HR-GONE: The Mysterious Disappearance of Frisco’s Human Resources Trio
It’s been unusually quiet over at City Hall lately. It’s the kind of quiet that screams “Something’s rotten in the records room.” While most departments are humming along in their usual bureaucratic fog, the stench of an investigation is sweeping the building due to some major “Absences.”
A few weeks ago, Lauren “Sassy” Safranek and Jacinta Shanks, top brass in Frisco’s Human Resources Department, vanished like a bowl of queso at a Friday Night tailgate. Gone. Poof. Not a peep. Did they get lost on a ship stuck in troubled seas? Maybe they went ice fishing and fell in the hole? It’s like they just pulled a Houdini!
We reached out to some of our sources inside city hall. When something like this happens, it does not take long for whispers and rumors to begin. One whistleblower told us, “One minute they’re steering the ship, the next day they’re gone like a Margarita on Cinco de Mayo.” Did they quit? Nope. Did they announce a vacation? Were they abducted by an alien spaceship sent by fed-up municipal employees?
I mean, it’s not the craziest theory on the table. What we do know is this: Multiple sources allege they’re on administrative leave—which in government-speak often translates to: “Something’s gone sideways, and we’re pretending we have it under control.”
Rumor Tornado: Allegations Aplenty
Cue the local rumor mill which is working overtime, spinning out allegations faster than a ceiling fan in an August heatwave. Allegations range from forged documents, toxic workplace culture, and racist comments. And while we’d love to dismiss it all as wild conspiracy, here’s the truth: When that much smoke is circling, it usually ain’t from a scented candle. For a city who claims to have pride in their professionalism and diversity, something like this is not just smoke, somewhere there is a fire! Someone call the Fire Department!! (more about that in a sec)
If things weren’t already murky enough, we got word that Shamaria, another key player in HR, is also out. Administrative leave too? Vacation? Witness protection? We hope to tell you soon why people are just vanishing from the organization chart. We are just giving the city the courtesy of a comment request before we move forward. For now, they think no one’s talking. Not the city, not the employees, not even a cryptic passive-aggressive Nextdoor post. However, that is simply not true! They have more cracks and leaks than the Titanic.
At least when you email any of them you get back the “official” statement which is a robotic Out-of-Office reply that reads like it was written by ChatGPT on Ambien. The silence is deafening. No answers. No updates. Not even a cryptic “thoughts and prayers” from City Hall. So, what did we find?
HR Hotline Tellanovella
Case 61: Discrimination or Harassment! It was filed on 4/25/23 and closed one month later on 5/23/23 and the person identified in the behavior was none other than Jacinta Shanks – HR Manager. The report goes on to say that on April 10th while the Director was away, Jacinta pulled her staff into a meeting and yelled and screamed at them for two hours. It reads “she was screaming that they were bad in their roles in HR, was name calling, cussing, screaming, etc.” Not only could she be heard yelling through the department, but she could heard in the hallway too which the reporter said was abusive and unprofessional. The end result? The case was closed and no evidence was found.
Case 62: Listed as “OTHER” was reported on 5/4/23 and closed on 5/23/23. The hotline complaint is about the same “April 10th Issue” listed in Case 61 but this time the complaint is the initial report was closed out and never investigated by the HR Director, Laurn Safranek.
Case 64: Falsification of Contracts, Reports or Records was reported on 5/29/23 and closed out 6/22/23. We reported this in our Twelve Days of Christmas Blog back in 2023. It was Day 3: Case 64 & HR Malfeasance and Day 9: Case 64 Responses. You can just click the Case names, and it will take you directly to those blogs. We know for a fact his true and it is why Lauren Safranek used a fake investigation to go after the Former Fire Chief, to cover up her own fraud. The complaint was closed out due to NO EVIDENCE FOUND!
Meanwhile, Over in the Fire Department…
You’d hope that while HR has hit the skids, all the other departments would be cruising along smoothly, right? Wrong.
Five employees have recently left the Frisco Fire Department. We’re not talking about minor attrition here—we’re talking about experienced professionals pulling the ripcord. Some retired early, which means, “I’m out of here because this will never get better,” while others just walked out of the job.
Why? The unofficial rumor is due to the lack of true Fire Department leadership and lack of support by city management. Tammy’s recent comments “caught on tape” sure didn’t help when they were called 300lb Bullies. They have realized it is not going to get better without change on the Dias and new fresh minds sitting in the seats on the council. Maybe that is why the Frisco Firefighters Association and Frisco Police Officers Association has endorsed Burt Thakur and Jared Elad in the runoff. One thing is clear for sure those that put their life on the line to save our lives and our property are sick of the city’s BS and jumping off the Titanic early while there is still a lifeboat to get them somewhere else.
Damage Control in Public Works?
HR, then the Fire Department? Surely, it’s a fluke – nothing to worry about, right? Wrong. Just a few weeks ago a lady spoke at citizens input about the “issues” in public works and how she was upset that a letter she sent it to recognize someone was never given to them. Well turns out there is a flood in the Public Works Department too and it goes back several years.
Sometime in 2024, Lauren Safranek (HR – now allegedly out on administrative leave) hired an outside HR Consulting Company, called Kathy Shields Consulting, to investigate the “alleged complaints through the HR hotline of an inappropriate relationship.” That’s right, the “ALLEGED” complaints involve Lover Boy, Kevin Grant, his alleged girlfriend, Loosey Goosey Gloria Martinez (who is married to someone else who works in the city).
Sources from deep in city leadership told us NDA’s were required by everyone in Public Works. The affair is alleged to have been happening for several years now, and the consultants couldn’t understand why people were bothered by it. Well, when one who is loosey goosey starts to get promotions and special treatment you can see why it would upset those that work around her.
Piling High HR Allegations in Public Works
Case 55: Time Abuse was reported on 1/3/23 and closed on 1/30/23. The report reads that Office Manager, Gloria Martinez and Kevin Grant, Assistant Director for months would go off during work hours to donate plasma for extra money while still on the clock (meaning they were stealing taxpayer dollars and being paid for it). The confidential reporters said they believed the stolen time was equal to $50,000 dollars. Their report continued with all the CSR’s and other direct reports were aware of the happenings. HR found no evidence and closed the case.
Case 57: Offensive and Inappropriate Communication was reported on 3/17/23 and closed on 5/8/23. This report is about Marvin Redmond, a Supervisor and foul mouth in the office. HR found no evidence and closed the case.
Case 58: Nepotism/Favoritism Inappropriate Workplace Relationship was reported on 3/20/23 and closed on 4/11/23. The report says Kevin Grant, Assistant Director of Public Works and Gloria Martinez, Office Admin, are having an inappropriate relationship and disappear at different times of the day for extended periods. It mentions Kevin has a DUI so he gets Gloria to drive him everywhere. They openly flirt in the office making others uncomfortable and awkward. The Director of Public Works, Gabe appears to do nothing and turns a blind eye. HR found no evidence and closed the case.
Case 59: Violation of Policy was reported on 3/20/23 and closed on 4/12/23. The report states that Gabe Johnson, the Director of Public Works knows that Kevin Grant, Assistant Director of Public Works was convicted of a DUI which is an issue because driving a city vehicle is part of his job to check on employees and job sites. The report notes others have been fired in the past for DUI’s but this time Gabe choses to look the other way. HR found no evidence and closed the case.
Interesting thing here, we did a simple search, and we found a DUI for a Kevin Grant – could it be the same Kevin Grant that works at the City of Frisco driving city vehicles?
Case 84/85/86/87/88: Multiple Reports about Public Works and the HR Cover up also reported to the hotline in 2024/25. The first starts with a 3-page complaint about Gloria Martinez, the Strategic Services Manager in Public Works (new title), related to her behavior and ongoing love affair with her boss. The case was closed when NO EVIDENCE WAS FOUND!
We could keep going, but we don’t want to sound like a broken record. Sources from deep in city leadership told us NDA’s were required by everyone in Public Works during the investigation. The consultants couldn’t understand why people were bothered by it. Our guess, when one who is loosey goosey starts to get promotions and special treatment, you can see why it would upset those who work around her.
What we find interesting is each time they are closed due to no evidence found. One report, I could see its just petty employee behavior but when you have multiple reports in multiple departments and they are always investigated by the same HR folk (who are even named in the complaint) something tells me – there is some rotting shit in Denmark.
Let’s Talk About Leadership — Or Lack Thereof
Enter Wes Pierson, Frisco’s relatively new City Manager. According to the Tammy tapes, she just finished his “yearly review.” Don’t worry, we are filing a PIR for that blow pop sucker!
To hear some folks inside City Hall tell it, Wes didn’t just walk in with a chip on his shoulder—he brought the whole bag of chips on this back. There’s a growing sentiment that his arrogant, top-down leadership style is rubbing people the wrong way, all the way down to those “entry level employees.” Micromanaging? Check. Intimidating culture? Double check. Open-door policy? Not unless you’re bringing praise, apparently.
And here’s the kicker: this isn’t Wes’s first rodeo when it comes to morale problems.
Sources from his previous job in Addison say the same script played out there. Multiple departures. Low morale. Leadership complaints. Sound familiar? Because it should. History doesn’t repeat, but it sure rhymes.
Walking on Eggshells
Maybe it’s time we stopped asking what happened and started asking who’s driving the bus at the city. Insiders describe the current vibe inside City Hall as “walking on eggshells.” But in the absence of information, people fill in the blanks themselves—and right now, that blank is filled with rumors, stress, and enough anxiety to power every Keurig in the building. However our City Council Members want you to believe everything is just dandy – and the truth is the cancer is all over the city including our City Council.
Final Thoughts
To the City of Frisco: This isn’t Mean Girls. We get that HR matters can be sensitive and complex. But people deserve a straight answer—or at the very least, an acknowledgment that something is amiss. And to Mr. Pierson: you were brought in to lead, not reign. Arrogance isn’t management.Intimidation isn’t accountability. And silence isn’t transparency.
The people who make this city run—from dispatchers to developers—deserve better than this circus. We’ve got talent walking out the door, departments on edge, and a leadership team that thinks “no comment” is good enough. Then to top off the Sunday, we have city council members getting caught on tape showing their authentic self in a safe space, acting no better than some of the city “employees” she thumbs her nose up at, who work for our city. Too bad we can’t file an HR Complaint with the hotline about Tammy.
If you read this and don’t think we need a change in our city, you are simply delusional! If you want to try and discredit us because we are anonymous – go ahead. Companies and cities cannot operate this way.
Years of HR HOTLINE COMPLAINTS, which name HR as part of the problem investigated by none other than HR. Simple No Evidence Found! Years of complaints about issues in Public Works, but simply no evidence found! More reports about other departments from PD, Facilities / Maintenance, and Professional Services, simple, no evidence found!
A city’s HR Team doesn’t go POOF IN THE NIGHT, unless there is a serious issue! If you want to believe our Fire Department is a group of bullies, we can’t change your mind. The fact is that a fire department does not lose tenure like our department has in one year unless there is a reason for it. If you want to believe that our Public Works department has no issues after 15+ complaints have been reported for the same thing by different people, then we can’t change your mind. How many cities have to hire this many outside consultants or investigators to look at an issue and still find no evidence? What you should care about is that it is your tax dollars paying for it.
For years, the city has operated with the mentality to protect the ones they like and cut the ones that could or will “uncover the problem”. Hence, our former Fire Chief and several other employees across other city departments. If you want to blame the wrong people and keep denying there is a problem, better yet, that there is a cancer in the city that starts at the top, then you are blind and stupid. The problem starts with our city council leaders and trickles down through the city. I would love for someone to explain to me how one city has so many problems! Don’t believe us, fine! We can’t make you see what you choose to close your eyes to. Just continue to be sheep!
City of Frisco Motto: Keep the cancer, eat the innocent!
We have always said we are here to be the People’s Voice! We recently received this letter and asked the parent if we could share while protecting their identity. They replied, yes! This is one parents view of Frisco ISD.
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 9:51 AM, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Dear Frisco Chronicles Editorial Team,
I read your recent coverage highlighting issues with Frisco ISD leadership, and unfortunately, I’m experiencing these failures firsthand.
I recently inquired about the possibility of keeping my children together at the same high school. One of my sons qualifies under the senior rule, and I simply asked if his sibling could attend the same school for stability. Instead of thoughtful engagement, I received cold, dismissive responses that completely disregarded our family’s situation. This wasn’t a formal request—just a parent trying to understand options for his children’s education, and even that was met with indifference.
On top of this, Texas has quietly introduced changes related to the TSI (Texas Success Initiative) exam that are now restricting students from earning dual credit. These changes were rolled out with no clear communication and directly contradict state guidelines. Instead of supporting college readiness, the law seems more focused on creating unnecessary roadblocks.
Parents like me are left with no answers, no support, and no leadership willing to even have a conversation. Frisco is a growing, diverse community, but the district leadership is operating with outdated attitudes, ignoring minority voices, and disregarding the very families they are supposed to serve.
Thank you for continuing to shed light on these issues. I hope you’ll keep pressing for answers because families like mine have been stonewalled for far too long.
Sincerely, XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX Concerned Frisco Parent and Community Member
Welcome, my friend. You’ve just stumbled into the Rabbit Hole (and the Tea is Piping Hot) of FriscoChronicles.com — where the official story is always just the appetizer, and the main course is a tangled plate of backroom deals, whispered alliances, and the kind of municipal maneuvering that would make Machiavelli sit up and say, “Well played, sir.”
If you’re new here, first things first — bookmark us and read our Welcome & Map To Mayhem exclusive which can be found at the menu bar at the top of the page. You’re going to need a sturdy map and maybe a flask for the journey. Because while Frisco’s skyline has been rising faster than a Texas summer thermometer, so too have the number of eyebrow-raising deals under its shiny veneer.
Let’s hit the rewind button, shall we? If you are new then that means you may have not read some of our earlier blogs which means you missed the Sizzling Jalapenos!
February 2023: Dark Money & The Rise of the Fields Dynasty This was where we put the spotlight (a 5000-watt halogen, to be precise) on how shadowy campaign cash may have allegedly greased the skids for the grand vision of the Fields Dynasty. Fields, a sprawling development project that came wrapped in promises of being a HALO FOR FRISCO, may have also been a HALO for Realtor, Jeff Cheney. Follow the money? We did. And it led straight to the boardrooms where land and power swapped hands faster than poker chips at Choctaw.
April 2023: The Preserve Lots & The Cheney Connection Ah yes, the story that had our inbox lighting up like the Fourth of July. This is where we broke the news on how prized pieces of land — The Preserve Lots — quietly found their way into the hands of connected insiders. And lo and behold, a familiar name popped up: Cheney which was enough to make you raise a glass and mutter, “Well, isn’t that interesting?” We mapped the connections, dotted the lines, and yes — it all comes together like a jigsaw puzzle where half the pieces were hidden under the mayor’s desk.
Other Must-Reads While You’re Here:
May 2023: The Phantom Consultants — because nothing says fiscal responsibility like paying consultants who don’t actually consult.
September 2023: The Traffic Impact Fee Shell Game — where infrastructure money disappeared quicker than grandma’s pecan pie.
December 2023: The Twelve Days of Christmas which Decks the Halls with Conflicts of Interest — a festive romp that could make you sing, “Things that make you go hhhmmm.”
Frisco’s story isn’t just about what’s happening now. It’s about understanding how we got here — and how some of the same players keep reappearing like bad sequels in an ’80s action movie.
So, pull up a chair, start at the beginning, and stay a while. The deeper you dig, the clearer the picture becomes. And don’t worry — we’ll keep the flashlight batteries fresh. The truth will be stranger than fiction, and you will bite your nails as you dig in!
In April of 2021 you would have thought an El Paso dust storm full of tumbleweeds came through Frisco and upset the equilibrium of our city. As we discussed in our earlier blogs Where There Is Smoke PT 1 and There is Fire PT 2, there has been a long standing point of contention between the Frisco Firefighters Association and the city in regards to workers compensation.
In 2021 the city opposed House Bill 2242 brought forward by Jared Patterson, Texas State House Rep for Frisco. In 2023 the FFA and Patterson brought HB 471, and they have been working extremely hard to get it or similar legislation passed in Austin that would protect first responders across Texas. The fight for more protection by the FFA and Jared Paterson has continued into our 2025 Texas Legislative Session.
Even though we knew about the El Paso dust storm, my wife and I were still shocked on May 16, 2023, after tuning into the city council meeting online, like we have done every other Tuesday for years. Mayor Cheney presented a proclamation to Denton County MGMR, for all the work they do each day relating to mental health. Mental Health Awareness Month aims to increase awareness about the vital role mental health plays in our overall health and well-being and provide resources and information to support individuals and communities in need of mental health support.
At that same meeting, during Citizen Input (23:00 minute mark), Frisco Firefighters Association President, Matt Sapp, along with Retired Frisco Fire Chief Mark Piland, and Assistant Fire Chief Cameron Kraemer to address the termination of Kraemer, a 27-year Veteran of the Frisco Fire Department.
What? After 27-years serving our city and its residents without hesitation, Kraemer was terminated BY EMAIL while on medical leave and under medical supervision for PTSD which we go into more detail about in our blog Backdraft which we really encourage you to read.
By the end of the meeting, I wanted to scream like Alanis Morrissette…
Isn’t it ironic? Don’t you think? A little too ironic
Where are we two years later? It is Mental Health Awareness Month again, and the second anniversary of Kraemer’s termination BY EMAIL while on medical leave. The fight is not over, not even close! It’s time to peel back the curtain on a firehouse-sized problem simmering here in Frisco? Buckle up, this one’s got smoke, politics, and no small dose of Texas-sized irony.
Smoke, Stigma & Silenced: Mark Piland
Since then, Retired Fire Chief Mark Piland has had his name wrongfully smeared and his 40-year stellar career in public service wrongfully attacked by City of Frisco leaders for speaking out on behalf of Kraemer and the Frisco Firefighters Association when he attempted to run for Frisco City Council.
The Legislative Lifeline
When your city will not support you, what do you do? The Frisco Firefighters Association has continued the fight and has been in Austin off and on the last several weeks with local State Rep Jared Patterson to fight for more protection for public safety employees in the State of Texas. Just today, HB331 officially headed to the Governor’s desk to be signed into law! The bill marks the final piece of legislation language from last session’s HB471 that our Frisco Firefighters have been advocating for the past three legislative sessions.
A Firefighters Fight: Cameron Kraemer
And Cameron Kraemer, where is he? Kraemer, while still under medical supervision, started the fight of his life against our very own City of Frisco. After a hearing on September 21, 2023, before the Texas Department of Insurance, the DMN reports that the administrative law judge hearing the case ORDERED THE CITY OF FRISCO, which is self-insured, to pay Kraemer benefits and any accrued but unpaid income benefits in a lump sum with interest as provided by law. According to John Riddle, president of the Texas State Association of Fire Fighters, Kraemer’s case is being watched throughout Texas, and it is important to the state’s 18,000 firefighters in 195 communities. Riddle said in the DMN, “For now, Frisco is among the most aggressive cities in fighting its injured employees at City Hall and the Legislature — and because of that, employees like Cameron Kraemer pay a high price.”
The battle continued as Kraemer took his case before the DOJ for them to determine if he was able to sue the city for wrongful termination which we wrote about in our blog Big Time Casino Payout. The DOJ ruled Kraemer could move forward with a lawsuit so in August 2024 Cameron Kraemer filed a lawsuit for wrongful termination against the City of Frisco in Collin County. Based on the research we have done, Kraemer is going to win, and we think he will win big! You can learn more in our December 2024 blog Kraemer vs City of Frisco that we wrote which lays out the details.
Final Thoughts from the Hillside Winery Whistleblower
Ask yourself why. Why is the city spending hundreds of thousands on a private law firm to fight so hard and drag this out for so long, when clearly, they are in the wrong? Why is the city spending tax dollars fighting our public safety employees instead of protecting them and just doing the right thing? What will this cost us, the taxpayers, when he wins? Our guess…. MILLIONS! But that is not all. We are hearing rumors of other lawsuits that have been or will be filed by former employees of the FD against the City of Frisco. We are digging into that now!
They had all the time in the world to prance around asking us to vote to change the use of EDC funds for a Frisco Center For The Arts but they cannot simply make things right with the firefighters. Instead, we have Councilwoman Meinershagen calling them 300lb bullies and complaining that they are fighting for protections that directly affect their life. We have Bicycle Bill Woodard, who wants you to believe the firefighters are lazy (his words during the May 2024 election), and they want to bankrupt the city. You can’t get a paycheck from a bankrupt city, so why would they want to do that? Cheney and Keating want you to believe that our RETIRED Fire Chief was fired after a stellar career with the city and 10 years of perfect performance reviews. Not to mention, in our PIR requests and federal FOIA’s, we found his entire 40-year career was stellar with not one deficient performance review. Lastly, no one is paying attention to the fact that in the last 6 to 8 months, several (rumor is 6 to 8) of our firefighters are saying Hasta La Vista Baby either via retirement or quitting their job. They are going to work for other organizations and cities where they are valued.
Just hope and pray your house does not catch fire because we were already short staffed and now it is getting worse! The city loyalists just turn a blind eye as always, and function as if nothing if wrong. They want you to believe we have nothing to be worried about, but as a taxpayer you can bet, I am worried! Big Time Payouts, the loss of experienced firefighters from our roster puts citizens and businesses in jeopardy.
In the interest of transparency and accountability, we are sharing a cease-and-desist letter we received and our attorney’s formal response. These communications relate to public matters we believe the community deserves to see. Our intention is not to harass, defame, or intimidate, but to clarify misinformation and stand firmly on our constitutional rights. We welcome civil and respectful dialogue.
Disclaimer:
The documents below are shared in the context of a legal dispute and public concern. They are posted for informational purposes and are not intended to threaten, harass, or defame any party. This post constitutes fair comment and republication in connection with a public controversy. Frisco Whistleblower does not accept responsibility for third-party comments and reserves the right to moderate discussion to ensure civility and compliance with platform standards. Any party objecting to the content is encouraged to contact us directly or through counsel.
Gopal Ponangi will be in the runoff against Jared Elad in June. We found Tammy Meinershagen’s comments about Gopal to be very interesting:
1) He failed to balance the ISD budget
2) He failed to communicate to voters “why” they needed the bond aka $1 billion
3) He is responsible for the failures at FISD, and she questions how he can lead the city better.
4) Tammy stated that the citizens don’t have confidence in FISD leadership.
She only left off his absence at most meetings and major votes, which we posted about previously (obtained in a PIR)
We’re curious if Tammy would say she’s responsible for the failure of the residents not understanding Proposition A and B for the Frisco Center For The Arts? Did she fail to communicate well? Does that mean she’s not equipped to help run our city? At the end of the day, that is what she implied about Gopal, right?
It will be interesting in the runoff to see if Tammy aligns herself with Gopal when she thinks he was an absolute failure on Frisco ISD school board? It might be more interesting to see if Gopal has a change of heart and supports Burt Thakur! It would make sense considering Tammy spoke so ill of John Keating and Angelia Pelham, who are huge Gopal supporters.
Oh, where will the yellow brick road take us in June?
Back in the day, Frisco was known as a dormant suburb, north of Dallas, but today Frisco is a community undergoing vast changes and becoming its very own urban Metroplex. Gone are the rural days when everyone knew their neighbors, and a trip to Stonebriar Mall was the excitement for the week. Today, we are at a crossroads of transformation, and the experience of change has been both loved and hated along the way.
The reason my wife and I moved here was because we loved the sense of community, the schools, and the feeling of being safe. The truth is all of that has changed with the massive development that has taken place in the last 10+ years. Yes, we knew Frisco would develop and we looked forward to that at one time. However, that is when you had a city council who engaged and listened to the residents and decisions were made based on what was best for the community.
Frisco has changed, and to be very honest, it is now filled with dirty politics on all sides. Secret deals are happening, and our city council is misleading us to approve projects that are in their best interest, and they are leading with iron fists. Our priorities have shifted, and our sense of community is disappearing every day. Today is election day, and each of us has a chance to vote for change.
We debated on releasing the tape of Tammy Meinershagen when we received it. In the end, we felt voters have the right to know who they are electing. Meinershagen’s statements against the South Asian community are offensive. Calling both South Asian candidates idiots and other names is disgusting and shows a lack of leadership and integrity. She then goes on to talk about how she is not afraid of bullies, even if they are 300lb firefighters or a black woman. Since when are those who protect and serve bullies? Her reference to a black woman being a bully because they disagree on how to do things would be the same as calling her an angry black woman, which I am pretty sure the black community would find an offensive stereotype. Then she references that the Frisco population is only 1% Asian, so she has no base here, and with a laugh, says that means she is white. Frisco’s lack of an Asian population does not make you white, Ms. Meinershagen, but it is clear that you want to be.
Then she goes on about her opponent saying she is “offended and insulted that he would run for city council.” So, she is offended that a citizen who had every right to run, is running? She pointed out at the Chamber Forum and on this tape how her opponent ran for Congress and lost – well Ms. Meinershagen, John Keating ran for higher office as well. In fact, he left his seat early to run and when he lost he came back and took over another seat during a special election so does that make him incompetent to run?
Ms. Meinershagen continues to talk about other local leaders, Scott Johnson, Jared Patterson, and Shona Sowell. Then she talks about residents who are or have taken a chance to run for office, like Mark Piland, Burt Thakur, Jared Elad, and Gopal Ponangi. While many may be upset, we released these tapes. The bigger question is, WHY ARE YOU NOT UPSET ABOUT WHAT TAMMY MEINERSHAGEN SAID?
Today Jamie Heit posted on her FRWC page that we have some shady behavior by certain candidates this cycle including that of a current candidate running for office. Heit ignores all the shady behavior her best friends have done in the past and finds excuses for that but now she sits upon a hill of moral authority accusing this candidate of secretly recording a conversation, questioning her morals and integrity.
Here is the problem with Heit’s statement: how does she know it was secretly recorded? Who told her that? Who told her that the conversation was with this candidate? There are only 3 ways you would have known the who, when, where and if it was secretly recorded:
1) Ms. Heit you were there, and you participated in the conversation and if that is the case why were you not disgusted then with the comments by Meinershagen? We know you were not there so we know this option is not possible.
2) Tammy Meinershagen would have had to tell you who this conversation was with and that she was unaware of it being recorded. If that happened, it means TAMMY IS ADMITTING TO THE CONVERSATION AND WHAT SHE SAID IN IT?
3) The candidate whom you have accused of doing this would have had to tell you they did it. We are pretty sure that did not happen. It would make no sense to be a whistleblower and then yell from a rooftop “It’s me!”
Our guess: Ms. Heit, you know about the conversation because Tammy told you, which means she is admitting to her statements. Secretly recorded or not, nothing illegal was done as Texas is a 1-party state. That means Tammy is admitting to her offensive and objectionable conversation. Someone like that should not be a leader in our city, as her statements clearly show she Tammy has no integrity or ethical morality laying out everyone’s personal business to someone.
Then you have Jake Petrus, otherwise known as the “Town Bully” for the cabal. He posted that this was a private conversation, secretly recorded at xxxx home. The only way Jake would know who the other person was or where it was recorded is if TAMMY TOLD HIM! If he is right, that means he talked to Tammy or someone who had talked to Tammy, to know how and when. THAT PROVES THE CONVERSATION IS LEGIT AND THAT TAMMY IS CONFIRMING HER ROLE AND STATEMENTS.
Either way it doesn’t matter if Tammy knew or didn’t know – what matters is Ms. Heit and Jake Petras would not know “the how, when and with who” without Tammy confirming it. That means she knowingly said nasty, hurtful, demeaning, racist things and spread the personal business of those who had trusted her to others in the community like a game of show and tell. Personally, if I were Johnson, Keating or Pelham, I would be glad to know about this. Clearly it shows they cannot trust Tammy, who they thought was a confidant/or a friend.
I don’t think those who considered her a friend would have ever guessed she is spilling the secrets of their lives and private conversations too others. While we are not the greatest fans of Angelia Pelham and John Keating the fact is they have the right to know their fellow city councilwoman was talking trash about them to others in our community. Simply put, this was probably not the first time Tammy allowed her loose lips to talk trash – it was just the first time she got caught.
If Heit or anyone, for that matter, wants to claim that someone who recorded this is not fit to be a leader, then we want to know why Tammy’s statements and behavior which clearly show a lack of integrity, knowledge or ethical morality is not being called out to be a leader in Frisco? She should resign!
In closing, Tammy kept referring to Frisco as “my city, my city, my voters, my budget, …” – this is not her city, it is our city! She seems to have forgotten that on her quest for Broadway or to be on Broadway. We also want to be clear that we will always protect our sources at Frisco Chronicles. We do want to make it very clear; WE DID NOT RECEIVE Pelham’s text or the Meinershagen conversation directly from the candidate Heit and Petras are currently calling out. We received the text from Source A and the recording from Source B, and neither of them was the candidate Heit and Petras are attacking online.
As for Broadway Frisco – Prop A & B we would ask you to consider this before voting:
Today, we hear “Tourism, Tourism, Tourism,” and most recently, how we need to be more like Nashville. The thing is, Nashville has a deep history back in the 1920s. They had a thriving publishing industry, then came the advent of the Grand Ole Opry in 1925. When WSM began broadcasting live performances from the Grand Ole Opry, it positioned them to become “Music City USA.” By 1945, it was one of the most popular radio programs in America and established Nashville as a hub for country music. They made urban renewal a priority and renovated several landmarks, including the Music Hall of Fame and The Sommet Center. Broadway (similar to 5th Street in Austin) became known for bars and a honky tonk music scene. It was the cornerstone for emerging young artists and a short distance trolley ride from the iconic Music Row. Major record labels headquartered themselves in Nashville, and it became a gathering place for the arts, entertainment and music. They did not simply build a 340-million-dollar Broadway, and become Nashville overnight!
What is the problem with Frisco being more like Nashville? We never implemented our identity as we began to grow and develop into a Nashville. Purefoy took us down the road to being Sports City USA! It worked! Now the city council says we must be more like Nashville to compete, or else! With every development, we have heard Mayor Cheney say this would have a HALO Effect on our city, making us the greatest city in America. Now, all of a sudden, if we don’t spend $160 million or $340 million to get FRISCO BROADWAY, we will lose the economic boom to Nashville? The AMC Awards are happening here, not in Nashville, why? It is being held at a great venue. We didn’t have Frisco Broadway to win over the AMC Awards. We are not Nashville! We will never be Nashville! We are Frisco, Texas!
Please vote no to the propositions in order to protect our community and the residents who live here.
Tammy says, “I don’t like bullies! I don’t care if they are 300lb firefighters or black woman!”
Tammy on Scott Johnson: “He is the weakest leader I have ever seen.”
Tammy continues, and it sounds like she is gloating when she talks about his divorce and his wife potentially spilling the tea if he runs for Mayor.
Tammy on Angelia Pelham: “She also voted Republican for the first time. Why would she do that? She is a staunch democrat.”
Tammy continues to talk about Angelia’s poor leadership, how she doesn’t care if she ever talks to Angelia at an event, how she doesn’t have a lot of respect for Marcia (John Keating’s girl), and how Angelia has not done anything for our city.”
Tammy on Shona Sowell: “She was a nice person at the beginning, I heard, but at the end of the six years, she was a monster.”
Tammy, the reason you gave in this conversation is not the same reason you have previously stated as to why you ran against Shona Sowell. Which one is the truth?
Tammy on John Keating: “He should not get married until after he loses the Mayoral race to see if Marcia sticks around.”
Tammy continues to talk about John, his ex-wife Leslie, his kids, and we are curious why you would ever have a conversation with someone and discuss someone else’s personal life. You are okay spilling others’ secrets and talking about their lives, so let’s see how you like now that it is happening to you.
Gossip is human nature. At some point, we all talk about others or are talked about. Not all gossip is evil. Some of them are mindless chit-chat. But it can hurt someone else and also backfire. Those who are busy discussing your life are probably not happy about theirs. Tammy needs to take a good look in the mirror and re-evaluate her choices. She doesn’t want folks talking about her husband’s Ketchup Caddy, yet she thinks it’s okay to expose anyone and everyone’s secrets.
Well Frisco, you might want to set down that Yeti tumbler and grab a porcelain teacup, because in this episode we’re not sipping sweet tea — we’re serving it scalding.
On today’s episode of “Who’s Mic Is It Anyway?” Tammy Meinershagen — our poised, polished, picture-perfect council darling — trades in her charm-school pearls for brass knuckles and pours out the kind of hot gossip that makes Bravo executives weep with envy.
You know Tammy: the one with the Barbie-blonde poise, high-heeled grace, and the kind of curated Instagram aesthetic that screams “I’m just like you but with better lighting.” For years, she’s been Frisco’s go-to for classy civic engagement and picture-perfect smiles. But as that hot mic keeps rolling, so does a side of Tammy that’s less Pageant Queen and more Petty Queen.
This time her tea kettle is pointed directly at fellow councilman John Keating — and boy, she doesn’t just spill the tea, she upends the entire teapot: ☕ John’s engagement disaster? Tammy’s got the play-by-play. ☕ His leadership skills? According to Tammy, “dumb and weak” might be putting it politely. ☕ Veterans backing him for mayor? Not according to Tammy’s version of events ☕ His girlfriend/fiancée/wife-to-be (we lost track)? Tammy claims she’s got the inside scoop on how that relationship’s less of a fairy tale and more of a soap opera. ☕ Talks to his ex-wife all the time? Tammy says yes. John’s privacy? Not so much.
At this point, the only thing hotter than Tammy’s tea is a July afternoon on the Star’s turf field.
So here’s the question we have to ask, Frisco: Is Tammy the well-spoken, community-loving stateswoman we all thought? Or is she Two-Faced Tammy — the master puppeteer sipping tea while setting matches? Better yet… which Tammy is running the show today?
Lastly, if John Keating is telling people he is running for Mayor, then doesn’t that mean he has to step down if he has started campaigning? 🫖🔥
One thing’s clear: In Frisco, trust might be harder to come by than a Legacy West parking spot on Saturday night.
👂 Stay tuned, because the tape keeps rolling… Who needs Ketchup Caddy when you have Two-Faced Tammy. Bring on the drama.
Frisco, grab your popcorn and maybe a splash of Pinot (I recommend something bold and unfiltered, like what we’re about to spill). In a town where carefully crafted talking points are served colder than a HOA board meeting in January, we finally got a taste of something unscripted. Tammy Meinershagen — yes, that Tammy, our city council member turned cultural ambassador turned enigma — has been caught on tape saying what she really thinks about Frisco. And let’s just say… it ain’t all sunshine, soccer moms, and symphony galas.
While most public officials in our fair city polish their words smoother than a granite countertop at Stonebriar, Tammy’s unguarded comments were refreshingly raw — or alarmingly revealing, depending on how much you’ve invested in your “Frisco is flawless” bumper sticker. The tape, which landed on the Frisco Chronicles’ desk like a forgotten love letter from City Hall’s underbelly, exposes views that might just ruffle a few perfectly landscaped feathers.
Is Tammy the bold truth-teller we didn’t know we needed? Or has her carefully curated public persona finally cracked under the weight of her own ambition? Either way, it’s time to listen in, lean forward, and ask the question Frisco hates most: Are we really the city we think we are?
Episode #1
Tammy talks about small businesses and the relationship of city governmentto those small businesses. After listening to it we have just three questions for Tammy:
How will the Frisco EDC continue to fund small business grants if we spend all the money, a $160 or is it $340 million dollars, on the Frisco Center for the Arts?
Tammy, you said the city budget is to pay for the essentials – is a FCFA an essential?
Next Tammy talks about DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion). She talks about receiving emails from constituents who are angry about how much are Indian Community has grown.
Tammy, you said our town is filled with racists then proceed to make fun of the Indian Community and the number of “FESTIVALS” they have. Would you call that racist?
You then call the Indian Community out for living in a different world, would you call that racist?
You then go on to QUESTION how any of them are even “VOTERS!” But wait, don’t you spend a lot of time courting and sucking up to the Indian Community to get those “VOTES?”
Lastly you talk about how Koreans are 1% of Frisco so “SHE IS BASICALLY WHITE”
Stay tuned! Follow us on Facebook and YouTube as we have a lot more to drop in the next 12 hours. We will be dropping them like they’re hot, baby!
We’re just getting started — and trust me, you’ll want to hear more!
When I was a young boy, my favorite thing was riding shotgun in the old truck with my dad through the grapevines on our farm. Harvest time was a marvel. I’d watch the workers move row by row, their hands stained purple, their rhythm steady, their laughter honest. One day, watching it all unfold, I looked at my father and said, “You must be the King Grape.”
He chuckled, looked me square in the eye, and said:
“Boy, no kings live here. Only hard-working hands.”
“But you’re important,” I replied. Dad just shook his head.
“If I teach you anything, it’s this — don’t get too big for your britches. Or you’ll find yourself alone.”
Later, Mom explained the phrase. “Too big for your britches” meant someone full of themselves — bloated with self-importance, an exalted ego, floating above the rest of us like a parade balloon.
And when I look at our current Frisco City Council? Let’s just say we’re one helium tank away from liftoff.
The Pelham Pattern
It is time to remind Angelia Pelham where she came from! In our blog In Debt We Trust, we told you back in 1996, she and her husband Dono filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in Florida under the name “Just for You Cosmetics.” According to the Orlando Sentinel(April 1, 1996), their reported assets totaled $1,245, while their debts? A staggering $343,466. Major creditors included:
Community First Bank (Jacksonville) – $140,000
Eric Stern (Carrollton, TX) – $35,000
Schroder Center Management (Dallas, TX) – $35,000
A “learning experience,” Angelia later called it in the Dallas Morning News. Fair enough — who hasn’t fallen and gotten back up? Most of the time, you learn your lesson, but the Pelhams the pattern didn’t stop there. Since then, her Frisco HOA has filed multiple liens:
Nov 2006 – $2,088.90
Oct 2011 – $956.80
June 2013 – $1,335.65
July 2020 – $1,233.70
Wells Fargo filed a civil judgment against Dono in 2014–2015 for $10,375. In 2016, a local business owner placed a lien for unpaid landscaping work: $4,039. Then came a Notice of Lis Pendens in 2020 — the county warned the Pelhams that a lawsuit had been filed over delinquent property taxes. That one appears to have been settled in 2022. (Wait, a city councilwoman, not paying property tax?)
