Landon Homes is ANTI-FIRST RESPONDERS

We have told you over and over how Frisco is “For Sale” to the highest bidder, and while some scoff at the notion, we hold steadfast that for a price a developer can have whatever they want in Frisco, Texas.  Leading the helm of that “pay for play” practice is Mayor Jeff Cheney, who along the way went from broke (his comment to a local newspaper) to one of the largest Real Estate Moguls in Frisco.  Guess he is not penny-less now!  With the vote of the council members locked in, each bit of Frisco is for sale piece by piece.

Today we were sent an email from a reader who was upset that they received an email from their BUILDER LANDON HOMES telling them to vote no against the firefighters.  They felt it was a violation of their privacy, and because it was political and had nothing to do with new homes or their home it crossed the line.  That’s right, a builder LANDON HOMES used their sales list and client list to email everyone who bought a home from them and tell them to VOTE NO in our local election. 

According to their privacy policy online Landon Homes respects your privacy and is committed to treating information about you responsibly. It clearly states they collect your information to give you superior service and to provide you with convenient access to a wide range of products and services and customer service surveys. No where in the written privacy policy does it say they will use one’s email for political purposes or to basically electioneer in their best interest.

The irony is the same builders ask the Fire Department to come out to their events and do “community engagement” events but they don’t want to support them back.

Why is it okay for builders to dictate how “WE, TAX PAYING RESIDENTS VOTE?” 

While Landon Homes clients probably agreed to get marketing emails from them for things such as new homes or developments, did they agree to become recipients of political messages?  Is that outside the scope of marketing?

How do you feel about a local builder being ANTI-FIREFIGHTER AND FIRST RESPONDERS?  Would you buy a home from them now? 

Do you think it is IRONIC that the same builders ask the Fire Department to come out to their events and do “community engagement” but then they don’t want to support them back? 

It is no secret that John Landon, owner of Landon Homes has been a donor to certain members of the city council over the years:

Jeff Cheney                      Jan 2020            $2500

John Keating                   April 2024          $1500

Safety First Frisco         April 2024          $10,000              

We have no issue with Landon’s donating to the ANTI PAC as that is their right as an individual.  However, they crossed the line went they entered their business into our political election and told home buyers how to vote!  Ask yourself, what other developers have sent out this same message during this election cycle?  How deep does this corruption go with our builders and city council? 

VOTE FOR CHANGE!  It is time for the residents to take back our city and to have a voice! Don’t be fooled by big-money developers with self-personal interests. Go out and support your Firefighters and first responders Saturday.  Send an email to Landon Homes and let them know to stay out of our elections at onlinesales@landonhomes.com

WWE RAW: In Their Own Words

The art of political rhetoric is where promises flow like honey from the lips of our esteemed leaders, only to be swiftly forgotten once the ink dries and the votes are counted on election day.  It is a delightful game of “he said, she said,” politicians masterfully navigate the treacherous waters between sincerity and self-interest, leaving behind a trail of broken vows and conveniently misplaced principles.  We want you to embark on a whimsical journey through the whimsical world of political doublespeak, where words are but mere tools in the grand symphony of deception!

For months now we have heard the political rhetoric about the “Big Bad Unions” coming to town from our city leaders who run the Vote No PAC which is funded by developers of the Fields project.  Keating & Pelham, in their own words, have openly said at forum after forum residents should vote “NO TO UNIONS” and the propositions on the ballot.  

Keating’s political rhetoric via campaign mailers on the other hand has changed and the new approach is to claim he was pro-public safety and that he has been a champion for the police and fire departments.  Was lying to the residents at the forums or is he lying to residents via mailers now?  Now he is trying to change his message at the polls so he has instructed his poll greeters not to hold the “Vote No” signs because he thinks it might be hurting him at the polls.   We think Keating is a typical politician who will spew whatever political rhetoric he wants depending on how the wind blows and that his word is no better than a grain of salt. 

