True Confessions of Mayor Cheney

With all the drama surrounding the city and the Frisco Fire Department, it makes you wonder what is Cheney thinking?  Cheney constantly touts we are the “Safest City” and he holds the Police Department in high esteem, which he has mentioned many times.  However, he has not said much about our Fire Department in quite a long time.  Looking back at Cheney’s words in 2017 we must ask how is this all sitting with him today?  He has been silent on defending our fire fighter first responders and that is not sitting well with me

Where There Is Smoke … Part 1

There is FIRE … Part 2

There is FIRE!! (PT 2)

Growing up if we saw a fire engine go by my dad would say there goes the fire brigade to save another soul.  I remember watching a movie and they said to the new recruits “train as if your life depends on it, because it does.”  I thought to myself could I be selfless, courageous, and risk everything?  When the bell rings, could I walk through the valley of the shadow of death as Psalms 23:4 says without thinking twice?  Truthfully, no I would be one of those to run away as they pass by me to run into what could be the last call of their life.   

We ended our last blog with Cheney’s statement, “we have what we need.”  If we have what we need then can the Mayor explain why Mr. Sapp who is the President of the Frisco Fighters Association had to speak at citizens input during a council meeting in January 2023 to bring attention of the staffing issue in the fire department. 

Sapp’s statement in full from the council meeting is as follows “Mayor and Council, I’m just going to read a statement on behalf of our members. I stand here before you tonight to ask one simple question, this is the third time I’ve asked this question since the public hearing for the FY23 budget in August.  Will we as a city add firefighters to this budget year?  I’ve asked this question to you, the city manager, and the interim Fire Chief and we have yet to get a clear answer from anyone. I know that the interim Fire Chief has stated he has no plans on asking for staffing they feel we are appropriately staffed.  The city manager follows the recommendations of the Fire Chief and we understand that you as a council can’t approve positions that were never asked for.  This is not a question of whether we need additional firefighters, simply look around as our skyline is ever changing.  There are billions of dollars in property we are tasked to protect.  Couple that with the fact that we applied for a safer grant for 15 firefighters this year, which we failed to get.  No one can honestly say we don’t need more firefighters.  For years now we have raised concerns for what is considered safe staffing standards by the NFPA 1710.  I have a recent independent report stating as much.  Some will try to devalue the standards set by the NFPA by claiming others around us do not meet that code or because of it being a nonprofit it doesn’t hold weight.  Make no mistake this city follows countless NFPA’s for the fire service because they are the national standard by which the United States fire administration sets the bar.  Not to mention, we are Frisco, and we provide the best in everything we do. As our City Council, you have created a unique and exceptional environment, we should not only meet the standards but exceed them.  Therefore, it’s unfair to compare ourselves to the staffing models of surrounding cities.  The FY22 budget states that we would be hiring 9 firefighters a year for the next three years.  Although we have a need for increased staffing levels for the current station count, this was said to be in preparation for the future station 10.  The majority of this council approved that budget, and this has now been pushed back to the infrastructure regions and therefore, the staffing plan is on hold.  This year’s budget for FY23 which was unanimously approved contained 19 police officer positions and added zero firefighters.  We understand this was done in anticipation of the safer grant that was applied for, but again, that was denied.  Now there’s no plan for this fiscal year.  We need action now because it takes over a year to hire firefighters longer for them to get in seats if they had to go to paramedic school.  With the progressive growth of this growth of this city this is a huge safety concern.  So, I ask again: are we going to add staffing for firefighters this year or are we going to forgo staffing which will negatively impact on our growth as a department and safety of our city for the next half decade.  Thank you for your time and your consideration.  (Mr. Sapp left the podium)

After the Star Patriot debate the Frisco Fire Fighters Association released a video responding to comments made at the debate by the candidates.  The video starts with a message that states they encourage the release of the full Circa Fire report and noted the city has chosen to release selective information regarding the CIRCA Fire and Mayday event, as well as information on former fire chief Mark Piland.  Sapp pointed out that it is their job to protect their membership (being the fire fighters) and the residents of Frisco.   Sapp then went on to correct several statements made by the mayor:

Mayor Jeff Cheney said we operate with 75 on every shift.  Sapp, President of FFA:  While at times they may see 75 people employed on an individual shift rarely are they over the minimum staffing number of 62.   Regarding staffing, Sapp said the National Fire Protection Association 1710 on staffing is and has been an issue that the FFA raised many times to city management and to the council directly.

Mayor Jeff Cheney said the National Fire Protection Associations Standards (1710) were union supported standards.    Sapp said the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) along with the Underwriters Laboratory (UL) did a study on staffing for firefighting almost 12 years ago and the NFPA is a national benchmark for all things fire related.  The City of Frisco follows many NFPA standards  for things like the self-contained breathing apparatus or for the sprinklers that are inside the building.   