Life has changed for the Pelham Power Couple these days. Angelia is draped in designer threads, seen at every gala and brunch in town, flanked by her friends in the gated communities across Frisco like the Stonebriar elite. Her husband’s church is growing, her influence expanding.
None of that is inherently wrong — if you rise and remember the folks who helped you climb. The issue is when you forget those who supported you and start swinging that shiny new status around like a scepter.
The Luncheon Debacle
Then came the text. A whistleblower sent us a screenshot of Councilwoman Pelham sending a text about a luncheon she coordinated for Frisco Lakes residents during Black History Month. A noble cause — supporting Black-owned businesses — and it took place at Earnest B’s, a public restaurant.
Angelia starts the text message with taking credit for coordinating the luncheon and specifically noted it was not a campaign rally. When Angelia arrived, she was surprised to see a candidate running for office there “campaigning” at an event they were not invited to!
First, this was not a private event! Angelia did not rent out Earnest B’s place of business for this luncheon. Other customers were coming and going because it is A PUBLIC BUSINESS! Angelia lives on MARS if she thinks she can tell any customer in a public business how and what they should do!
Angelia continues, if you were there to get some lunch, you should have done so without campaigning with a group that you were not invited to attend.
Second, how did Angelia know the candidate was “campaigning?” Earnest B’s is not a huge restaurant, so what if they were stopping by for lunch and knew someone there and started talking (like we all do across Frisco) and Angelia happened to walk in on it, now she accuses the candidate of campaigning. Even if they were campaigning, it is a PUBLIC BUSINESS that you have no say over. If the restaurant had an issue with someone “campaigning” on their property then they should have said something – not Angelia a patron of the business who is there to SUPPORT BLACK BUSINESSES.
Angelia continues, “Yes, I called Gopal since you decided to HIJACK MY EVENT and make it into a campaign event. Gopal is MY CANDIDATE, so I absolutely felt that he needed to be there since YOU made it a campaign event.”
I can hear my mom now from the window of our house, “Mannaggia Angelia, Mannaggia!” That is our “Damn” as you Americans would say, and used to express utter frustration with someone, something or a situation. Accusing someone of HIJACKING YOUR EVENT? Newsflash, this was not a private facility or shut down for just you and your glorious presence, Ms. Pelham, it is a PUBLIC BUSINESS! Second to accuse someone of that you better have proof and DAMN good proof! Next, you call Gopal “MY CANDIDATE” – do you own him? Is he your property? That is how you made it sound!
Lastly Angelia says, “it is that kind of self-seeking behavior that you display (meaning the candidate) that causes me concern about you on council. I want to be very clear about my thoughts on your actions yesterday”
Angelia – we want to be very clear on our thoughts as well! You come across as an entitled SELF-SEAKING witch who is “TOO BIG FOR HER OWN BRITCHES.” My Event, My Candidate, My Luncheon! What’s next? My Oxygen? How dare you come into a public business and say hi to anyone at my table – this is my table! Take your food and go, peasant!
Queen of the Dias
It’s campaign season, so is it plausible to say the candidate was out and about wearing a vote for me shirt, stopped in to get lunch from a popular Frisco place, happen to know someone at the table and said hello when you walked in. Last year when you were running Angelia, we saw your shirts all over the city on folks and we also know “your people” attempted to attend an event paid for by a private citizen at the country club until they were asked to leave. The difference in the space, it was rented and paid for by a private citizen who had every right to determine who they wanted at their event vs your public space luncheon. Guess it was okay then when they were supporting you.
Oh, how the mighty Queen of the Dias, Angelia Pelham sees herself today. Gone are the bankruptcy days, today she can cast stones, throw accusations anywhere and everywhere, send demeaning and rude texts to other candidates, and then expect “healing sessions” to fix it when it’s all over. How did that work out with the Fire Department?
Newsflash: You’re not the queen of Earnest B’s. Or Frisco, for that matter. Now it appears Pelham is more concerned with control than compassion. More interested in ownership than stewardship. More inclined to protect her own than to empower others.
Mannaggia Angelia!
Well, Mannaggia, Angelia.
Don’t forget the vineyard. Don’t forget the struggle. And don’t mistake a city council seat for a throne.
Because when you get too big for your britches — Frisco Whistleblower knows how to hem you back down to size.
With local election season in full swing, we examine recent claims about Gopal Ponaji (aka Ponangi) and his ties to the Global Hindu Heritage Foundation (GHHF). When we initially heard these accusations, we thought they were farfetched. As we started to investigate, we found out it is something voters should be aware of and have a general pause of concern or questions about. Our goal: to lay out the facts and context so readers can judge for themselves.
Ponangi’s Links to GHHF
Public records and event reports indicate Ponangi has been associated with GHHF for years. For example, a 2016 Dallas news article on a GHHF-sponsored event explicitly names “Gopal Ponangi, [an] active volunteer who served as Master of Ceremony for the evening”. This gathering was organized by GHHF founder Dr. V.V. Prakasarao Velagapudi. Moreover, internal GHHF documents list Gopal Ponangi among the group’s “core group” members. Ponangi’s name appears alongside Velagapudi’s and other GHHF officers, suggesting he held an ongoing role. We have found no official record of Ponangi renouncing or distancing himself from GHHF over the years.
These references show Ponangi’s involvement goes beyond the current campaign. They do not prove wrongdoing, but they do confirm he has been publicly connected to GHHF activities. Whether this connection should concern voters depends on GHHF’s character and aims – which is why we now turn to that broader context.
Hindutva Ideology and the RSS
Understanding GHHF requires knowing about Hindutva and the ideology that motivates it. Hindutva (literally “Hindu-ness”) is a political-cultural movement formulated in the 1920s that promotes Hindu cultural dominance in India. According to Wikipedia, it “encompasses the cultural justification of Hindu nationalism and the belief in establishing Hindu hegemony within India”.
What does that mean in practice, Hindutva thinkers argue India is fundamentally a Hindu nation. This worldview is closely associated with India’s RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) and the ruling BJP party.
Scholars note that Hindutva goes beyond religious devotion and often rejects India’s secular ideals. According to media and researchers, GHHF explicitly supports this Hindutva vision. Bridge Initiative (a Georgetown University research group) reports that GHHF “supports Hindu nationalist ideology and regularly publishes discriminatory, inflammatory, and intolerant content about Islam and Christianity.” In fact, the organization has even “raised funds to aid the demolition of churches in India and supports the mission of making India a Hindu-only nation.” Bridge further notes that GHHF leaders have advocated India declaring itself a Hindu state.
By contrast, GHHF’s own website frames its mission more benignly. It states the group exists “to protect, preserve, promote, and maintain Hindu culture, Hindu temples”. GiveFreely.com (a nonprofit data site) similarly summarizes GHHF’s focus on temple preservation, but critics point out that these activities overlap with Hindutva goals. The Christian Post notes GHHF “advocates an ideology known as Hindutva, or extremist Hindu supremacism, which holds that India belongs solely to Hindus”. In short, Hindutva is not merely cultural pride – it’s a doctrine that often paints religious minorities as outsiders. That background helps explain why GHHF’s statements and events have become controversial.
The 2022 Frisco Fundraiser Controversy
In November 2022, GHHF held a gala fundraiser in Frisco that drew national attention. Reports revealed the event flyer listed items like “Demolition of Illegal Churches in Tirupati” (a major Hindu pilgrimage site) and “ghar wapsi” (efforts to reconvert Muslims/Christians to Hinduism) as part of the GHHF agenda. These revelations alarmed many local Indian-American Christians and Muslims.
Community members did not remain silent. After learning of the flyer, concerned citizens staged protests in Frisco. By early December, local groups organized formal opposition.
Key Points from the Fundraiser:
The GHHF event was hosted at a Dallas-area venue on Nov 27, 2022. Its public agenda (as shown on Eventbrite) included Hindutva objectives: “Ghar Wapsi – reconversion of Muslims and Christians back to Hinduism” and “Demolition of Illegal Churches in Tirupati”
News reports emphasized these items. The Dallas Morning News wrote: “The dinner’s agenda items included… demolition of ‘illegal’ churches in India and the conversion of Indian Christians and Muslims to Hinduism.” (Both reports cited the actual flyer as evidence.)
These concrete facts – printed and posted online – were the spark for the backlash. Event organizers declined to publicly comment on these agenda items, and no evidence has appeared that the church demolition was ever actually funded. But the documentation of the flyer itself is clear. In response, faith leaders began sounding the alarm.
December 2022: Frisco City Hall Protests
On Dec. 6, 2022, dozens of residents packed a Frisco City Council meeting to air their concerns about GHHF. Local pastors and activists spoke out, warning that what they saw as extremist Hindutva aims had crossed into Frisco.
Local faith leaders and Indian-American residents gathered outside Frisco City Hall to condemn GHHF’s agenda. The Christian Post reported that “several pastors and other Christian leaders joined members of the local Indian Christian community to call for lawmakers to take a closer look at the activities of GHHF.” Independent journalist Pieter Friedrich, contributor to Christian news outlets, addressed the Council directly. He said, “Just last week, right here in Frisco, Texas, we had an American nonprofit organization fundraising to support the demolition of churches in India…Friedrich urged the city to speak out: “I urge the Frisco City Council to have the courage to proclaim that the GHHF’s hateful agenda has no place in Frisco…or in America.”
Of course, GHHF and its supporters dispute this narrative. They argued at the City Council meeting (via emails to local media) that “we have not raised funds to demolish churches” and that the matter involved legal questions of Indian church permits, not GHHF incitement. While GHHF has not been accused of any illegal act in the U.S., but the documented language of its flyer – and its promotion of ghar wapsi – had already concerned many.
Given these divergent accounts, it’s important for readers to weigh the information critically. Voters should look at the actual references.
Key Issues at a Glance:
Gopal Ponaji/Ponangi is explicitly identified as a GHHF volunteer and organizer in official materials.
GHHF professes a mission of temple preservation, but critics document that it endorses Hindutva goals like church demolition and religious conversion.
The leaked fundraiser flyer for Nov 2022 listed “Demolition of Illegal Churches in Tirupati” and “Ghar Wapsi (reconversion)” among its agenda items. This fact was confirmed by multiple news reports.
Bridge Initiative and others urge caution: “The group has raised funds to aid the demolition of Churches in India”
Conclusion: Do Your Research Before Voting
The facts above show that Ponangi has long-standing ties to GHHF and that GHHF has an explicitly Hindutva agenda. Whether one finds that alarming is a matter of judgment. We have provided documentation from multiple sources so readers can decide for themselves: every key claim comes with a link at the end of our blog. Frisco voters should carefully review these materials. In this race, as in all elections, misinformation can spread easily. We urge you to check out our verified sources. FriscoChronicles will continue to follow this story. We hope readers with the published record: examine it, question it, and then cast your vote with confidence.
It’s campaign season in Frisco, and you know what that means: political signs are vanishing, alliances are shifting, and hypocrisy is doing cartwheels down Main Street. We have heard from a few citizens asking us why we have a “Double Standard” when it comes to calling out current city leaders who support Smart Frisco while we have said nothing about Brian Livingston who is supporting the Citizens For A Smarter Frisco PAC. We have been asked why we have not disclosed how the Vote No PAC – Citizens For A Smarter Frisco is funded? Honesty matters so here you go!
Let’s rewind the tape.
Let’s talk about the political elephant in the room—Smart Frisco, the feel-good PAC with a slick name, big-dollar backing, and conveniently aligned with current city leaders. Councilmembers Bill Woodard, Jeff Cheney, and Tammy Meinershagen have all publicly supported this PAC as well as previous PACs in the past while claiming to be wearing their “private citizen” hats on. We cannot pretend their alignment with Smart Frisco doesn’t carry political weight. Ah yes—the magical invisible hat that somehow lets you hold public office and advocate for propositions without consequences or accountability. It’s like Clark Kent glasses for ethics.
In the previous election Brian Livingston took no position and clearly said it is up to voters to decide and this time around he dared to speak up about his own concerns regarding the Frisco Center For The Arts during council meetings. It was not until the current city council members came out for a second time advocating for a PAC trying to influence the vote that Livingston clearly had enough and said what is good for the goose is good for the …..
Now critics cry foul and the pearly clutching begins! The cabal acting as if he had crossed a line even though they set the precedent crossing the sacred boundary. Livingston dared to voice his concerns and support for the Citizens for a Smarter Frisco PAC, which is advocating against the current Performing Arts Center deal and now critics cry foul, as though he’s crossed some sacred boundary, they themselves trampled over a year ago.
Behind Citizens For A Smarter Frisco PAC
Based on records filed with the city the PAC started a few weeks after Smart Frisco. The treasurer is listed at Chris Fields and from what we can tell he has no criminal record, does some political consulting and works in the IT Field. We pulled their campaign finance report, and they have $0 listed, $0 donations and until the next report is out, we will not know who funded the PAC. We messaged Chris Fields and asked why the PAC developed and he responded, “out of citizen concern.”
Livingston has been front and center for the PAC at forums and reposting their content but nowhere near the extent of the city leaders on the side of Smart Frisco. Do you feel that as a representative for the city council you should be representing a pack against the performing arts center?
Livingston: Honest, Direct, and—Let’s Face It—Right
We sent Mr. Livingston an email and asked him Do you feel that as a representative for the city council you should be representing a pack against the performing arts center and why he has chosen to support Citizens For A Smarter Frisco and this was his response.
Livingston wrote, “I want to be clear—I never wanted to represent a political action committee in this way. However, a precedent was set last year when other members of this council chose to publicly support a PAC while claiming to do so as private citizens. That action opened the door for elected officials to engage in public advocacy while still holding office, and I believe it’s important to be honest about that reality.
As a councilman, my first responsibility is to be transparent with the residents of Frisco. I have taken this position with the “Vote No” PAC because I firmly believe the current Performing Arts Center deal, as written, is not in the best interest of our city. I also strongly disagree with the proposed change in use of EDC funds, which were never intended to support projects of this nature.
This isn’t about opposing the arts—it’s about fiscal responsibility, honoring the original intent of our economic development tools, and making sure every deal we enter into reflects the long-term needs and values of the Frisco community.”
That’s what you call “owning” the situation. No spin. No double talk. Just a clear admission that if we’re going to play by these new rules, let’s at least acknowledge them out loud. Whether you agree with him or not, you can’t deny that what he’s offering is rare: a transparent position, rooted in fiscal concern, with zero political waffling.
What’s Good for the Goose…
Here’s the core issue: you can’t praise transparency when it suits your narrative and then screams “conflict of interest” when someone else plays by the rules you created. If it’s okay for Cheney, Meinershagen, and Woodard to champion a PAC two years in a row while in office, then say Brian Livingston’s advocacy for fiscal responsibility and public transparency is not appropriate and unnecessary. This isn’t about theater. It’s about trust. And whether you support the Performing Arts Center or not, you should support honest governance over political theater.
The Bottom Line
Frisco deserves better than this convenient amnesia and selective outrage. If elected officials want to play the PAC game, they should at least have the decency to stop pretending they’re playing as “private citizens.” And if a councilman speaks up about a shady deal and does so publicly, let’s not crucify him for being the only one saying the quiet part out loud. It would be totally disingenuous to pretend this isn’t political coordination masquerading as “just a concerned citizen.” The real issue isn’t who’s supporting which PAC—it’s why some voices are allowed a microphone, while others get handed a muzzle. Frisco voters are smarter than that. Let’s act like it.
There are several important dates to know when it comes to the ballot propositions:
First day of early voting—April 22
Last day of early voting—April 29
Election day—May 3
Want to weigh in? Got receipts or screenshots? You know the drill. 📩 FriscoWhistleblower@protonmail.com – Anonymity is our love language.
While the world tackles climate change, AI ethics, and the moral collapse of TikTok, Frisco is dealing with… loss of our children’s innocence, assaults and stolen/vandalized political signs. That’s right, political signs! Welcome to the great political crime spree of 2025 in what our Mayor and Council claim is one of the safest cities in America, or is something else going on?
If you’ve driven down Preston, Legacy, Main Street, or Eldorado lately, you may have noticed something peculiar: political signs popping up like spring weeds, then suddenly poof—gone. Others are bent, knocked over, or tossed into ditches like yesterday’s Whataburger cup. Some have been found face-down in drainage ditches, others mysteriously sliced like a scene from a low-budget political thriller.
On March 30th, we had a candidate reach out to us letting us know that 15 of her political signs were stolen and several more intentionally damaged. She also stated that zip ties were cut, poles were pushed over, and some poles were completely missing. She documented the damage with pictures to us and said she would be filing a police report. We decided to pull a PIR and research the issue because last year we got the same complaints from candidates.
Now, don’t get us wrong, sign fatigue is real. By week three, those smiling headshots and bold promises start to blur together. But here’s the twist: it’s not just Mother Nature or rogue sprinklers. Nope. It seems there’s something more coordinated—and sneakier—going on.
Reporting Political Signs
First step, we indexed the reports in order. What we found or should we say who we found reporting them – was quite interesting!
1/26/25: Email to City Secretary from Mel M (kookykate) asking how she would make a report for political signage being out more than 90 days before the election.
1/26/25: Email to City Secretary from Councilman John Keating, yes, he used his official city email to report a Elad sign at Legacy & Eldorado. He wanted to know when signs can go up and reported that it does not have Place 4 on the sign. Kristi Morrow replied to him they can go up 90 days prior to an election and nothing in the state code says it has to have a place number on it.
Side Note: Keating has endorsed Elad’s opponent, he is one of the longest councilman in the history of Frisco, he has run several times – so shouldn’t he know the rules by now? Nope. He has to email the City Secretary to ask which shows off his complete incompetent nature.
2/25/25 Case 25023400: Reporting Party said a political sign struck a water line for the HOA water which has now been turned off and they wanted to file a vandalism complaint and complained to be with the HOA. The reporter was unsure if it was a city pipe or commercial pipe and he was told to contact the city water department.
2/25/25 Service Request 4914712: Ann Anderson reported a political sign at the corner of Preston / Warren and wanted to know if it was allowed to be there because she has never seen signage in Stonebriar area of the city.
2/27/25: Email to City Secretary from John Lettelleir, Director of Development Services for the City of Frisco. He was concerned about a sign located on the west side of Independence Pkwy, just north of SH 121 (in front of Race Trac) and was concerned if that was city property. Kristi Morrow, City Secretary responded she also noticed there are signs in the right-of-way along Dallas Parkway / Cotton Gin, and Dallas Parkway / Main. She went on to say some seem to be running down Dallas Parkway by the hospital but not necessarily at an intersection but placed close to the road.
2/27/25: Email to City Secretary from Cindy Hons asking for the city to check the placement of the following signs below.
Muni Sign: NE corner of 121/Preston
Sangita Sign: SE corner of Gaylord/Preston
Sangita Sign: SW corner of Warren/Preston
Sangita Sign: SE corner of Eldorado and Dallas Parkway (alongside Eldorado)
Side Note: We can only assume Cindy Hons makes her away around the city often to see all these signs in one day.
2/27/25 Case# CE25-00618: Randy Archambualt called code enforcement to make a complaint related to “incorrect sign placement” regarding a Burt Thakur political sign on teal parkway. It is interesting that Randy was once married to Rene (Frisco ISD BOT) and is a known supporter for the opposite side of the isle.
2/28/25 Email to City Secretary: Ginni Scott emailed the city secretary regarding the political sign she felt was a “safety concern” at the intersection of Teel Pkwy / The Trails Pkwy.
2/28/25 Email to City Secretary from Ben Brezina Assistant City Manager regarding a “big giant political sign” for Burt Thakur at Teel / The Trails Parkway and he is concerned that is hard to see oncoming south bound traffic when trying to turn south on to Teel.
Amy Moore, Code Enforcement Supervisor immediately sends it to Amy Smith telling her to have it checked TODAY and if this is VISION CLIP to remove it. She specifically notes “THIS IS FROM 5TH FLOOR AND BEN LIVES OVER THERE”
Side Note: Why does it matter that it came in from the 5th FLOOR? The fact that Amy Moore wrote that in her email, clearly shows a bias. Ben Brezina works for the City Manager’s Office, who clearly supports the encumbant and the FCFA. If it is not a targeted attack by all of these folks – it sure looks like it.
3/4/25 Case# CE25-00681: Reporter listed as ADMIN sent an email (which the city did not provide us) lodging a complaint for “Incorrect Sign Placement” at the NE Corner State Hwy 121 and Preston for a MUNI sign. It was determined by code enforcement that the sign as NOT in violation. Who is the ADMIN that reported it?
3/4/25 Case# CE25-00695: Email complaint received by Caleb Davis for a Burt Thakur sign located at the NE Corner of Preston / Lebanon and it was later determined it was NOT in violation.
3/4/25 Case# CE25-00697: Email complaint received by Caleb Davis for a Burt Thakur sign at the SW Corner of Preston / Lebanon and it was later determined it was NOT in violation.
Side Note: We researched the number on the report for Caleb Davis and funny thing – the number did not come back to a Caleb Davis nor anyone that lives in Frisco.
Is This the Pettiest Political Season Yet? Yes! City officials and supporters of specific candidates are now going around documenting and reporting their opponents’ signs to the City—for being too close to the curb, for not having the right permit, or just for existing in the wrong median. It’s like Mean Girls but with clipboards and zoning codes.
Sign Stealer in our Midst? Multiple candidates have emailed us that their signs have been damaged or stollen. Removing your opponent’s signs doesn’t make your message stronger, it makes you look desperate. It’s political sabotage with the maturity level of a middle schooler sneaking gum into detention.
For those thinking of tampering with a campaign political sign – don’t! In Texas, tampering with campaign signs is a crime and is a Class C misdemeanor. That’s the same category as public intoxication and fireworks violations—basically, it’s for people who lack impulse control and creativity.
Why the Drama Over Corrugated Plastic? Is it just ego? Control issues? The thrill of a late-night mission to liberate signs from a busy intersection? Maybe. But more likely, it’s a symptom of something deeper, a political culture that’s forgotten how to win people over with ideas and instead relies on eliminating competition by any means necessary. Including sign sabotage.
What does this say about us as voters, as neighbors, as a city? Maybe it says we need to start demanding more maturity from the people asking for our votes. Or maybe it just says that campaign season turns otherwise reasonable adults into territorial raccoons with a hammer and a clipboard. Either way, the message is clear: Frisco deserves better. We can disagree on policy without disappearing each other’s signs in the dead of night. Let’s raise the bar, not just the yard signs.
We want to hear from you: Do you think Burt Thakur, Muni, Jared Elad and Sangita Datta are being targeted?
Seen any suspicious sign activity? Know someone with a trunk full of political signage that doesn’t belong to them? Report it to the police or drop us a line—anonymity guaranteed.
Currently, our great city of Frisco is facing a lot of pressure from “outside forces” relating to the Anthony / Metcalf case. Everywhere you turn, from social media posts to the news stations (nationwide), they are talking about this case. We have a Civil Rights Group meeting with our Police Department, demanding fair justice and asking our Board of Trustees not to expel Anthony when he has one month left in his senior year.
Recently, we saw a post by Councilman, John Keating where he said he recently endorsed a Frisco ISD Trustee candidate, believing we shared a vision for academic excellence, transparency and parental empowerment. He went on to say he was made aware of several social media posts the candidate made in the past which contradict those values.” Then he closes with in light of these revelations, I am withdrawing my endorsement for this candidate.
At first, we were confused because Mr. Keating, who has Whistleblower blocked from his Official Councilman page (breaking the law), never saw a post of his “original endorsement.” We started digging around and realized he had endorsed Stuart Shulman for Frisco ISD BOT Place 3. We looked through Shulman’s page and didn’t see much that concerned us, which left us more confused. Then we saw in several different Facebook groups, screenshots of posts from his page that had been shared, and now we understood.
The first photo is of Shulman with a Beto For Texas sign. No big deal vote for who you want as that is your constitutional right! However, Keating claims to be a Republican and he donates to several Republicans and for him to OPENLY ENDORSE a democrat is a BIG Problem because he will lose his claim to be a Republican (to his Republican friends). He can quietly endorse a democrat and then play stupid but not someone openly posting their political view. As we said to each his own, we are a house divided and it is Shulman’s constitutional right to vote for whoever he wants, and we respect our differences.
Then we saw the BLM – Black Lives Matter Post! Here is a man who wants to run for our Board of Trustee’s openly supporting a racially divisive group. Everyone has a feeling or opinion on BLM and to act as if it is not controversial would-be understatement. We just had a horrible thing happen here in our district and if Shulman was on the Board of Trustee’s would he be shouting Black Lives Matter? He should be shouting ALL OUR KIDS LIVES MATTERS! Would that make an impact on his decisions? Honestly, I don’t want to find out!
This is not Frisco! Frisco is a blended community and that is honestly what makes us great. We may not all agree politically – that’s okay! We may not all operate the same – that’s okay! However, divisive rhetoric based on race or the color of one’s skin tone is simply unacceptable from a Leader in this city. Our children need real leaders right now! Our school district has real LIFE AND DEATH issues happening. Our children deserve to be safe and know that all their lives matter (red, yellow, brown, black, white and blue). The last thing we need is someone on our Board of Trustees who supports any type of race-driven organization or racially divisive groups. Just NOT ACCEPTABLE!
The question we have after this tragic event and after all the folks saying we are not a racially divided community – why didn’t the rest of them pull their endorsements? That’s right, Shulman is endorsed by a lot of our folks in our community and no one else pulled their endorsements. It begs the question do the following folks support a man who openly supports a racially divisive group to be on our schoolboard? Do they think this is the kind of leader we need today facing the adversity we are facing? If yes, then you should question THEIR JUDGEMENT!
Are we surprised Mayor Jeff Cheney endorsed him? No, he already took a knee in solidarity!
What about the rest? At a time when we should be unified for ALL THE CHILDREN IN OUR DISTRICT – do these so-called leaders support this? The two other candidates (Suresh and Renee) that have been campaigning with him – silent! Angelia Pelham – silent! Rene Archambault – Silent! The list goes on! If these leaders sit in silence at this time, after what has happened then in our opinion, they do support him and what he stands for. They are advocating for him to be on the Board of Trustee’s. Is that what you want for your child? Is that what we want for all the children in the district? I hope not!
So here we are, perched on the edge of civic glory or total chaos, depending on which Facebook group you follow. Early voting begins tomorrow, and I encourage you to participate. Not just because it matters (which it does), but because if you don’t vote, someone with worse judgment than you will.
– The Frisco Chronicles Your Friendly Neighborhood Overthinker
Occupation and Background: Financial Advisor – I own my own Wealth Management Firm
Why are you running for Frisco City Council?
I’m running for Frisco City Council because I think we need to start serving the residents of Frisco more effectively, instead of serving the developers and Frisco elite. We need to slow down the density and address the traffic issues, as well as focus on public safety. I also want to focus more on fiscal responsibility and transparency and less on vanity projects such as the PAC and Universal.
Community and Development
What are your top three priorities for Frisco’s growth and development?
Slow down density/halt building apartment complexes; Focus on responsible, community friendly development on the east side; Address traffic in a meaningful way
How do you plan to balance economic growth with maintaining community character?
I’d like to focus more on smaller projects for the community and not so many mega projects. And, I’d like to focus on attracting more small businesses to Frisco.
What is your stance on residential and commercial zoning changes?
Not sure I understand the context of the question
How will you ensure that infrastructure keeps pace with growth?
I think we need to slow down the growth and let the infrastructure catch up. Future projects should have a plan for infrastructure built in at the beginning. And, it must be adhered to.
Density continues to be a hot discussion for Frisco Residents. Cheney even did a video on Density seven years ago when running for Mayor. He said in that video that the resident’s ultimate concerns was the concept of density and what the ultimate build out population number should be.
At build out the city’s comprehensive plan allows a maximum capacity of up to 350 thousand residents (building with maximum density). He then said in his campaign video that is not what people move to Frisco for, and he believed to maintain quality of life the population target goal should be around 280,000. He continued, we need to build out with world-class level developments with more open space, less multi-family all over the city and an overall less dense environment. In the last two years Cheney has changed his tune and said, “Density is a political dog whistle used at election time for political mailers.”
What is stance on Density?
Density is a real issue for Frisco citizens. Many have cited this as a reason for leaving. And, it’s creating quality of life issues for everyone. The only way to address it is to slow down the growth and determine what the right population number is for Frisco. 350k residents seems too high.
Fiscal Responsibility and Budgeting
What would be your approach to managing the city’s budget while ensuring essential services are maintained?
First, make sure that essential services are covered. We need to take care of our fire and police departments as well as other city services. Beyond that, all expenditures need to be thoroughly and reasonably evaluated to determine if they are necessary.
Do you believe Frisco’s current property tax rates are sustainable? Would you support any changes including cuts, increases or adjustments to the current property tax rates? Why or why not?
No. Residents can’t afford their property taxes based on the appreciation of their valuations. Even when the city and Frisco ISD lowers the tax rate, residents still don’t see it as their tax bill gets higher every year. I would be for reducing the rate but that isn’t enough.
What are your funding priorities for public safety, education, and infrastructure?
Public safety should be fully funded including additional police officers to handle the increased issues that will come with Universal (traffic, crime). See my previous comments about infrastructure.
How would you plan to handle Frisco’s increasing debt and financial obligations?
The debt can be handled by not taking on any more of it. The addiction to debt/bonds needs to stop to ensure the financial health of the city for years to come. TIRZ money can be used to pay debt obligations.
In December of 2021, the Mayor, Jeff Cheeney had to vote in a rare tie breaker vote in regard to an employee Health Clinic operated by Premise Health. At the time city staff shared the results of a survey which collected responses from 684 of 1,239 city employees. Out of those 684, a total of 89.75% said they were likely or somewhat likely” to use the clinic for urgent care needs. Only 64.7% said they were likely to “somewhat use” the clinic as their primary care provider.
Estimated expenses in the clinic’s first year total over $1.44 million, according to the proposed five-year budget. Those expenses include salaries, insurance, management/implementation fees and equipment purchases. The clinic’s fifth-year budget is listed at more than $1.31 million. It was projected that the clinic will operate at a loss in its first three years. The estimated cost for the first five years was $6.28 million. At the time there was a concern about how many years it could take to break even on the investment and how many employees would use the option.
At the five-year mark if the clinic is still not breaking even would you support closing the Employee Wellness Clinic or continue to operate at a loss?
Yes, I would support closing the clinic if it’s not at break even.
Should the city be in the business or running an Athletic Center, Performing Arts Center, or any other type of business model that mirrors a commercial business which has annual operational costs paid for by tax dollars?
No
Transparency and Accountability
How will you ensure transparency in your decision-making process and open communication between the city council and residents?
I will explain my decisions on key votes so that the community understands my reasoning. I will also make myself available to meet with residents by hosting regular town halls and I will also listen when community members speak at city council meetings and read their emails.
Currently only the city council meeting is aired live, however many residents believe they should have access to live meetings for the different boards and commissions as well as well as the published minutes of the meetings should be more detailed as to what was discussed.
Do you support more increased public access to city council meetings, boards and commission meetings?
Yes
What steps would you take to improve access to meetings, meeting minutes and public records?
I would see what other cities do and replicate the good ideas in Frisco by submitting a proposal for change.
What is your definition of conflict of interest?
A conflict of interest is when someone could potentially benefit from actions or decisions made in an official capacity.
Do you support implementing a stricter ethics policy that puts a check on the influence of money in local politics which would require council members to recuse themselves from votes that could benefit donors who contributed more than $1000 or $2500.00 to a political campaign?
Yes
Do you believe active members of the city council should be on the front lines advocating as “private citizens” for Propositions on the ballot during local elections?
No
Community Services and Quality of Life
What are your plans for enhancing public parks and recreation on Frisco’s East Side of the DNT?
If Brinkmann Ranch is to be entirely sold, I would work to ensure that some of the land be allocated for public use. The city could require the developers who purchase the land to fund the project/s. That is probably the best location. I would like to see some of the land kept for the cows to graze as that is part of Frisco’s history.
How do you plan to address traffic congestion across Frisco?
Work to ensure the traffic signals work more effectively. Remove concrete medians where the left turn lane traffic spills into the center lane regularly (at DNT and Eldorado for example).
Do you think Frisco has a public transportation need? No
How will you engage with and listen to diverse voices of the community?
See question 1 in the previous section
Public Safety
What measures will you take to ensure Frisco’s Police and Fire Department remain well-funded?
I will ask the departments what they need, validate that by looking at other city models and then advocating for funding.
For years the Frisco Firefighters Association has taken to the citizens input pulpit asking for more staffing (specifically going from a 3 Man Truck to a 4 Man Truck). Turnover has been high recently with Firefighters taking retirement and then going to work for other cities who are more supportive of their First Responders.
Do you support increased staffing and moving to a 4 Person Truck? Yes
What will you do to start repairing the relationship with our first responders to stop the turnover, so they stay here in Frisco, and we don’t lose that much needed experience and wisdom.
I will meet with the fire fighters regularly and listen to their concerns. I will also ensure that retention is improved by implementing a target and holding the city manager and fire chief responsible for achieving it. I would start with a 2% decrease in turnover and go from there.
As Frisco continues to grow, do you believe Frisco’s current policies on crime prevention and emergency response are sufficient? Why or why not?
I don’t think we are staffed appropriately for Universal and need to evaluate what is needed before situations escalate. The recent stabbing of a Frisco ISD student shows that this is not the same city it was a few years ago. We need to staff for the situations we encounter today.
Would you support removing Animal Services “out” from under Public Safety and turning it into its own department?
Yes
Residents have been advocating for an animal shelter (instead of the partnership with Collin County) and the city keeps stalling, saying they are open to one with a public-private partnership. Do you believe Frisco should have its own Animal Shelter and Education Center? Do you believe it is a city service, or should it be a public-private partnership?
Yes, and yes it Is a city service?
Closing Statements
Is there anything you would like us to know about you that we have not asked?
As part of our commitment to keeping Frisco residents informed and engaged, we sent a candidate questionnaire to all the individuals running for the Frisco ISD Board of Trustees using the contact information provided on their website. We appreciate those who took the time to respond and provide thoughtful responses. Unfortunately, Renee Sample and Ange Yao also running for Place 2, chose not to reply.
Occupation and Background: Self Employed, Former Financial Advisor
Prior to running, how have you been involved in the community?
I have been involved in multiple ISD committees including being one of the first people chosen for the Special Education Parent Advisory Committee. I was one of 8 parents chosen to present to teachers, admin and paraprofessionals for the first ever Behavior Symposium on what it’s likie being a parent of a special needs child. I was also on the Parent Panel that evaluated Standards based grading. Additionally I was on the District Advisory Council and was part of the Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum sub-committee. I also sit on the board for The Frisco Bowl, Leadership Council for The National Small Business Association and have been President of multiple networking groups.
What experience or skills do you have that will make you a great board member?
I think I excel at asking questions in a unique way that garner answers the average person wouldn’t get. Because of my financial background, business mindset and strategic approach, I think I can help foster relationships, handle challenging situations and stand firm in the face of adversity. My decades of experience in the corporate world and as a small business owner have helped me gain knowledge in human capital, changing financial markets, sales, management, training, marketing and branding. Education is a business and it needs to be treated as such. Gone are the days of running districts as if they have a blank check coming from the community. We need people like me who will take a business centered approach and reinstitute a culture of hospitality back into our ISD. Besides being a business, education is a service and we need to remember our clients are our students and our teachers.
What are the 3 most critical issues facing the district today?
This is a fascinating question because as I was preparing for my run back in December I was focused on what my top three issues should be and I boldly put them on my street signs. It’s as if I was clairvoyant with Fiscal Responsibility, School Safety and District Transparency. But we can’t stop there. The level of rigor of our curriculum is declining along with our enrollment. We have teachers in AP classes that don’t know the curriculum and the students are forced to learn on their own. This was just confirmed at the South Asian Business Alliance yesterday, 4/19/21, by a student in the audience when I brought it up!
How do you plan to address these issues?
🔹 Fiscal Responsibility
Our community deserves a school district that treats every dollar like it matters — because it does. As a former financial adviser and small business owner, I know how to manage budgets and make smart, sustainable decisions. On the board, I’ll:
Push for clear, detailed, line-item budgets the public can easily understand.
Hold district leadership accountable for overspending and inefficiencies.
Prioritize classroom funding over bloated administrative costs.
Have a teacher centered budget
🔹 School Safety
Parents should never have to wonder if their kids are safe at school — period. I will work to ensure our safety policies are strong, consistent, and transparent. That means:
Conducting regular reviews of safety protocols across all campuses.
Working with law enforcement and safety experts to implement best practices, not just checklists. I have a great relationship with our current Frisco police chief
Ensuring mental health resources are available and accessible for students in crisis.
Listening to teachers, students, and parents about what safety really means on the ground.
🔹 District Transparency
You can’t have trust without transparency. I’ll fight to make Frisco ISD more open, honest, and responsive by:
Requiring timely public communication from the board and superintendent — especially in emergencies.
Demanding that decisions (like school closures, rezoning, or leadership hires) are made with community input, not behind closed doors.
Supporting regular Q&A sessions and open forums with board members. I think doing 2-3 of these town halls per year will increase community engagement and trust.
Publishing clear explanations of board votes and policy changes so families know what’s really happening.
Do you support ESA’s and Senate Bill 2?
No I do not. They come with too many strings and is not truly the educational freedom that people are looking for.
It is crucial to maintain the financial health and integrity of the Frisco ISD community. Parents believe the need for transparency and accountability is at an all-time high in the district. Would you support a official Forensic Audit of the district’s finances by an independent 3rd party?
Yes, I fully support a forensic audit of Frisco ISD.