Meanwhile, Matt Sapp, President of the Frisco Firefighters Association, and several Frisco Firemen and women we spoke to told us over and over “Unions are not legal in Texas” and that is by Texas Law called an Association.   If you ask any city leader, they are going to give the big bad union story, but Keating “In His Own Words” admitted that it is regulated by Texas Law and it is an “Association.”  Why are Keating, Pelham, Cheney, Woodard, and Rummel then misleading the people of Frisco with the scary term Union when they know it is an Association?  Well, it better fits their narrative and creates fear in residents which is what they want. 

Pelham has claimed the push for the propositions is because someone wants POWER and CONTROL.  In her own words, she said this is not about the whole fire department, it is about a select few called the Fire Association. 

Well, that “select few” is over 90% of the association made up of 200 or more firefighters according to Matt Sapp.  That leaves us wondering who wants the power and control in question.  At certain times Pelham is about “data” and at other times she is about generalizations which ever best fits the narrative.  Who do you believe?

Why are we sharing this with you?  Voters must realize our elected officials are not being straightforward with us.  That is all we have been trying to show and prove to you since the day we started this journey of Frisco Chronicles.  Voters need to have all the information to be able to make the best decision when they cast a ballot.  Next up more WWE Smackdown of In Their Own Words – Part 2.

WWE RAW: Early Voting Breakdown

To follow the elections up close, we have visited several of the polling stations this week in both Denton and Collin County.  Our goal was to talk to the candidates and those on both sides of the two propositions to get a first-hand response and reaction.  We were surprised to learn that many were being paid to be at the polls and when we asked why we should vote for the candidate many couldn’t answer that.  We also met some who were very friendly, and they spent time talking to us and explaining the reason for their support of a candidate or proposition on the ballot.  Lastly, we talked to some who came across as angry and crass like they had a chip on their shoulder.  We sometimes walked away with the feeling that they were pretending to care about people they’d never seen before, all for the sake of getting their vote. Nothing says “genuine concern” like a forced smile and a rehearsed “have a nice day” as they enter the polling station. Truly, democracy at its finest.

It was eye-opening and all done for the sake of research.  However, just like any good novel or reality TV show, there must be some drama.  First, we wanted to talk to the Vote No group, and upon arrival, the first thing we noticed was that most of them had on Keating candidate shirts. We only saw a few Pelhams holding vote no signs but that was only if there were other Pelham greeters holding Pelham signs with them. We talked to an older man holding a Vote No sign and when we asked why we should vote against the propositions, we were taken aback by his answer.  He told us the firefighters were lying to us by saying they needed more staffing and that this was about money, power, and control.  He went on to say the men in yellow shirts were not even Frisco Firefighters they were “out of towners” and if this passed it would decimate the city.  Honestly, he came across as angry and outright vengeful!  We asked about the recent arson fire, and we were shocked when he said with a flippant attitude well, they probably started it to help themselves at the polls.   It took everything in me to not whip the man upside the head with my walking cane. 

Then we met a woman wearing a “Keating” shirt at another station who repeatedly told us the Firefighters were liars and they should be ashamed of themselves for how they have tarnished the reputation of Frisco and its leaders.  She talked about how great our city leadership was and that if we voted for the propositions on the ballot, it would be our greatest regret.  She said we need to trust our officials to see that they are doing the right thing.  Her disdain for the Firefighters and her arrogant and condescending attitude didn’t help her case at all and it sure didn’t help Keating.

The last man we spoke to at the college came across with the best message.  He was calm and reasonable and gave us his side of the facts.  He had valid reasons or concerns for the propositions, and it felt as if he was truly concerned.  He made no horrible innuendos or nasty remarks about the firefighters and simply said he disagreed with them on this.  We asked which candidate he supported and because he did not have a t-shirt on for Pelham or Keating like the other ones did this week and he said they were told not to hold the Vote No signs while wearing the incumbents’ shirts because they felt it was hurting their campaigns.