Mayor Jeff Cheney alluded to the idea that sprinklers inside a building can take the place of personnel.  Sapp said that is simply not true.  Sprinklers are designed to allow people time to escape, not to put a fire out.

About workers compensation, Sapp said the city gave employees a worker’s comp plan several years ago and the FFA raised issue with it not being in writing.  Together staff, city management and then Fire Chief and Police Chief put it together and made an ordinance.  Sapp was very firm when he said, “make no mistake the mayor should not be sitting her touting that the Frisco’s effort to make sure WC protection is a valuable asset for all employees.”  He also pointed out the mayor opposed House Bill 2242 in the 87 th legislative session they are also currently opposing House Bill 471 in this session.

Sapp then addressed the April 4, 2023, Council Meeting and the decision to release documents related to a complaint from the CIRCA fire.  He noted this is the first time that they know of where the council voted on a PIR request.  Sapp said he has asked for countless documents in the past which are either released to him or they go to the attorney general for a ruling.  While he applauded their release of the documents, but he noted this was clearly done as a political tactic against Mark Piland.  The reason he says this and believes this is because they did not release all the documents and he pointed out the report consists of over 500 pages.  One of the issues in the report given by the Consultants is the staffing level.  It states our staffing does not meet the national standard and we fall below cities of our same like and density.

The video ended with Sapp saying they will make sure that the misinformation and disinformation does not continue to lead to more normalization of deviance.

The phrase, “where there is smoke, there is fire,” refers to if people are saying or there are signs that something maybe wrong then there is usually a good reason for what they are saying.  Many concerns have been raised about our current council and how things within the city are operating and there is probably a reason to be concerned.  The city manager, city council and mayor should ask themselves these questions when they go to bed at night. Are we letting down those who serve us every day by not staffing according to the national standards?  Are we letting down those who are willing to die for us every day by not supporting a worker’s compensation bill?   

As residents, should we be embarrassed that our firefighters must ask for staff support at a city council meeting?   Should we be mortified that our mayor at the same meeting responding to any citizen who questioned Universal but after Mr. Sapp spoke “crickets.”  Not one member of our council said a word.   The answer is YES to both!   We are about to build a large hotel near the PGA, open a theme park, add another few thousand houses at the Fields development so should we be concerned that we don’t meet the national standards of NFPA 1710?    According to the current council we should not be concerned.  I interpret that as until someone dies we will just look the other way.  How does the #1 city in America accidentally send a letter to the legislature?   Someone should have been fired for that and we should release the report of why and how that happened.  Wait, there probably was not an investigation done and that means there is no report.  Cheney said word for word at the debate “we have 75 on for every shift.”  As Maury would say, the lie detector’s test determined that was a lie!  According to what the FFA published that is clearly false.  Cheney said it is the city manager’s job to hire and make sure we are meeting expectations in our departments so who should we hold responsible, George Purefoy or Wes Peirson?  Lastly, based on the FFA response why did the city not release the entire report and investigation?  Why did 4 council members who openly endorsed the mayor for re-election vote on this item?   That is clearly a conflict of interest due to the endorsement and relationship between some of these council members.  Residents deserve answers to these questions, and they have the right to question those who choose to serve them. 

“Let no man’s ghost return to say his training let him down.”  – A Firefighter

Where There Is Smoke…(PT 1)

Imagine it is your first day of work and you arrive at your new office excited to start the day.  You have no idea in minutes life is going to change forever but then you hear it, it sounds like an explosion, like a bomb.  You open your eyes to see a fireball just passing right beside you.  You look around, realize you are trapped, and you stop and think, “I am going to die here today.”  You remember praying, “God, I don’t believe you brought me here to die like this.”  Then you hear it, the sound of a fire extinguisher and you realize first responders are making their way into the office building.   You can’t breathe but know you have to get help, so you reach out through the smoke when you feel a hand on the other side of the smoke.  It grabs you and pulls you through the smoke to safety.  You quickly “that hand” rescued three people, but you were the only one to survive.  This isn’t a story; it is the reality of Sheila Moody who lived through 9/11 at the Pentagon.  She learned a plane traveling 530 mph carrying 7000 gallons of fuel crashed into her office and she was one of three to survive out of 46 people in her office.

Now imagine you are at work and just like the rest of America you are glued to the TV watching what is unfolding in New York and DC.  The phone rings and you learn as the East Coast Task Force leader for the Federal Urban Search and Rescue System that you are being deployed to the Pentagon.  You pack up and head north for a 3-hour drive to D.C.   This is what happened to Former Frisco Fire Chief Mark Piland.  Now ask yourself, where were you on September 11, 2001?  Can you imagine what those first responders saw that day and the days to come?   Would you have the guts and emotional stability to do that job?  Truthfully I can’t for one moment put myself in the shoes of survivor Sheila Moody or first responders.  Men and woman across the country answer the call every day, and in Frisco all they have asked for was more staff and a workers compensation plan with the maximum coverage to protect them.  At the last debate, Piland asked a simple question, why would we not want them to have that? 