Transparency and accountability are at the heart of effective leadership — and right now, many in our community are losing trust in how our district manages its finances. A forensic audit isn’t just about identifying fraud or mismanagement; it’s about restoring public confidence, increasing fiscal responsibility, and ensuring our tax dollars are truly serving our students.
As a former financial adviser, I understand the difference between a routine audit and a forensic audit. A forensic audit digs deeper — it’s a detailed, investigative look at how money is being spent, how contracts are awarded, and whether financial practices align with district policies and ethical standards. It’s not about politics or pointing fingers — it’s about getting answers and setting a higher standard moving forward.
I believe a forensic audit should:
Identify wasteful or questionable spending
Ensure procurement and contracting processes are fair, legal, and transparent
Provide clarity on large expenditures that have raised public concerns
Give taxpayers and families the transparency they deserve
This isn’t a criticism of every employee or administrator in FISD. It’s about making sure the system is clean, efficient, and trustworthy — and if it isn’t, then we fix it.
A district with a $900M+ annual budget should welcome this level of scrutiny — not fear it. If elected, I will be a voice at the table pushing to make a forensic audit happen and to ensure its findings are made public in full.
Because at the end of the day, it’s your money, and you deserve to know exactly how it’s being used.
Do you believe the current districts’ disciplinary procedures are acceptable or do you believe we need to update our procedures for discipline and safety?
Yes, I absolutely believe our behavior policies need to be updated.
As a parent and a community member, I’ve seen and heard far too many stories of disruptive behavior, violence, and a lack of accountability in our schools. Our current policies are inconsistent, outdated, and in some cases, ineffective — and that’s putting both students and teachers at risk.
We need behavior policies that:
Are clear, consistent, and enforced across all campuses
Support teachers and administrators in maintaining safe, respectful learning environments
Include real consequences for serious misconduct — not just vague warnings or delayed action
Provide pathways for intervention and support, especially for students dealing with trauma or mental health challenges
Protect the learning experience for students who come to school ready to grow and succeed
Updating our discipline policies isn’t about being overly punitive — it’s about setting high expectations, enforcing boundaries, and creating a school culture rooted in respect, safety, and responsibility.
I believe in restoring order, protecting students and staff, and giving schools the tools they need to act decisively. Our educators deserve better. Our families deserve better. And most of all — our students deserve schools where they can learn without fear or chaos.
If elected, I will push for a comprehensive review and overhaul of the current behavior code — with input from teachers, parents, students, and law enforcement where appropriate. It’s time for a reset.
What do you believe needs to happen with Staley Middle School and how should this be handled?
Staley Middle School should have been repaired or rebuilt seven years ago, just as the district promised. Instead, teachers, staff, and students have been forced to endure unacceptable conditions — mold, leaking ceilings so bad it rains inside when it rains outside, and lead-contaminated water from outdated pipes. This is not just a facilities issue — it’s a failure of leadership, planning, and basic human decency.
No school in Frisco — or anywhere — should ever fall into this kind of disrepair. That this situation was allowed to continue for years is beyond comprehension, and those responsible for delaying action must be held accountable.
But this is not just about Staley. It’s about how we make decisions in this district. We’re told the school may close due to low enrollment, but that’s only part of the story. I believe a deeper dive is needed — one that looks beyond the numbers and into the real-world impacts:
How many students actually walk to Staley?
How will closures affect transportation, safety, and family logistics?
What role is declining district trust playing in enrollment drops?
Why are families choosing to leave Frisco ISD — and what are we doing about it?
Until the district is willing to ask hard questions and listen to the community, we’ll be stuck in this cycle — and Staley won’t be the last school on the chopping block.
We need long-term vision, not short-term fixes. We need leadership that prioritizes student health, staff safety, and honest dialogue with families. And we need to rebuild trust, starting with the way we treat the people and places at the heart of our school system.
Do you have knowledge of Roberts’ Rules and Board Meeting Decorum?
Yes. During my tenure on the board for the Long Beach Jaycees, we used Robert’s Rules of Parliamentary Procedure at every meeting. Plus I have the book.
What efforts or changes could be made to increase decisive leadership and improve community trust during board meetings?
Strengthening Leadership and Rebuilding Trust Starts at the Board Table
Frisco ISD families deserve leadership that listens, acts, and communicates clearly. Right now, many community members feel shut out of the process — their voices are limited, their questions go unanswered, and meetings often feel performative rather than productive.
To increase decisive leadership and rebuild trust, I believe we need to make immediate and meaningful changes, including:
🔹 Expand Public Speaking Time: Parents and community members shouldn’t feel rushed when voicing concerns. I will advocate for longer and more flexible speaking times during board meetings to ensure every voice is heard — not hurried.
🔹 Introduce a “Student Corner”: At each board meeting, a rotating group of students should be given the chance to speak about their experiences, achievements, and concerns. If we’re making decisions about them, they deserve a seat at the table.
🔹 Hold Regular Community Town Halls (2–3 times/year): The board should proactively engage with families, educators, and students outside of formal meetings. Scheduled town halls would create a space for real dialogue, listening sessions, and collaborative problem-solving.
🔹 Mandate Superintendent Communication Policy: The Superintendent should not have the option to go silent during times of crisis or confusion. The board must implement a clear policy that defines when, how, and how quickly the Superintendent communicates with the public. This must be tied to their performance goals — because transparency is not optional.
If elected, I will push for a culture of respect, responsiveness, and results. No more confusion. No more closed doors. Just honest leadership that brings the community in, not pushes it out.
Lastly, anything you want voters to know about you!
I love this district with all my heart. It’s given so much to my family, and I believe in what Frisco ISD can be at its best. But I also know that not every family has had the same experience — and that pains me deeply. No parent should feel unheard. No student should feel unsafe. No teacher should feel unsupported. That’s why I’m running.
I’m not here for a title or a spotlight. I’m here because I believe in service, and because I want every child — in every corner of this district — to have the opportunity to thrive. I want to elevate students, support families, and help make decisions that restore trust and strengthen our schools.
This is about doing what’s right, not what’s easy. I’m ready to show up, listen, lead, and stand up for what matters most — our kids.
Occupation and Background: Information Technology and Real Estate Entrepreneur
Prior to running, how have you been involved in the community?
Prior to running for the Frisco ISD Board of Trustees, my involvement in the community has been extensive and deeply rooted in a desire to serve. For five years, I served as an HOA Director in Richwoods, demonstrating my commitment to local volunteerism and community well-being. Currently, as Chair of the Tamil Nadu Foundation, Dallas chapter, I’ve led efforts to raise over 2 million to fund education for special needs and impoverished children, showcasing my leadership and dedication to educational causes. Beyond these roles, I am passionate about giving back and actively dedicate my time, energy, and resources to support vital organizations such as the Frisco Pantry, homeless shelters, and numerous other deserving nonprofits within our community. This diverse range of experiences reflects my long-standing commitment to service and my understanding of the needs of our community, including the importance of education and support for families.
What experience or skills do you have that will make you a great board member?
My experience provides a unique and valuable skill set for serving on the Frisco ISD Board of Trustees.
• First, my long-term commitment as a crossing guard at Richwoods – Vandeventer Middle School isn’t just volunteer work; it’s a direct connection to our students and families. I’ve seen firsthand the daily realities, the challenges, and the joys of our students, and I understand the concerns of parents in our neighborhoods. This on-the ground perspective is invaluable for making informed decisions that prioritize student well-being and safety.
• Second, my leadership experience as a former HOA director and chair of a non-profit has equipped me with critical governance and management skills. I understand how to build consensus, manage budgets responsibly (a crucial skill for a district like ours), and ensure transparency and accountability in decision-making. These are essential for effective board leadership.
• Third, I possess a strong grasp of education policy and governance. I’m passionate about ensuring equitable access to high-quality education for every student in Frisco ISD, regardless of their background. I’m committed to data-driven decision-making and advocating for policies that support student achievement.
• Finally, I’m a dedicated servant leader. I believe the role of a board member is to listen, collaborate, and advocate for the best interests of our students, parents, and community. My previous experience running for this board demonstrates my commitment to Frisco ISD, and I’m eager to bring that same dedication and work ethic to the position.
What are the 3 most critical issues facing the district today?
1. Declining Student Enrollment and Funding challenges
2. Past 3 years FISD is running a deficit budget – Accuracy in Financial Forecasting and Enhanced Transparency
3. Campus Safety and Security—Disciplinary issues, cyberbullying, Vaping and Drugs, Fentanyl
How do you plan to address these issues?
Declining Student Enrollment and Funding challenges:
I believe Frisco ISD stands at a critical juncture, demanding a proactive and visionary approach to ensure our long-term success. The declining enrollment trends we’re witnessing, and the resulting closures in neighboring districts, serve as a stark reminder of the urgency of the challenges before us. We must act now to secure Frisco ISD’s future.
My priorities would be to:
Develop a comprehensive long-term vision: We need a clear plan for the next 5, 10, and 15 years, outlining how Frisco ISD will evolve in terms of enrollment, program offerings, and facility standards. This vision must be data-driven, reflecting a deep understanding of enrollment trends and demographic shifts.
Address declining enrollment head-on: This requires a multi-faceted approach. First, we must conduct thorough data analysis to identify the root causes of the decline. Second, we must engage in open and transparent communication with our community, ensuring that parents and residents are informed and involved in the solutions. Third, we must innovate our programs to attract and retain students, offering specialized courses and pathways that meet their diverse needs and interests.
Champion strategic program investments: I propose investing in program enhancements and expanding specialized courses to make Frisco ISD a destination district.
Establish a magnet school: I am particularly excited about the potential of converting a high school into a magnet school focused on high-demand fields such as STEM or the arts. This strategic investment would not only attract students from across the region, boosting enrollment, but also position Frisco ISD as a leader in innovative education and enhance the overall appeal of our community. This initiative must be driven by community input and a rigorous market analysis to ensure its success and relevance.
Advocate for adequate state funding: We must also be strong advocates at the state level to ensure Frisco ISD receives the funding necessary to support our long-term vision and maintain the high quality of education our students deserve. By embracing this comprehensive strategy, we can ensure that Frisco ISD not only weathers the current challenges but emerges stronger and more vibrant, ready to serve the needs of our students and community for generations to come.”
Past 3 years FISD is running a deficit budget – Accuracy in Financial Forecasting and Enhanced Transparency
From my perspective, addressing the issue of the past three years of deficit budgeting, the need for accuracy in financial forecasting, and enhanced transparency would be a top priority: The fact that Frisco ISD has been operating under a deficit budget for the past three years is a serious concern that demands immediate and comprehensive attention. As a board member, ensuring the fiscal health and stability of our district would be a paramount responsibility.
My approach to this critical issue would be multi-pronged:
Demanding Accuracy in Financial Forecasting: We must implement rigorous and data driven forecasting methods to ensure a clear and reliable understanding of our financial outlook. This involves a thorough analysis of enrollment trends, revenue projections, and expenditure forecasts. We need to move beyond reactive budgeting and develop proactive strategies based on accurate predictions.
Prioritizing Enhanced Transparency: The community has a right to understand how their tax dollars are being spent. I will advocate for greater transparency in our financial reporting, making budget information readily accessible and easily understandable to the public. This includes clear explanations of budget assumptions, potential risks, and detailed breakdowns of expenditures. Open communication fosters trust and allows for meaningful community input.
Comprehensive Budget Review: We need to conduct a thorough review of the current budget to identify areas of inefficiency, potential cost savings, and opportunities to realign resources with our strategic priorities and the needs of our students. This review should involve input from administrators, teachers, and the community.
Long-Term Financial Planning: Addressing the deficit is not just about the immediate fiscal year; it requires a long-term financial plan that aligns with our five, ten, and fifteen-year vision for the district. This plan must consider potential enrollment fluctuations, future program needs, and facility requirements.
Exploring Revenue Opportunities (without burdening taxpayers unnecessarily): While being mindful of the tax burden on our community, we must also explore all potential avenues for responsible revenue generation, including maximizing state funding, seeking grants, and strategically leveraging district assets.
Accountability and Oversight: The board has a crucial role in providing strong oversight of the district’s finances. I am committed to holding the administration accountable for responsible financial management and ensuring that budget decisions are made in the best interests of our students and the community.
Addressing the deficit budget and ensuring accurate financial forecasting and enhanced transparency are not just about balancing the books; they are about safeguarding the quality of education we provide to our students and maintaining the trust of our community in Frisco ISD’s leadership.”
Campus Safety and Security—Disciplinary issues, cyberbullying, Vaping and Drugs, Fentanyl
I believe a safe and secure learning environment is the bedrock of a successful education. We must address the serious issues of disciplinary problems, cyberbullying, and the alarming rise of vaping and drug use, including fentanyl, with a firm and proactive approach.
Prioritizing Order and Discipline: Maintaining a structured and disciplined environment is crucial for both safety and academic achievement. We must have clear, consistently enforced disciplinary policies that hold students accountable for their actions and promote respect for authority. This includes zero-tolerance policies for violence, drug use, and serious behavioral infractions.
Strengthening Physical Security: The physical safety of our students and staff is paramount. We must ensure that our campuses are secure, with appropriate measures in place to prevent unauthorized access and respond to potential threats. This may include increased security personnel, surveillance systems, and controlled access points.
Parental Rights and Involvement: Parents have a fundamental right to know what is happening in their children’s schools and to be involved in decisions that affect their safety. We must ensure transparent communication with parents regarding safety concerns and disciplinary issues, and actively seek their input on safety policies.
Combating Cyberbullying and Digital Threats: Cyberbullying is a serious problem that can have devastating consequences. We must implement strong policies to prevent and address cyberbullying, educate students on responsible digital citizenship, and work closely with law enforcement to address online threats.
Addressing Drug and Vaping Issues: The rise of vaping and drug use, especially the dangers of fentanyl, demands a firm and uncompromising response. We must implement robust prevention programs, educate students on the risks, and work with law enforcement to address drug-related activity on and around our campuses.
School Resource Officers and Law Enforcement Partnerships: Strong partnerships with law enforcement, including the presence of school resource officers, are essential for ensuring campus safety. We must ensure that our schools have clear protocols for communication and collaboration with law enforcement in the event of an emergency.
Mental Health Support with a Focus on Personal Responsibility: While acknowledging the importance of mental health support, we must also emphasize personal responsibility and accountability. We should focus on programs that promote resilience, character development, and healthy coping mechanisms, in addition to providing access to counseling and mental health services. By prioritizing order, discipline, parental rights, and strong partnerships with law enforcement, we can create a safe and secure learning environment where our students can thrive.
Do you support ESA’s and Senate Bill 2?
I will champion our public schools. I have concerns about ESAs and SB 2, particularly regarding the potential diversion of funds from our district and the need for rigorous accountability measures. My commitment is to ensure our public schools remain strong, well-funded, and accessible to all students in our community. Our local tax dollars must stay locally to support district initiatives, while also advocating for adequate state funding to supplement our local efforts.
It is crucial to maintain the financial health and integrity of the Frisco ISD community. Parents believe the need for transparency and accountability is at an all-time high in the district. Would you support a official Forensic Audit of the district’s finances by an independent 3rd party?
Yes, I absolutely believe it is crucial to maintain the financial health and integrity of Frisco ISD, and I agree wholeheartedly that parents’ demand for transparency and accountability is at an all-time high – and for good reason. Given the concerns I’ve heard from parents and the community, and considering the importance of public trust in how our tax dollars are managed, I would strongly support an official forensic audit of the district’s finances by an independent third party.
Do you believe the current districts’ disciplinary procedures are acceptable or do you believe we need to update our procedures for discipline and safety?
No. The current districts’ disciplinary procedures are not acceptable. The recent incidents are deeply troubling, and I understand the heightened anxiety among parents across Frisco ISD. I believe our primary responsibility is to ensure a safe and secure learning environment. This demands a robust approach, prioritizing strong physical security measures, close collaboration with law enforcement, and clear, consistently enforced disciplinary policies that hold students accountable. We must also emphasize parental rights and involvement, ensuring open communication and seeking their input on safety protocols. While acknowledging the importance of mental health, we should also focus on programs promoting personal responsibility and character development. I strongly advocate for school resource officers, and their positive impact on campus safety. We must act decisively to prevent violence, address threats, and ensure our schools remain focused on education, not fear. I am committed to working tirelessly to restore and maintain a safe learning environment for every child in Frisco ISD.
What do you believe needs to happen with Staley Middle School and how should this have been handled?
I firmly believe that extending the operation of Staley Middle School until the 2025-2026 school year is the most responsible path forward. This approach prioritizes the well being of Staley’s students and staff by minimizing the disruption to their education and careers, allowing for a more stable and supportive environment during a period of transition. Furthermore, it demonstrates a genuine respect for the Staley community’s voice and their desire for a more gradual adjustment.
Do you have knowledge of Roberts’ Rules and Board Meeting Decorum?
Yes, I understand the importance of Roberts’ Rules of Order and proper Board Meeting Decorum. I recognize that Roberts’ Rules are designed to ensure fairness, efficiency, and the orderly conduct of business. They provide a framework for motions, debates, and voting, ensuring that all voices are heard and that decisions are made in a transparent and democratic manner. I understand the importance of adhering to an agenda, respecting time limits, and conducting discussions in a civil and professional manner. My goal is to contribute to a board that operates effectively and transparently, building trust with the community and ensuring that our decisions are made in the best interests of our students.
What efforts or changes could be made to increase decisive leadership and improve community trust during board meetings?
To truly foster decisive leadership and restore the trust of our Frisco ISD community, we must implement significant changes to our board meeting procedures. I believe that increasing decisiveness necessitates clear, detailed agendas, but critically, we must empower every trustee to place their items on the agenda, ensuring a wider range of perspectives are heard and addressed. We need focused deliberations, grounded in data-driven presentations, and the use of defined decision-making frameworks for complex issues. Strategic planning sessions and transparent articulation of decision rationales will further enhance our ability to lead effectively. Equally important is rebuilding community trust. To achieve this, I propose we make public comment the very first agenda item at every board meeting. This will signal that we prioritize the voices of our residents. Furthermore, every resident should be granted a minimum of three minutes to address the board on any issue, regardless of the meeting’s agenda. This open forum will demonstrate our commitment to listening and responding to the concerns of our community. We must also enhance public participation through various means, ensure complete transparency in information and decision-making, and actively listen to and acknowledge community concerns. Regular community forums, clear communication of board actions, and unwavering accountability will be essential in building bridges. Above all, we must demonstrate respect among board members, even in disagreement, to cultivate a productive and trustworthy environment. By implementing these measures, Frisco ISD can cultivate a board that leads decisively, operates with complete openness, and earns the confidence of our entire community.
Lastly, anything you want voters to know about you!
I want Frisco ISD voters to know I’m committed to upholding the core values of fiscal responsibility, parental rights, and academic excellence. My years of community service have instilled in me a deep respect for the responsible use of taxpayer dollars, and I will advocate for transparent and accountable financial practices. I believe parents are the primary stakeholders in their children’s education, and I will champion policies that empower them to make informed choices. My focus will be on ensuring our schools provide a rigorous, values-driven education that prepares students for success. I believe in maintaining a safe and disciplined learning environment, where teachers can focus on teaching and students can focus on learning. I will advocate for strong partnerships with law enforcement, and for policies that ensure the physical and mental well-being of our students and staff. I’m committed to restoring trust in our school board by prioritizing transparency, accountability, and the efficient use of resources. I will work to ensure that our schools focus on core academic subjects, and that our curriculum reflects the values of our community. I am dedicated to serving Frisco ISD with integrity and unwavering commitment to the principles that make our district strong.
Meet Dr. Amit Kalra who is running for Frisco ISD Board of Trustees Place 1. We appreciate Dr. Kalra for submitting his responses to our candidate questions. We have published his answers as submitted to us.
Prior to running, how have you been involved in the community?
In Frisco ISD I have been a part of the District Advisory Council, Capital Projects committee, Library Reconsideration Committee Review Pool, Bond Exploration committee and the Leadership Board Academy
In Frisco City, I have completed the City Hall 101 Program and have been a part of the Frisco Cricket League captains and volunteer committee.
I have served in the HOA of my community and developed a newsletter for the community.
I have been organizing community events and cultural meets, all at-cost to provide the best experience at minimal cost to the attendees and not drawing any profit from it for 8 years now.
I have been volunteering in every community I have lived in for the past 25 years.
What experience or skills do you have that will make you a great board member?
By volunteering in different committees, I have learned about the different departments, operations, personnel and the idea exchange platform through the workshops. Recently we had a workshop attended by the candidates and BOT. The results of that workshop for planning the 2025-26 school year was shared with the District Advisory Council, I was a part of that too- other candidates were not. I am the only candidate in my race who will be ready to take on the role from Day one and save the district time and resources for training. I am also aware of what are the direct and indirect needs of the district at the moment.
I am a parent of Frisco ISD 6th grader who has been to three different elementary schools in Frisco ISD.
I am a physical therapist who has worked with children with special needs.
I am a healthcare professional and we don’t have one on the school board.
What are the 3 most critical issues facing the district today?
Deficit budget, decreasing enrollment and school safety are the three most critical issues being faced by the district today.
How do you plan to address these issues?
school safety through increased teacher empowerment and ability to escalate issues to take control of the situation instead of delayed response from procedural timings.
Decreasing enrollment by addressing the needs of the community and improving the and making more accurate assumptions in budget calculations. This will prevent overestimation of enrollment numbers.
Deficit budget through restructuring of departments as necessary and prevent the execution of “all or none” law currently in place for replacement of equipment and furniture. Analyze the increased spending on the healthcare services and the counsellor services ( it encompasses a whole lot more than just school counselors).
The new challenge that got created today is the passing of HB3. Maintaining student enrollment is a challenge the new board will face.
Do you support ESA’s and Senate Bill 2?
I do not support ESA, but it got passed today.
It is crucial to maintain the financial health and integrity of the Frisco ISD community. Parents believe the need for transparency and accountability is at an all-time high in the district. Would you support a official Forensic Audit of the district’s finances by an independent 3rd party?
The Board of Trustees oversee the performance review of two personnel’s- The Superintendant and the internal auditor. We are currently rated top amongst the top financial review benchmarks in place. The financial reports are available online. I would, however, like more details about the line items since they encompass a lot of sub items under those few words. If the need arises for an Independent 3rd party audit the board has the power to vote on it, but then approval of that third independent third party may also get questioned by some sections of the society. It’s also an added cost when implemented. There needs to be substantial evidence to demonstrate some wrong doing to make these changes. I believe in transparency and accountable finances.
Do you believe the current districts’ disciplinary procedures are acceptable or do you believe we need to update our procedures for discipline and safety?
I think there is a scope for continuous improvement in the districts disciplinary procedures with a lot more common sense application in place. It’s too rigid and too structured that limits the perpetrators for getting punished for provocation. Teachers also feel limited in their ability to act, handle and respond to a situation and the events that occur post situation.
Our procedures need to enhance towards AI related image morphing and visual generation that may mislead a student, teacher, staff or parent in to believing its accuracy. Cell phone presence reduction, free time screen usage reduction, and reduction of barriers to reporting and increased usage of StopIt app will help to further address these issues.
What do you believe needs to happen with Staley Middle School and how should this have been handled?
As a capital projects committee member I was anticipating meeting to discuss Plan B and Plan C for Staley after the Bond failure but were disbanded. I disagree with this course is action. Any discussion about closure should have been a recommendation from this committee first. Communication was inadequate from Nov to Mar between the district and the Staley parents/ administration. When half the staff is moved out then why are discussions being placed now? It’s more painful to see these thousand paper cuts. At this point it’s been pushed to the point of closure as the only option which will be announced after the elections. It will close whether it’s for repairs or permanent closure.
Capital projects committee should have decided on the next steps. The demographer should have been changed. The communication to the board about the impact and financial implications of every aspect of Staley closure/ delayed closure/ and continued operation should have been shared at a meeting at Staley itself with the board and Staley community present.
Do you have knowledge of Roberts’ Rules and Board Meeting Decorum?
Yes. This is the big highlight after the last board meeting where the rules were reduced to words in a book. These rules were also shared as a part of our HOA board.
What efforts or changes could be made to increase decisive leadership and improve community trust during board meetings?
Being present for the workshops and discussions prior to the meeting.
Asking the hard unpleasant questions behind the scene to make a clear understanding of the situation and its implications.
Understanding the leadership role and the influence of emotions Vs facts/logic.
Accuracy in the meeting order items and staying on course with the meeting items.
Elect leaders who will stand up and take a stand instead of pleasantry panderers.
Lastly, anything you want voters to know about you!
My child attends middle school in Frisco ISD and every decision I will make will have an impact for the next 6 years. With school voucher program passing we need a leader that understands the role and will help to quickly adapt to the changes. I have a Presidential Voluntary Service Award. As a healthcare worker I took a stand against the Covid-19 vaccine because I didn’t find the research convincing. This impacted me and my family directly. I operate and make decisions based on facts, evidence, research, and critical analysis. All my friends know that I am keen follower of rules and regulations. I took the time out away from my family to learn about the role before I filled out my application.
I am here to serve because it’s important to have the right leadership for decision making.
We would like to thank Sangita Datta for responding to our Citizen Questionairre. It is important to note after sending this out to each candidate running in Place 2 and 4, Ms. Datta was the first candidate to respond and clearly she provided thoughtful insight to each question asked. Meet Sangita Datta – Running for Place 4
Candidate Information
1. Full Name: Sangita Datta 2. Campaign Website and Social Media Links:
3. Occupation and Background: I am a financial specialist and the founder of Datta Insurance Services. I hold a Bachelor of Science in Architecture and multiple licenses in life and health insurance. My professional journey has given me deep insight into financial responsibility, risk assessment, and strategic planning—skills I aim to bring to the City Council.
4. Why are you running for Frisco City Council? I believe Frisco’s greatest strength isn’t just in its rapid growth—it’s in its people. While we’ve built a global name through world-class sports and entertainment, we now need to ensure that our residents—families, small business owners, seniors, and young professionals—aren’t left behind.
I’m running to:
Invest in public safety, ensuring our first responders have the resources they need
Preserve and reinvest in our older neighborhoods and infrastructure
Bring high-quality job opportunities to Frisco by partnering with companies and local colleges
Maintain fiscal responsibility and reject vanity projects that don’t serve core needs
Create open, transparent communication between the city and the residents
I’ve spoken to countless residents who feel the burden of rising costs, congestion, and a loss of connection with local government. I want to be their voice and serve with empathy, common sense, and accountability.
This isn’t just a political campaign—it’s personal. I want to help build a Frisco where families plant roots, build lives, and thrive with pride.
Community & Development Involvement
I’ve been actively involved in Frisco for over a decade. My community service includes:
Graduate of Frisco City 101 and Citizens Police Academy
Member of Leadership Frisco Class 25
Ambassador for both the Frisco Inclusion Committee and Frisco Chamber of Commerce
Secretary of the Frisco Parks and Recreation Board
Small business mentor, helping local startups grow
Host and organizer of community Diwali celebrations and supporter of cultural diversity events
Honored with the Frisco Emerging Leader Award, Frisco Women of Influence Award, and listed in Marquis Who’s Who in America, 2024
1. What are your top three priorities for Frisco’s growth and development?
Public Safety First Frisco must continue to be one of the safest cities in America. That means prioritizing funding, staffing, and resources for our police and fire departments—and listening to the needs of those who serve us every day.
Reduce the Tax Burden on Residents Many families are struggling to keep up with rising costs. We can reduce this burden by attracting large employers, building a local workforce pipeline through partnerships with nearby colleges, and creating jobs right here in Frisco—allowing residents to live and work locally.
Transparent, Two-Way Communication I propose a Neighborhood Ambassadorship Program to bridge the gap between city leadership and residents. Transparency and education are critical to building trust and making informed, community-driven decisions.
2. How do you plan to balance economic growth with maintaining community character?
Frisco’s growth is undeniable—but growth without intention can erode the very character that made this city so desirable in the first place.
To balance economic development with community values, I will:
Support responsible development that aligns with Frisco’s long-term vision and comprehensive plan—not just short-term financial gain.
Ensure we preserve green spaces, parks, and our city’s charm, especially in older neighborhoods that represent our roots.
Prioritize mixed-use developments that support walkability and community interaction, rather than isolated high-density clusters that strain infrastructure.
Push for community input on major zoning or development projects, so residents feel heard and involved in shaping their neighborhoods.
Frisco can grow without losing its identity. The key is thoughtful planning, active listening, and a commitment to preserving the “small-town feel with big-city amenities” that so many of our families value.
3. What is your stance on residential and commercial zoning changes?
Zoning is a powerful tool that shapes how our city functions—and I believe zoning changes must be made with extreme care, full transparency, and strong community input.
My stance:
I support zoning flexibility when it brings real value to the community, such as local job creation, diversified housing options, or enhanced infrastructure.
I oppose rezoning that prioritizes high-density or multi-family development in areas not designed to support it—especially if it creates stress on traffic, schools, or emergency services.
I advocate for data-driven impact studies and resident forums before any significant zoning change is approved.
Zoning decisions should always prioritize quality of life, long-term sustainability, and smart growth—not just short-term returns.
4. How will you ensure that infrastructure keeps pace with growth?
Ensuring our infrastructure keeps up with growth is one of my top priorities. Frisco is growing rapidly—with a population nearing 250,000, and large-scale attractions like Universal Kids Resort and FIFA 2026 on the way. This growth brings opportunity, but without the right infrastructure, it also brings stress.
Prioritize infrastructure before permitting major developments. Roads, water, drainage, and public services must be in place before large residential or commercial projects break ground.
Invest in East and mature areas of Frisco, not just the new. Older neighborhoods deserve reinvestment to keep up with demand and preserve quality of life.
Ensure developers pay their fair share through impact fees that go directly toward infrastructure improvements.
Leverage technology for traffic management, public safety, and utilities. Smart infrastructure solutions can reduce congestion and improve service delivery in real-time.
Establish long-term infrastructure forecasting and reserve planning, including dedicated funding for upkeep and upgrades—especially in fast-growing and high-traffic zones.
Our city must plan not just for today—but for the Frisco of 5, 10, and 20 years from now. Growth is exciting, but if our infrastructure lags behind, everyone feels the strain. My commitment is to build a Frisco that works just as well as it shines for ALL.
5. What is your stance on density and population build-out?
I believe Frisco is meant for everyone—not just the wealthy. This city should be a place where families can grow, seniors can age in dignity, and young professionals can build their future—all without being priced out or pushed out. But growth must be balanced with planning. Getting overcrowded is not the solution.
The current comprehensive plan allows for a maximum build-out population of 350,000, but that number is simply not sustainable with our existing infrastructure and services. I support a more responsible target of around 280,000 residents, which protects both our quality of life and city services.
We’re already seeing the signs of strain:
Our newly built world-class library is already too small to meet growing demand.
The Frisco Senior Center is running out of space to accommodate new entrants and serve our aging population with the dignity they deserve.
Increased traffic congestion and emergency response times show that our infrastructure and public safety resources are being stretched thin.
So , High-density housing should be limited and strategically placed in areas that are supported by strong infrastructure—not pushed into neighborhoods that can’t handle the impact.
We must ensure that our first responders—police, fire, EMS—have the staffing and equipment they need to serve a growing and diverse population.
Resident feedback must be central to all zoning and density decisions. We need transparent communication and planning, not top-down decisions that leave communities frustrated.
And finally, we must invest in city services—like libraries, senior centers, parks, and roads—to grow with our population.
Frisco is one of the most desirable places to live, and I want to keep it that way—for everyone. That means growing smart, planning ahead, and putting people first.
Fiscal Responsibility & Budgeting
1. What would be your approach to managing the city’s budget while ensuring essential services are maintained?
My approach to managing Frisco’s budget is centered on accountability, resource optimization, and creative problem-solving—while always protecting the essential services our residents rely on.
Every department has a budget, but we must go beyond just approving numbers. I believe in evaluating the “why” behind each request, understanding the logic, and working collaboratively with departments to ensure their needs are met without excess or inefficiency. We must strike a balance—not overburdening teams, but also not allowing unnecessary comfort at the expense of taxpayers.
One of my professional strengths is in optimizing resources. I’ve helped businesses find lean, sustainable solutions—and I would bring the same mindset to city governance.
Here’s how:
Lean budgeting practices across departments to ensure funds are used efficiently and with clear outcomes tied to service delivery.
Public-private partnerships and sponsorships: Many companies are willing to offer products, services, or financial support in exchange for name recognition. Tapping into this model—especially with local nonprofits or regional sponsors—can significantly reduce city costs without compromising service quality.
Encouraging cross-departmental resource sharing and eliminating duplication to streamline operations.
Prioritizing outcome-based budgeting, where spending is tied to measurable results that directly benefit the community.
With Frisco’s continued growth, we must be smart with every dollar, ensure transparency, and keep the focus on delivering real value to our residents—without increasing financial strain.
2. Do you believe Frisco’s current property tax rates are sustainable? Would you support any changes including cuts, increases or adjustments to the current property tax rates? Why or why not?
Frisco’s current property tax rate may seem competitive on paper, but when paired with rapidly rising property values, the real burden on residents continues to grow—and that is simply not sustainable for many families, seniors, and first-time homebuyers.
I do not support increasing property tax rates. In fact, I believe we should work toward gradual rate reductions over time, especially as our commercial base expands.
Here’s how I would approach it:
Focus on economic diversification: By attracting more corporate headquarters, technology firms, and high-wage employers, we can shift more of the tax burden away from homeowners and toward commercial entities.
Grow our local job market: Giving Frisco residents the ability to live and work in the city helps stabilize income, reduce commuter costs, and stimulate local spending—all of which feeds back into a stronger economy and tax base.
Expand strategic partnerships and cost-saving initiatives: As mentioned earlier, collaborating with nonprofits and private sponsors to reduce city expenses helps prevent the need for tax hikes.
We need to remember—most residents aren’t asking for luxury; they’re asking for affordability, safety, and sustainability. They want to be able to stay in the city they helped build, without being taxed out of it.
I will always advocate for smart, people-first budgeting that reflects the real-world pressures our residents face.
3. What are your funding priorities for public safety, education, and infrastructure?
My top funding priorities reflect what truly matters to the people of Frisco—safety, opportunity, and livability.
1. Public Safety: Public safety is non-negotiable. As Frisco grows and welcomes major venues like Universal Studios and FIFA, we must ensure our police, fire, and EMS departments are fully staffed, well-equipped, and proactively supported. That means:
Transitioning to a 4-person fire truck staffing model, as requested by our firefighters
Prioritizing competitive pay and benefits to retain experienced first responders
Investing in modern technology and equipment to improve response times and public confidence
2. Education (Collaboration & Support): While public education is not directly funded by the city, we play a key role in partnering with local school districts and institutions to support student success. I would advocate for:
Internship and workforce development programs in partnership with Frisco ISD and local colleges
Safe routes to schools, better lighting, and traffic enforcement near campuses
City-led initiatives that support mental health, student safety, and career readiness
3. Infrastructure: Growth without infrastructure planning leads to frustration and failures. I support:
Proactive investment in roads, drainage, and water systems
Smart traffic management solutions to reduce congestion
Maintenance and modernization of aging infrastructure—especially in mature neighborhoods, not just new developments
These aren’t just line items in a budget—they’re the foundations of a strong, inclusive, and future-ready Frisco. My job as a council member will be to ensure every dollar spent advances these priorities in a fiscally responsible and community-first way.
4. How would you plan to handle Frisco’s increasing debt and financial obligations?
Debt, when used wisely, is not always a bad thing—especially when we’re talking about AAA-rated municipal bonds, which give Frisco access to favorable rates and funding options for long-term infrastructure and capital improvements. It’s about understanding opportunity cost and using debt as a strategic tool—not a fallback.
Frisco is in a solid financial position today, but maintaining that strength requires forward-thinking, discipline, and clear priorities. Here’s how I would approach it:
Prioritize needs over wants—always. We must focus on funding what truly matters: public safety, infrastructure, and reinvestment across all of Frisco—not just select areas or headline-making projects.
Maintain strong reserves. A “rainy day fund” is crucial. It’s what allows us to respond to emergencies, economic downturns, or unforeseen challenges without risking basic services or spiking taxes.
Use public-private partnerships strategically. Many companies are willing to co-invest in amenities or services in exchange for name recognition or community impact. This model can significantly offset costs without burdening taxpayers.
Ensure geographic equity. Debt-backed investments should not favor just one side of the city. We must reinvest in mature neighborhoods, aging infrastructure, and underserved areas to preserve the livability and character of all of Frisco.
Practice transparent financial communication. Residents deserve to understand how debt is used, why it’s incurred, and how it’s being repaid. I support easy-to-access budget dashboards, annual debt reports, and educational town halls on major funding decisions.
Tie borrowing to measurable return on investment. If a project is funded through debt, there must be clear value to residents—whether it’s economic development, traffic relief, job creation, or public safety improvements.
Debt can be a smart investment if it’s tied to community benefit, managed transparently, and accompanied by fiscal discipline. My goal is to make sure Frisco’s financial future remains as strong—and as community-focused—as its present.
5. In December 2021, the Mayor cast the tie-breaking vote to approve the Employee Wellness Clinic, which is projected to operate at a loss for the first few years. At the five-year mark, if the clinic is still not breaking even, would you support closing it or continuing to operate at a loss?
I strongly believe in supporting our employees and ensuring they have access to quality, affordable care—but we also have a duty to manage taxpayer dollars wisely.
If, after five years, the Employee Wellness Clinic is still operating at a loss, I would not automatically support continuing the same model. At that point, it’s clear we need to reassess and adapt. Sometimes, outsourcing or forming a new public-private partnership is a more viable and sustainable option than owning and operating something at a deficit.
We can and should explore:
Partnering with regional healthcare providers to deliver wellness services at negotiated group rates
Integrating care through existing insurance networks to avoid duplication of services
Reallocating resources to prioritize employee wellness in smarter, more efficient ways
The goal is not to take services away—but to provide them in a way that makes fiscal sense. Our employees shouldn’t have to compromise on well-being, and our residents shouldn’t be asked to shoulder ongoing financial losses.