Then we talked to the firefighters and surprisingly the statements were the same at each visit.  We asked why we should vote for the propositions and if it was about a power struggle.  Repeatedly we were told no, it was not a power struggle for them it was about safety, transparency, and accountability.  Several said they just wanted to make it to the end of each shift so they could go home to their families.  We heard over and over that they were very happy with their pay and benefits, and this was not about more money.  They talked about the concerns of working off-duty events, with city gear and apparatuses, yet not being covered by city benefits in case they were injured.  They talked about the concerns regarding how dismissive the city management and fire leadership is with the rank.  They talked about staffing levels and how they currently compare to other cities and how as we build out and up, they feel they take more risk. They are truly concerned there is no plan for more staffing in a city that has grown 10-fold in the last 5 to 10 years.  While they expressed concern for recent actions by the city and council, they never once personally attacked anyone calling them names.  They were personable, factual, and non-emotional about it and simply said we hope you vote for public safety. 

What did we learn from the two interactions?  The two groups took very different approaches to the polls.  One group came across as unhinged and the other came across as expressing concern for the safety of residents and themselves. The vote-no group needed more guys like the one at the college who appeared rational because all the others we spoke to were angry and hateful.  We are not the only ones who felt this way because post after post on social media residents talked about their experience at the polls and how they felt about the vote no and council members came across in a negative way.

What became very clear, is that both Keating and Pelham are rebranding the message to the public.  We thought the statement about them being told not to wear the incumbent’s t-shirts while holding a vote no sign was interesting.  If Pelham or Keating think it is the vote no sign a poll greeter is holding while wearing their shirt that is hurting their campaign, they are dead wrong.  It is how the city has violated its own “CORE VALUES” which might be the reason they are shocked come Saturday, May 4th.   Core values, like “Integrity” which reads, “Integrity is honesty, trustworthiness, ethical behavior and always doing the right thing. Integrity matters because we are entrusted with building and maintaining our community. Integrity is the foundation of all other core values.”   Better yet, maybe the core value that is called “Our Employees” states we support, develop, and reward the contribution, diversity, and talents of all employees. 

As for the candidates, most of the poll greeters on the front line had a passion for whomever they were supporting, from ISD candidates to City Council candidates.  It is clear the ISD races are not as contentious as the city council races.  All of the candidates in the ISD races took time to answer questions and greeted folks and thanked them for voting.  Much more civil across the board. 

As for the city council race, two things were quickly apparent when talking to them.  At the city council level, one group continually undercut or made negative references about their opponents while the other simply did not acknowledge the opponent and only talked about why their candidate is or was the best choice.  Secondly, it was clear some were getting paid because they could not give us one reason as to why we should vote for the candidate.  When it came to the ISD races that was very different, as each poll greeter knew their candidate and only talked about how their candidate was the best choice.  Some poll greeters could learn something from them.

The one thing we do know is soon the sign wars will be over and life will go back to boring. Recently one candidate filed a police report regarding their sign being stollen and the next day on the same corner appeared a new blue sign. The chance to drive by a fire station with people waving and wearing colorful shirts will be over! Then what happens, we will see!

In BED with the Developers

The second wave of campaign finance reports came out and if you have been following us now for a while then you know what we are about to tell you! John Keating and The Vote No PAC must be busy in bed DEVELOPERS IN FRISCO.

John “Cheating” Keating who called out his opponent at a recent forum for having the “largest single donation” in campaign history from one person must apologize for his inaccurate words. When Mark Piland ran for Mayor, he had two (2), $10,000 donations from a neighbor in a community where he has lived for years. However, John Keating’s current campaign finance report shows he accepted $20,000 in one BIG OLE PAYMENT from Ronald Feferman who owns Primary Media a digital billboard company who apparently works with the VisitFrisco.com group according to their website. Then Keating took $1500 form John Landon of Landon Homes, $2000 from Trey Sibley of Rudco, LLC (aka Hillwood / Fields).

