We started by restating the previous PIR and the response NO RESPONSIVE RECORDS and it said, “The City of Frisco has reviewed its files and has determined there are no documents or emails responsive to Lee Glover regarding the behavior of being drunk on the 2022 Wisconsin Trip.”  

Then we laid it out again in the new request and we wrote “To be clear and upfront we have a copy of a city email along with a video of the incident that the city claims to have no responsive records too. So, we wanted to clarify our request to make sure the city understands what we are asking for just in case. Copy of any email, document, or text message that included Henry Hill in regard to a complaint made by a firefighter regarding Lee Glover’s behavior at an event where he appears to be intoxicated in or out of the state of Texas.  Copy of an email, incident report, complaint, or any other HR issue regarding or involving Lee Glover made by Jake Owen with then Fire Chief Mark Piland or any of his staff in 2022 or 2023.  Copy of any email sent by the Fire Department staff/management that includes Henry Hill, the city manager’s office staff, and/or hr. staff regarding a complaint by Jake Owen that involves or includes Lee Glover in 2022 or 2023.  We also learned of another FF leaving so we wanted to see a copy of any interview notes, documents, or emails in regard to or relating to the exit interview by Jeromy Porter and city manager Wes Pierson in 2023 or HR Department Staff.”

On 11/20/23 sitting here I yell out “What in tarnation” and my wife comes in the room saying what, what.  For those who don’t know What in Tarnation is like your version of WTF or WTH.  I said look and pointed to the screen, and she read out loud,  “The City of Frisco has reviewed its files and has located records responsive to your request.”  WHAT? IT IS A MIRACLE, A MIRACLE I TELL YOU!

First Response: No Responsive  Records!  Then only after we told you we already have the proof in a form of an email and a clip of a video that has a drunk Glover in it do we get this WAIT, WE FOUND THE RECORDS!  Both requests had the same key words: Lee Glover, Wisconsin Trip, Complaint, and Henry Hill.  Wow so we are to believe they  just found these records the SECOND TIME AROUND. 

You may wonder why is this PIR important and that is because is shows Lee Glover who at the time is the Assistant Chief talking about how he is going to be the new Chief when Piland leaves? However no one knew Piland was leaving, including Piland! So how did Glover know in June 2022 that Piland would be leaving in August 2022? How did Glover know he would become Interim Chief? What collusion was he a part of to be able to know that information?

No! No! No!  We caught the city lying and breaking the open records law by not complying with the first request.  The Texas Attorney should launch an investigation because we know they have had withheld other PIRs as well.  In fact, currently we have a PIR in about a street flood and they have sent it to the Attorney General for review.  Why, what is so secretive about a street flood?  

We also filed for a copy of any complaint filed against Glover since 1991 when he started with the department, and they sent us back the same one.  Do they want us to believe only one complaint has been filed against him?  I can tell you we have evidence of others so why didn’t they turn it over when we asked for a copy based on his whole career span?  WHAT IS THE CITY HIDING?

On the other hand, the city council on the same night can vote after an executive session to release a portion of a report to hurt a political candidate running against Mayor Jeff Cheney and they won’t fight that request by sending it to the AG.  Keep in mind 4 of the 5 council members who voted for its release had already publicly endorsed the current Mayor when they held that vote.  You want to tell me that was not a political hit job just like they had done to other previous candidates who ran against the inner circle.

It is clear the city of Frisco is walking a thin line…but it is clear to us the city clearly broke the law by not providing the documents.  If they want to hide it they either charge an obscene amount of money like $100, they stall by sending it to the AG, or they  just flat out lie they don’t have the records.  Either way we proved the city is hiding public records.

Day 5: Christmas Gift

We had hoped to publish our timeline but after The Exit Interview and Case 64 we were surprised to receive several emails from insiders wanting to tell us about their situations and offering us more Christmas gifts. So while you sip some egg nog with your family and watch a great holiday movie we are unwrapping some holiday gifts sent to us. After we cross our T and dot our I’s it is our hope we will be back tomorrow to start rolling out our 12 Days of Christmas Special.

Day 4: Mayday Report

The Mayday Report has been a hot topic of conversation for the last year. In fact the Mayor and his council friends used it during the election to smear the reputation of Mark Piland, his opponent. We wondered, what is in the Mayday Report? We requested it several times through PIR’s and the city dragged its feet to respond each time.

We also were curious, how much did the city spend to do this “Investigation?” Remember, this is our tax-payer dollars at work! Well, the answer is $83,196.79! That is the number from the PIR we filed however we are guessing there could be more charges that we have not been told about.

So what did $83,196.79 get us? Well, you can read it for yourself as we are publishing it here. You can find the invoice for the investigation as well as the Full Mayday Report. In fact the first 23 pages are the most important, the rest is just appendix attachments. It’s amazing how many times they say insufficient/no evidence to each of the issues. It is a good thing that it is not a drinking game or we could miss Christmas.