At the end of the day, we are obligated to do the right thing—for our employees and for the taxpayers. That means being compassionate, but also clear-eyed about performance, sustainability, and accountability.
6. Should the city be in the business of running an Athletic Center, Performing Arts Center, or any other type of business model that mirrors a commercial business which has annual operational costs paid for by tax dollars?
No—the city is not a commercial business, and it should not operate as one, especially when the city itself acknowledges that these ventures are not expected to be profitable.
When taxpayer dollars are involved, the priority should always be essential services and core infrastructure—not entertainment or amenities that carry long-term operating losses.
I absolutely support arts, recreation, and culture, but owning and operating large-scale commercial-style facilities should be carefully reconsidered. If these amenities are important to the community, we should explore:
Public-private partnerships, where private entities help fund, operate, or manage the facility
Naming rights and sponsorships to reduce public cost
Or allowing the private market to meet these needs, while the city provides support through zoning, promotion, or limited incentives
We must focus on fiscal responsibility, not vanity projects. The city’s role is to protect, serve, and sustain quality of life, not run businesses that add to our debt and increase pressure on future budgets.
Transparency and Accountability
1. How will you ensure transparency in your decision-making process and open communication between the city council and residents?
Transparency is not just a principle—it’s a responsibility. As a city council member, I will work to create an environment where residents feel heard, informed, and involved every step of the way.
Here’s how I plan to ensure that:
Open-door communication: I will be accessible to residents through regular office hours, public forums, and neighborhood listening sessions.
Clear, timely updates on major decisions: Whether it’s a zoning change, bond project, or new development, residents should know what’s being decided, why it matters, and how they can give input.
Support for a Neighborhood Ambassador Program: This initiative would allow each area of Frisco to have a direct liaison who helps bridge the gap between city hall and the people—especially in fast-growing or underserved areas – meeting every quarterly to understand the ongoing concerns from residents and city limitations can be understood better.
Plain-language summaries of complex issues: Government shouldn’t be confusing. I’ll advocate for summaries and visual aids that explain city decisions in a way that’s easy to understand. Education is key !
Digital engagement tools: More live streams, online Q&As, and interactive platforms that give people a say—especially those who can’t attend meetings in person.
Transparency builds trust, and trust builds community. I’m committed to leading with integrity, openness, and accountability.
2A. Do you support more increased public access to city council meetings, boards, and commission meetings?
Absolutely. Residents should always be welcomed, encouraged, and empowered to attend public meetings and provide feedback. Transparency and accountability start with access.
City Council members are elected to represent the people, not operate behind closed doors. That means:
Public meetings should be live-streamed and archived
Agendas and materials should be shared in advance
Clear instructions should be given on how residents can submit input or speak on agenda items
Meeting schedules should be clearly communicated across multiple platforms—including email, social media, and city apps
City government should be inclusive and accessible to everyone, not just those who can make it in person or understand policy jargon. We serve the people—and that starts with inviting them to the table.
2B. What steps would you take to improve access to meetings, meeting minutes, and public records?
To improve access and transparency, I would support:
Live-streaming all board and commission meetings, not just City Council
Ensuring all meeting minutes are detailed and posted in a timely manner, with summaries that highlight key decisions, votes, and discussions
Developing a centralized, user-friendly online portal where residents can easily search agendas, minutes, and public records
Promoting civic literacy, through educational content that helps residents understand how to get involved and what the city’s processes mean for them
Transparency is not just about availability—it’s about clarity, accessibility, and engagement. As a council member, I’ll advocate for modernizing how we communicate and ensuring every resident has the tools to stay informed.
3. What is your definition of conflict of interest?
A conflict of interest occurs when a public official’s personal, financial, or professional interests interfere with—or appear to interfere with—their ability to make objective, unbiased decisions in the best interest of the public.
This includes:
Voting on matters that would financially benefit themselves, close family members, or business associates
Participating in decisions where they have undisclosed affiliations or loyalties
Using their position to influence outcomes that benefit political donors or private entities they’re connected to
Even the perception of a conflict can undermine public trust. That’s why it’s important not only to avoid conflicts, but to disclose any potential conflicts transparently and recuse oneself when appropriate.
Elected officials must always remember: we are here to serve the public—not ourselves, our friends, or our donors. Integrity and transparency must guide every decision.
4. Do you support implementing a stricter ethics policy that puts a check on the influence of money in local politics, including recusal from votes that could benefit major donors?
Yes—100%. Public service must be rooted in integrity.
I fully support stricter ethics policies, including requiring recusal from votes where a council member’s donor stands to benefit. Even the perception of bias undermines public trust, and that trust is everything.
I also believe that current City Council members should not publicly endorse or advocate for candidates during elections. They are elected to serve the people—not to influence outcomes or use their position to sway voters. They should remain neutral and let the democratic process work without interference.
Frisco residents deserve decisions made for the right reasons—not for political favors or financial gain. I will always put people first and lead with transparency, fairness, and accountability.
5. Do you believe active members of the City Council should advocate as “private citizens” for propositions on the ballot during local elections?
No. Once elected, council members represent the entire city—not just their personal views.
Even if acting as a “private citizen,” their title carries weight and influence. Advocating for or against ballot propositions while in office can blur the lines between public duty and personal agenda.
Elected officials should focus on educating the public with facts, not persuading them how to vote. Voters deserve unbiased information so they can make informed decisions for themselves.
City leadership must remain neutral, respectful of public trust, and committed to fair democratic processes.
Community Services & Quality of Life
1. What are your plans for enhancing public parks and recreation on Frisco’s East Side of the DNT?
When I moved to Frisco several years ago, Lone Star Ranch felt a little “oldish,” while the East Side looked brand new. I couldn’t buy in the East at the time—but now, I see the tables have turned. The West Side is booming, and many parts of the East Side are in need of attention.
That’s why I firmly believe: “Old is gold.” These established neighborhoods helped build Frisco’s foundation, and they deserve reinvestment, renovations, and updates to match the city’s new growth. Frisco shouldn’t feel like two different cities—it should look and feel like One Frisco.
Here’s my plan to enhance parks and recreation citywide, with a focus on equity:
Reinvest in older parks with modern amenities—shade, lighting, restrooms, and updated playgrounds.
Bring new recreational programming to underserved areas—youth sports, wellness events, senior fitness, etc.
Ensure citywide capital improvements are planned with a balance between new growth and legacy communities.
Empower residents through a Neighborhood Ambassador Program, so every corner of Frisco has a voice in how resources are allocated.
Parks bring people together. They reflect how much we value community, wellness, and connection. I will work to ensure that every resident—regardless of ZIP code—feels seen, served, and included in Frisco’s future.
2. How do you plan to address traffic congestion across Frisco?
Traffic congestion is one of the top concerns I hear from residents—and it’s only going to increase with major attractions like Universal Studios and FIFA 2026 on the way.
To stay ahead, we must:
Invest in smarter traffic signal systems and road expansions in high-traffic zones
Prioritize east-west and north-south connectivity to reduce bottlenecks
Work with regional partners on inter-city traffic flow solutions
Encourage local job growth so fewer residents need to commute long distances daily
We can’t solve tomorrow’s traffic with yesterday’s planning. It’s time for proactive, tech-driven solutions that keep Frisco moving.
3. Do you think Frisco has a public transportation need?
Yes—Frisco is reaching a size and scale where exploring smart, flexible public transportation options is necessary.
While we may not need a full-scale rail system yet, we do need to:
Evaluate on-demand, micro-transit services for seniors, students, and workers
Expand regional transit partnerships to connect Frisco with nearby cities and employment hubs
Plan ahead for future needs as traffic and population grow
Public transit isn’t just about mobility—it’s about access, equity, and sustainability. We need to start the conversation now to be ready for tomorrow.
4. How will you engage with and listen to diverse voices of the community?
Frisco is a beautifully diverse city, and our leadership must reflect that inclusivity—not just in words, but in action.
As someone who has served as a Frisco Inclusion Committee Ambassador and actively participated in cultural events across the city, I’ve seen firsthand the power of listening to every voice at the table.
Here’s how I’ll continue that work:
Create a Neighborhood Ambassador Program so every part of Frisco has direct, local representation and feedback loops to City Council
Host listening sessions and town halls in different neighborhoods—not just at City Hall
Actively seek input from underrepresented communities, faith groups, seniors, small business owners, and youth
Ensure city communications are accessible and available in multiple formats and languages
Representation isn’t just about who’s on the dais—it’s about how we make people feel seen, heard, and valued.
Public Safety
1. What measures will you take to ensure Frisco’s Police and Fire Department remain well-funded?
Public safety is a top priority and the foundation of a thriving city. As Frisco grows, we must ensure our first responders have the resources, staffing, and equipment they need to keep our community safe.
Here’s what I will advocate for:
Proactive budgeting for police and fire based on population growth and projected demand—not after service gaps appear
Investment in technology, training, and mental health support for first responders
Ensuring competitive salaries and benefits to attract and retain top talent
Collaborating with department leadership to understand real-time needs—not just relying on static annual reports
Frisco is one of the safest cities in the nation. We must protect that reputation by staying ahead of the curve, not playing catch-up.
2. For years the Frisco Firefighters Association has taken to the citizens input pulpit asking for more staffing (specifically going from a 3 Man Truck to a 4 Man Truck). Turnover has been high recently with Firefighters taking retirement and then going to work for other cities who are more supportive of their First Responders.
Q: Do you support increased staffing and moving to a 4 Person Truck?
Yes—if it’s a demonstrated need, we must support it.
Our firefighters are on the front lines every day, and if moving to a 4-person truck improves safety, response times, and efficiency, then it’s our responsibility to prioritize that in the budget.
We can’t expect excellence from our first responders without giving them the tools, staffing, and support they need to succeed. Public safety should never be under-resourced.
4. Would you support removing Animal Services “out” from under Public Safety and turning it into its own department?
Yes, I’m open to exploring this idea—if it improves efficiency, responsiveness, and animal welfare.
Animal Services is an important function, but it operates very differently from police and fire. Giving it its own department could allow for:
More focused staffing and resources
Improved community education and outreach
Stronger partnerships with local rescue organizations and shelters
That said, any decision should be based on data, operational needs, and budget impact. If separated it leads to better service without burdening taxpayers, I would support it.
5. Do you believe Frisco should have its own Animal Shelter and Education Center—or rely on a public-private partnership?
Yes, I believe Frisco should work toward having its own Animal Shelter and Education Center.
As our population grows, so does the need for local, responsive animal services. While public-private partnerships can be helpful in the short term, relying solely on external agencies like Collin County limits accessibility and control.
A city like Frisco should be able to:
Provide quicker response times for lost or stray pets
Offer community education and adoption services
Build stronger partnerships with local volunteers and rescue groups
That said, I would still explore a phased approach or a hybrid public-private model to manage costs responsibly. But long-term, Frisco needs its own dedicated facility—because animal welfare is a city responsibility, not just a community afterthought.
Closing Statements
Service is second nature to me. This campaign is not a performance—it’s simply an extension of who I am, every single day. I’ve always lived by the principle of service before self—from my early days volunteering at Mother Teresa’s Missionaries of Charity, to mentoring small businesses, organizing cultural events, and serving on multiple boards right here in Frisco.
I’m not running for a title. I’m running to expand the impact I’ve already been making quietly for years.
Frisco doesn’t just need another politician—it needs a sensible, compassionate, practical leader who knows how to listen, learn, and take action. I’ve been doing that as a resident, a business owner, and a community ambassador. Now, I’m stepping up to do it on a larger scale.
My desire to serve comes from the heart—not from politics or ambition—but from a deep love for this community. Frisco needs people-first leadership rooted in common sense, fiscal responsibility, and empathy. That’s the kind of leadership I offer—and that’s why I’m running for City Council.
If transparency were a magic act, Frisco City Hall would be pulling rabbits out of hats while the real answers disappear up their sleeves. Welcome back to our ongoing tale of smoke, mirrors, and municipal mystery, The Phantom of Frisco saga. Now, in Part 2, we go deeper into the back corridors, where the stage props and “public meetings” feel more like rehearsed performances for an audience of none. Enjoy our final blog that expresses the last of concerns we have and we hope it lifts the curtains so you can see who’s really pulling the strings.
Community Arts vs Broadway:
For years, the Frisco Arts community was pushing the need for a community theater where residents could perform musicals, art shows and more. How did that turn into bringing Broadway to Frisco? Do we NEED Broadway – No! Do we NEED a COMMUNITY THEATRE EVENT SPACE – Yes! We have a lot of local groups who could benefit from it. A community theater event space would have a much smaller price tag than what the city is pitching today. The city and Tammy Meinershagen, the leader of Frisco Arts, are no longer thinking about the needs of Frisco residents or the Frisco Arts Community.
Backstage Pass to PAC Mentality
Smart Frisco is a local political action committee that supports Proposition A & B. We were open to learning more but then they did a post with the caption It’s Free! Immediately we wondered who is behind Smart Frisco? Who is running Smart Frisco? Who is funding Smart Frisco? NOTHING IS FREE!
The first report filed for the PAC is the Treasure Report which lists the name Heather Eastburn. We simply googled her name at that point to find out she was arrested in April 2023 for “Assault Causes Bodily Injury of a Family Member” and thought is this someone we should trust to tell us it’s free! Then we found out Eastburn used the excuse of being INDIGENT to bond out. That means the party of the original action is unable to afford the costs of paying or giving security costs (bond). Eastburn’s credibility was in question simply because she claims indigency to get free bond/lawyer all while telling Frisco Residents that the $340 million performing arts center IS FREE and WON’T COST US A CENT! Eastburn has a layer of problems we won’t expose here but, in the future, maybe fix your home before trying to take money from our pockets through sales tax.
Who is funding Smart Frisco?
The answer, Smart Frisco has been flushed with $20,000 in cash by Frisco North Development LLC, which is owned by the Wilks Brothers, who are building Firefly Park in Frisco. Firefly is slated to be a $2.5 to $4 BILLION dollar project located next to what could be the home of the future FCFA. Clearly having a Frisco Arts Center next to their billion-dollar development would benefit them greatly.
Then you have Councilman Bicycle Bill Woodard who donated to the PAC. He has done this before when he ran the PAC against the Frisco Firefighters in 2024. Why does his involvement make us cautious? Our city is constantly in the news, and every picture taken has our council front and center at events. When you want to use the excuse “I am doing this as a private citizen not a council member” we don’t buy it! We have proven that the PAC last year used city resources which Bill could have only had access to as a councilman and to us you can’t play both sides. Residents give more credibility to what he says because he is in a position of leadership versus another PAC run by regular ole joes! When a PAC is funded 99% by a developer, and the voice for the PAC is a city council member – that concerns us!
Letter of Intent (LOI) – Language Semantics at play!
How does semantics play into an LOI? Semantics is the meaning or interpretation of a word or sentence. A letter of intent (LOI) is a formal written document expressing a party’s intention to enter into a contract or agreement. It outlines the main terms of the future agreementand shows a serious commitment to a deal. LOIs are preliminary to any formal dealsor terms and are designed to be general and non-legally binding.
Pay attention to the key words in the definition which are intention, agreement, commitment, preliminary, and non-legally binding. The City Council wants us to vote on changing the use of funds in our EDC based on a commitment, preliminary, non-legally binding agreement. Some would say it is filled with semantical words, depending on how you interpret them.
On April 1st, the city council authorized a LOI with Frisco Live for them to be the operator-at-risk for the new FCFA. We reviewed the 8-page Venue Operator Letter of Intent and the first thing to catch our eye was the following which states, “Frisco Live is a Texas non-profit corporation formed by Broadway Dallas and Broadway Across America.” Then it goes on to say they will make the best effort to obtain tax-exempt status, however if they don’t the parties will still move forward.
Why does this matter? The non-profit with a tax-exempt status is to help them with FUNDING! Remember, the last $100 million must come from donors or heavy hitter sponsors. This is the biggest piece of “the unknown” pie that residents should be concerned with. According to the IRS website, “Until a nonprofit receives that status—even if it operates as a nonprofit in good faith—donations to it are not deductible. Just calling yourself a nonprofit or even being registered as a nonprofit corporation with your state is not enough for federal tax purposes.” Why would you donate when it is not tax right off? If they did not achieve tax-exempt status and the city moves forward anyways, then how will they cover the $100 million they are supposed to be raising from donors?
They also stated at the meeting they had done two funding studies and had a target list so why not share the studies. As of now we can only assume there are no donors who have signed a commitment to fill this gap. Project Theatres has stated numerous times that most donations don’t come in an upfront lump sum – they are given over years. The city needs to state before we vote to change the use of EDC funds what will happen if they don’t get that status and where will the money come from? Why would you vote so they can continue to move forward, spend more money on a very expensive project with so many unanswered risks. How much do we spend without knowing the facts? Again, residents need to ask themselves, are they willing to take a $100 million dollar risk?
Next the LOI talks about how Frisco Live will contribute $4 Million to the FCFA Capital Campaign Fund as part of the 2025 “silent capital campaign” effort. It goes on to say the delivery of that money is contingent upon the following and is fully refundable if not meet.
1. In the event the project is canceled before completion or fails to be completed.
2. If The City of Frisco and PISD fail to get the bond issuances necessary to design and construct the project.
3. The City’s authorization and funding of the one-time maximum $8 million reserve balance split between three City administered funds. First $6 Million for the startup “Operational Support Fund,” plus $1 Million for the “Facility Maintenance Fund” and $1Million for the “Major Capital Expense Restricted Fund.”
What caused us to be concerned? The number $8 million because every time this slide comes up in their presentations, they say $6 Million. They have failed to highlight the two $1 Million contributions, aka they just put that in the small print.
When we watched the April 7th meeting a resident named Dan Elmer took to the microphone (2:20:00) and explained his background in private equity and how he is in charge of approval authority for loans for a local bank. He said he could not vote yes for the propositions based on what was written in this LOI. He said he was incredibly disappointed to watch the council approve this LOI especially after Councilman Brian Livingston asked the question “who are the parties to the definitive operation agreement” being discussed and no one could answer that.
Elmer went on to say, while the consultants and council expressed Broadway Dallas and Broadway Across America, based on the current LOI that is not true. Elmer then held up the agreement and said Page 1 – “Parties Involved” – City of Frisco and Frisco Live Inc.” Elmer then asked, “Why does that matter?” The structure proposed is a remote bankruptcy structure and there is no recourse to Broadway Dallas or Broadway Across America. That would require a separate agreement.
Elmer then asked, “What’s the role of Broadway Dallas and Broadway Across America as written in the current LOI?” They are CONSULTANTS to Frisco Live! That means they are providing services to Frisco Live, a Non-Profit Bankruptcy Remote Entity. Why is that important?” Let’s say they run out of funding, Elmer said that means they have no assets, andno one is required to step up and fund this entity as the LOI is written today.
Elmer continued, “in order for that to happen you need a keep well agreement which is an agreement that those entities will continue to provide funding in the event of an operational loss which is not in this LOI today.” You don’t have a guarantee of an operating agreement from Broadway Dallas /Broadway Across America. What you do have is “THE PROMISE TO NEGOTIATE THE CONSULTING AGREEMENT AT A LATER DAY UNDER UNSPECIFIED TERMS.” He also stated at the April 1st meeting it was said we are not paying management fees to Broadway Dallas / Broadway Across America. He pointed out that it is not true, we will be paying consulting fees which are stated in the LOI. He said whatever fee arrangements are to be paid should be back end loaded to limit the fees they are paid early before the concept is proven. Again, he stated, none of that is discussed in the LOI. Holding up the agreement he said these are not things to be figured out in the next steps, these are material deal terms that are not in the framework of the deal.
Elmer went on to say that he reached out to the email on the presentation and the phone number to ask what the fees are to be paid in year 1 & 2 and he got no response. He closed by stating he is not against the project, but he is against a bad deal, and this is a bad deal. Sir, you took the words right out of our mouth!
Facility Use
We heard over and over the “Community Hall” will be shared by Prosper ISD and several local community groups. Based on the presentation on 4/7/2025 (slide 7) it stats that Prosper ISD, community non-profit arts organizations, small community events, visual arts exhibits and regional events will occupy the facility 84% of the time. The remaining 16% of the time it will be dark days, meaning no use. A note at the bottom of the slide says, “community use projections INCLUDE PISD NEEDS.”
Former City Manager, George Purefoy, posted on Facebook that he was told at the open house that the local arts groups will have approximately 50% of the use of the small theater. According to the city’s FAQ , “Prosper ISD is anticipated to be the predominant user of the Community Hall.” Funny they don’t have consistent answers to the questions! It must have been a typo when they left off the percentage on the answer in the FAQ. We decided to go directly to the source… Prosper ISD that is!
We emailed the Superintendent for Prosper ISD and one of the questions we asked was what % of the time would the community theater be used by Prosper ISD. The Chief Communication Officer responded to us, Rachel Trotter and said, “AS OF TODAY, THE SMALLER THEATER WILL BE USED 84% OF THE TIME BY PROSPER ISD.”
Question, if Prosper is using it 84% of the time and it’s dark 16% of the time, then when are the community non-profit arts organizations, small community events, visual arts exhibits, or regional events supposed to use the facility? The question of Prospers quantitative use of the community hall was asked this week and Gena with Project Theatres paused and never directly answered, instead she gave generic percentages as we expected. Based on how the Universal Kids vote went down, it is our opinion that the night of the vote many will be shocked to learn some “changes” may take place leaving no availability to other groups. We call it the Bait & Switch!
Well, they can use the large hall right? Yes, but can they afford to rent the large hall? Probably not!
Next, based on the usage chart, Broadway will only be using the Large Hall 15% of the time. A $340 million dollar investment for 15% of the time to be used for Broadway. Does that sound reasonable to you?
Conflict of Interest
Lastly, we point out the conflict of interest starting with Tammy Meinershagen. She claims to be voting yes for this because she believes it is good for the community; the truth is there is no way in hell she would vote against it. Tammy was introduced to music as a young child and plays the Violin and at age 5 she played her first concert at the Rockford Symphony Orchestra in front of 5000 people. Her family moved to Frisco in 2004, and in Voyage Dallas Magazine article in 2018 she said, “As a professional musician and teacher, I felt a bit like a fish out of water in Frisco, and I wanted to help our city become more well-rounded.”
Meinershagen went on to say in the article, “I began serving in many capacities regarding arts and culture, as PR/Marketing Chair of the Texas Music Teachers Association, Diversity Chair for the Frisco Council of PTA, a Board member of Frisco Public Art, and Frisco Association for the Arts. After meeting Councilman Jeff Cheney (now Frisco Mayor) in 2009, I was eventually appointed to the 2015 Citizen Bond Committee to represent the arts. It was there, that I spearheaded a successful bond initiative of $10 million in bonds for a performing arts center in Frisco.”
At the time of the article, she was serving as the Executive Director of Frisco Arts, the city official arts advocacy agency. Our point, even if Tammy Meinershagen thought this was a bad deal – there is NO WAY SHE IS VOTING AGAINST IT. She is blinded by her love and conflict of interest. She knows if this does not pass it could be another 5 to 10 years down the road before another opportunity comes up. Her conflict of interest is glaring when it comes to voting and being involved on this project.
Next up, Cheney! He has been transparent that he wants this to be a destination city. Based on the proposed location it will help Mayor Jeff Cheney, and the Cheney Group sell more houses at the PGA (where he claims to have no exclusive contracts). It will help his friends, the Wilks brothers, and their billion-dollar development. It will help the new PGA Entertainment District being built by Cheney’s friends (remember his former Broker). The potential millions to be made off tourism directly are the real driving force here for Cheney and his developer friends.
Lastly Bicycle Bill – if he wants to donate from his campaign fund to the Smart Frisco PAC and be a voice for the PAC then claim he is doing it as a private citizen – we say NO WAY! You did not donate from your personal funds, he used his campaign money, that was donated to him to help him win his run for the council. In our humble opinion, we would say that is a conflict of interest.
TIME TO VOTE
Where does it end? April 22nd starts early voting, election day is May 3rd, and you are the deciding vote! What we do know is that details are important, and the truth is we don’t have many details at all. City leaders have said this is the most transparent project they have ever worked on, and you’re seeing the whole picture. But as any good illusionist knows: if you’re watching the right hand, you’re missing what the left one’s hiding.
We warned you to buckle up! We told you the sales pitch would be coming from all angles, and it would be Oscar-worthy. We also told you don’t be surprised when the fine print on this production budget reads: No refunds, taxpayers!
Listen to what others are telling you and look at the resume! Former City Manager George Purefoy says this deal is no good. Ron Patterson, who resigned after 21 years with the City of Frisco, where served as an Assistant City Manager, President of the Frisco Economic Development Corporation (EDC), and then became the Deputy City Manager and was one of the top 3 candidates to replace George upon his retirement has also said this is a bad deal. Former City Council member Shona Sowell and current Councilman Brian Livingston are saying – no! Cheney wants you to believe they are all idiots and they just don’t understand this deal.
The mayor and council are banking on residents to fall for the Broadway glam, so they don’t look at the details behind the curtains. Hell, we have not even talked about the parking garage that will be needed for this project yet. Trust me, they say! In the end, if this passes, they hope that by the time the shiny new Performing Arts Center opens, everyone will have forgotten how the money got there in the first place. Maybe they’re right. Or maybe, just maybe, Frisco isn’t as easily distracted or stupid as they think. Know Before You Vote!
As for me? I’m just an old man who’s seen this kind of story before. When you cut corners in winemaking, you don’t get a masterpiece, you get something undrinkable. And when you cut corners in city finances, you don’t get a thriving, well-managed town. You get a mess.
Standing ovation or a total flop? Stay tuned for May 3rd.
Cue the organ. Dim the gaslights. Somewhere beneath City Hall, in the catacombs of taxpayer-funded dreams and concrete promises, a shadowy figure stirs. No, it’s not Andrew Lloyd Webber’s misunderstood genius — it’s Mayor Jeff Cheney, cloaked not in a mask but in economic development jargon, quietly orchestrating Frisco’s most expensive performance yet: the Frisco Center for the Arts.
You won’t find him on stage — no, he’s under it. Pitching, plotting, and maybe even humming a show tune with Tammy Meinershagen. They are not haunting an opera house, but haunting public trust, serenading voters with visions of velvet seats and chandelier-worthy productions — all while the deal’s finer details stay buried beneath layers of “partnerships,” and “nonprofits,” and a conveniently ambiguous price tag.
This isn’t just art. This is politics set to music — a taxpayer-funded overture with mystery, misdirection, and a plot twist or two we’re not supposed to see until the curtain drops. Grab your mask (and maybe your calculator), dear reader. We’re headed backstage, into the Phantom’s lair, where the lights are low and the truth is off-book.
#1 Concern: Mo Money, Mo Problems!
The total maximum project budget for the FCFA is $340 million. Prosper has pledged to contribute $100 million from a bond approved in 2023. Then the City of Frisco is proposing $45 million from the CDC, $75 million from the EDC and $40 million from the Tax Reinvestment Zone No. 1. The Frisco CDC and EDC come from sales tax, which means if you shop in Frisco and you pay sales tax on an item then you are paying towards this project.
City leadership keeps reinforcing that this project will cost $160 Million funded through sales tax efforts and we keep asking for proof that residents won’t be left holding the purse strings. The question residents should be asking is “Does this project along with all the other current projects, put a significant tax burden in the future for Frisco?”
Do you know what Frisco’s outstanding bond debt is today? Currently Frisco taxpayers are on the hook for $1.47 BILLION in OUTSTANDING bond debt (principle & interest).
If we read the latest 2024 Rating Summary for all the CDC debt which includes Toyota, the CDC is currently carrying $464 million in outstanding principal and interest which is being serviced by the $34.9 million in CDC sales tax revenue as reported September 2024. Using Toyota as an example, normally the CDC finances on a shorter term, however with Toyota Stadium they did $72 Million for 30 years at a rate of 5.30 probably to keep the payment low.
When you look at the historical revenues for the CDC, the year ending 9/30/20 they had $22,562,428 in gross tax receipts and at the end of 2024 it was $34,929 and it was about the same in 2022/2023). That means with all the Halo Projects Cheney brags about it having only generated an additional $12 million in sales tax for CDC. Huh? That is because no one saw Covid coming and the world shut down. What if that happens again or the economy tanks, then what?
Are we over invested?
Toyota Stadium: $182 million in improvements: $77 million – TIRZ: City of Frisco, FISD, $40 million – FCDC, $65 million – The Hunt family
Downtown Rail District Revitalization: $76 Million
Grand Park: In 2006, voters approved the allocation of $22.5 million towards the acquisition and initial development of GP. In 2015, voters approved an additional $10 Million for GP. From research we know the city approved $4.84 Million already spent on design costs. We went through numerous articles, city power points, meeting notes and the one thing we can’t find – what will Grand Park cost? Ask yourself, a park bigger than Central Park in New York with all the bells and whistles – how much will that cost? Where will the money come from?
Plus, we have plenty of projects open like The Mix, Firefly, and Universal where we are offering performance-based incentives. For The mix it is up to $113 Million.
From Box Office to Backroom
Take the CDC and EDC out of the picture for a moment – what type of projects are currently on the plate for the city. These projects are “Needs” not “Wants” which is very different. According to GIS Data the Parks Capital Improvement Projects has 50 total projects in the pipeline for $170 Millon and the Engineering Capital Improvement has 66 projects in the pipeline for $457.9 Million.
Taxpayer Tango
Let’s talk about Bond, money bond! In the 2006 bond, voters approved of $5 Million and in the 2015 bond voters approved of $10 Million for a total of $15 Million. How much of that is left? According to the pretty PowerPoints thrown at us for the FCPA they have $11.5 Million left. We are curious about how that is possible and are doing more research into their claim. How much of it have they spent and what did they spend it on? Why has the city done so many feasibility and spatial studies over the years for a theater? The answer, because each study came back and said a larger facility was not sustainable. In fact, the recommendations have been a 300 to 500 seat option and 1200 to 1800-seat option. If you ask our opinion, they spent millions of that bond money on shopping studies, meaning research, consultants, and surveys. Why, they needed “THE ONE” that supported the narrative, we need a 2800 to 3000 square feet facility to justify the boondoggle Broadway Ballot.
Remember how they have said no property tax dollars will be used on this project? A Tax Reinvestment Zone captures growth in both sales and property tax value. It can only be used to fund improvements for the properties inside its boundaries. If they are using money from the TIRZ that is captures of property tax then they are using our dollars for this project.
Smoke, Mirrors, and Marquee Dreams: A vote “YES” just takes us to the next step! If you have been following the meetings for this opportunity, then you have heard each of them say “This is a vote to go forward to the next step.” This is the definition of a misleading statement filled with false impressions and the intent to deceive or mislead the voters. Context matters!
This is a NOT a vote to “go to the next step” it is a major vote to change the use of Economic Development Funds.THIS VOTE SETS A PRECEDENT ON USING EDC FUNDS FOR NON-TRADITIONAL USES. The city is COMMITING FUNDS, which enables them to get a contract done (meaning we have no contract now) to SECURE AN OPERATOR. No money = No Operator.
A vote “YES” will put a burden on the CDC and EDC and burn a lot of potential future opportunities that could significantly contribute to the tax base and sales tax base in Frisco. The ever-growing debt burden will impact future projects. So this is not a vote to just go forward to the next step. If it was they would not be trying to sell it so hard like used car salesman.
Let’s close this one out! Money matters and we are already carrying a $1.47 Billion Dollar Burden! We have not even touched on the other issues and concerns yet, of which there are several. Numbers don’t lie! No matter which way the city tries to sell this to residents it is FISCALLY IRRESPONSIBLE to bring a project like this to voters and mislead them with a vote yes in may is just a vote to allow us to move to the next step. Once they change the use of the EDC funds nothing will stop Cheney or Tammy Meinershagen (who apparently wants to be our next Mayor) for going all the way. Is that a burden you are willing to carry?
As part of our commitment to keeping Frisco residents informed and engaged, we sent a candidate questionnaire to all three individuals running for Place 2 on the Frisco City Council. Using the contact information provided on the official candidate website, we reached out to each candidate via email, offering them an opportunity to share their views on issues that matter to our community.
Who took the time to respond? Only one candidate — Burt Thakur — replied to our questionnaire. We appreciate his willingness to engage with the voters and provide thoughtful responses to the questions submitted.
Unfortunately, Tammy Meinershagen and Sai Krishnarajanagar did not respond to our outreach. By choosing not to answer these citizen-submitted questions, they passed on an opportunity to directly address the concerns and interests of the very people they seek to represent. Tammy must be too busy selling her performing arts center and keeping Catchup Daddy in line. As for Sai, we have no idea what he would be up to – maybe getting another ear pierced.
For Whistleblower, being accountable to your constituents matters, and two of the candidates made it very easy for us to say The Whistleblower Team Proudly Endorses Burt Thakur!
**Please note we have not altered the candidates’ responses. If you would like a copy of their questionnaire, email us.**
Occupation and Background: Data Center Commissioning Engineer. I have also worked in power generation in operations. I am a U.S. Navy veteran and I served during 9/11 and was deployed in Operation Iraqi Freedom. I am a graduate of the Naval Nuclear Power School.
Why are you running for the Frisco City Council? I’m running because I love Frisco and our residents. As taxpayers, we deserve careful stewards of our money, with elected leaders who make wise decisions. My infrastructure experience, coupled with established relationships with government leaders will help guide smart growth decisions and accelerate high velocity decisions for all Frisco residents.
Community and Development
What are your top three priorities for Frisco’s growth and development? 1. Lower Property Tax 2. Create Good Paying Jobs 3. Safe Streets – Proactively Fund Police & Fire and fix traffic
How do you plan to balance economic growth with maintaining community character? We must support and foster small business growth – as one small business owner told me, ‘Burt, i wish the city council was as excited about our business as they are about the flashier ones they are getting!’ There’s something to be said about going down main street and seeing ‘mom and pop’ shops and thriving businesses in the Railway district. By poor city planning with road construction, many of these businesses are struggling to get customers and now are having a difficult time making their lease payments. I’ll never forget the first night my wife and I drove through downtown and fell in love with Frisco and envisioned growing old here. We couldn’t believe we found our dream home , and we got to live in a city with a small town feel. I believe in growth – but I believe in sensible growth. I do not believe it is prudent to compete with Dallas or Ft. Worth – if we wanted to live there, we would have purchased a home there! I argue that instead of Universal Studios which will bring 25,000 people a day and disrupt our traffic among other issues or a poorly funded $380 Million Performing Arts Center – how about ensuring basic needs? Many want an animal shelter, a place for mental health help, a building for veterans groups, community center for parents with special needs children, or more recreational and athletic facilities. How about covered parking in school areas for protection from hail? For sensible economic growth, how about businesses which make money – like power plants, high tech manufacturing, data centers, start-up incubators, high tech research?
What is your stance on residential and commercial zoning changes? What I am against is subverting the intent of zoning changes to benefit private interested in city councils. For example, Irving approved a zoning change which paved the way for a casino resort near their stadium site. Ultimately, there are several bills in the Texas legislature which could remove the ability of local governments to control zoning. As this is uncharted territory, I have been researching different methods to potentially ensure we have more control at the local level – and therefor you, the voter, on helping guide zoning.
How will you ensure that infrastructure keeps pace with growth? We must upgrade our infrastructure. This includes water and sewer, substations and power transmission, internet and fiber lines, our roads as well. This is why it is imperative to ensure the basics are met before jumping into capital projects which impact our infrastructure.
Density continues to be a hot discussion for Frisco Residents. Cheney even did a video on Density seven years ago when running for Mayor. He said in that video that the resident’s ultimate concerns was the concept of density and what the ultimate build out population number should be.
At build out, the city’s comprehensive plan allows a maximum capacity of up to 350 thousand residents (building with maximum density). He then said in his campaign video that is not what people move to Frisco for, and he believed that to maintain quality of life, the population target goal should be around 280,000. He continued, we need to build out with world-class level developments with more open space, less multi-family all over the city, and an overall less dense environment. The last two years Cheney has changed his tune and said, “Density is a political dog whistle used at election time for political mailers.” What is your stance on Density? I agree with Mayor Cheney from 7 years ago.
Fiscal Responsibility and Budgeting
What would be your approach to managing the city’s budget while ensuring essential services are maintained? I’d call for a detailed budget analysis to identify inefficiencies and prioritize funding clearly toward essential services such as police and first responder services (safety), essential services, infrastructure, sanitation, and required community programs. I’d implement performance-based budgeting using specific KPIs to evaluate and optimize the effectiveness of expenditures, encouraging modernization and digitization as much as possible to improve efficiency and reduce costs. I’d look for areas where we could utilize AI services to reduce level of effort and costs. Additionally, I’d pursue EDC projects which create large economic possibilities (power plants, high tech manufacturing, data centers etc.), competitive grants, and carefully balanced tax policies to maintain economic attractiveness. To foster transparency and public trust, I’d engage citizens through community-driven budgeting and clear communication. I’d also attempt to engage county, state and federal leaders to discuss what initiatives are funded for collaboration and inclusion into programs if we have qualifying projects and needs
Do you believe Frisco’s current property tax rates are sustainable? Would you support any changes including cuts, increases or adjustments to the current property tax rates? Why or why not? I would try to lower Property Taxes. One method is to increase sales tax through new businesses which also have the potential of generating significant income (as described earlier) – thereby increasing sales tax revenues and reducing reliance on property taxes. We should also determine where we can create cost-saving measures within city operations like streamlining services and adopting efficient technologies, can decrease expenditures. We can also work to determine if we are paying for redundant services or if there are opportunities to combine services while we prioritize essential services. I’ll be advocating for increased county, state and federal funding to supplement local revenues. Another potential way could be through more effective management of unspent or unused bonds (according to our city website we have more than $150 Million). When bond funds remain unused or projects are completed under budget, these surplus funds can be strategically redirected or repurposed to pay down existing bond debt or fund upcoming projects which require new borrowing. The bonds can also be returned if feasible (or possible). Reducing the city’s overall debt obligations or avoiding additional debt issuance lowers annual debt-service payments, directly easing the burden on taxpayers and creating room to decrease property tax rates. Additionally, carefully monitoring bond expenditures and ensuring funds are allocated efficiently prevents unnecessary financial burdens, helping to maintain fiscal responsibility and taxpayer affordability in the long term.