The issue of staffing and workers’ compensation in Frisco goes back many years.  At the Star Patriot debate,  Piland said the city should support current Texas House Bill 471 which relates to the entitlement to and claims for benefits for certain first responders and other employees related to illness and injury.  We thought it was an odd statement because why would the safest city in America, one of the #1 places to live, not have a full coverage workers compensation plan for first responders who answer the call in our city.  Also discussed was the NFPA 1710 Safe Staffing Levels for a fire department.  Piland said as a city we don’t meet the NFPA 1710 requirement which can potentially put our firefighters and residents in a dangerous position.  We are not experts in this field so we had to do a little research to understand the history so we could try to explain it to you.  We don’t have a horse in this race, we are not related to anyone who serves as a first responder in Frisco or anywhere else for that matter. 

Before we can address the debate issues you need to understand some history.  Let’s travel back in time like Marty McFly in our Delorean time machine.  Frisco Firefighters have been fighting for years for a full coverage workers comp plan.   It appears a written letter dated April 20, 2021, from the city to the state legislators opposed HB 2242 regarding workers compensation for first responders.  Mayor Cheney claims the letter was sent by Ben Brezina IN ERROR on May 12 at 11:09 am (even though incorrectly dated earlier) opposing HB 2242 but then a retraction was sent the same day at 11:34 am.  The letter had Mayor Jeff Cheney’s electronic signature, yet he claims he never actually saw the letter before it was sent. 

That means a letter went to a state agency without first being seen and/or reviewed by several people including the mayor himself.  Should we be concerned?  Following the unbelievable, absolutely embarrassing so called error the response from the Frisco Fire Fighters Association (FFA) was a letter to Frisco Residents expressing their disappointment that Mayor Cheney, the city and council, attempted to kill house bill 2242 at the State Legislature which would protect first responders across the state. The letter states he did this with no regard for the thousands of police, firefighters and EMS personnel and the families it would protect.  It went on to say the mayor has chosen to use his position to help elect a candidate (in reference to Angelia Pelham) that had voluntarily refused to submit a political questionnaire to the FFA.  Based on who has endorsed her, and the view expressed toward the FFA  they can only assume if elected she would have the same disregard not only for firefighter issues but all First Responders.  We also found a letter to one of the fire fighters in the city that had exhausted all their protected leave due to a work-related medical issue.  It notified the employees that if their request for accommodation was denied they would have 30-day days to apply for another position in the city or their employment would be terminated.  

Question, why would the city ever oppose or stay neutral on a bill for first responders regarding workers compensation?  How is a letter sent in error regarding a legislative bill with the mayor’s signature and he does not review that beforehand?  Why would we terminate a firefighter for medical leave related to an on-the-job injury/illness, but Ben Brezina can send a letter by ACCIDENT to the State of Texas Legislature and not be fired?   Lastly, why was a letter even written in opposition if they never had any intention of taking a position on the bill?  The whole think stinks of some Shady Shit and we can understand why Piland took a stance and said the city should endorse the current bill before the State of Texas Legislature it at the debate. 

Piland also pointed out that the Frisco Fire Department does not meet the national staffing requirements.  He gave an example of mid/high rise building which would national high rise staffing requirement is  43 firefighters, yet Frisco’s response is 25 fire fighters.  He also pointed based on a 2000 sq ft home the response should be 17 firefighters and he then asked how many homes in Frisco do you think are under that square footage?  Lastly he said most cities have 4-person truck staffing and Frisco only has 3 per truck and typical response times should be 8 min and in some areas of the city we are at 9 minutes.   

Cheney said it is the council’s job to hire the city manager and it is the city manager’s job to hire and make sure we are meeting expectations for our departments.   Is he saying the reason we are not at full staff is the fault of George Purefoy and Wes Pierson then?  He went on to say the city council is aware of what’s going on and that the current interim Chief Glover has done an amazing job.   They are in the process of hiring a new fire department chief, but Glover has already raised morale, regained trust and started changing operations.  He said it was evident that Glover, Purefoy and Pierson have different philosophies than that of Piland which was evident during his tenure as Fire Chief.  Lastly Cheney said the national standards are not specific to any one community.  We have had 6 high rise structure fires and the standard calls for 62 firefighters, and we have 75 on for every shift.   Lastly Cheney firmly stated “We have what we need.” 

In part two we will see, if we have what we need so stay tuned….