Day 3: Case 64 & HR Malfeasance

What do you think of when you hear the word Human Resources?  Are you one of those who thinks HR is your friend, and they are there to help you manage workplace misconduct and other issues?  Maybe you fall on the other end of the spectrum and think HR is the hidden devil in the workplace and they are there to protect the company…not you.  If you have ever seen the movie Up in The Air then you know Ryan Bingham, played by George Clooney, lives a life of constant travel and is a corporate downsizer.    What is that?  His job is to look at employees face-to-face and fire them delicately.   In one scene he says “Natalie, what is it you think we do here?”  Natalie replies, “We prepare the newly unemployed for the emotional and physical hurdles of job hunting while minimizing legal blow-back.”  Ryan looks at her and says, “That’s what we’re selling.  It’s not what we are doing.  We are here to make limbo tolerable, to ferry wounded souls across the river of dread until the point where hope is dimly visible.  And then stop the boat, shove them in the water, and make them swim.”    Does any of their conversation sound like they are there for the employees, of course not!

After talking with several whistleblowers and reading the exit interview notes we filed a few PIRs, one specifically asked for information on the Job Descriptions and any complaints made regarding them being changed without approval.  Interestingly we got back a document titled Case 64 – Hotline Web and it was titled “Falsification of Contracts Reports or Records.”   We immediately knew Porter was on to something in his comments to Wes Pierson in the exit interview. 

What was Case 64 about to unveil?  Well, in the snapshot it says the call come in on 5/29/2023.   The report goes on to identify the caller as an employee, who chose to remain anonymous.  Under a section called “Case Information” it lists several questions the caller had to answer.

Question One:  Please identify the person(s) engaged in this behavior:  The caller identified HR Director,  Lauren Safranek,  HR Department, Lori Rutland, and Assistant Fire Chief, Lee Glover. 

Question Two: Do you suspect or know that  a supervisor or management is involved?  The caller identified Deputy City Manager, Henry Hill.

Question Three: What is the general nature of this matter?  The caller said HR Director, Lauren Safranek and Assistant Chief, Lee Glover have repeatedly altered documents to protect their personal job performance measurements and personal initiatives.  Example of this include forcing employees to secretly alter job descriptions without notifying employees, deceptively altering policies without staff involvement, requiring employees to falsify signatures, taking actions to deliberately undermine employee grievance / complaint processes, and making slanderous statements of other Supervisors to facilitate personal gain.

Question Four: What do you estimate the monetary value of this matter to be?  The caller said anywhere from $250,000 to $499,999 USD.

Question Five: Where did this incident or violation occur?  The caller said FD Job Descriptions, FD Reports, Workers Compensation Policies, Termination Letters, Investigation involvement with a conflict of interest.

Question Six: Please provide the specific or approximate time this incident occurred?  The caller said 2020 to 2023.

Question Seven: How did you become aware of this violation?  The caller states they accidentally found a document or file.

Question Eight:  Please identify any persons who have attempted to conceal this problem and the steps they took to conceal it.   The caller states City Manager, Wes Pierson, Deputy City Manager, Henry Hill, HR Director Lauren Safranek, Assistant or Fire Chief Lee Glover, and HR Lori Rutland worked together to hide their various actions.  It asked for details to which the caller said multiple staff and previous employees have been impacted by these actions and are aware they took place.

If you are anything like us our jaws dropped wide open, we could not believe what we were reading.  We had to read it a few times and each time we asked why would an employee take a risk to make these accusations with the possibility they could be identified.  This gave a new light to the Porter’s exit interview.

Then we noticed the report section titled “Assignments & Access” and it listed the case assignee(s) as none.  Then it reads restricted access and lists Henry Hill.  Then it has the case access list which names Hector Quiroga and Jacinta Shanks.  It made us wonder what restricted access means.  Was Henry Hill the only person with access or the only person restricted so he had no access to the complaint?  If restricted access means no access, then why are Lauren Safranek, Lori Rutland, and Lee Glover also listed as well as they are named in the complaint?  

There were no case notes, no synopsis, and no outcomes listed.  Do you think they even investigated the claims made by the caller?  Do you think this should have been reviewed by an independent third party since it involved city management?  Remember in our blog about the ethics complaints the city attorney could not investigate as they are paid for by the city, to protect the city.  Most of those in upper management have been there awhile and are probably too friendly with each other to be objective. The reality is these are very serious accusations and if true could leave the city open to potential lawsuits and if it happened the city should be firing several people from the top down. 

We were determined to go through all the items now in our PIRs and start putting together a timeline from 2020 to 2023 to see what we could uncover.  In our next blog we plan to lay out the timeline and our theory supported by evidence of what we believe happened.  Our guess, you will be shocked!