What are your funding priorities for public safety, education, and infrastructure? For public safety – I’d prioritize proactive as opposed to reactive funding and staffing for a well-equipped police and fire department and first responders, investing in advanced training, modern technology, as well as better traffic studies and mitigations for traffic jams so we can maintain response times with the arrival of potentially 25,000 people from Universal Studios. For education, I’d work with the respective governing bodies and trustees to see what help they require and how we in the council can help find support for local schools to ensure adequate resources for modern classrooms, more school resource officers, innovative educational technology, and competitive teacher salaries. Infrastructure funding would target long-term sustainability and growth through investments in road expansions, improved traffic management systems, reliable utilities, and enhanced broadband connectivity—key elements in attracting high-tech employers and supporting future growth.
How would you plan to handle Frisco’s increasing debt and financial obligations? I would adopt a strategy rooted in transparency and fiscal discipline. By carefully prioritizing debt issuance exclusively for critical infrastructure and economic development projects, we can strategically control expenditures and reduce reliance on taxpayer-funded debt. Transparent financial reporting and open communication with the community will ensure residents clearly understand how funds are used and why debt decisions are made, fostering public trust. Simultaneously, leveraging unspent bond funds or surplus reserves to pay down existing debt will directly reduce the property tax burden. Creating an attractive economic environment through competitive taxation policies, targeted incentives, and streamlined permitting processes will draw investments from innovative sectors, generating higher-paying jobs and diversifying the local economy.
In December of 2021, the Mayor, Jeff Cheney had to vote in a rare tie breaker vote in regard to anemployee Health Clinic operated by Premise Health. At the time, city staff shared the results of a survey which collected responses from 684 of 1,239 city employees. Out of those 684, a total of 89.75% said they were likely or somewhat likely” to use the clinic for urgent care needs. Only 64.7% said they were likely to “somewhat use” the clinic as their primary care provider. Estimated expenses in the clinic’s first year total over $1.44 million, according to the proposed five-year budget. Those expenses include salaries, insurance, management/implementation fees and equipment purchases. The clinic’s fifth-year budget is listed at more than $1.31 million. It was projected that the clinic will operate at a loss in its first three years. The estimated cost for the first five years was $6.28 million. At the time there was a concern about how many years it could take to break even on the investment and how many employees would use the option. At the five-year mark if the clinic is still not breaking even would you support closing the Employee Wellness Clinic or continue to operate at a loss? I need to learn more about this issue. From reading the question, I’d like to determine the cost-benefit of this project. I’d like to learn where the money is being spent, and what opportunities exist to make this a profitable business. If there isn’t a way to make it profitable, and there is no need for this clinic, I would like to know what the exit strategies are for this clinic, and if it would be something that an organization like the Veterans Affairs would be interested in operating.
Should the city be in the business or running an Athletic Center, Performing Arts Center, or any other type of business model that mirrors a commercial business which has annual operational costs paid for by tax dollars? I do not like public-private partnerships which use our hard-earned tax dollars for operations and maintenance costs.
Transparency and Accountability
How will you ensure transparency in your decision-making process and open communication between the city council and residents? I’ll make myself available to residents. I’ll hold monthly townhalls, and attempt to visit various groups around our city on a regular basis . In addition, I will ensure my team releases all meeting minutes and I will make it a point to keep a weekly update of what work I performed at the end of the week. I believe it is important to ensure we complete projects which matter to people and, with accountability, you , the voter get a weekly update of the status of the various projects I’ll be working on and executing. This also allows me to solicit help from the members of the community who have good ideas on execution. In addition, many people have expressed their frustration on applying to various boards and being rejected. I don’t know the cause of this, and I’ll investigate – this process should be transparent, and should serve as a potential opportunity for us to raise the bar for serving on a board by having clearly defined requisites and a definable interview process where we can track metrics
Currently only the city council meeting is aired live, however many residents believe they should have access to live meetings for the different boards and commissions as well as well as the published minutes of the meetings should be more detailed as to what was discussed.
A. Do you support more increased public access to city council meetings, boards and commission meetings? Absolutely – we should have transparency and an opportunity to be informed in what various boards/commissions are proposing.
B. What steps would you take to improve access to meetings, meeting minutes and public records? I would introduce a motion to approve all meetings are streamed as well as meeting minutes available to the general public.
What is your definition of conflict of interest? If there is a possibility of favoritism for a company one owns or works for or if there is a significant opportunity to make money from a vote. Basically, if there is a potential abuse of power due to business interests which the politician has with their vote.
Do you support implementing a stricter ethics policy that puts a check on the influence of money in local politics which would require council members to recuse themselves from votes that could benefit donors who contributed more than $1000 or $2500.00 to a political campaign? Yes
Do you believe active members of the city council should be on the front lines advocating as “private citizens” for Propositions on the ballot during local elections? No – as an elected official, one has an enormous influence on the electorate. In essence they are the target of a lobbyist for a cause. While I am a firm believer in our 1st amendment rights , a politician masquerading as a private citizen when it is convenient for them to push an agenda is morally questionable.
Community Services and Quality of Life
What are your plans for enhancing public parks and recreation on Frisco’s East Side of the DNT? I the last city Council Meeting, the Parks and Recreation Open Space Master Plan was discussed. This included Shepherds Glen Park which will increase amenities for residents in east Frisco. Additionally, the Cottonwood Creek Trail Extension will extend the existing trail. Many residents I have spoken to like my idea of seeing if we can build an arboretum. This is something that I’d love to explore as a councilman and determine its feasibility
How do you plan to address traffic congestion across Frisco? I want to see what opportunities exist for smart infrastructure and leveraging AI-driven solutions. This could include integrating intelligent traffic management systems powered by AI algorithms to optimize traffic flow, dynamically manage intersections, and predicting congestion patterns in real-time, significantly reducing wait times and improving commuting efficiency. With Universal Studios bringing potentially 25,000 people a day, or the World Cup, we need to figure out solutions quickly. Expanding road capacity strategically, coupled with smart signaling technologies, could enhance overall traffic management. This would be in addition to the initiatives currently being worked on in city council.
Do you think Frisco has a public transportation need? From what I’ve read in Frisco’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, it emphasizes enhancing mobility and exploring alternative transportation modes to accommodate future growth. If our population keeps growing at the rate proposed in the plan, I think we would need better public transportation provide mobility options for residents without personal vehicles, and support economic development by connecting workers to employment centers, and also potentially reduce traffic.
How will you engage with and listen to diverse voices of the community? By making myself available. Look, I don’t and won’t know everything. I will attempt to meet many members of our city, and I’ll hold monthly townhalls. I will also attempt to come to many events hosted by our vibrant communities. My office will have an open door policy for the residents of Frisco. Also, once a week, I’ll have coffee at a local business, and I’ll post those times and will broadcast a livestream where I’ll take questions from those who are unable to attend.
Public Safety
What measures will you take to ensure Frisco’s Police and Fire Department remain well-funded? My approach will focus on prioritizing public safety within the city’s budget planning, I want information to flow to the council as well – concerns and issues should never be punitive. I want to ensure Frisco remains one of the safest cities in the country so guaranteeing consistent and adequate resources for staffing, advanced training, and cutting-edge equipment is a top priority of mine. I’ll advocate for strategic fiscal policies that secure dedicated funding streams and explore alternative revenue sources to supplement city resources. Additionally, regular assessments and transparent evaluations of departmental needs including review of surveys will be conducted, ensuring funding allocations and departmental needs align effectively with public safety priorities. By actively communicating with residents about the critical importance of these investments, we will maintain strong community support for sustainable funding, thus safeguarding the high-quality services provided by our first responders.
For years the Frisco Firefighters Association has taken to the citizens input pulpit asking for more staffing (specifically going from a 3 Man Truck to a 4 Man Truck). Turnover has been high recently with Firefighters taking retirement and then going to work for other cities who are more supportive of their First Responders.
Do you support increased staffing and moving to a 4 Person Truck? Yes
What will you do to start repairing the relationship with our first responders to stop the turnover, so they stay here in Frisco, and we don’t lose that much needed experience and wisdom? I will actively engage in open and ongoing dialogue to clearly understand their needs, concerns, and ideas. We can work on improving compensation packages, expanding to national searches for attracting a larger talent pool, benefits, and career advancement opportunities. I want to ensure we are properly investing in comprehensive mental health and wellness programs to ensure their wellbeing. By cultivating a supportive environment built on respect, trust, and consistent communication, we can retain experienced personnel, preserve institutional knowledge, and enhance morale, ensuring that our community benefits from their invaluable expertise and helps to preserve a safe Frisco.
As Frisco continues to grow, do you believe Frisco’s current policies on crime prevention and emergency response are sufficient? Why or why not? While our police, fire and first responders have an incredible program, which is the envy of other mid size cities, there is only an upside in continuous investment in technology, personnel training, new skills as well as determining better community engagement and policies. As these departments see a need for growth opportunities, I want them to know that they will have an advocate for their expert opinions on what needs to be driven in the city council for maintaining Frisco’s safety.
Would you support removing Animal Services “out” from under Public Safety and turning it into its own department? Yes
Residents have been advocating for an animal shelter (instead of the partnership with Collin County) and the city keeps stalling, saying they are open to one with a public-private partnership. Do you believe Frisco should have its own Animal Shelter and Education Center? Do you believe it is a city service, or should it be a public-private partnership? Yes and this should be a city service.
Closing Statements
Is there anything you would like us to know about you that we have not asked? Here’s a fun fact – I’m a Jeopardy! champion, and I appeared on the last televised episode with Alex Trebek before his death.
What is the most important issue facing Frisco, and how do you plan to address it? Frisco residents should vote no on Propositions A, B, and E to protect both their financial interests and democratic rights. Propositions A and B would commit the city to substantial financial obligations—including $160 million in new bonds—for an extravagant performing arts center, potentially burdening taxpayers and risking future property tax increases if projected revenues fall short. With numerous comparable venues nearby, this costly investment is unnecessary and not aligned with recent calls from residents for fiscal prudence. Proposition E, meanwhile, would significantly diminish voter power by allowing the City Council to appoint replacements to vacant seats without voter input, potentially leading to political favoritism and reducing democratic accountability. Voting “no” ensures Frisco maintains responsible financial management and preserves citizens’ fundamental right to directly elect their representatives
Do you have any final messages for the voters? I would love to get your support dear reader. If you like my positions, please make sure you vote. Please tell 10 of your friends to vote for me as well. This election, more than ever, will determine Frisco’s futur. Please vote for Burt Thakur for Frisco City Council, Place 2.
Elections are just around the corner, and while the yard signs are blooming like bluebonnets in May, the details on Frisco’s shiny new “Broadway-style” Frisco Center for the Arts remains as clear as a foggy morning on Preston Road.
We’ve got the Smart Frisco PAC telling us this whole thing is “free”—which is fitting, considering their treasurer once filed as indigent to get a reduced bond. I guess if it’s good enough for the courts, it’s good enough for taxpayers. Free must be her favorite word—right after entering a “plea” for her charges of assault causes bodily injury to a family member.
Then there’s Councilman Bill Woodard—who donates to the PAC and then insists he’s supporting it “as a citizen.” That’s like Clark Kent donating to the Daily Planet and swearing Superman had nothing to do with it.
Meanwhile, Cheney is pitching this project like a used Buick with a busted transmission—“low miles, clean title, don’t ask too many questions!” And let’s not forget Councilmember Tammy Meinershagen, who’s dressing this deal up like she’s starring in Pretty in Pink—but she fights like a jaguar defending her turf in the Amazon. Ask a question and you’ll find yourself swatted into next week.
And yet, no one—not one single elected official—wants to talk about the actual nuts and bolts of that build this deal. Residents need to stop and ask themselves, “Why are we voting on a project with more gaps than a 1970s punch card?”
“Just go with it,” city leaders say. I think we heard that before when they were talking about Universal Kids Studios. Remember the night of the vote, all the major elements hand changed like how late the park can open, how high the rides can be, and of course that mysterious traffic report. The city wants us to trust them again, like they are magicians, and we should just hand over our wallets.
I can still hear my dad saying, “Son, nothing in life is free.” Especially not a $340-million-dollar arts center being peddled like cotton candy at a county fair. Buckle up, Frisco. It’s time to pull out the wrench, tighten the screws, and see what this Broadway baby is really made of. Spoiler: it might not be glitter and show tunes under the hood.
The conversation of a Performing Arts Center has been ongoing for years in Frisco. We started by filing a PIR for a complete copy of all the performing arts center studies done over the years and any associated documentation related to the reports including those from consulting groups, or 3rd parties. However, the city leadership who claims to be transparent, upfront and honest, sent our request at the time to the Attorney General claiming “trade secrets” as to why they wanted to withhold details.
Take the Delorian back to 2002 and that is when the City was in discussions for the Arts of Collin County (ACC) which was to be owned and operated by the Cities of Allen, Frisco, McKinney and Plano. At the time the survey conducted said there were no adequate medium-too large facilities in Collin County to support the enjoyment of the arts. At that time the city council supported an initial facility program that included a flexible multipurpose theater with a seating capacity of 800 to 1200 seats. It should also include a second theater with a seating capacity of 350 to 600 seats. The initial location was to be 121 and Custer Road on a site that contained 80 acres donated for the project. The funding for the ACC was to be $76 Million split 4 ways between each city. A bond package put before Frisco voters in 2002 was approved but the road ahead was not going to be without speed bumps.
What Killed The ACC?
The beginning of the end is when McKinney voters opted not to pony up the $19 Million membership fee leaving Allen, Plano and Frisco to pony up more money. The economy had turned downward. The project which had taken 10+ years to advance was not again in front of Frisco voters in 2011. At that time Frisco had the highest voter turnout in 14 years with over 18 percent. Roughly 53% of the voters decided to revoke the city’s authority to sell the $16.4 million in bond money for the ACC. At the time of the vote more than $8 million in bond money had already been spent on researching and designing. It was the final curtain call for the Collin County ACC. Former Mayor of Frisco, Mike Simpson, who was the ACC’s project executive director told the DMN at the time, “There is no question that the city of Frisco making the decision to withdraw their funding and withdraw their support was the biggest challenge. We pretty much had full funding with Frisco’s participation.”
Economy Bounce Back
It was time to dive back into an arts facility pool in 2015. At a February city council meeting the city council voted on two key items. The first was item #17 which was to consider an act to publish a Request for Qualifications for the development and implementation of a study to examine the feasibility of a performing/theater arts facility within Frisco City Limits. It does not say how much it would cost to do but it does say the funding for services would be handled during mid-year adjustments.
That same night they also approved the Citizen Bond Committee recommendation for the 2015 Bond Package which included $10 Million for a performing arts center. One of the many residents who spoke at that time to support the line item was none other than Tammy Meinershagen.
In November of 2015, the Frisco Creative Center for the Arts commissioned a Facility Programming Report by Page Southerland Page which is a program study to discover what the needs were by local groups in an arts facility. Based on those needs Page Southerland Page prepared 5 scenarios and in January of 2016, Tammy Meinershagen (the Arts President), presented the preliminary program and needs assessment to the City Council at the Winter Work Session. What was the outcome? The 5 outcomes included one 300 seat, three different 800-seat options, and a 1200 seat option which would be overboard.
2018 Brings More Studies
Sometime in 2018 the City of Frisco commissioned a “Needs Assessment” by Webb Management Services and Parkhill, Smith & Cooper. It was presented to the council on June 29, 2018, at the Summer Work Session. What did it cost taxpayers? Well, we don’t know exactly but we do know based on the Check Register in 2018 Parkhill, Smith & Cooper was paid a total of $315,600.30 for professional services. What were the suggestions? A marriage of two facilities:
1) 300 – 500-seat facility for community use which was currently in high demand but lacking in availability with a potential cost of 40 to 50 million dollars including parking and land.
2) 1200 – 1500 seat facility that will a gap for Frisco and surrounding areas in the region, but it would require a partnership with private entities and cost 50 to 60 million range.
What were the concerns: If the city opted for only the larger facility it would not be sustainable and would not likely be cost-effective for community performing arts groups.
Frisco ISD and City of Frisco Swim Together in the Arts
In August of 2020, we found another Visual & Performing Arts Center Feasibility Report that had been commissioned by Frisco ISD and City of Frisco. We filed a PIR with Frisco ISD and learned that the report cost the district $28,000 and the City of Frisco reimbursed Frisco ISD in the amount of $14,000. It lists Garfield Public Private and Schuler Shook. What was the outcome?
In early January of 2021, Chief Innovation Officer Jason Cooley updated the Council on the Performing Arts Center. He recapped feasibility studies concluded in December 2020, indicating a consensus on the flexibility required for such a facility in Frisco in order to accommodate various needs of the entities using the facility. Dr. Cooley stated the next steps are to have discussions with the school district to determine the appropriate size of the venue. City Manager George Purefoy updated Council on the status of the agreement, indicating the draft is with the school district for their review and comments. A final agreement was not expected until March or April of that year.
By June of 2021, then President of Frisco EDC, Ron Patterson was bringing before council a request to approve a Master Development Agreement for a Performing Arts Center, Parking Garage and Park. The deal included City of Frisco, Frisco ISD, Frisco CDC and EDC, and HP Frisco Holdings, aka Hall Group. The public private partnership was shouted from the rooftop by Mayor Cheney and it was to include 1,250 seat Main Performance Hall, 250 Seat Community Venue, a 1,100 stall parking garage and a 5-acre public park. The estimated total at the time was $99 Million ($66 Million for the PAC and $33Million for the garage).
Financial Considerations:
· $43M FISD will source their funds through approved bonds
· $13M City will source these funds through approved bonds ($2M of the $13M already sold and the remaining will be sold as required for the project)
· $33M CDC and\or City CO bonds to be funded through TIRZ#6 with a backstop of this debt by Hall
· $10M Hall will provide funding for the PAC, fund $15M for the Park development, provide the PAC and Park Properties at no cost to the City and FISD
Key Point: The FEDC, while not part of the master development agreement, will provide up to $5 million toward redevelopment of a portion of Hall Park for two buildings, according to the memo. One facility will contain a 15-story office building, hotel space and a parking garage. The second will be a luxury high-rise residential building with a parking garage.
In November of 2021, the city council was taking the next step to approve an agreement for the Program Manager Services (CBRE Heery) who would act as the representative for the planning, design, and construction of the project. The cost is a lump sum fee of $2,074,400.
In February of 2022, an agreement was executed with Corgan + Studio Gang for architectural services for the PAC and garage in the amount of $175,000. The initial agreement was for a spatial analysis study to determine the appropriate size and scale of facilities which can then be used to determine an appropriate construction budget and schedule.
THE IMPLOSION
By August 2022, it was announced that the City of Frisco and Frisco ISD were parting ways on the plan to build the joint performing arts center in conjunction with Hall Group. The school district announced it will move forward with its own PAC using the $3 million approved in bonds back in 2018 by voters.
A community impact article from that time stated, “Some local arts supporters advocated for a larger facility to attract touring Broadway shows and other commercial acts. A fundraising campaign launched in August 2021 set out to raise $100 million more for the project. An online petition about the efforts to build a new performing arts center sought to have at least 1,750-2,000 seats.” It went on to say, “But city and school officials learned in May that costs in materials, labor and equipment had increased more than 50% since the June 2021 agreement. Representatives with Corgan, which was chosen as the project architect, stated that a 1,250-seat venue would carry a price tag of between $135.7 million-$151.1 million. A 1,500-seat venue would cost between $146.1 million-$158.2 million, and a 1,750-seat venue could cost as much as $181.1 million, according to Corgan estimates.”
HERE COMES BROADWAY
In January of 2023, the council was again voting to execute an agreement with Theatre Projects Consultants, Inc. for consulting related to a PAC which includes a performing arts venue business plan. It would also include developing a utilization strategy, management approach, and business plan for three different venue options: a 350-seat community venue, a 1,500-seat flexible venue, and a 2,000-seat proscenium venue. Total cost for these services is $99,300. Bond funds were available for this project.
In May 2023, at a special called city council meeting, Chief Innovation Officer Jason Cooley introduced Alex Keen of Keen Independent Research and Gena Buhler of Theatre Projects who gave a presentation regarding the current study for the proposed Performing Arts Center. After discussion, Council determined to envision large and small facilities located together and to focus first on Broadway, with an emphasis on making it a uniquely Frisco venue. Council encouraged Alex Keen and Gena Buhler to consider including a VIP or club experience which would generate revenue to help with the maintenance and operations of the facility.
In September of 2023, the council executed an agreement again with Theatre Projects Consultants, Inc for more “consulting services” in the amount of $1,415,500 to be paid for by bond funds. This new scope will include exploration, development, costing, and preliminary design for the proposed performing arts complex. Elements include multiple costing studies, site analysis (Hall Park site), comprehensive community engagement, economic impact analysis, a design competition, capital stack/funding study, and refinement of the final business plan and City investment. This is a phased approach over the next eighteen months, offering flexibility to adjust along the way.
On October 3, 2023, at a city council Work Session, Assistant City Manager E. A. Hoppe gave a presentation (Exhibit B) reviewing the scope and timeline for the Performing Arts Center. He also reviewed the proposed venue and club touring schedule and the establishment of a Council Ad-Hoc Committee, including three (3) Council Members and City Manager Wes Pierson. Mayor Jeff Cheney, Council Member Tammy Meinershagen, and Mayor Pro-Tem John Keating volunteered to be the members of this Ad Hoc Committee. *** Look at that the 3 Amigos volunteered for the committee***
The next update came June 25, 2024, at CC Summer Work Session, whenGena Buhler, Principal of Theater Projects and Alex Keen, Principal of Keen Independent Research gave a presentation, reviewed the updated timeline, project phasing and tasks, refining the business plan, and priorities for the project. They also provided an update on a possible Broadway partnership update and a funding study. Also, they mentioned the community engagement feedback project is still in progress.
In September of 2024 at a city council meeting they received an updated Item # 7which was a status update on Phase 1A/1B planning study for FCFA. Gena Buhler, with Theatre Projects, and Alex Keen with Keen Independent Research gave an update to Council regarding the Phase 1A/1B planning study for the Frisco Center for the Arts.
At the same meeting the council also authorized the City Manager to finalize and execute the First Amendment to the Agreement with Theatre Projects Consultants, Inc., for consulting services related to a performing arts venue in the amount of $214,350. These changes from the original contract, resulted in a new project total of $1,629,850. According to city records, bond funds are available for this project and were utilized for the initial Phase 1A/1B portion of the project.
By November 2024, the council was ratifying the execution of a Letter of Intent (LOI) with Broadway Across America/Broadway Dallas related to the proposed Frisco Center for the Arts. Based on Phase II, the City Council and community were informed of two exciting partnership conversations. One with a proposed Broadway presenting partner, and the other with a potential educational/community partner.
The attached Letter of Intent with Broadway Across America (BAA) and Broadway Dallas outlines key expectations of both parties during the process of continuing to explore the Frisco Center for the Arts project. The Letter of Intent is non-binding and does not have a specific financial implication to the City.
Then in December 2024 the council authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement based on the Request for Qualifications #2510-001 Frisco Center for the Arts Facility Concept Design to Pelli Clarke & Partners. These services will cost $385,000 in the amount of $385,000.
The scope will provide for the facility concept design of the Frisco Center for the Arts that will host a variety of events, including theater, concerts, dance performances, and community gatherings. The center will feature multiple performance spaces, including a Broadway-caliber main theater, a community hall, and flexible spaces for educational and community programming. The projected facility size is approximately 220,000 square feet, and will feature multiple performance spaces, including a 2,800-seat proscenium venue (Large Hall), and a flexible 300- to 400-seat community and education-focused courtyard venue (Community Hall). Funds are available through bond funds
2025 Steam Rolling Ahead
At the end of January at the CC Winter Work Session, Gena Buhler, Principal of Theatre Projects began a presentation updating Council on the status of the Frisco Center for the Arts. She began by explaining the partnerships of the project with the City of Frisco being the owner of the building, Prosper ISD as the educational partner, Broadway Across America and Broadway Dallas as the Broadway presenter, and the Venue Operator which is currently in negotiation. Ms. Buhler continued the presentation by reviewing Phase 2 of the project and the fundraising assessment results.
Gena Buhler then updated Council on partnership agreements with Prosper ISD, the Broadway presenting partner, and the operator selection process. Assistant City Manager E. A. Hoppe reviewed the Frisco model versus a venue management model. He emphasized the modified Frisco model, including the financial model which allows the operational partner to provide a moderate capital contribution.
Wes Pierson then explained the propositions that will be determined by the citizens of Frisco in a Bond Election in May 2025. City Attorney Ryan Pittman explained the ballot language and the public hearing process required prior to the Bond Election.
Proposition Language:
(1) authorizing the Frisco Economic Development Corporation to use proceeds of its sales and use tax, including all amounts previously authorized and collected, for projects related to the proposed Center for the Arts development project, including but not limited to, land, buildings, equipment, facilities and improvements found by the Frisco Economic Development Corporation Board of Directors to be required or suitable for use for the proposed Center for the Arts development project.
and (2) the issuance of bonds in the maximum amount of $160,000,000 for a City-owned performing arts facility, and levying taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds;
February 2025, public outcry began swiftly upon reading the propositions language. At the Feb 4 council meeting a presentation was for the public by Gena Buhler, Principal of Theatre Projects. Several residents including candidates running for city council came to speak against the use of EDC funds for the project. Jared Elad and Burt Thakur who are currently running for city council, and John Redmond, former candidate for council in 2024, spoke in opposition to Agenda Item #38. However, Josh Meek, candidate for council spoke in favor of Agenda Item #38.
The Council was in agreement to move forward with the proposed funding process and agreed on moving forward with the proposed location at US 380 and the Dallas North Tollway. They also agreed to move forward with the currently proposed modified Frisco Model for an Operator contract. When it came time for a vote it Passed Vote: 5 – 1 with Brian Livingston be the 1 against.
The next council update came on March 18th at a CC Work Session, E. A. Hoppe introduced Mitch Hirsch, Design Partner with Pelli Clarke & Partners, who gave a presentation updating Council on concept design. They described the steps taken to learn the culture and history of Frisco to best develop a concept design for the proposed facility.
Next Big Step: Letter Of Intent
On April 1, 2025 at the Frisco City Council Meeting, Agenda Item #26 was to consider and act upon award of Request for Proposal #2510-011 Frisco Center for the Arts Facility Operator to Frisco Live and authorizing the City Manager to finalize and execute a Letter of Intent related to these services.
In Fall 2024 the City of Frisco solicited a Request for Proposal (RFP) #2510-011 Frisco Center for the Arts (FCFA) Facility Operator, and received proposals on December 2, 2024, from Frisco Live (submitted as Frisco Arts Community Entertainment), Oak View Group, TVG Hospitality, and ASM Global Theater Management. Using the criteria listed in the RFP, the evaluation team consisting of representatives from City staff, Prosper ISD, and Theatre Projects consultants ranked Frisco Live as the top proposer.
The following requirements and expectations for management of the FCFA facility were established and included in the Request for Proposal included venue operations, programming and content management, education and workforce development, financial management, marketing, and Club & VIP Experience Management.
A week later the city held a special called meeting of the council to conduct a public hearing regarding Proposition A on the May 3, 2025, Election Ballot, and the City will inform the City’s residents of the cost and impact of the proposed Center for the Arts project that is the subject of Proposition A on the May 3, 2025, Election Ballot.
Well, that was a long road trip to take you on to understanding the nuts and bolts of the Frisco Center For The Arts. It’s is time to stretch our legs and tomorrow we are going to tell you about The Final Act which is what questions you should be asking beyond the Glitz and Glam of Broadway. What should you consider before voting for or against the propositions that could forever change Frisco?
Last year we went to a high school football game and my wife commented about the security gauntlet that we had to go through as visitors to the event. We could smell the soft pretzels and popcorn awaiting us from the concessions stand while wading through the sea of people just to get in. For a high school event my wife commented that it felt like a full TSA, at the airport on a holiday weekend experience, but with a little less dignity.
First up was the ticket scan, then we headed through a bag check line. It felt like a slow walk of shame with woman’s purses being emptied and laid out for all to view. I had not seen that many tampons, contraband lip balm, and smuggled trail mix in my lifetime. Clearly, they thought the woman were carrying weapons of mass destruction.
Next was the metal detector, which was one belt buckle away from the beeping gateway of judgement. Even if you’ve removed your belt, your shoes, your watch, and every shred of self-respect, it still went off. Why? Because the machine doesn’t detect metal, it detects your audacity. It knows you’ve sinned, probably by attempting to carry a bottle of Dasani through the checkpoint. Then came the handwand if you failed the walk-through metal detector. Nothing screams fun night out of high school football like being gently frisked by a part-time community college student in a reflective vest who’s three hours into their six-hour shift and seriously considering a career in goat herding.
Once you finally pass through the gates—sans dignity, snacks, and your favorite keychain that looked vaguely threatening—we felt free at last. Free to enjoy our grandson’s game by squinting at the Jumbotron while wondering how cramped the parking lot would be when the game is over and pondering if you should leave early in the last quarter to avoid the mass exodus of smelly high school students acting obnoxious. But hey, at least we’re safe. After all, nothing deters a truly determined criminal like a 21-year-old with a handheld wand and a clipboard.
It made us wonder about Frisco ISD’s security and when we read the police report related to the Metcalf / Anthony event, what security did they have that day? We talked to an insider who reached out to us about the security (ie. Police Officers) at any and all FISD events. We were told they are there for the presence and general safety of the people in attendance(everyone but student athletes) whether anything should be needed when it comes to criminal laws. If the police were present that day they would have been on the opposite side (home stands) as that is where the general public is watching from.
As for the athletes, the insider told us they are sitting in groups on the visitor side and probably have no idea that officers are or would be there. Based on current policies our insider told us this incident still would have happened. The insider went on to say that each school is in charge of their student athletes which includes an Administrator from each school and any of those schools Track Coaches. They are “in charge” of the students/ athletes, since it is still a school activity. They went on to say meaning no police responsibility at all.
They went on to say it is just like in the schools, SROs enforce the criminal aspects only. School rule enforcement is up to the school administrators and staff. Varsity football is the only FISD sport that uses any walk-through metal detectors and that’s because of the venues they use like Toyota and Ford Centers. Lastly, they told us that Coach K brings in “security” staff to use hand wands and only for football. No athletes anywhere in the district are scanned or wanded for weapons in any sport.
After talking to the insider, this is what parents should be asking the district today:
1. Was there a police presence that day and if so, were they only on the side where the general public sits?
2. Who was the Administrator assigned to each school that day? They obviously were not at the tents, so where were they?
3. If the track coaches are on the field, then who is overseeing the students while in the bleachers?
4. Will the policies change, and will they have hand wanding at all events? Will it include the general public and students? Why is a Coach responsible for bringing in security. Why does the district not have district policies of when police presence is required? Well only when its practical or appropriate – you will read about that below.
5. Where was the administrator, coaches and trainers in relation to the tents?
After talking to the insider, we were curious what the district has published in relation to the security enforcement. According to Frisco ISD’s website they have a whole section on security which reads, “In Frisco ISD, the safety of students, staff and visitors is our top priority and we take this responsibility very seriously.” After everything we have heard from parents and district insiders security is not a top priority for the district.
It goes on to read, “Our comprehensive security program addresses prevention, intervention, student assistance, preparedness, emergency response and building security. FISD routinely reviews safety and security procedures and makes adjustments when necessary. That means we’re constantly exploring new and creative ways to enhance existing security measures and adopting those policies and protocols proven to be effective in reducing risk. It is a team effort – we rely on the continued support of students, parents and the community to keep our schools safe. We work closely with our local police and fire departments to coordinate prevention and response activities, perform regular security audits and provide frequent training to all employees on security issues.”
1. We would love to see that comprehensive security program they have.
2. New and creative ways to enhance existing security? I would like you to be more practical than creative when it comes to security for my kids.
3. Team Effort? So now they are putting it back on the students and parents?
4. Security Audits: We would like to know when they conducted the last 3 audits and did, they every include the athletics events specifically?
They have a whole page on the website dedicated to the School Resource Officer Program. We noticed it says the district partners with police departments in Frisco, Plano, McKinney and Little Elm provide School Resource Officers (SROs) who are assigned to all middle and high schools, as well the Career and Technical Education Center and Student Opportunity Center. Officers assigned to middle schools have responsibility for two to three elementary schools. Additionally, the Town of Little Elm has one SRO for the District’s two elementary schools, and extra officers and patrols support elementary schools in Frisco, McKinney and Plano.
1. It lists 8 SRO’s on their website so how do they have one assigned to “all middle and high schools?”
2. If middle school SRO’s are over two to three elementary schools how many times are they on each campus, each week?
According to the site SRO’s are employees of the police departments, with salaries, vehicles and equipment being a shared cost. SROs are armed at all times and are highly trained by their respective police departments to respond in the event of an emergency. They are also equipped with medical supplies and specialized tools to assist in a crisis situation.
1. What SRO was at the UIL track meet and did they have medical supplies and specialized tools to assist in the crisis?
We found some of their duties and responsibilities interesting, such as take enforcement action on criminal offenses when appropriate. Handle initial police reports of crimes committed on campus. Provide a police presence during events and functions, as appropriate, when requested by the principal and as approved by an SRO Sergeant or Police Administration. When practical, attend all school special events. When possible and practical, divert juveniles out of the criminal justice system into other social agencies.
Read that again! Taking enforcement action on criminal offenses when appropriate? Who determines what is appropriate? Handle initial police reports of crimes? Who handles the police reports after the SRO does the initial police report? Provide a police presence during events “AS APPROPTIRATE, WHEN REQUESTED” – what? When practical attend all school special events? Who determines what is appropriate, who is responsible for requesting it, and who determines what is practical? If you as us it sounds like a lot of interpretation is left open!
Got a problem – well report it in an app called STOPit! Parents who want to make a report can via the world wide web. What happened to the days of talking to the principal and counselors directly?
After hearing about what happened to Austin Metcalf, my wife looked at me and said, “Next time we go to a game for our grandson, she will not complain about the security measures in place ever again.” Austin Metcalf deserved a district that could rise to the moment, that had the leadership, protocols, consistent policies, and foresight to protect him. What he got instead was a tangled web of confusion, inconsistency, and silence masquerading as policy. Frisco ISD’s lack of clear procedures and its failure to act decisively didn’t just expose cracks in the system—it revealed a gaping hole where leadership should’ve been. If we don’t demand change now—real, accountable, uncomfortable change—then we’ve learned nothing from Austin’s death. And worse, we’ve accepted that this kind of tragedy is just the cost of sending our kids to school when it shouldn’t be. It can’t be.
Well, well. The Frisco ISD Superintendent has finally broken his silence. After being called out by Frisco Chronicles for their district’s lack of leadership during this recent tragedy, Dr. Mike Waldrip has released a statement. Not a press conference. Not a town hall. A carefully worded, non-emotionally packaged letter.
Some might say it’s heartfelt. Others—especially those who’ve been watching this district duck accountability like it’s an Olympic sport—might call it something else: too little, too late. Let’s be clear, bullets hit an elementary school and no response. Then rocked with another tragic event that left one student dead, and another charged with Murder, that has left our schools and community shaken to the core. The students, the staff, and the community deserved an immediate, transparent, and unflinching response from district leadership that would lead us through this difficult time. What we got instead was silence—and then, finally, a statement that reads more like a press release drafted in the PR department’s “Cover Your Assets” war room.
Let’s break down Waldrip’s response, starting with “two deeply concerning incidents.” Concerning Incidents? Are you kidding? Then you say you are “reminded that challenges often bring out the best in us, revealing our collective strength, resilience and compassion.” Your response revealed a lot – too little, too late! Where was that courage when parents were begging for answers after these events unfolded? Where was that resilience when students returned to school with more trauma than guidance, more rumors than facts, and more fear than support?
This letter expresses gratitude for emergency responders, and rightly so. But that’s not the leadership vacuum we’ve been calling out. That’s not the black hole of communication from the people paid—handsomely, I might add—to protect, inform, and lead this district through the worst of times. Instead, we got radio silence, save for the whisper campaigns and online confusion the district now blames on “fake social media profiles” and “fraudulent fundraising.”
When leadership abdicates its duty to communicate with clarity and conviction, it creates the perfect breeding ground for confusion. Leadership isn’t just about showing up when your asking residents to vote yes to propositions—it’s about showing up immediately, honestly, and with a clear plan of action. Instead, Frisco ISD waited. And waited. And waited.
Now, we’re being told to stand united. That’s fine. But unity starts with trust, and trust is built on transparency. Not platitudes. Not PR. And certainly not finger-wagging at a public left in the dark. Parents aren’t asking for perfection. We’re asking for truth and for our leadership to lead. If you wait until the storm passes to address the community, you’re not leading. You’re hiding in the bunker, hoping the wind blows over before anyone notices the silence.
So, Dr. Waldrip, thank you for your words. Now we ask—where were they when we needed them most?
Since last week momentum across the nation on social media and in the news continues to grow about the tragic death of Austin Metcalf and the alleged suspect, Karmelo Anthony who has been charged with Murder – 1st Degree Felony. Our community is grieving, and it is compelled by the outside hate and accusations being hurled at the victim, the families, and the community.
Everyone has questions that of course will go unanswered until the Frisco Police Department finishes their investigation. The fact is that two families are torn apart, and both families are grieving in very different ways. Young adults witnessed this and will most likely suffer from some sort of PTSD as they cannot unsee what they experienced that day. What has transpired since the tragedy could have been avoided. What could have helped in this situation is for our City and ISD leaders to come out with a strong voice that a full and complete investigation would be carried out and to support the ongoing investigation by Frisco Police.