As for Keatings claim that Piland took the largest single donation in campaign history, that is FALSE. He also has not taken money from people actively under investigation for fraud by the federal government to the tune of 2.5 million or more. He also does not have a history of accepting shady money from people with legal problems but guess what …. John Keating does!

Then we looked at the Safety-First Frisco Vote No PAC campaign finance report, and guess what we found … John Landon of Landon Homes who has active projects in Frisco must be playing Santa Claus because he donated $10,000 to the PAC. Let’s just add that $10k to the other money they took from DEVELOPERS with ACTIVE PROJECTS that we reported about in our blog, Bought and Paid For.

Where, oh where, did the previous monetary contributions on the last campaign finance report come from:

Mario Sinacola & Sons Exc, Inc: $10,000 (they have active contracts with developers & the City of Frisco)

K-N Ventures (aka Fehmi Karahan of Fields Development): $10,000

Columbus Realty Partners (aka, Staubach, Richard Reupke, Robert Shaw & Fields Development): $10,000

Rudco Land, LLC (aka Trey Sibley III or Hillwood Properties – Fields Development): $10,000

Hunt Funding Group (aka Hunt – Fields Development): $10,000

CrossTie Capital (aka Philip Rose – Fields): $10,000        *click the name to read our last blog.

Chief Partners III, LP (aka William Vanderstraaten – Fields): $10,000

It is important to note that any of the names above that are underlined, DON’T LIVE IN FRISCO.  Yes, they have a development here, but they are not Frisco Residents.   

If you live in Frisco, then this should upset you our local elections are being determined by BIG MONEY FROM DEVELOPERS, who don’t even reside in our city. Oprah and her sled missed my front door when hanging our free developer money, did she make it to yours. She was too busy yelling, “You get Cheney’s Friends Developer Money, you get Cheney’s Friends Developer Money and you … well you get nothing!

Stolen Voices: The Political Sign Snatcher

Ah, the scenic drive through Frisco during election season, where the streets are a colorful mosaic of political fervor. Each corner proudly displays a candidate’s political sign, as if competing for the most eye-catching display of democracy in action. You can’t help but marvel at the sheer dedication to plastering every available inch of space with campaign paraphernalia. And just when you think you’ve had your fill, you reach the sanctuary of your neighborhood, only to find it transformed into a battleground of conflicting endorsements.

The other day driving home from H-E-B, my wife and I were commenting on all the signs, and she mentioned how we had received emails from several people about a possible “Political Sign Snatcher” among us.  Then she started humming a tune and I silently thought to myself, what song is that?  Then it hit me, talk about a flash back to the past, it was Ace of Base- The Sign.

I saw the sign and it opened up my eyes I saw the sign
Life is demanding without understanding
I saw the sign and it opened up my eyes I saw the sign

Oh, oh, oh, oh.

I saw the sign and it opened up my mind.
And I am happy now.

When we reached home, I raced to the lazy boy, opened the laptop, and started to read our emails.  I was shocked to learn that a “Political Sign Snatcher” had stolen hundreds of signs that were found in a sewer drain.   We received an anonymous tip that hundreds of “Fire Association Signs’ were found in a local sewer drain.  That’s right, stuffed down deep in a city sewer drain off a neighborhood road.  We reached out to a city insider who told us they received a complaint and the next morning both the Fire Fighters Association and the Police or Streets Department went to the location and guess what?  All the signs were gone! 

Hundreds of signs in a drain now missing and we are guessing the value of those signs is easily over $1000.00 and residents should be concerned about it.

We have so many questions and so should you!  If a resident called in a complaint, and the signs went missing by the next morning, who took them?   How would the political sign snatcher know they need to come back and get the signs out of the sewer before getting caught?   Someone would have had to tip them off that someone had filed a complaint which could lead to them getting caught.  Who has access to the complaint made by the citizen?  If someone in the city did “WARN” the sign snatcher that could put the city in very hot water. 

We are curious, did any homes nearby have cameras and did the city streets and sewer team notify the police?  If so, is there now an open investigation?

What do you think?  Tell us in the comments!