Where’s Waldrip? That is a good question! From a scan of social media, we can find no comments made by the Superintendent of the ISD anywhere. All he did on Twitter was repost the Frisco PD post about fake accounts and then Chief Shilson’s letters to the public. No personal comments from Waldrip anywhere. What a good way to lead during crisis. If you remember in 2024 he was all over social media in videos telling residents why they should support the four propositions on the upcoming Nov 5th ballot. Now, it is a game of Where’s Waldo Waldrip.
Where’s Frisco ISD? A clear view of their page shows a post at 10:01 am right as the first 911 call came in relating to 5th graders. Then April 5th at 6am reminds people the last chance to complete the k-12 survey and share your feedback with district leadership. Fast forward to today…nothing! Great leadership FISD telling students you will have therapists on hand, that our ISD community is strong, etc. Nothing – absolutely nothing!
Where is the Frisco ISD Board of Trustees? Dynette Davis, Frisco ISD Trustee made a statement on April 2nd at 2:33 pm. She writes “We are deeply saddened by the tragic loss of a student within Frisco ISD. The Board of Trustees shares in the profound grief of this senseless act of violence and extends its deepest condolences to the victim’s family, friends, and loved ones. A young life ending far too soon is a heartbreaking reminder that violence is never the answer to conflict. In times like these, we must come together in support and compassion. Students who need help processing this tragedy are encouraged to speak to their parents or guardians and to reach out to school counseling services for guidance and support. Frisco ISD is committed to providing all necessary resources for everyone impacted by today’s terrible events.”
Current Frisco ISD Board of Trustees who made a comment or shared Davis comment includes Sherrie Salas and Stephanie Elad.
Current Frisco ISD Board of Trustee members who have made no comment are Keith Maddox Sr., Mark Hill, Marvin Lowe, and Gopal Ponangi (who is running for Frisco City Council).
Candidates running currently for the Board of Trustees that commented include Renee Sample, Stuart Shulman, Amit Kalara, Muniraj Janagarajan. and Melanie Jones
Others candidate running currently for the Frisco ISD Board of Trustees who have made no comment include Suresh Manduva and Ange Yao.
Just look back over time:
We had a bullet hit a Frisco ISD elementary school prompting the early release of students, where is that investigation? What happened?
What happened to the students involved with vandalism at Memorial High School a few years ago during a senior prank day. Damages included paint on the walls, furniture destroyed, and fire extinguishers set off, closing the campus for several days.
Multiple kids have been killed in Frisco just walking to school or riding their bike in the early morning hours to school. What is the district doing along with the city to prevent that?
We even had a child arrested for bring a BB gun to school back in 2019.
Heck the Attorney General of Texas sued our district for electioneering back in 2024.
Where is the leadership within our school district? What we don’t understand is why more people are not asking questions of the school district? This is the time for them to come out holding hands with a powerful message of unity, forgiveness and strength … but nothing! You could hear crickets’ chip from across the city. Where is the leadership in our district? Why is no one asking…. WHAT IS HAPPENING IN FRISCO ISD?
At Whistleblower, we have said we feel for both families – this was a tragedy that did not have to happen. These types of things should not be happening in our community. When it comes to Austin Metcalf and Karmelo Anthony, instead of being able to heal, we are faced with a firestorm of media outlets, content creators, and others whose goal is to create their narratives that include pushing hatred and divisiveness. Every rumor, accusation, and false narrative only hurts this case and our community.
Today the Next Generation Action Network in Dallas met with Frisco Police. They are concerned about a fair trial, and they are concerned about the false narratives across the board. They were concerned about the Anthony families fear to leave there home and the death threats the family is receiving because their child was involved in this incident. They want to make sure the Anthony family is receiving the protection they need. The President of NGAN said the disinformation out there is actually hurting the case, and social media has been a stomping ground for them to launch any disparity they want to. President, Dominque Alexander said after he met with Frisco PD, he feels comfortable as of right now things are being done properly, but they will have to wait and see how things go moving forward. Frisco PD should look into the threats against the Anthony family as well. We agree they should!
Next NGAN wanted to clear up some of the rumors being spread which include:
The Autopsy Report Online: Fake
The Statement From an account under Chief Shilson’s name: FAKE
Austin Metcalf and Karmelo Anthony knew each other before this incident: False
Austin Metcalf and Karmelo Anthony partied together before: False
Austin Metcalf and his twin brother were not on the roster to be at the track meet: False
Kamelo Anthony was not on the roster to be at the track meet: False
ALL THREE BOYS WERE ON THE ROSTER AND SUPPOSED TO BE THERE!
All three young men arrived at the track meet via Fisco ISD school buses.
Karmelo Anthony was kicked out of his home days before this event: False
Concern about if all witnesses have been interviewed: Per the President of NGAN, Frisco PD confirmed they have interviewed several people and are ongoing, and they have more to interview.
Video of the event: Yes – Frisco PD confirmed they have confiscated video footage of the event. That will not be released to the public as it is part of the investigation and will come out in court.
At Whistleblower we would also like to clear up two issue we have heard:
Frisco ISD does not own the event/stadium? False, it is owned by the school district, so state laws apply
What was Anthony right when it came to him carrying a knife on school grounds?
Can a weapon, such as a knife be carried on school property? Texas Penal code Section 46.03 (Places Weapons Prohibited) states, “A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly possesses or goes with a firearm, location-restricted knife, club, or prohibited weapon listed in Section 46.05 (Prohibited Weapons)(a):
(1) on the premises of a school or postsecondary educational institution, on any grounds or building owned by and under the control of a school or postsecondary educational institution and on which an activity sponsored by the school or institution is being conducted, or in a passenger transportation vehicle of a school or postsecondary educational institution, whether the school or postsecondary educational institution is public or private, unless:
pursuant to written regulations or written authorization of the school or institution;
on the premises where a high school, collegiate, or professional sporting event or interscholastic event is taking place, unless the person is a participant in the event and a firearm, location-restricted knife, club, or prohibited weapon listed in Section 46.05 (Prohibited Weapons)(a) is used in the event;
Instead of creating a narrative that this is a race issue, ask Frisco ISD and its leadership some serious questions about how their actions have failed students. Why don’t they back up their teachers? What have they done over the years to bury issues? Why would they not have security at the stadium? What medical personnel did they have at the stadium? The big shockers that come from this are going to fall on the lack of leadership from our school district, starting with Superintendent Waldrip.
Most of all, continue to pray for both families and our community.
***** IF YOU WORK FOR FRISCO ISD AND WANT TO TELL US SOMETHING YOU CAN EMAIL US AT FRISCOWHISTLEBLOWER@PROTONMAIL.COM. WE WILL PROTECT YOUR IDENTITY ********
In the wake of the tragic stabbing of 17-year-old high school athlete Austin Metcalf at a track meet, the community has been grappling with grief. Amidst this turmoil, people feel the need to talk about it, and it has become a hot topic across social media platforms. Comments from students, parents, community members, and agitators all seem to reflect opinions on what happened that day. The community is divided because no one can truly comprehend how two boys go to school and don’t come home.
But one post from today (9 hours ago) on the FRWC Facebook page, run by Jamie Heit, set off a spark of anger among many in the community, and our email box blew up! We went to read the post, and honestly, we couldn’t believe what we were reading. Heit posted a new fundraising link for Karmelo Anthony (17 years old), who is now charged with Murder, a 1st Degree Felony, and sits in jail with a bond set at $1 million. She writes, we do not know what occurred on Wednesday, and in her opinion, it was up to the investigators to determine, the attorneys to litigate, and a jury and judge to decide. She has chosen to share the fundraising link for Anthony just as she did for the Metcalf families, and that it was not meant to be disrespectful for the loss of life or the unimaginable pain that the Metcalf family is dealing with.
Heit goes on to say in the post what we do know, is that one student is being laid to rest and another student sits behind bars for ALLEGEDLY STABBING the other. Then she closed the post to comments. I wonder why?
Here is the problem with the post, Jamie Heit refers to Anthony as the “alleged” assailant and suggests that the full details of the incident remain unknown. The term “alleged” is typically used to describe someone accused of a crime. Furthermore, Heit’s assertion that “we don’t know what happened” seems to overlook the comprehensive information released by law enforcement. The Frisco Police Department’s statements, corroborated by eyewitnesses, outline a clear sequence of events leading to Metcalf’s death that are in an arrest warrant affidavit.
Based on the arrest warrant affidavit (that all four local news channels shared including Heit’s favorite WFAA) which details the moment officers arrived at the track meet and what witnesses told them led up to the deadly confrontation. The affidavit also states Anthony claims it was self-defense. The arresting officer who found Anthony and walked him off the track said before he even questioned Anthony about the incident, Anthony said, “I was protecting myself and Metcalf put his hands on me.” After another officer arrived, Anthony was then handcuffed and escorted towards the squad card and according to the affidavit when the officer referred to Anthony as the alleged suspect, Anthony responded “I’m not alleged, I did it!” The affidavit goes on to say when while Anthony was being escorted to the police car and put in the back seat of the vehicle the office made note of fresh blood on Anthony’s middle finger. The document states that Anthony (while in the back seat of the police vehicle) asked the officer if Metcalf was going to be OK and then asked the officer if his actions could be considered self-defense.
Here is the thing, at this point it doesn’t matter why he did it – no one should have died that day. Anthony ADMITTED TO STABBING METCALF – so it is not “ALLEGED” IT IS “CONFIRMED”.
The reason as to why he did it is listed in the affidavit and confirmed by other witnesses. Heit must not have watched her favorite channel WFAA. WFAA as well as every other media outlet got a copy of the arrest affidavit, which documents the events. What we know is that Anthony was sitting under the Memorial pop-up tent when the rain began to fall. The report goes on to say, “One witness reportedly told police that the victim, Austin Metcalf, had told the suspect, Karmelo Anthony, he would need to move out from under his team’s tent.” Another witness told police, “Upon being told to move, Anthony opened his bag and reached inside and then said to Metcalf “Touch me and see what happens.” Another witness said, “Metcalf reportedly then touched Anthony, and Anthony told Metcalf to punch him and see what would happen.” The affidavit continues, “Anthony reportedly pulled out what the witnesses recalled as a large black knife and stabbed Metcalf once in the chest before running away.” A witness then said, “Metcalf grabbed his chest and told people to get help.” According to the affidavit, the story was the same among several eyewitnesses at the scene.
But with all that information already out, Ms. Heit writes her post today with a fundraising link, saying we don’t know what happened, it was alleged, it was … really? Our mailbox was filled with messages, and what irked many of the people who emailed us about her post was her previous posts from the week, where Ms. Heit doesn’t hold herself accountable to the same standards she preaches from her pulpit to her group members to follow. Just look at the other posts that led up to today’s firestorm post.
The first post on FRWC appeared on Wednesday April 2nd by a resident at 10:41am saying to “check on your kids” because my son just called and there was a stabbing of a Memorial student by a Centennial student. Word spread fast and many residents tuned into the number one “Frisco” page run by Jamie Heit who we have written about in the past in our blog Heit’end Controls. Due to the number of inappropriate or misleading comments Jamie Heit quickly announced she was closing comments and would only be posting official updates in order not to spread misinformation or be disrespectful towards the family or students affected by this. In a case like this we can appreciate that move because it involves young adults and there was nothing but rumors flying around as it had just happened.
Just a few hours later, Heit took to online pulpit or page and posted a WFAA story (since when did news stories qualify as official updates) and wrote that since the family has now confirmed their son’s passing, she felt it was now appropriate to share that they have set up a GoFundMe. Just a short time later, she posted information on the prayer vigil for Austin Metcalf (which we attended). At around 4 pm that same day, she made another post sharing a link to the Frisco PD’s official press release then updated the same post at 5:45 pm. Heit noted the PR had the suspect’s photo but said she would not share the suspect’s photo because he is a minor. She then warned everyone not to post photos or videos of the suspect who is a minor or they would be banned from the group. Then she says, “UNLESS THE MINOR’S HEADSHOT IS PUBLICLY RELEASED BY AUTHORITIES, IT DOES NOT BELONG ON FRWC!”
Ms. Heit, maybe you should click the link you posted because it has the offenders’ official booking photo. You contradicted your own words because the AUTHORITIES did release the photo. Then after updating your post at 5:45pm you posted again at 6:10pm “Just Heartbreaking (broken heart emoji)” and it is another WFAA report (now considered official updates apparently) with a photo of the victim who had been identified – Austin Metcalf, WHO IS A MINOR!! Ms. Heit, why is it okay, 20 minutes later after your tirade and blocking people for posting photos of a minor, that YOU now post a picture of a minor? Then 20 minutes later, she posts the father’s official GFM, which has Austin Metcalf’s picture again. Why not post a link to the GFM without the picture, just like you did in the post regarding the offender? You know, to protect the minors? Why is it okay to post one of the boy’s photos but not the other?
The next day on April 3rd, Heit again posts official updates by WFAA, saying “This is just gut-wrenching” and goes on to write this has the videos with both Austin’s mother and brother are in the link. The link brings up a picture of Austin Metcalf’s, A MINOR! IS IT OKAY NOW TO POST PHOTOS OF MINORS?
Later that day, Heit posts official updates again from WFAA, and this time it has a picture of the student arrested, Karmelo Anthony. Remember, readers can post pictures, and people have been removed/blocked from her page, but Heit can do whatever she wants because it is an OFFICIAL UPDATE from WFAA. The official press release by the POLICE that had a photo of the offender, you would not publish because you claimed he was a minor. The official update by WFAA, well, you can publish that! What happened to the rules about minors?
Then yesterday a resident posted about the Frisco PD working with the FBI to investigate fake social media posts regarding the fatal stabbing and it shows kids (MINORS) getting on buses. Pretty sure the linked photo is of minors getting on school buses, so it is okay to post these minors. Later in the day, Heit posts about the ICF Healing for Hearts which is for all faiths to discuss the tragedy. Yet Heit did not post any of the other church groups offering similar such events. Wonder why.
In closing, are we surprised by today’s post? No, of course not! FRWC is her page, and Heit can do, post, accept, and deny anyone or anything she wants. What she shouldn’t do is lie to 20k+ people that this was done to be fair to everyone involved. Heit did this so she could keep her like-minded friends happy. We have said it before when you have control of a page with 20k+ followers and want to claim to be impartial, then be impartial! That won’t happen because she does this all the time, she makes posts, shuts down commenting on posts, deletes comments, and is constantly lecturing everyone on how to act, but then does not follow her own words.
Texas law states that once you turn 17, you are legally considered an adult, and any criminal charges could and would be handled in an adult court. While I agree with Ms. Heit that the legal process will ultimately determine the outcome for Anthony, the facts presented thus far paint a compelling picture. In such a sensitive situation, it’s crucial for community leaders and influencers to base their statements and actions on verified information to avoid spreading misinformation or inadvertently minimizing the gravity of the incident. As the community mourns the loss of one student and grapple with the fact it happened at the hands of another student, it’s imperative to approach the situation with empathy and a commitment to truth, ensuring that the memory of Austin Metcalf is honored appropriately, and that justice is pursued truthfully and diligently for Anthony Karmelo.
For now, we are praying for both families, we understand that each one is facing their own battle with grief and sadness. What we won’t due is post a fundraising link for a kid who admitted to stabbing another child. That is just….insane!
Well folks, it’s that magical time again in Frisco—election season—when the lawn signs bloom like spring wildflowers, the political mailers clog our mailboxes faster than credit card offers, and the campaign coffers overfloweth… with cold, hard cash.
But not just any cash. Oh no, we’re talking about that sweet, sweet nectar of the gods: Developer Donation Dollars—a.k.a. Tammy’s Triple D’s.
Yes, in a stunning twist no one saw coming (except literally anyone who has watched city politics for five minutes), Councilwoman Tammy Meinershagen reported a jaw-dropping $40,833.64 in campaign contributions in just the last three months. That’s a lot of yard signs and catered meet-and-greets. But here’s where it gets juicy: $31,041.44—roughly 76%—came from developers who have current or future projects in the pipeline and paving Frisco one luxury development at a time.
Coincidence? Just your average neighborhood bake sale gone wild? Or maybe developers just have an intense passion for local democracy… the kind of passion usually accompanied by architectural renderings and infrastructure impact studies. Why are these developer titans so invested in our humble city council races? Are they just really, really into zoning meetings? Or could it be they know that in Frisco, if you want to shape the skyline, you’ve got to shape the council first?
Let’s put on our rubber gloves and dig through the money trail, one donation at a time—name, company, and what exactly they’re building in our backyard. Spoiler alert: it’s not a public park. Grab your hard hats, folks. It’s time to follow the bulldozers—and the bucks.
$1000: Todd & Heather Lisle: Todd worked at Forvis Accounting until he retired. According to the Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports each year on the city website, “FORVIS, Certified Public Accountants, has issued unmodified (“clean”) opinions on the City of Frisco’s financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2023. The report of the independent auditors is located at the beginning of the Financial Section.”
$2000 Each: Theresa & Michael Sinacola, James Sinacola and Joseph Sinacola – works on projects every day in Frisco for private developers and the city projects.
$3000: Philip Rose – CrossTie Capital (Frisco Fields Development)
$3000: Fehmi and Elizabeth Karahan – Karahan Companies (Frisco Fields Development)
$5000: Robert Shaw – Columbus Realty Partners (Frisco Fields Development)
$5000: Richard Reupke – Partner and Chief Financial Officer at Columbus Realty Partners since the firms inception in 1999. They own Twelve Cowboys Way Luxury Apartments and are involved in PGA/North Fields developing a Class A Multifamily development in Frisco.
In-Kind (Non-Monetary) Donation:
$9,892.34 Craig Hall – Founder of Hall Group For Kickoff Venue/Food/Beverage
Other donors include:
$500: Jason Denton – Local Businessman and on the Frisco CDC Board
$1500: Answer Azam – Local CPA and Former Candidate For Council
Political Expenditures Made:
$5000: Cynergy-Ink ** We could find no company website for this company, no franchise tax id account in Texas and the address but the address comes back to a home registered to a woman whose social media says she does Graphic Design
$2900: Campaign Management Services for a mobile app and we can not find anything on this company but they appear on several candidate campaign finance reports for campaign services.
And there you have it, folks. Just another heartwarming tale of local democracy, where average citizens like you and me—armed with nothing but a mortgage, three kids, and a dog that eats Legos—are expected to go toe-to-toe with deep-pocketed developers who treat campaign donations like they’re dropping quarters into a casino slot machine that spits out zoning variances.
Some residents are tired of wondering why that five-story mixed-use “village” just popped up where the park used to be, or why our street floods every time someone flushes during a light drizzle—maybe, just maybe—we should follow the money (unless you don’t want to ruin the surprise). I know, I know… who has time to read campaign finance reports when “The Bachelor of Frisco Lakes: Retirement Village” is on? We’ve got real problems—like whether our HOA will fine us for leaving your garbage bin out 14 minutes too long. It leaves us no time to wonder why our city council candidate suddenly got $40,000 from developers who wants to turn a pasture into a “luxury lifestyle hub.” That’s just a coincidence! Pure civic enthusiasm!
But hey, democracy’s working just fine. As long as by “democracy,” you mean a handful of land speculators playing Monopoly with real houses, real traffic, and your real tax dollars. We have shouted it from the rooftops of Frisco homes, trying to warn you that when that same candidate tells you they “can’t be bought,” they’re technically telling the truth—because let’s be honest, at this point they’re on layaway. Just waiting to be delivered after the election.
Yesterday morning, two families woke up in Frisco excited for their kids who had UIL Championship Track Meet at Kenkuydall Stadium. Neither family had any clue or saw coming that by the end of the day one family would lose a son, and the other family would have a son facing murder charges. This should not be happening in Frisco, Texas.
Today, it is compounded by the fact that America (yes America, this has gone viral) has an opinion on what happened. Rumors are being crafted, hate is being spread across social media calling this racial because of the colors of the boy’s skin tones, accusations are being hurled. People are digging through these two teenage boy’s social media accounts looking for the “worst of the worst” to post and they will find it – but how does that change this now? The end result is spreading more hate and divide in a time when we should be waiting for answers.
Believe me when I say this is a parent’s worst nightmare come true on both sides. The parents had no clue as their kids went out the door, neither of them would be coming home. The father of Austin Metcalf, the victim who died in his twin brothers’ arms, spoke out and said, “I want to clarify something right off the start because I have already heard some rumors and gossip. This was not a race thing; this is not a political thing …this is a human being thing! This young man made a bad choice, and it affected his family and our family forever. It is a very unfortunate thing.” He went on “I forgive this boy, not for him but for me, as a father to have peace. His life is destroyed, my life is destroyed; it is an unfortunate, tragic event that will affect us for the rest of our lives. I want to get the word out to other parents so they will talk to their children, so this does not happen again. Senseless acts of violence have become more acceptable, and we have become more callous to them. That needs to change.”
He is an incredible father to have faith over fear today! My wife and I would like to follow in his father’s footsteps and send our thoughts, prayers and condolences to both families. We will be lifting them all up in prayer as well as for our community to heal from this. Last night, Austin Metcalf was called home. Last night Karmelo Anthony spent the first of many nights in jail. Nobody Wins!
Part of that healing is asking legitimate questions that we expect investigators to find answers to:
1. Why did a young man bring a knife to a track meet?
2. At what moment, did he loose control and make the decision to stab him in the chest?
3. When did the first call to 911 get logged?
4. What was the dispatch time, enroute time, and arrival time of the first arriving unit, and was the clear time?
5. Were there any medical personnel for the school on-site at this track meet? If no, why not?
6. Did the revitalization construction happening downtown directly affect the response time of EMS units. What was the time frame delay between him being stabbed and receiving life saving measures by police and fire including CPR and the administration of blood?
7. Is the school offering mental health services to the kids involved and around?
8. Is the city offering mental health services to the first responders who had to watch this young adult die?
9. Were there any warning signs in the young adult’s life or history that would have led the school to believe that he could become a dangerous offender or be carrying a weapon?
10. How could this have avoided? What security measures did the school district have in place at this event?
Both families have to live with Karmelo Anthony decision for the rest of their lives. These questions will tell us who dropped the ball and at what level because a kid does not wake up and say Today, I am taking a knife to a track meet. We need to know where, how, and when the failures happened to keep all the students safe in our schools. One young man made a decision that would affect both families’ lives forever yesterday. We need to stop and talk to our kids and make sure they understand that it doesn’t matter if this was over a seat, a cellphone, or a simple exchange of teenage verbal words — none of those reasons, or any reason, is acceptable to take a person’s life. That is the conversation parents should be having today with their kids. The other day, I took my wife to HEB, and she is in a wheelchair. I had a hard time getting it up over the curb. A group of kids laughed and snickered – no one offered to help and that is what is wrong with our country today. It is time to reteach our kids about humanity and being good stewards. We need to ask ourselves, “What is happening to our town, to our community, that this would be how an otherwise normal day ends?”
This should not have happened in Frisco, Texas …. Yet it did!
The conversation around FCFA (Frisco Center for the Performing Arts) is like watching a hockey game. Fans focus on the puck, darting across the ice at breakneck speed, while the real action—the jabs, the shoves, the outright brawls—unfolds around it. In this case, the puck is the FCFA debate, and the players? Several players have come forward offering wisdom and insight like George Purefoy, Shono Sowell, Jared Elad, Jerry Spencer, and Burt Thaker.
Mayor Jeff Cheney has decided to be both the referee and the enforcer, throwing punches at anyone who dares question his grand vision. His online meltdown is documented in his trolling comments of citizens, council candidates, previous city employees, and future mayoral candidates. We call him the digital reincarnation of American Cult Leader, David Koresh. Cheney views Frisco residents as his personal Branch Davidians, expecting—no, demanding—blind loyalty. He envisions himself as the all-knowing prophet of Frisco’s future, leading his followers toward his Broadway-sized promised land, whether they like it or not.
Just like Koresh, Cheney loves the sound of his own voice. His strategy? Talk incessantly until his opponents are too exhausted to argue. History has shown that when Cheney gets his panties in a wad or feels his grip slipping, he shifts into attack mode, labeling residents “ignorant,” “unaware,” or “misinformed.” It’s almost comical—except for the fact that he genuinely believes he’s the smartest person in the room. As my mother used to say, the proof is in the pudding.
Why the Obsession with FCFA?
Why is Jeff Cheney and his sidekicks Tammy Meinershagen and John Keating fighting so hard for a Frisco Center For The Arts?
For Meinershagen, it’s personal. She has had a lifelong love affair with the arts (she plays the violin), and she has served on the Frisco Arts Boards and Commissions. One could wonder, has her love for the arts possibly clouded her judgment. Is she advocating for the entire city or just her arts community?
Keating has a twofold motivation: 01: He wants to be mayor, and winning this battle gives him a nice “dog whistle” for his next campaign boost. 02: He owns a house in The Preserve, which Cheney has said is the most exclusive community to ever be built in Frisco, as it sits next to the PGA. A luxurious neighborhood near the proposed arts center —a fancy arts venue next door = only increased property values.
And Cheney? Well, he wins in real estate—again. Let’s be honest, a massive arts venue will drive up property values along the 380 corridors, directly benefiting the real estate that the Cheney Group represents in Fields Residential Developments. Just as he has done in the past, Cheney will say there is no conflict of interest and that he doesn’t use his position as Mayor to benefit his business. Coincidence? We think not.
The Social Media Meltdown
Why is Cheney on a social media overdrive to sell this project to the public? To understand you must look at the comments on the March 8th post by the Smart Frisco PAC on their Facebook page. Former City Manager, George Purefoy, who is a very respected individual in our city and many value his opinion since he “built Frisco,” openly stated he was against the measures on the ballot relating to the Frisco EDC and did not like the fact that residents were being misled that it would cost nothing. On the same post, several other well-respected names in our community spoke out. Political candidates such as Jerry Spencer, Jared Elad, and Burt Thacker have also come out against the measures.
On March 22, Shona Sowell, who previously served as a city councilwoman for many years, giving her access to the spatial studies and feasibility studies done regarding a performing arts center. She has also been involved in city conversations related to a PAC and published an informed opinion on her Facebook page, Shona Sowell for Frisco Mayor. That is when Cheney lost it and his performance backfired!
First, Cheney uses a set of cabal minions to question Purefoy and Sowell. In this case, that would be Jake Petras and David Bickerstaff. When that doesn’t work, he dives right into the media fire himself, replying to several comments on Sowell’s page and her post.
Resident Jeff Jacobs thanked Sowell for her breakdown of the facts. Cheney responds, “this a 50-year decision for Frisco. Please do your due diligence apart from political alliances and evaluate this project on what it will truly mean for the future of our community.” How does Cheney know that Jacobs has not done his own due diligence? Why does he assume his support is solely out of a political alliance with Sowell? Where does Cheney, OUR MAYOR, get off making those assumptions or talking to a resident like that. Keep in mind Cheney knows Jacobs is well informed as he is a well-respected Realtor in the Frisco community.
Jacobs commented later on in the comments on Sowells post with a meme about Frisco ISD arts center. Cheney obviously does not pay attention who he is talking to or he would have realized he already responded to Jacobs once, so he responds again with the same exact copied comment he left for Jacobs the first time around.
Next Bowers makes a comment thanking Sowell for taking the time to break it down and a short time later Cheney responds, “I count on you to do your homework on this project. I disagree with all the information presented in this post and hopeful Shona will actually meet with city staff to learn more.” In response George Purefoy responds to Bowers with his concerns on the project and you can guess that did not go over when Cheney read it. AGAIN…why does Cheney, OUR MAYOR, assume that Bowers has not done her homework? Why is Cheney “cut and pasting” his comment that he disagrees with the whole post to Bowers. Was Bowers on Mayor Cheney’s page asking him for his two cents? Nope!
Another resident named Annette responds that nothing is free in government and that Frisco needs to focus on infrastructure and stop ignoring the east side which looks sad. Mayoral Candidate Sowell responds that she, too, lives on the east side and understands her pain and wants the whole city to look great for residents. Minutes later, Cheney responds with the same “cut and paste” comment about how he hopes she does her homework and that he disagrees with all the information presented in Sowell’s post. HELLO MR. MAYOR – YOU CLAIM TO CARE ABOUT WHAT RESIDENTS WANT, SO DID YOU EVEN READ HER COMMENT? No!!! You couldn’t care less that a resident feels the east side has been forgotten about in your master plan, and that she expressed a concern. Nope, you only respond about the performing arts center because THAT IS ALL YOU CARE ABOUT! Remember, we said proof is in the pudding, stop and listen and respond to residents – NOT WHAT YOU WANT!
Several more residents’ comment in support of Shona’s post and you can bet minutes later Cheney responds (no trolls) again with the same “cut and paste” comment as he did all the others asking her to do her homework on the project and he disagrees with all the info presented.
Want more proof in the pudding that this is not about Residents but about Cheney and what he wants? Resident Brewer responds to Shona’s post with “Hmm…our mayor’s explanation differs significantly from this.” Without hesitation, Cheney and his minion Bickerstaff respond, attacking Shona as “not credible,” and then, when Resident McCarley responds, asking “What’s incorrect in Shona’s explanation? What is she misinformed about? What facts did she get wrong on this project?” MAYOR CHENEY and Mr. Bickerstaff – this was your time to answer the question and explain your claims that you posted repeatedly, calling “misinformation” with the facts, but did you? Nope!!! Crickets …. Proof again of the pudding, it is not about communication to residents, it is about TELLING THEM what they need to believe.
In another section Cheney is asked if the city is responsible for the cost overruns as Shona stated? Did Cheney respond? NOPE!!!
Then David Bickerstaff (who has a political alliance with Cheney – his own words) posts on Sowells page in the comments for people to read Mayor Cheney’s posts with the real facts. Cheney then responds, “We’ve met with multiple candidates to address questions and concerns, and most have changed their positions after learning more. We invite you to do the same. I would have hoped you would have attended a single public meeting prior to posting such inaccurate information. As a candidate for Mayor the public should expect this, and it is disappointing you have not attended a single informational meeting. I know we would love to meet with any candidate in this race or future to understand the scope and give them the facts to discuss with the public.” Whistleblower responds to Cheney asking him why the city is fighting their PIRs by sending it to the attorney general on the preforming arts center if they have been trying to be so transparent. Cheney never responded to that question, because he probably didn’t see it since he blocked us from his Mayoral page which is illegal by the way.
MR. CHENEY IF YOU READ THIS: What “multiple candidates” have you met with to address their concerns who changed their positions on the project? How many meetings was Sowell involved in with all the other performing arts centers? Why are you insinuating a woman CAN’T READ THE CITY’S SLIDES and decipher with intelligence what they mean, especially when that woman has years of council experience? You said you would love to meet with any candidate in this race to discuss the facts but then why did you try to shut down Burt Thacker at this week’s council meeting when he spoke about the performing arts center? Is the council supposed to respond to folks at citizens’ input, or better yet, cut them off while speaking? Nope, I don’t think you can do that, but we all know you make your own rules.
Whistleblowers Opinion on the Social Media Debacle: Mayor Cheney’s antics, trolling another politician’s page, is classless and disgusting. Going through her posts and commenting on them the way he did not only makes our city look bad, and it makes him look pathetic. He repeatedly assumes that every person is uneducated and not smart enough to make their own decision. If they ask a question, he doesn’t answer it and ignores them. He accuses them of making their decisions based on political alliances when his own political alliances come onto the page to cause disruption. In one post, the Mayor of Frisco – Jeff Cheney, summed up how he sees most of us residents… as stupid idiots who can’t make informed decisions. Only the Great Cheney Klan knows what is best for us. As for Ms. Sowell, we don’t know her personally, but we have watched her for years at council meetings, and she came across in her post the same way she did in those meetings with class and professionalism. She took time to answer anyone’s questions and generally seemed to care about people’s opinions. We are not supporting anyone for Mayor yet as that race is to far out, but she could be a tough one to beat if she continues to put residents first.
Censorship and Control
Cheney’s next move? A post on his own mayoral page. Unfortunately, we can’t link it—he’s blocked us. (Illegal, by the way, but details, details.) His post sounded like it was written by ChatGPT, filled with self-aggrandizing nonsense like, “I am here to discuss the details that I believe…”
A clinical psychologist will tell you that if you look closer at the context written by a narcissist, it has elements of exaggerated sense of self-importance and a need for admiration. What is Cheney saying? To Cheney, this isn’t just an arts center—it’s his magnum opus. The ambition, the “halo effect,” the relentless drive—it’s all part of his self-made mythology. “Only I, Jeff Cheney, have the courage to take on this challenge, to climb the mountain, to lead Frisco into this bold new era.”
Cheney then lays out the details in his post, which you can read for yourself if you are not blocked. A few points of concern for us #4 that reads, in the coming weeks, we’ll lock in an LOI with a world-class operator under an “operator-at-risk” model. That means as of today, as you are reading this, we do not have an LOI with an operator, and we don’t have an operator at risk model. A letter of intent is not a contract, it is a preliminary agreement, generally non-binding.
He also states that “they will inject upfront capital,” but he does not say how much and in return “we’ve” meaning the City has allocated up to $6 million for startup costs (capped there), with any further deficits falling on the operator annually throughout the contract.” What that means is if we vote for this and something goes wrong and we can’t get a contract (past the LOI) worked out, who is holding the purse? The city! He is asking us to put all our chips in on a “risk” that it will work out. This is the same man who made promises about Universal, and the night of the final vote changed numerous things in the contract to be more beneficial for NBC Universal than the residents who lived right next to it. Changing the operating times, height of roller coasters, etc. He wants us to trust him again.
In #6 Cheney talks about “Halo Effect” and the impact on Frisco. He has been using the Halo Effect now for years as his talking point as to why we will do things. When the PGA was approved that project sparked the Halo Effect, then he used it Universal will create a Halo Effect and now the theater. MAYOR CHENEY, WE HAVE BEEN HEARING THE TERM HALO EFFECT FROM YOU FOR YEARS AND GUESS WHAT WE ARE STILL SHELLING OUT MONEY LEFT AND RIGHT FOR COMPANIES WHO SHOULD WANT TO COME HERE BECAUSE WE ARE ALREADY GREAT! When does it end?
He closes with every great Frisco project that has come our way has come with risks and unknowns – yes but they had better money backing it. The PGA, The Cowboys, are billion-dollar operations. Is this partner a billion-dollar partner? No! While there was risk it was not as great as this one. This operator does not have near the same capital as previous ones.
Whistleblower Opinion: Cheney’s post is a direct response to Shona Sowell and George Purefoy. Why does he block people from his page who may have questions? Why does he delete comments that don’t align with his agenda? If you are serious Mr. Mayor, why do you and the rest of the council unblock us and the others you have blocked and allow the same community engagement that Shona Sowell did on her page. That’s right you don’t care about the opinions of residents which is why you trolled her page in your meltdown, and you didn’t answer any of them. The ego and self-centered attitude you have, that you are the only who you can make this happen, is the problem here and will ultimately be while residents vote against it.
The Dallas Morning News Debacle
Do you still want more proof in the pudding? The DMN is the same paper Mayor Cheney has praised in the past. Cheney didn’t agree with their opinion and stated the DMN has “written some uneducated stuff in the past but this may be their worst. It is completely nonsensical.” Were any of these articles UNEDUCATED AND NONSENSICAL?
Then he immediately talks about how they don’t understand the project. He admits in the closing that “Of course we only have LOI’s now, but formal agreements will be executed following the election.” WHAT DID THEY GET WRONG MAYOR?
And so, we’re left with a burning question: Is this the leadership Frisco signed up for? A mayor who spends his time trolling opposing candidates online, throwing tantrums at newspapers that dare to question his grand vision, belittling anyone who doesn’t fall in line, and assuming that anyone who dares question his Broadway dreams just isn’t smart enough to get it?
At what point does passion for a project turn into arrogance? At what point does civic leadership turn into online heckling? One has to wonder, does Mayor Cheney keep a special alert set up for any slight against his pet project, or does he just have that much free time? Mayor Cheney should spend less time policing Facebook comments and more time listening to the very people he was elected to serve. Because for a guy who’s always questioning everyone else’s intelligence, he sure seems to be struggling with the basic concept of professionalism. Maybe instead of scolding residents, journalists, and fellow politicians like a frustrated theater director dealing with amateur actors, he could take a step back and consider that disagreement isn’t the same as ignorance. Either way, watching a sitting mayor spiral into social media meltdowns over dissenting opinions is certainly… a choice.
Or, you know, he could just keep rage-commenting. That’s always a good look. He did have to take a break from commenting to attend the 100th Anniversary of the Music Hall at Fair Park and success with Broadway Dallas. Guess he likes the perks already before we get our theater. Think the city will have us of a box at the new theater too to view all the shows?
(The lights flicker, and the performing arts center goes dark. The drums begin to rumble like a storm and then with grand fury the curtains rise for the play to begin!)
ACT I: The Magnificent Mogul (The lights come up on a grand stage.) Center spotlight, Mayor Jeff Cheney, dressed in regal attire, surveying his domain—the kingdom of Frisco. The backdrop is a glittering real estate billboard for the “Santa Barbara in The Preserve at Fields.” A chorus of Realtors hums disapprovingly in the background. King Cheney (booming voice): Citizens of Frisco, behold! A paradise unlike any other! Luxurious living, exquisite homes, and of course, no conflicts of interest whatsoever! Just because I, the humble servant-mayor, also run The Cheney Group, doesn’t mean I would ever dream of using my influence to benefit my business! (The crowd murmurs)
ACT II: The Great Arts Debacle (The scene shifts to the Frisco City Council Meeting, where they are about to vote on the Frisco Center for the Arts.) Tammany Hall takes to her microphone to welcome a band of concerned citizens, each holding a scroll of grievances to read at citizens’ input. King Cheney, now looking slightly less majestic, listens from his throne, pulls up his phone, and his fingers twitch over his social media apps. Citizen 1: Your Majesty, why must we fund this expensive arts center when other needs go unmet?
Citizen 2: Will this benefit the people of Frisco, or just serve as another jewel in your town?
King Cheney (flustered, stands up): How dare you question my wisdom? Do you not see my vision? Only I know what’s best for Frisco! (Suddenly, a transformation begins)
Before the eyes of the audience, King Cheney shrinks, his voice becoming higher, more desperate. His regal robes stripped away, leaving him in a striped shirt, suspenders, and racoon hat.)
Tammany Hall (played by Tammy Meinershagen): Mr. Mayor, you are starting to look like a certain childhood bully – Scut Farkus. Cheney (looking for a mirror): Scut Farkus? Who… I demand to know who that is?
Tammany Hall responds: You know Mayor, the notorious tormentor from A Christmas Story.
ACT III: The Meltdown Scut Cheney—er, King Cheney—now frantically types away on social media. His fingers fly over his phone, leaving a trail of desperate comments across every Frisco Facebook group and post related to the Frisco Center For The Arts. The doors from the back of the chamber open abruptly and running down to the stage is Steve Cone holding an article published in the Dallas Morning News.
Cone (shouts): “Mr. Mayor, Mr. Mayor, you have to read this, right now!” It’s so bad, Mr. Mayor, so bad! What do you want me to do Cone asks?” Scut Cheney (frantically points to the audience): Listen to me! You’re all wrong! I know best! The arts center is my dream! You just don’t get it! WHYYYYY!?
(The citizens watch in bemusement. A few chuckles ripple through the audience. A small child tugs at their mother’s sleeve.) Child: Mommy, why is the mayor crying and having a tantrum on the internet? (The mother shrugs. The citizens shake their heads. The lights dim as Scut Cheney’s tantrum echoes into the void of the digital realm. The curtain falls to thunderous applause.)
Epilogue: As the audience exits, they are handed a complimentary “Cheney Group” brochure, because no matter how the play ends, the sales must go on. The End… or is it?
Back on May 14, 2024, we filed our first PIR related to a performing arts center. We asked for all the studies and documents related to those reports from consulting groups or third parties like Frisco ISD or Hall Group.
On May 24, 2024, we got a tip from an inside source and we released breaking news in a Facebook Post that Craig Hall backed out from the Performing Arts Center at Hall Park. Today we ponder, did he know something about the project, or how the scope of the project was changing that we didn’t at the time? Possibly, but looking back we think he was a smart man for getting out along with Frisco ISD at the time.
On May 30, 2024, we received a letter from the city secretary that, due to confidentiality issues, the City has chosen to seek a ruling from the Attorney General regarding a portion of the responsive documents. We were not surprised! Now we want you to STOP AND THINK ABOUT … what did they not want the public to see it? For a city telling you this FCFA project is the cherry on top of the city, why do they continue to delay and withhold information? As a voter, if that does not concern you, it should!
At the February 7thCity Council Meeting future candidates took to citizens input under Agenda Item 38 (starting at the 2:25:00 mark).
First up, Jared Elad, candidate for City Council Place 4. Elad stated he had been a resident for 11 years, and he first became aware of this project when he learned the city’s partnership with Frisco ISD fell through due to disagreements over the scope of the project. Frisco ISD is moving forward with a 55-million-dollar facility as we speak to serve its students.
Elad stated he was concerned about Frisco residents maintaining and operating this project in perpetuity. He said it had been stated that this project could cost up to $6 million per year to maintain and he asked the council and the city if they had really done their analysis to make sure it won’t go higher than that? He finds it even more concerning that we are in a partnership with Prosper ISD, which limits the location options since it will have to be within Prosper ISD boundaries. He said that boundary limitations will make the project less accessible to most Frisco Residents. Elad asked why the city was unable to reach an agreement with Frisco ISD, and why it could not have been reworked to serve the Frisco residents better. Now we are left with not 1 but 2 Frisco Performing Arts Centers that the Frisco residents will have to support.
Another concern of his was the city signing a letter of intent with Broadway Access – he noted that a letter of intent is not binding. Without a signed agreement, there is no guarantee that this partnership will come to fruition. That could leave Frisco residents with a facility to maintain and a facility that won’t meet its projected potential revenue. Elad went on to say it has been reported that the Dallas Performing Arts Center is struggling financially as we speak, due to the pandemic and the nature of consumers’ habits changing. He looked at the council and asked, “What makes us think we can do better?”
As for the jobs, he said it will only create a minimum number of jobs, other than the construction phase. While he appreciates the other public-private partnerships like The Star and Frisco PGA, he believes this one will go too far with the potential cost burden it will put on Frisco residents. He closed, asking the council to reconsider the priorities for Frisco and to make sure we are fiscally responsible.
Next up was Burt Thakur, candidate for City Council Place 2. He said he absolutely loves the arts, supports the arts, and believes in the power of the arts to change people. He talked about how when he was in the military, he would use the power of books to transform himself in other places, giving his mind some peace. He said the question of whether we like or support the arts is not what is in front of us at this moment.
The question before us today is are we being financially responsible, and do we have the right priorities in line. Are we good stewards of taxpayer dollars? Thakur went on to say that on Friday the proposed number was $360 million, then a few days later the number was adjusted to $340 million. Then he pointed out, if you take the graphic in the presentation, that ads up to $380 million. Why are we being given vague ranges with an 80 million dollar variance for the cost? Where are the specifics?
Thakur brought up his concern regarding the yearly O&M (operational/maintenance) costs potentially facing Frisco residents. Can we justify this when we, as a city, have other pressing needs that are unfunded? He also touched on the Frisco ISD theater and said, with one already in progress, how is there not a way to find a potential to combine the two and mitigate risk? Thakur mentioned how police and fire have all asked for additional staffing, which costs a fraction of the yearly operational costs, yet the city can’t find the money for that. We don’t have a proper animal shelter, nor do we have a building for our Veterans. We need a space for the local VFW and other Veteran organizations to meet. Thakur said he loves the arts, but he believes in responsible governance, and he asked the council to work smarter, take a step back, and make sure we are funding our needs first. Thakur closed with; We owe it to the people of Frisco to prioritize wisely.
Next up Josh Meek, candidate for City Council Place 4. Meek started by voicing his support agenda item 38 & 39. With the amount of time, money and resources invested in this project we need to reach an answer. He then said that answer needs to come from no one else but Frisco citizens. He hopes that the council allows citizens to vote sooner, rather than later because prolonging it could have increased costs.
Meek went on to say Frisco is ultimately a destination location and he thinks that it would be a far, far oversight to not explore the potential we have when it comes to partnering with Broadway. Meek said he has two boys and when Hamilton came out, they looked at traveling halfway across the country to have that experience so why would he not allow this to be in his own backyard. When you start to break it down a big part of what has made us successful is that we have created these areas for people to visit and experience. He believes that this should go to the ballot. He said we have four districts that cover Frisco so while many are asking why we not partnered with Frisco ISD, maybe we should be asking why we have not partnered with the other ISDs and should we more in the future (Lewisville ISD, Little Elm ISD, Prosper ISD). Meek said he is on the CDC Board, and he has had the opportunity to see the benefits we will have from this.
Besides the council meeting we got an email from another candidate, Jerry Spencer, candidate for Frisco City Council Place 4. He wrote; I am opposed to the Arts Center in its current form. I especially do not like taking money from economic development and community development. I want to get away from this sports/tourism obsession and go after emerging technology/medical research, etc., with the sales tax money. Instead of Sport City USA, we need to re-brand ourselves Brain City USA! I have no problem with a REGIONAL Arts Center. Let’s do one with Plano, McKinney, Allen and Denton. It will take some work, but with effort it can be done. Then, we spread the costs over 1 million people, rather than the 235,000 in Frisco. The per capita costs would come way down. In closing, my website will be up in a few days
Lastly, while he is not running now he did run in 2024, we want to recognize that John Redmond spoke at the council meeting in early February. He said, in theory, he liked the idea of the Performing Arts Center. However, he feels we have spent tons of bond for a community theater and spent the last focused on a highly commercial, very large-scale performing arts center. Redmond went on to say he believes these decisions have been made based on the input of a very small select group of people and not based on the voice of Frisco residents.
Whistleblower Opinion Time: While many will say Whistleblower hates the arts, that is simply not true. My son was in community theater since middle school. We had to take him to other cities to do community theater shows. What we support is a community theater venue for our residents and nearby visitors. We don’t support a monstrosity theater built for Broadway shows and concerts. I asked my son the other day what do you think about this Broadway thing in Frisco? He said dad Broadway isn’t just about the performance it is about New York, the lights, the theaters, the city itself creates the experience of Broadway. Seeing Lion King in Dallas or Fort Worth doesn’t elicit the same response as you traveling to New York and encapsulating the entire experience of Broadway. We agree with him!
We appreciate hearing from the candidates because we believe they will be the future of this city. We believe if residents rise and vote for change, we could see different things coming from the council pulpit. One thing never escapes us, why did Frisco ISD and Craig Hall backout? What did they know or what did they see change that they didn’t agree with? We have analyzed this project in every way we can and a few points keep popping up:
1. Frisco has a lot going on right now with the Frisco PGA, Fields build-out, Universal, Toyota Stadium overhaul, downtown revitalization, Grand Park, and more. So many of these things have not been finished, and now we are going to start another project. Are we overextending ourselves and soon to hit a bubble of sorts?
2. Where is the HEART of Frisco? Every city has an area that is the original heartbeat of the city. Where is that for Frisco? We lost the heartbeat of our rich history that dates back to the late 19th century. Initially, a railroad stop, and hub for the railway, we lost that cultural historical heritage instead of building around it and putting it into everything we do. Wouldn’t it be cool if you could take the local railway as our public transportation from downtown up to the PGA for dinner, then over to the theater for dinner?
It could have been awesome, but instead we just set up a museum to hold pictures of our heritage and how many people actually visit that each year. The reason some of these cities the Chamber visited on their “Leadership Travel” were so great is because they built around their history. Instead, Frisco just built over it!
3. The location of PAC being at 380 and the DNT, so it is in Prosper ISD boundaries, which does limit the access to Frisco residents. How could we not have solidified a deal with Craig Hall, who was offering the land as a donation? The land they are proposing we use today for this project was purchased years ago by the city with the intent to sell it one day. Why? They knew it would be worth millions along the 380 / DNT corridor. Taxpayers paid for that land! It was not free to the city! We spent money back then to make money today to help pay off our debt obligations.
4. EDC & CDC: Where did that money come from? Sales Tax! They want you to believe this is not your money, it’s all those tourists who come here. Do you grocery shop here, eat here, buy gas here? If you do, then you are paying for it!
What was it designated for? Community Development and Economic Development – it was not originally intended for a Performing Arts Center. If you read the slide about the Frisco Model vs Venue Management Model you will see the private partners in the sports model operate these partnerships without on-going operational funding from the City. These are partners like the PGA, Omni, The Cowboys all with strong financial backing.
In the Frisco Center For Arts model we have no idea who the Private Operator will be. The financial model is DEPENDENT on overall financial milestones for fundraising. What happens if the economy goes to crap and people are not donating – who covers that cost then? You…and me! It also states the private partner operates with LIITED ON-GOING OPERATIONAL FUNDING from the city. We agree with the candidates why so VAGUE – where is the CERTAINITY? Why are you asking us to vote on so many “What If’s?” Words like dependent, limited, don’t make me feel comfortable.
Lastly, will it deplete the CDC and EDC money for other potential projects? Okay it brings construction jobs here during development – are you in construction? It will have a few salary jobs to run the theater but will the hourly jobs to clean it, be an usher or attendant help you pay for your million-dollar house? What jobs will this bring to Frisco that are viable economic jobs that people can live on in Frisco? None! What happens if we ever faced another Pandemic? During that time a survey showed that the Dallas Arts suffered a $67.7 Million dollar loss. Who will pay for it then?
Mayor Cheney and his protégés Tammy Meinershagen, Bill Woodard, John Keating, and Laura Rummel must have every project be so great, so grand! It’s like they all suck on the same bottle of whiskey every night and pass the blunt until they have the same stories lined up. Time to say enough, otherwise we might be setting ourselves up for some hard times ahead in Frisco. Slow down, smell the roses! Fix the infrastructure and stop lying to citizens. Life would be so much better.
If you thought the drama of Frisco’s so-called Future Performing Arts Center was confined to city hall meetings and backroom deals, think again. Mayor Cheney has taken the battle to the digital streets, launching an all-out social media war against anyone daring to question this multimillion-dollar boondoggle on the May ballot.
Like a conductor leading an orchestra of outrage, the mayor isn’t just defending the FPAC—he’s aggressively silencing critics, painting skeptics as enemies of “progress,” and doubling down on the same vague promises that have fueled public distrust. Dissenters? Blocked. Tough questions? Ignored. Concerned citizens? Branded as obstructionists.
Honestly, at this point, who needs a performing arts center? The Frisco drama unfolding online on Mayor Cheney’s Facebook page is almost better than a Broadway show and IT’S FREE! Between the plot twists, the villain arcs, and Mayor Cheney’s keyboard warrior antics, the entertainment is free—no ticket required. As long as someone questions the FCFA, Mayor Jeff Cheney will get ants in his pants so cancel the theater plans and let the social media circus continue.
One thing we can tell you, as Frisco teeters between vision and vanity, one thing is clear: This isn’t just about the arts anymore. It’s about power, control, and the lengths our leadership will go to in order to suppress scrutiny, questions, and concerns. In the spirit of giving Cheney something to talk about, we want to continue with more public statements made by community members that many hold in high regard. Curtain up, folks—because this show is just getting started.
In Her Words: Shona Sowell – Former Councilwoman and Running for Frisco Mayor
In a Facebook Post on Shona Sowell for Mayor she posted some of the following details. “Spending $160MM in your taxpayer dollars by changing the use of the funds of Economic Development Corporation, which exists to attract businesses to Frisco, plus adding $7MM a year in operational costs to the City for a performing arts center makes no sense. It is not how we do deals in the City of Frisco.
In Frisco a performing arts facility has long been an issue of research and discussion. Whether you are an arts supporter, performer, casual partaker, or a minor player, one must weigh the costs of a decision that will impact our city budget for decades to come. Previously, I fully supported the joint arts facility in partnership with Frisco ISD and Hall Park. Like other successful public/private partnerships we have done in Frisco, this one had strong partnerships responsible for the operations of the facility. The city was not responsible for cost overruns and was not responsible for the yearly maintenance and operations costs (M&O) for the facility. This approach would have only cost Frisco one tenth of this current proposal. Our financial obligation was limited and spelled out in the agreement. This is how Frisco has been successful with public private partnerships, and it is the same process for The Roughriders, The Dallas Cowboys and The Star, PGA Golf Course, & FC Dallas and Toyota Stadium. However, the current elected officials did not want to partner with FISD and Hall Park on this approach and decided not to move forward. Now they want to spend 10 times that amount on a deal where you the taxpayers own the risk.
The current proposal of a much larger facility in partnership with Prosper ISD and private donations (that do not even exist yet) with an operator who is not well capitalized is a terrible financial decision for the residents of Frisco. This proposal is NOT THE FRISCO WAY and puts Frisco taxpayers at risk.
She went on to give her thoughts on the challenges and risks of what is being suggested, and if you click here you can read them all. We have summarized them here for you:
Frisco taxpayers are paying for this through “Sales Tax” and Frisco residents voted for those funds to go to the EDC to be used for roads, infrastructure, and to attract corporations. Second, unlike other private partnerships, Frisco taxpayers are paying twice through the general fund, the taxpayer will be responsible for the annual operational expenses of the facility and filling the funding gap.
Third, the proposed land which is the site for this project, was purchased by tax dollars and the debt on the land was paid for tax dollars and is owned by EDC. Now the city wants them to just give it away (instead of selling it to a development at fair market value). That means taxpayers paid for the cost of the land. Fourth, elected officials have not disclosed how they will handle parking, and it is not in the cost of the project today. A garage could cost $50 Million that taxpayers will have to pay for. Fifth, Sowell noted per the presentation takes 5 years for donations to come in projects like this so if they delay construction taxpayers can expect the cost to go up by almost $100 million by the time we build it. The city would have to take that funding from other departments like police and fire.
She went on to say, public private partnership cannot legally sign contracts to build until the funds needed are in the bank. The bonds must be sold from both entities, and the private donations must be in the Frisco bank account. She pointed out that the consulting group maintains in their presentation from the January work session that the funds will come in more as the building gets closer to opening. Shona asks, do you as a resident want to be holding the bag and double the city cost when the pledges are not fulfilled? (Slide #2)
Her other concerns include if phasing of the project was an option. Yet, no plan of phasing has been presented to the residents to fully educate their vote. And if phasing is the method current councilmembers intend to use, how do we ensure the taxpayer is not left holding the bag on a project that stalls and cannot be fully completed? She also notes the agreement suggests Prosper ISD would control 84% of the dates in the smaller “community” theater—leaving very few dates left for our community groups such as the Frisco orchestra, chorale, theater groups, etc.—to use the “community theater”. The 2015 Bonds of $10million were sold for the “community groups to have a place to perform.” That means our own community groups lose big in this facility. They won’t be able to afford it, and there won’t be many calendar dates for them to use.
The annual costs to run the facility are going to be forever subsidized by the taxpayer. The projections from the consultant show a LOSS of over $6million annually for each year, a funding gap that YOU the TAXPAYER will have to cover for the first 5 years. Back in 2017, most art facilities across the country showed an annual loss of more than $10million. If we adjust for inflation—we are probably talking about at least $15-20million.
Even with a “operating partner”—if that partner were to be unable to pay for the costs of keeping the facility open, (see the Winspear, Raleigh Theater and others) the City of Frisco assumes the risk for ALL M&O expenses. Our other operating partners are large, well known, well-funded entities such as the PGA of America, the Dallas Cowboys, the Jerry Jones Family, The Hunt Family, and Bob Rowling. This is not the case here. We continue to tell our small businesses along Main Street and our public safety officers that we cannot afford 4 men on trucks, increased wages, or support for those businesses going under. But current leaders say we can afford this project? It’s a matter of priorities. While many will tell you Frisco NEEDS this project, it’s simply Frisco CANNOT AFFORD this project. It puts our tax rate, our entire city budget, and our financial future at risk.
In His Own Words: Brian Livingston – Current Council Member
Brian Livingston posted about the performing arts project on his Facebook Page. He started by sharing the post from Shona Sowell for Frisco Mayor. He went on to say it is a great conversation starter and something that should be shared as much as possible. For those that aren’t aware, I voted against putting the Frisco Center for the Arts on the ballot and will vote NO to Proposition A & B in May. My vote has nothing to do with my support for the arts and believe my history shows I have supported the arts community in Frisco. I voted NO for the following reasons:
1. I disagree with the statement that there is no risk to the Frisco taxpayer. If the operations do not generate sufficient revenue to cover expenses, the Frisco taxpayer will be the ultimate backstop. The “at risk operator” will be a newly created entity that will have limited financial capacity.
2. If capital improvements/repairs exceed the reserves in place, the Frisco taxpayer will again fill the void.
3. There are opportunity costs with using EDC funds for purposes other than what voters have previously approved. There will be economic development opportunities we will miss out on and that will result in fewer high paying jobs in Frisco. For years I have been criticized for supporting legislation and seeking ways to use EDC funds to support the city operations, first responders and capital improvements. What changed?
4. Finally, I fundamentally believe that if the demand for this center was actually as high as stated that private donors would be driving this project not the government.
Livingston closed by encouraging everyone to attend public hearings and email questions to every member of the Frisco City Council. He also stated he was glad to meet with anyone who wants to discuss my position.
In his own words: John Allen Redmond – Former Candidate For City Council & Resident
Redmond ran for council last year so its not surprising to see him being vocal about what he wants for the great city of Frisco. Redmond stated online “In general, when a private entity spends its money…it is careful. As we see every day, when someone spends govt (OUR!) money…the spigot is open wide. The same small group of vendors and individuals seem to benefit…that is a universal truth…whether here in Frisco, Austin or Washington DC. Trust but verify. There is an operator coming…there are large philanthropic gifts coming…Broadway wants to be here…ignore other venues around the country that are struggling, because we are Frisco…and we will get it right or our citizens will pay for it and it doesn’t matter. I am simply not convinced.”
He also stated “I will say that it is hard to be all things to all people. My objection to this project is based on economic viability and the narrative on which it is being ‘sold’. The reality is that this is a 10+ year old “argument”. We have already spent millions of dollars on this and to-date, and the answer has continually been ‘no’. Now, if a private entity, like Jason Young, wants to build it…go ahead. But, to gaslight the citizens of Frisco…I am not down for that.”
Lastly, Redmond said, “If this bond (meaning Prop A & B) passes…mechanically they will have the funds to execute the project. So, despite the language that has been used to-date, whatever discovery and/or evaluation they claim is over…this is a done deal.”
In his own words: Will Sowell – Former Frisco City Council
We told you about the Smart Frisco post claiming “It’s Free, It’s Free!” Reading through the comments we noticed Will Sowell; Former City Councilman spoke up. Sowell said “I appreciate anyone that advocates for their beliefs in what they want the city to become. But to say this does not cost any city tax dollars is disingenuous.”
Sowell continues, that the debt being proposed here is debt from the EDC, not City of Frisco debt. So, there is the concept of opportunity cost. If a large employer were considering coming to Frisco, financing would not be available to attract a large employer, which is the mission of the EDC. That is why (referring to the proposition on the ballot) we have to vote on the EDC use of the bonds because it is not consistent with the charter of the EDC.
Sowell continued, the EDC debt is repaid through sales tax that Frisco residents pay, so there’s first way that Frisco residents pay for this through taxes. Sowell then pointed out the city Frisco Model vs Venue Management model slide from a presentation and talked about the third way residents will be paying for the PAC. “Third, during the first 5 years, it is estimated by the City of Frisco that $5MM of budget funds will have to be used to cover maintenance and operations.
Fourth, the city of Frisco has to cover any overage on the building and on operations. There have been overages on every public private partnership the city has done. The difference here is that the city and thus the residents and not the partner pay for the overage per the city slide.
In The Words of The Whistleblower Team:
We enjoy reading everyone’s perspective on the future performing arts center. We develop new questions, learn new things and that is how people grow to make good decisions. We enjoyed hearing the different perspectives from current and former council members, the former city manager who built this city, and many more. Like everyone else when we saw Mayor Cheney’s post today, we had to stop and read it and follow the drama in the comments. We plan to publish it in its entirety tomorrow for everyone to read (who has not seen it of course). Don’t worry, we will not forget to publish the comments because that may be the best part!
We also plan to publish what the candidates think about the Frisco Center For The Arts as we are sending each of them an email to explain their position. For us, no matter what anyone says we constantly go back to one thing, why did the Performing Arts Partnership with Frisco ISD and Hall Group fall apart? What was it that made FISD say, nope not our bag of chips! What made the Hall Group, a huge supporter of the Arts, step back and withdraw the donation of the land for an Arts Center? Something tells me we should be asking bigger questions, diving for deeper answers.
Lastly, we continually go back to why they are asking for us to vote to change the use of the EDC funds? Why are we rewriting the rules? What about constructions costs and the unknown costs? Simply put, that is what Cheney does! He voted against a PAC under Maso and Pat Fallon when he was on council. Maybe he did that because he wanted all the glory and recognition for himself. Why are they trying to sell it to us so hard? All of those things make feel like we are being led to drink water in the desert that just isn’t there.
Stay Tuned for The Final Act of Curtains Up, Community Divided.
When I was a boy, I learned an important lesson on my family’s winery: if you mix the wrong barrels together, you don’t get fine wine—you get a mess. Turns out, the same principle applies to city finances, though some folks in Frisco’s leadership seem to have skipped that life lesson.
Frisco’s new Performing Arts Center has sparked a debate over the methods and madness with which the city is trying to fund the project. Half the city is applauding, marching in lockstep with the mayor and city council, trusting them like a magician who promises he didn’t just make your wallet disappear. The other half? They’re watching this financial sleight of hand and calling foul, led by former city leaders who actually understand the difference between Economic Development Corporation (EDC) money and Community Development Corporation (CDC) money—a distinction that apparently gets a little fuzzy when a big, shiny building is on the table.
The Great Money Shuffle
In our last blog, Frisco’s Bond Ballet, we gave you a civics lesson about how EDC funds are meant to attract businesses and create jobs—you know, the kind of things that keep a city economically stable. CDC funds, on the other hand, are for quality-of-life projects—parks, libraries, and yes, performing arts centers. Two separate barrels, two separate purposes.
Frisco’s Cultural Civil War
Now, I love the arts. I really do! I’ve been to my fair share of performances and appreciate a well-done production. But let’s not pretend that “The Great EDC Heist” is just an innocent case of creative accounting. On one side, you have the true believers, the ones who think this Performing Arts Center will turn Frisco into the next Broadway. They trust the mayor and city council like a cult waiting for the mothership. To them, any skepticism is just negativity. “Why don’t you want Frisco to have nice things?” they ask, as if wanting accountability is the same as being anti-art.
On the other side, you have the cynics (or as I like to call them, the realists). These are the people pointing out that raiding the EDC fund to pay for a performing arts center isn’t just bad policy—it’s a dangerous precedent. If we’re playing fast and loose with money now, what’s next? A city-funded theme park? A mayoral gold statue? Maybe we’ll just rename Frisco to “Vanity Project, Texas.”
It is time to pay attention and speak against the moves by the city when it comes to treating EDC funds like their personal arts-and-crafts budget, shifting money around with the confidence of a three-card monte dealer on a New York sidewalk. But every time I hear current leadership speak, I hear “Don’t worry, this is totally above board.” Right. And I’m the Pope.
Former city leaders—the people who helped build Frisco into the powerhouse it is today—are stepping forward and saying, “This is not how we do things.” And instead of listening, the current administration is waving them off like cranky old men shouting at clouds. But let’s be clear: these aren’t just some bitter retirees whining about change. These are the people who made Frisco what it is, and they’re telling us that this funding scheme smells fishier than a back-alley sushi joint. Let’s see what they have to say:
In His Own Words: George Purefoy, Former City Manager – aka “The Man Who Built Frisco”
In a recent Facebook Post by Smart Frisco, Former City Manager, Purefoy stated his concerns about the proposed project. He said, “Unlike the other major Public Private Partnerships (P3), this proposal does not have a private partner on board agreeing to be responsible for all construction cost overruns and for the annual cost for operations and maintenance. Unlike the other Frisco P3 projects, this project does not project to have all of the funding in place for the construction of the project by the award of bid for construction, thus it is projected that the project will be built in phases, thus cost containment will be even more difficult with inflation.
Purefoy continued, “currently there are no costs for parking included in the projected budget. I estimate that there will be a need for approximately 1200 spaces which will require an additional 12 acres of land if it is surface parking at an estimated construction cost of $7 million (plus land), or if it is structured parking, an estimated $50 million.”
Purefoy went on to say, “To say that there is $0 Cost to Frisco Taxpayers for this project is about as erroneous as anything I’ve seen in political advertising. Then he said, “Without the need for an election, the Economic Development Corporation funds currently can be used for the cost to build major thoroughfares and utility projects, and the Community Development Corporation funds can be used for both of the above projects plus many others which benefit the City and would lessen the impact on Frisco property taxpayers.”
Purefoy also has “major concerns about what will happen during economic downturns.To add this project to the list of annual budget needs of the Citywill result in other city departments being negatively impacted in order for the City to fund the performing arts center.”
George continued by saying he was told that the proposed 300-seat community theater included in this project will be used primarily by Prosper ISD. If that is true he continued “then the primary facility for most of our local arts groups will be extremely limited for their use.” In his opinion, this effort needs to be led by a local group of private citizens which raises private funds from individuals and companies for both building, operating, and maintaining the Arts Center. The city can then be approached to provide supplemental funding for the construction. Purefoy closed his comments by saying, “With all of the needs Frisco will have to keep up with the aging infrastructure in the not-too-distant future, the City does not need to create another major city obligation to fund on a continued basis.”
After making these statements Purefoy went to one of the Open Houses and updated his statements above. We also had an implant to attend the open house and several of the statements matched what Purefoy had said but we want to share them with you because these were comments by CITY STAFF.
In The Words of City Staff:
Public Private Partner & Construction Costs and Overruns: “City staff: It is accurate to state that the proposed project does not have a private partner that agrees to be responsible for all construction cost overruns. The city is in the process of selecting a venue operator through an RFP process. While it is accurate to say that to date, we don’t have a private operational partner in place,the city is pursuing an operator-at-risk model for the operation of the venue. This means the selected venue operator would assume financial responsibility for the ongoing operations of the facility without the City of Frisco providing financial guarantees for the day-to-day operations of the facility. Having this type of agreement in place is an important component of moving forward with the project.” Our implant was told they hoped to have it in place by May and Purefoy was told “It is anticipated that an LOI for an at-risk operator will be in place prior to the May election.”
Whistleblower Questions: Why is the city putting this project and proposition on the ballot for May, when it is incomplete? The city wants residents to “TRUST THEM” … NEWSFLASH FRISCO: WE DON’T TRUST YOU! You have given us no reason to trust you based on previous projects. Maybe instead of saying the city saying we hope, we anticipate, we want they need to say we have confirmed, we have signed contracts, we will once you have put the project together in its entirety. Right now, you are asking residents to vote blindly on items that are not final and cannot guarantee for your own personal shit’s and giggles.
When our whistleblower asked city staff about the “phasing” of this project we were told the city plans to update the FAQ’s and will not be going forward with that option. Then George Purefoy posted “The consultants at the open house for the Arts Project told me that the current plan is to hold construction costs to $200,000,000 or less, hold fees for design to $70,000,000 or less and go forward with bidding and make whatever changes are needed to hold costs to no more than $270,000,000 for the project.” Whistleblower wants to know HOW WILL YOU GUARANTEE THAT? IS IT WRITING? ARE THE DEALS INKED AND LOCKED IN?
When our whistleblower asked about cost escalation contingencies and parking from city staff we got a lot of hum, uh, oh, well, look at this big photo. However, George Purefoys updated comments after the open house read, “City staff: It doesn’t appear that cost escalation and/or contingencies are included in the numbers above. As should’ve been part of Gena’s explanation, the project budget is still in the rough order of magnitude stage. Our public presentations have stated a project budget up to an estimated $340 million. The direction to date is to plan for a budget that does not exceed $300 million. The project budget incorporates standard percentages for contingencies, cost escalations, and soft costs. As our project planning progresses the costs will be refined as the concept design aligns with a project budget not exceeding $300 million. The soft cost calculation of 35% should be applied to the escalated construction costs, and contingencies should be included as well.” Whistleblowers, until the city finalizes an RFP, signs an actual deal (NOT A LETTER OF INTENT) for Broadway, and has guaranteed cash in the bank from donors…someone will be holding the bag if things go south.
On the same Smart Frisco post in response to George Purefoy’s statements, local businessman Jason Young responded. Young said “Based on my meetings with some of the players (including private donors). I know of at minimum $50 million ready to go from private folks.”
Mr. Young, what meetings have you had with city leadership and what role do you play in these discussions regarding the FCFA? Are you willing to be it all on your own words that you know “of a minimum of $50 million ready to go by private donors?” Where is the money, Mr. Young? They could donate now or sign commitment letters. Better yet they could put the money in a trust for good faith to help voters feel better about voting for this. Instead, why are we being asked to blindly trust our city leaders and you that, these donors and plans exist. Once again, we ask who will end up holding the bag if those donors you claim “are ready to go” don’t come through. WHO WILL IT BE? FRISCO RESIDENTS? If something falls through the cracks, we will HAVE TO SUBSIDIZE IT! Lastly, to the city how in the hell do you NOT INCLUDE cost escalations and contingencies in the numbers WHEN YOU ARE ASKING RESIDENTS TO VOTE ON IT?
Parking: As for parking, we were told they were looking at options, however Purefoy was told that the current estimated need is 1300 parking spaces and the cost for this is included in the not to exceed $200,000,000 construction budget. Structured parking is preferred and if adequate private funding comes in, the structured parking will be constructed, rather than surface parking.”
Purefoy was also told at the open house that the local arts groups will have approximately 50% of the use of the small theater. However, the city’s FAQ states “Prosper ISD is anticipated to be the predominant user of the Community Hall.” It just happens to leave off the percentage of that use and we were told they would have 80% of the use of the small theater. WHICH ONE IS IT? WHY ARE THE ANSWERS NOT CONSISTENT?
We are glad to see George Purefoy speak out! While we have not agreed with every decision he made as City Manager we do agree on this that the burden and risk far outweigh the benefits to resident’s long term. In our next blog we are going to share with you the thoughts by Will Sowell, Brian Livingston and Shona Sowell who just announced she is running for Mayor. Stay Tuned
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to another dazzling performance of Frisco’s Bond Ballet! A timeless masterpiece where the city pirouettes around financial transparency, leaps over budget concerns, and performs a breathtaking grand jeté over taxpayer skepticism—all while insisting, with a straight face, that no new taxes will be needed.
Every year, like clockwork, Frisco’s leadership takes center stage to pitch the latest and greatest “must-have” project—this time, a performing arts center. And just like in previous acts, the audience (a.k.a. the taxpayers) ask the same question: Where is the money coming from? But fear not! The City assures us that through the magic of bonds, reallocated funds, and a sprinkle of creative accounting, the show can continue without anyone noticing an increase in their tax bill. Bravo!
But why does this ballet feel so… familiar? Perhaps because it’s a revival of past performances—new costumes, same choreography. Whether it was the stadium, the library, or the latest infrastructure project, the script remains unchanged: Big dreams, vague funding plans, and a promise that it will all work out in the end. They city just wants you to grab your playbill (or financial statement, if you dare) and settle in for another encore performance of Frisco’s Bond Ballet—where the numbers may not always add up, but the show must go on!
To understand HOW THEY PLAN TO FUND the Performing Arts Center you must first understand what the Frisco Community Development Corporation and the Frisco Economic Development Corporation do and what their funds are for! Per the City of Frisco website, “Type A (EDC) and Type B (CDC) corporations were created by Texas law to help local municipalities encourage economic development. An Economic Development Corporation (EDC) is a nonprofit entity created to finance new and expanded business enterprises, subject to authorization under Texas law. Texas law defines what authorized projects EDC may participate in and allows for the adoption of sales and use tax to fund those projects.
Type A EDCs are authorized under Texas law to fund, among other things, manufacturing and industrial development projects and the provision of land, buildings, equipment, facilities, expenditures, targeted infrastructure and improvements that are for the creation or retention of primary jobs for projects such as manufacturing and industrial facilities, research and development facilities, military facilities, recycling facilities, distribution centers, small warehouse facilities, primary job training facilities for use by institutions of higher education, and regional or national corporate headquarters facilities, and certain infrastructural improvements to promote or develop new or expanded business enterprises.”
Type B (CDC) corporations, also funded via a sales and use tax, are authorized under Texas law to fund, among other things, the development of recreational and community facilities, including parks, museums, sports facilities, auditoriums, amphitheaters, and concert halls, in addition to all projects eligible for Type A funding or other participation.
Now that you understand the basics of EDC and CDC funding, let’s focus on what Frisco’s Bond Ballet! City leaders are trying to PITCH a state of the art performing arts center that will bring Broadway Shows. To get your “BUY-IN” they are using a grand performance of confusion when it comes to the actual cost and how they plan to use creative accounting to pay for it – so you think “IT’S FREE!”
The City of Frisco leadership and the Frisco EDC Bond Propositions are pushing to rewrite the rules of the game allowing them to reroute sales tax revenues meant for Type A (Economic Development Corporation) Funds for Type B (Community Development Corporation) Purposes. Citizens already voted in the past on how this money should be allocated to both the EDC and CDC so why are they trying to change it now? IT IS THE ONLY WAY KING CHENEY, TONE DEAF TAMMY, BOBBLEHEAD BILL, and the rest of the council and city leadership can get a Performing Arts Center because they know you “the voter” won’t approve a property tax increase.
Instead of using EDC money that is meant to keep FRISCO COMPETITIVE and stimulate local economic growth and attract businesses that bring good quality paying careers the city leadership and city council want to use it as their own personal piggy bank to fund their dreams and desires. City officials are interpreting the local government code broadly, arguing that the performing arts center qualifies as an economic development project.
Let’s pretend a PAC qualifies economic development as the code is written today – then why is the city asking us to vote on Proposition A and B? When you read both props look at the words we highlighted in BOLD and ask yourself why would they need me to vote on this?
Proposition A reads “The Frisco Economic Development Corporation is authorized to use proceeds of its sales and use tax, including all amounts previously authorized and collected, for projects related to the proposed center for the arts project, including but not limited to, land, buildings, equipment, facilities and improvements found by the Frisco Economic Development Corporation Board of Directors to be required or suitable for use for the proposed Center for the Arts Project in accordance with section 505.152 of the Texas Local Government Code.”
Proposition B reads, “The issuance of bonds in the maximum amount of $160,000,000 for a City-owned Center for the Arts Project, and levying taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds.”
By bringing Prop A & B the city can tell you…. IT’S FREE! When you hear Smart Frisco tell you it’s FREE – it’s NOT! It is your Sales & Use Tax that funds the budget for the EDC. That means for every dollar you spend in Frisco, buying gas, groceries, or visit local businesses, a portion of the sales tax and use tax YOU PAY is GOING TO THE EDC! While tourists spend money, trust me residents spend more here so clearly, we are paying for it! While it may not be a property tax increase when you spend money in Frisco you are FUNDING THE EDC. The city is asking residents to be the Sugar Daddy for this project.
The latest act by the city, city leadership and the Frisco’s Economic Development Corporation (EDC) starts with taking artistic liberties—not in the theater, but in the way it’s justifying the use of taxpayer dollars. The city sees this as an open invitation to bankroll the arts center, citing potential economic benefits such as increased tourism and commercial activity.
We would argue that this is a classic case of bait and switch or mission creep—where funds originally intended to boost Frisco’s business landscape are now underwriting a cultural project that primarily benefits a select group. Truth is we have done very well for ourselves in life, and we live comfortably, but Frisco is getting more and more expensive to live each day! The city leadership and council care more about Tourism instead of those who live here. Tourism is important but IT IS NOT EVERYTHING! What happened to Cheney Version 2017 where in his political video he talked about the quality of life for residents?
Before you vote YES to either of these propositions ask yourself, “If I get laid off and look for another job locally near me could I afford to live on what a Theater Attendant gets paid? What about a Park Attendant at Universal?” Face it young kids are not working anymore, and current businesses are struggling to find labor and now we are going to add more hourly labor – how is that creating good quality careers?
The question remains: Is this a wise and proper use of EDC funds, or is it just a budgetary sleight of hand to avoid putting the full burden on taxpayers? Either way, Frisco residents should be paying close attention. What starts as a reallocation for the arts today could and would set a precedent for future creative interpretations of economic development spending. After all, if a performing arts center is “economic development,” what’s next? A taxpayer-funded roller disco in the name of tourism? Stay tuned—this show is just getting started.
In our 15 to 20+ years living here in Frisco, this is the worst smelling project we have ever seen. They can smell the Shit Stink in Celina, Prosper and probably up to Oklahoma. The level of dirt our politicians use to cover up key details for this Performing Arts Center project from the public is unconscionable. In our next blog, we talk about what the city is not telling you! If it is city-owned who pays to operate it? Have they inked a deal for a venue operator? Over the years as the performance hall ages, who is responsible for the UPKEEP and how will we pay for it as it is a city-owned facility? The 50 to 60 million they plan to raise from donors and corporate sponsors – have any of these deals been locked in? If now, how do they know we won’t need to bring more money to the table? How will the local arts community have use of this facility, can they even afford the rental fees to host events there? How much time will we have on stage if we share it with Prosper ISD? How does this benefit our local theater group if Broadway shows are always on stage? Where do those funds come from? They keep talking about Broadway Shows yet have they inked a deal with Broadway Across America? Why would you vote to change how funding buckets are used when the truth is THE CITY IS WITH HOLDING DETERMINENTAL FACTS THAT COULD AFFECT YOUR DECISION ON HOW YOU VOTE FOR SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
Welcome to the Greatest Show in Frisco—Starring Your Wallet! Ladies and gentlemen, step right up! Frisco has unveiled its latest act in the grand circus of civic spending—a $300+ million performing arts center! That’s right, folks, for the low, low price of just hundreds of millions of your hard-earned tax dollars, we, the citizens of Frisco, can enjoy the privilege of funding a shiny new venue for performances most of us will probably never attend.
And who’s leading this blockbuster production? The front line “sales pitch artists” include The City of Frisco and a company called Theatre Project Consultants Inc. Of course, they are using their friends at Community Impact to deliver messages to mailboxes of 30,000+ residents. But wait, there is more! Enter, SMART FRISCO, the newest political action committee in town, whose idea of “smart” appears to be convincing taxpayers that we absolutely, positively must have this arts center—or else the arts police will revoke our cultural credentials, and the ghost of Shakespeare will haunt City Hall!
Who is Smart Frisco? The website says it is a citizen-driven political action committee dedicated to informing and educating our community about the Center for the Arts Bond Initiative and its role in driving economic development. We went to the city’s website and looked up campaign finance reports and we found the Campaign Treasurer Report filing which lists Heather Eastburn as the treasurer and their HQ office is a UPS store in Frisco. Sound familiar? Just last year Bill Woodard (current council member) set up the Safety-First Frisco PAC against the Frisco Firefighters also HQ at a UPS store?
We looked up the Smart Frisco PAC on the Texas Ethics Commission website. First, we searched by the treasure’s name and found NOTHING! Then we searched by Smart Frisco and found NOTHING! Then we looked under Active Campaign Filer Lists for political committees with appointed treasures and NOTHING! Why is it so hard to find out who is behind the PAC and who is financing the PAC?
Smart Frisco recently just posted to their Facebook Page an eye-catching graphic showing a set of tickets that read “COSTS NOTHING CHANGES EVERYTHING!” The website has the same stylish, eye-catching “PRO-PROPAGANDA” wanting you to “VOTE YES” and telling you “IT WILL COST YOU NOTHING!” They want you to believe this project would be “By Frisco, For Frisco, and most importantly, IN Frisco!”
The post elicited several responses and questions like who will be paying the annual $6 million cost for theater operations? Newsflash Frisconians, there’s no such thing as a free lunch! Ever heard the quote, “one man’s ‘free’ is another man’s tax increase?” One thing we know for sure is compliments are free, but this arts center sure isn’t!
Smart Frisco refers to a Community Impact graphic on one post which states the city believes they can raise $50 to $60 million in individual gifts and another $50 to $60 million in corporate gifts. Then in May they are asking you to vote on a BOND which they claim pending approval, will be for no more than $160 million. Lastly Prosper ISD has committed $100 million to the project.
Prosper ISD? What about Frisco ISD? Frisco ISD, who is facing a budget crunch, is building their own Performing Arts Center using $43 million earmarked from the approved 2018 Bond. Remember in 2021, The City of Frisco, Frisco ISD and developer Hall Group entered a partnership to build a “JOINT” PAC at Hall Park. In August 2022, the city and school district announce they were parting ways and canceling the “JOINT PROJECT PLANS!”
FRISCO ISD is facing a BUDGET SHORTFALL, which they blame solely on the Frisco voters who did not vote to approve the last bond. Yet they, too, can justify the need to build a $50 million performing arts theater that belongs solely to Frisco ISD even though they are cutting some arts programs. They are blind to the fact that residents are demanding financial transparency on how they have already spent hundreds of millions of previous bond money on things other than what they promised it would go for at the time. That is a tangent for another blog!
Back to the question: Who is Smart Frisco? Honestly, we don’t know! We know the treasure has a mug shot, but we are not sure if that is relevant. I bet we will learn exactly who Smart Frisco is when they have to file their first campaign finance report. Remember, you can’t fill a gas tank for free! The purse must be filled to fund a PAC, so we believe the donor’s list will speak volumes on who is holding the marionette strings of the dancing dolls.
In Frisco, there is a permission process for running for office. What do we mean by permission process? Let us share: if you are interested in running for city council, you need to let Mayor Cheney know, and he will notify his henchwoman, Lorie Medina. Medina will then let you know if you have permission and if you are qualified enough to run for office. Suppose you don’t have the support of Cheney and Medina, otherwise known as the leaders of the established Frisco cabal. In that case, they will make it very difficult for you by turning to their developer friends to fund the campaigns of the “Cabal Approved” candidates.
How do we know this? It is what we have been told by several previous candidates who ran for office against the Medina Machine! If you want to run for office in Frisco, you must have their blessing, and they will give you the “pathway” to the dais of the council. But first, one must pay their dues, of course, or they will be told, “It’s just not your turn yet!”
It makes you wonder why any rational human being would want or try to run for office in Good Ole Frisco! Maybe they believe in things like community service and making a difference. Maybe they think local government should be more than a rubber stamp for developers. Then again, maybe—just maybe—they’re the rare type of person who enjoys the thrill of fighting voter apathy that plagues our elections. Either way, this time around Frisco residents have choices, and it is up to them to get off the couch, stop making excuses, and vote for change. Otherwise, you will once again find yourself asking why your city council makes decisions without your input. Remember, you had a chance to care. You just didn’t. Let’s look at who is running for Place 4! To be fair, we will go in order of their names on the ballot.
First up is Joshua Meek, whose filing application states he is a Real Estate Professional! According to his website, he is “Your Local Real Estate Expert” – just what we need, another Realtor! According to another site, Meek Industries, of which he is the Founder and CEO, they are a diversified holding company with a mission to acquire and grow attractive investments that generate sustainable cash flow. What? It does not list any partners, investments they are involved in, etc.
According to his political website, he has attended 133 Frisco City Council Meetings. Have you ever wondered who is that guy who sometimes wears a baseball hat and sits right behind the podium where everyone speaks to the council – that is Meek. He was appointed to the Frisco Community Development Corporation Board and has been involved in several notable projects. It touts he is a community leader, who over the last 14 years served in a variety of Frisco organizations and community positions including, Frisco Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, Visit Frisco Board Member, member of the Frisco Rotary Club, Leadership Frisco class graduate, and Citizens Police and Fire Academy graduate.
What is Meeks Platform? Well, it says he wants “THRIVING PARTNERSHIPS” and touts our success is due to those partnerships with DEVELOPERS, school districts, healthcare systems and higher educational institutions. He goes on to say these partnerships must be PRIORTIZED as we finalize Frisco’s buildout. Truth is he is the young Cheney who is all about development and developers from what we can tell.
Next up he wants to “Pioneer Innovation” and somehow relates that to public safety. He believes that integration of technology and artificial intelligence can further enhance the high-quality performance of Frisco’s first responders. Personally, I don’t think AI can fight a house fire or stop an armed robbery the way our actual first responders can!
Lastly, he wants to “Leverage Economics” and he will continue to lower the tax rate by leveraging the use of sales tax revenue. That way Frisco CDC and EDC are able to create funding sources to help strategically fund parks, projects and attract employers that many other communities. What caught our attention was his comment “By continuing to invest in Frisco as a destination location” but do Frisco Residents want to be a destination location or a community. He also forgot to mention the CDC or EDC will fund a big Performing Arts Center that the cabal wants.
Next up Jared Elad whom we have nicknamed “The Beard” from his yellow signs popping up! His application lists his occupation as a small business owner. According to his website, he came from a modest upbringing in Tennessee and Oklahoma and got a bachelor’s degree from Oklahoma State University.
He began his career as a Financial Advisor with Merrill Lynch and later worked at Wells Fargo and BB&T/Truist as a Financial Advisor and Vice President. In 2024, he went independent to better serve his clients. Elad is married to Stephanie Elad (FISD Board Member) and has two daughters. Jared currently sits on the Board of Directors of the Villages of Stonelake HOA.
Jared Elad’s website goes on to say he wants to Eliminate excess spending, Lower taxes, Accomplish the budget, and be Dependable to the community. Get it ELAD! He touts we need fiscal responsibility with transparency, and he wants every taxpayer dollar spent efficiently, and wants to cut out wasteful expenses with a focus on projects that bring true value to “FRISCO RESIDENTS.”
Elad’s site also goes on to say he will support Public Safety, and he is dedicated to partnering with Frisco PD and Fire to ensure they have the resources, training, and equipment needed to serve and protect all Frisco residents effectively. He is for Community Friendly Development & Growth that supports economic vitality while not forgetting that it needs to align with the needs, concerns and wants of “FRISCO RESIDENTS.”
Lastly, Jared Elad has some cute pet videos and displays his support for Frisco Pets on his Facebook page. For the pet lovers, he had declared he is for a new pet shelter to ensure the safety and well-being of Frisco pets. As soon as he displayed his support for pets, the first comment came from an infamous Cabel supporter, Jake Petras, who stated he would also love a pet shelter and asked how we would fund it. Funny because we have seen many posts where Petras attacks pet people and the idea of a shelter, so we have to assume the cabal has him at work again being their mouthpiece to put other candidates running on defense or at least try!
Next up we have Jerry Spencer, and his application states he is an investor. He has lived in Texas for 76 years and over 20 years in Frisco. We could not find a website for Spencer, but we did find a Facebook page, but it was also limited to information. We sent a message asking if he had any platform ideas he wanted to share for our article.
Spencer responded that he lives on the east side of the tollway in Plantation. He would like to see Frisco shift the focus from sports, tourism, and being a destination city and broaden our economic base with a much greater emphasis on attracting emerging technology and 21st century industries such as AI, robotics, drone technology, autonomous driving, medical research, etc.
Spencer would like to also put a focus on regional cooperation with our regional partners in both Denton and Collin County. He believes Frisco has a Lone Ranger mentality, and he would like to see us have a regional performing arts center where we pair up with Plano, McKinney and Allen. There are 235,000 people in Frisco, but more than 750,000 in those four cities. The per capita costs of an arts center drop dramatically when spread over four cities. He said working together would be a better solution.
Next, we have Gopala Ponangi, whose occupation is listed as a Business Owner. He has lived in Texas for 24 years and spent 21 of those years in Frisco, Texas. Gopal is married with two daughters and has a pet Shih Tzu named Coco. He is a small business owner with an emphasis in Digital Marketing for Financial Services and Real Estate. If Gopal’s name sounds familiar it should, as he has served on the Frisco ISD Board of Trustees, Place one. His website at the time said, “Education is my passion, and I will strive to give my best to our students and the community.”
According to his website for Place 4 City Council, he says he is proud to be an active member of Frisco, leaving initiatives through nonprofits with a focus on Education, Healthcare and the Fine Arts. His bio states he is the Past Director of the Frisco Economic Development Corporation. He also was a founding Co-Chair of the Mayors Adhoc Committee for the Frisco Indian Affairs which has now taken the shape of the Multicultural Committee under Frisco Boards and Commissions. He touts on his website how he has served on several committees through FISD.
As for his Vision for Frisco, he would like to focus on more local jobs through smart, responsible growth. He would also like to see an improvement in traffic and will work to prioritize smart traffic solutions to keep Frisco moving forward. He is committed to Public Safety and will prioritize funding to ensure our first responders have the necessary resources to protect citizens.
After reviewing Gopal’s website, we had two questions. First if he is passionate about education then why is he running for city council? Second, he states he served on a lot of boards which made us wonder how he had the time? If you investigate his attendance for some of these boards, he boasts about it appears he was absent at 99% of the meetings. If he can’t show up for boards/committees/meetings, etc. then why would we think he will show up for city council meetings and all the duties that come with that role.
Lastly, we haveSangita Datta, and her application states her occupation as a financial specialist, having lived in Frisco for the last 6.5 years. We assume Datta is a Frisco Socialite because we constantly see her at events, and she has helped each of our current council members campaign during election cycles. According to her website, she is committed to making Frisco a better place to live, work, and grow. Her service journey began in Mother Teresa’s house in Kolkata, where she learned the meaning of life, compassion, and giving back to the community.
Datta’s platform includes promoting economic growth and fiscal responsibility through attracting quality jobs and supporting local businesses, using city resources wisely to keep taxes low, and fostering an environment where entrepreneurs can thrive. Secondly, she stands for enhancing a family-friendly community life by investing in parks, playgrounds, and community spaces and supporting initiatives that help working parents maintain Frisco’s reputation as a great city. Hmmm, we have initiatives that maintain our city’s reputation. Do tax dollars pay for that? Datta also wants to ensure safety and preserve Frisco’s unique character. After reading her site, we are not sure how preserving the city’s character affects safety, but hopefully, we have time to learn during the debates.
She believes her experience serving on the City of Frisco Parks & Recreation Board, Ambassador for the Frisco Chamber of Commerce, as Treasurer for the Indian Association of North Texas, and as an Ambassador for the Frisco Inclusion Committee will help her while serving on City Council. Datta also graduated from the Leadership Frisco, Citizens Police Academy and completed the City 101 programs.
That rounds out your choices for Place 4! Meeks reminds us of a young Cheney Real Estate mogul in training. Elad is a marketing genius with “The Beard” and we are excited to learn more about him in the debates. The pet-friendly Frisco will most likely gravitate to Elad because he has openly said he supports an animal shelter. Gopal is the obvious Cabel plant as he “supports the arts” meaning a Performing Arts Center. Proof that Gopal is one of the implants in his kickoff photos with Keating and Pelham.
We would like Gopal to explain his attendance record for previous positions he has held and tell us how it will be different this time. In our opinion, Datta should be madder than a wet hen that those she supported for years are not showing her the same respect she has shown them over the years. We need more clarification regarding her platform, and we are concerned her relationships with the current council means she will stay “inline” with what the Cheney Machine wants. However, we could be wrong, maybe there has been a clear line drawn in the sand of friendship. As for Spencer, we just don’t know enough about the person or platform to offer an opinion. The Whistleblowers want change – however that comes! We want independent individuals who will make their own decisions and not follow the gravy train of the current council members.
In our December blog called Fairweather Frisco Friends, we told you about how the city went on a full-frontal attack, with Bobblehead Bill leading the charge against our firefighters in the May 2024 elections. Why would they do this? The Frisco Fire Fighters Association felt their relationship with the city deteriorated or went up in smoke to the point that they had no other choice than to bring propositions for Civil Service and Collective Bargaining. After the election, Angelia Pelham and John Keating promised on their election roads to make things better with the Fire Department and to work on solutions. Ever wonder how that turned out?
In our blog, 13th Storke of the Clock, we told you about the aftermath following the May 2024 election and how the city and city management held “HEALING SESSIONS,” aka mandatory in-service meetings. The point was for the Fire Department staff the opportunity to express their complaints and fears. The result was a 50+ page report that was no different than the 2011 Climate Report, which talked about how Mack Borchardt and Lee Glover were the direct cause of the problems.
That 2024 report was given to the city management for their review, and we are guessing Weasel Wes didn’t like the remarks about him in the report. The 2024 report noted that when it comes to the City Manager, Wes Pierson the FD doesn’t trust him or his judgement. The report went on to say since taking over in this city he has been dismissive, divisive, flat out ignored them, refuses to meet with them, and has been condescending to members of the FD fracturing a future relationship.
After wasting the departments time in the “in-service healing session meetings” the members of the Fire Department waited, and waited, and waited for possible change. One notable change was that Fire Chief Lee Glover was given a “counselor” to help him do his job better. The other notable change was staff started leaving like hot cakes. That’s right the “EXPERIENCE” in our fire department is dropping like flies but they don’t want the citizens to know that.
Sometime in December or early January, we were told the Fire Fighters Association again raised some member motions for a “VOTE OF NO-CONFIDENCE!” Bet you have not heard about that! We are told it passed but we are still working sources to find out the final vote outcome.
It was the February 2025 response from Weasel Wes that caught our attention. It reads that he received their letter dated 12/27/2024 regarding the results of the vote of no confidence in Fire Chief Lee Glover and how he appreciated meeting with two of the board’s directors to discuss the letter’s contents. Sounds good right? Not so fast!
Paragraph two states while Weasel Wes respects their prerogative to voice concerns, he is DISAPPOINTED that this vote was the chosen method to do so – especially since work is currently underway to address issues that have been raised. He continues “It’s equally disappointing that as far as I (Wes) know, there was no attempt to communicate about these matters before the vote.”
HEY WEASEL WES – WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN? DID YOU READ THE 50+ PAGE HEALING SESSION REPORT, OR WAS YOUR HEAD STUCK IN A HOLE SOMEWHERE?
Next Weasel Wes acknowledges some changes have been made by Chief Glover that are viewed as unpopular but if those changes result in better service or value for the citizens he is inclined to support them. That must mean that Weasel Wes supports taking away Squad after they just asked for that money in the 2019 and 2023 bond for more Squad ambo’s. Funny thing is more and more cities are implementing Squad Units as Frisco takes it away. Weasel Wes must also supports Glover’s decision to go back to the big bulkier fire trucks that are hard to navigate the narrow Frisco streets lined with cars because no one knows how to use their garage or driveway. He supports the reduction of staff. After Assistant Fire Chief, Kyle Mills announced his retirement after 21 years with the department, Chief Lee Glover decided to redistribute rolls instead replacing that position. In 2024 they had Firefighter Stewart and Captain Graham retire. Then in October 2023, Deputy Chief Porter retired. Years of experience out of the door. The truth is many of them utilized their retirement options to leave Frisco and have jobs elsewhere. Porter is at Little Elm today and Mills took a job with the Texas A&M Forest Service.
We reached out to other local Fire Departments and asked if they would ever eliminate positions in their ranks, and we were told “not a chance” repeatedly. One commented off the record that eliminating positions is equal to department suicide because cities will never give you the money back in budgets in the future to reinstate those positions. Yet Fire Chief Glover thinks we don’t need more front-line staff, and he is willing to reduce his management staff. How does that benefit the citizens, Weasel Wes?
Weasel Wes then goes on in the letter to say he recognizes there are still opportunities for growth and improvement in the FFD and he will continue to encourage Chief Glover and his team to pursue efforts to improve our service delivery in a responsible way. He notes that Chief Glover has opportunities to grow as a leader, just as we all do…. Wait Weasel Wes, Glover has been with Frisco FD for over 20 years and held positions such as lieutenant, captain, deputy chief, assistant chief and more so don’t you think he should have GROWN THOSE LEADERSHIP QUALITIES DURING THAT TIME? Now, after all this time he should be ready to step in and not need a counselor or more opportunities to grow.
Ready for the hard facts and truth? The bulk of his email was written in a way like it is the first time he is hearing about these issues and that he is shocked to hear of the issues at hand. Weasel Wes writes it as if the rank and file and the association have never shared their concerns prior to this December 2024/January 2025 vote. The hard truth is they shared their concerns with Weasel Wes before they even hired Chief Glover which we documented in our blog, Turn Back Time. Then they continued to share their concerns after they hired Chief Glover with a survey in 2023, also at citizen input and in the May 2024 election. Lastly, let’s not forget about the cities own survey that resulted in a 56-page report (during the aka Healing Sessions) where it was mentioned over 100 times with the issues directly being related to culture, morale, leadership, vindictiveness, racism and retaliation like behavior. He closes the letter by saying everyone he talks to says the department is great – well Weasel Wes who are you talking to?
Weasel Wes couldn’t have been more disrespectful and very intentional with how he wrote the letter. Angelia Pelham and John Keating have not followed up on their promises “TO MAKE IT ALL BETTER!” We documented some of those in our blog, Wasted Time. Remember that next time they run! We can’t wait to see what Tammy Meinershagen promise on her campaign this year when it comes to fire fighters as she was on the front lines against them in May 2024. Our City Manager is not stupid, in fact he is quite calculating and is known for being arrogant from all the emails we receive from inside the city. His letter is an example of just that!
Next, Weasel Wes is going to act like he never knew the city was being sued by Former Assistant Fire Chief Cameron Kraemer for wrongful termination. We wrote about the case in our blog Kraemer vs City of Frisco. If he wins, the city will pay big time, which we wrote about in our blog, Big Time Casino Payout.
Frisco is the home of perfectly manicured lawns, HOA emails no one reads, and a voter turnout rate that could make a ghost town look politically engaged. Every election cycle, a handful of brave souls decide to throw their hats in the ring for city council, only to be met with the resounding enthusiasm of… crickets. Why would anyone subject themselves to this? Good question. Running for office in Frisco is basically signing up to shake hands with people who won’t vote, attend forums that barely fill a Starbucks, and post on social media only to get three likes (one from your mom). And yet, candidates still do it.
Let’s play a game: Ask your friends and neighbors what they know about the upcoming Frisco elections. Chances are, you’ll get a mix of blank stares, mumbled guesses, or the classic “Wait, we have an election?” Well, here’s a crash course: February 14th was the last day to file for a spot on the ballot (so if you were thinking about running, too late—better luck next cycle). The real fun begins with early voting on April 22nd, leading up to the final day to cast your vote on May 4th (not April 3rd, by the way). During this time, our fire stations and schools will be transformed into democracy hubs, filled with voting machines that will see depressingly low foot traffic.
Meanwhile, candidates will be busy breaking the city’s sign ordinance, because let’s be honest, rules only seem to apply to challengers. The city turns a blind eye when incumbents plaster their signs wherever they please, but if a newcomer so much as breathes near the wrong patch of grass, code enforcement swoops in like the fun police. It’s all just part of the charming tradition we call local politics.
Whistleblower is here to educate and let you know about the candidates! For City Council Place 2 we have Burt Thakur, Sai Krishnarajanagar against Tammy Meinershagen. Let’s dive into them!
Burt Thakur, a former Navy Veteran, and a longtime resident of Frisco previously made a run for Congress. Burt Thakur was born in New Delhi and raised by his maternal grandparents. He spent his childhood in India, where his grandfather was responsible for the care of the national forests, tigers, and land management. He moved to New York in the late 1980s and later attended Valley Forge Military Academy in Pennsylvania. After graduating, he enlisted in the United States Navy. Burt served as a nuclear reactor operator on the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman. He was honorably discharged in 2006, after serving for 6 years. Thakur is an engineer project manager who facilitates the construction process for large data centers. He also appeared on Jeopardy and was interviewed in the Winners Circle.
Thakur recently addressed the Frisco City Council to address the issue of the Performing Arts Center and fiscal responsibility. If passed, the measures would allow the city to use $160 million to build the Frisco Center for the Arts. The center, designed to host Broadway-level shows, is estimated to cost more than $300 million.
Burt Thakur’s website states he has a vision for a Stronger, Safer and Thriving Frisco. Burt is a champion for veterans and their access to care and has helped many veterans get access to their benefits. In Frisco, Burt wants to ensure a space is granted for veterans’ organizations like the VFW and American Legion to share. As his best friend from the military committed suicide, Burt knows first-hand the value that a community and shared space can provide to his brothers and sisters who served. He also states that “integrity” is a commitment to ethical leadership. He states “True leadership is built on honesty, transparency, and accountability. I have always stood for ethical decision-making, responsibility, and staying true to my principles.
Next, we have Sai Krishna who ran in 2020 for council place 3 back in 2020. According to the Dallas Morning News Voter Guide in 2020, Krishna is a Registered Nurse with an associate’s degree in nursing, a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, and a master’s in business administration. He also is an Insurance Provider. During his 2020 race, Krishna had only lived in Frisco for 3.5 years. According to the guide he had not served on city boards or commissions at the time of the 2020 race. We could not find a working website for Krishna, or anything published online about his 2025 run for council.
Lastly, we have Tammy Meinershagen who currently sits on the Frisco City Council in Place 2 and has lived in Frisco for over 20 years. In a recent January 2025, Local Profile highlight Meinershagen was asked what her first impression of Texas was, and she replied “I had such a bad impression of Texas — I really did not want to come. I didn’t want to move to Frisco, and I certainly didn’t want to become a Texan. I expected everyone to be in cowboy boots and hats, and I had heard several stories of racism in Texas that also concerned me. I just didn’t think I’d ever feel at home in Texas. I pushed really hard against it for many, many years.” She went on to say that her opinion has changed because she has realized the diversity Texas offers.
Since being here and getting invested in Frisco, she became the Multicultural Chair for the Greater Frisco’s Council of PTA’s which led her to get involved in The City of Frisco. She helped organize the first multicultural float for the community in 2011 and worked on the Citizens Bond Committee, where she advocated for the arts center. Meinershagen was named the “Spirit of Frisco” by the Frisco Chamber of Commerce and one of CEO MOM Magazine’s Power 15. She is also the first Asian-American to serve on the Frisco City Council, and she made history as the first Korean-American female elected to any City Council in the State of Texas. Meinershagen is also a professionally trained musician and can play the piano and violin.
She is asking for you to “Re-Elect” her but remember we never “ELECTED” her to begin with. Meinershagen was set to run against the incumbent, Shona Huffman, who choose to resign from her current seat and withdraw from the race to focus on recovering from a breast cancer diagnosis. An election was never held and Meinershagen “won by default” meaning we never ELECTED her. This will be her first actual race for City Council. A Community Impact article from Feb 28, 2022, reads, “Tammy Meinershagen to ASSUME Place 2 on Frisco City Council; May election for city to be canceled.” The article states that according to Mayor Jeff Cheney, Meinershagen will FILL THE SEAT and went on to say they are CANCELING the May 7, 2022, election since both races were uncontested.
Meinershagen made headlines recently on Frisco Chronicles when we wrote about her husband’s involvement with Ketchup Caddy. In 2022, her husband Todd Meinershagen AGREED to pay more than $525,000, including interest, for his role in market manipulation related to the company Ketchup Caddy.
Meinershagen is a very prominent supporter of the Frisco Arts and the new Performing Arts Center. She supports the bond being put before voters for a $300+ million-dollar theater that will cost residents anywhere from $5 to $6 million a year to operate of city tax dollars. Meinershagen also supported the controversial Universal Kids Studios project over objections by local homeowners. Remember the “BAIT & SWITCH” that changed at the last minute during the development meeting before the council vote. Meinershagen was one of the loudest supporters on social media selling us the part would only be operating from 10am to 6pm when it is was actually 8/9am to 9/10pm. She also told us rollercoasters would be 40 to 50 feet high, but they are actually able to go up to 100 feet high. She used social media to sell it one way when she knew the whole time they were going to make last minute changes.
Lastly Meinershagen, stepped out front and center against our Frisco Firefighters last year during the election. While they have been asking for more firefighters, she adamantly agrees with the stance of the city leadership that everything is just fine. She claimed she was not representing herself as a council person at the polls but just a regular old resident with a passion for the issue. Residents don’t often spend that much time at the polls holding signs unless it is for a purpose, group or team.
What are your thoughts on Place 2? Will you get out to vote? We will be sending a questionnaire to all three candidates soon with some hard-hitting questions so it will be interesting to see how they respond, or if they even will respond. Next up we dive into Place 4 and the 5 candidates running for that position.
After our Human Trafficking blog, we were surprised to see the number of comments regarding Frisco’s history of questionable businesses in the 80s. The City of Frisco works hard to maintain a squeaky clean and impeccable image and we were curious how hard is it to determine a reputable massage business versus a sexually oriented one.
We were surprised to find an article that looks to be written by former Mayor Bob Warren on FriscoStyle.com where he talks about the sexually oriented businesses otherwise known as “S.O.B.s, brothels, or houses of ill repute.” He states in the article “They came here after having been “flushed out” of neighboring cities … At that time, Frisco was just a little country town, barely a dot on the map, and four of the businesses landed along Texas State Highway 121, on Frisco’s southernmost border. There was the “Doll House,” the “Body Shop,” the “Tub Club” and “Michelle’s Ranch.” He said the most infamous was Aprils which was located on Preston Road where La Hacienda Ranch is today. Apparently, the mobile home stood out like a sore thumb to strangers passing by. Upon entering the mobile through dangling beads in the doorway you were greeted with very dim lights.
Warren ended the article with “It was not easy, but Frisco finally rid itself of the little S.O.B.s. Where they went, I do not know, but may they rest in peace, just not in Frisco.” But did they really rid the city of these businesses? We were curious how easy it is to find “Happy Ending” massage parlors. How many more in Frisco could there be? Why are the police not actively trying to shut down these businesses? Maybe they don’t want the whorehouses listed on the GIS Data to protect the reputation they have carefully crafted.
We googled “massage near us” and started reviewing Frisco locations. First up Spring Spa located Preston and Lebanon Road. From the looks of the website, everything looks on the up & up. We took the phone number right on the google business site and the website and googled massages xxx-xxx-xxxx and first thing to come is the website BedPage.com with the same address and phone as Spring Spa. Now do you think this looks reputable or like a “happy ending” hangout.
We also searched a website sent to us by a reader called Hot.com. The first one listed under Frisco is King Spa with a 3.7-star rating. It is located off Preston just across from the entrance to Preston Vineyards. On one erotic review site, we found 4 reviews from 2024/25 talking in code of course. The code refers to an HJ which we are assuming means “hand job” and another refers to the young lady taking the HF and for an extra $100 offering an HJ (hand job) and the customer to got to play with and suck on her tits. Through a website called Encounter, we found a post about “Lucy” where they describe her as 5’6 tall, skinny with black hair, flat aZZ, and naturally smaller boobs. She apparently offers “Premium Content.”
YL Wellness Center seems to be a HOT HOT place based on the reviews. Located very close to King Spa off Preston in between Preston Vinyards entrance and Rolater Rd. In one review from 2022 found on adultsearch.com we found a review written by DarkManHere that reads “Massage for 1 hr is $60. The massage was top notch. I had lower back pain so went for this massage. After the massage I felt a lot better. Relieved now. Offered just HJ for $40. By removing the dress and allowing me to touch, she charged $100. I went for $100. She came over me, rubbed her tits on me and then jerked me. Used hot towel to clean me up”
The next review was written by HereComesTheBoom in 2021, and it reads “Massage was okay, but after telling her that I was a virgin, she told me she loved virgins and would be more than happy to change that for me. So, then she gave me a blowjob and let me f*ck her and c*m inside of her. I will definitely be back again.”
Lastly, we found an ad on an escort network website with an address of 615 Main Street, Ste 112, Frisco, Texas and when we googled that address it came back to May Foot Spa. While the ad looked clean, we were curious about who placed the ad on the website. Why would you place an ad for a simple innocent massage on an escort website? Someone who works there had to and they included the business phone number and address for May Foot Spa. Innocent massage businesses are not going to post on sites like Bedpage, Hot, Call Girl Guide, Encounter, and more.
What did we discover? A simple search of most of these businesses can be found on other sites offering erotic massages and happy endings. If we can find it, then why can’t the Frisco Police? Here is a thought, create a task force and shut these operations in the hub areas of our city and nearby communities down. They are in shopping centers that you and I go to daily. As a community, we have to do better! Our leadership cannot avoid the problem and then say we are “One of the Safest Cities in America.” We need to be a safe city and while many may say this is not a crime that hurts others, we are pretty sure most of these girls are probably trafficked in some form and we should never say that is okay and turn a blind eye.
If you hear “Frisco, Texas” what is the first thing that pops into your head? Is it the glitzy new PGA lifestyle we have? Maybe it’s The Frisco Star, oh wait, the Cowboys would need to win a game first. What about The Mix or Grand Park, our bad, those are not built yet. Soon to be new downtown in time for FIFA? Maybe it is none of those things! Maybe you are more pragmatic and think of the CROWN JEWEL … that we are the #1 Safest City, where nothing bad ever happens, or at least that is what the city wants you to believe.
Certainly nothing bad is happening behind the tinted windows of countless “massage” parlors scattered across town, right? Nope, in the city that proudly boasts its title as the #1 safest place to live, there’s absolutely no way anything shady could be going on. If it were, surely our vigilant city council and ever-watchful police force would be all over it, right? Because it’s not like they’d want anything to hurt that squeaky-clean image or anything…
Back in November we received an email tip from one resident who was concerned about the number of POP UP “Massage Parlors” and how they seem to be as popular as the fast-food restaurants on every corner. The resident noted that she went to pick up an RX late one evening and while sitting in her car waiting in line, she noticed a massage business with tinted windows and a scrolling open neon sign saying open until 11pm with men coming and going the whole time.
She felt something was off and was pretty sure illegal activities were happening there, but like many residents turned a blind eye. It was not until her neighbor mentioned something two days later about going there to get a massage and was turned away because they were “busy.” The neighbor noted that there were no cars near the place, and it didn’t make sense. That is when she told her neighbor about her concern and what she saw when picking up her RX earlier that week.
The next day the neighbor who had been refused service texted (still upset) saying she googled the business, and she was shocked when the phone number pulled up sex ads. She texted her screenshots which prompted her to go look it up too! After finding the shocking info she decided to file a report with Frisco PD they were supposed to send her a statement form to fill out but never did. After a few weeks of no response to her call and email, she reported it to us, and we started looking into it!
When you first google the name of the business Massage Aces it appears to be very reputable! It is located at 423 & Stonebrook Parkway behind the CVS Pharmacy. They had a link to their YouTube Channel which showed a nice video of a reputable massage business. A simple search of the business phone number just like the tipster said, brought us to a whole new world.
The business phone number on the website pops up on multiple “other” websites like bodyrubsmap, bedpage, skipthegames, and craigslist. The ads offer massages, sex, clean girls, escorts, and call girls which all link back to the business address 400 Stonebrook Pkwy, and the business phone number. Disturbing pictures of rather young girls in sexually provocative poses and clothing.
We were shocked that this was reported sometime in late October, and nothing was done until the middle of February 2025. The tipster forwarded us the email she sent to Frisco PD, leaving us wondering – what took so long to take action? How many other massage parlors are there in Frisco, just like this? We determined within one day of getting the tip this was a front for a lewd sexually oriented business. Just google the phone number that offers sex in their “CLEAN ROOMS” with “CLEAN GIRLS!” We are left wondering if the issue of being the safest city will be on John Keating’s political mayor when he tries to run for Mayor! Frisco…the home of human trafficking and exploited underage girls! Ladies check your husbands’ receipts, if you see Massage Aces or Sandy Spa, it might be time to talk with them.
Our biggest concern is the safety of these young women being trafficked, the fact that it is 1/2 mile from our schools and backs up to our neighborhoods. At least we can assure you as of this week Frisco PD, Code Enforcement, or Building Inspections did stop by, and the business has a big “red tag” on the door! It was done with little fanfare, not to attract attention to it. The notice is for an “occupancy issue” under the new name Sandy Spa. The red tag notes it is a “sexually oriented business” and closed until further notice. Wouldn’t you like to know what the city and/or Frisco PD did to protect these women? Our guess is not much in hopes of quietly moving them to another city so it’s “not in our #1 backyard!”
While we know you are pawsitively waiting for our purrfect part three to Paw Patrol we must take an intermission break for some important information. For those who don’t know the City of Frisco is a “home rule” city, meaning it’s citizens or residents can vote to adapt a charter that acts as the City’s basic governing document. The city governance style is that of a “council-manager” style which means government functions are controlled by a six-person City Council and a City Manager.
According to the city website the City Charter must be reviewed at least every six years and not more often than once every two years. That is why the city has a Charter Review Commission, which is a board that contains ten citizens for a term of six months. They choose two alternatives in the event one of the members is unable to complete the term. The primary purpose or function of the board is to: (A) inquire into the operation of the City government under the Charter and determine whether any provisions require revision; (B) propose any recommendations it deems desirable to ensure compliance with the Charter of the City government; and (C) report its findings and present its recommendations to the City Council. The last Charter Amendment Election was held in May 2019.
We are curious if our readers of the Frisco Chronicles are aware of how important the City Charter is to our day-to-day governance. It made us curious and a little concerned about what proposed changes to the city charter residents will be asked to vote on in May. To be frank we don’t trust the city! We have not seen any public discussion on the charter review and no articles written about it. Apparently, citizens had the right to go to Charter Review Commission and speak at the regularly scheduled Wednesday meetings from June 2024 through October 2024, but were citizens aware of that? Was that announced anywhere?
Many voters will get to the ballot box and feel unprepared to vote on these changes. In our opinion it could leave many residents/voters in the dark about the potential impacts their vote can have on the city’s governance. Not to mention, the timing and approach of this effort should raise eyebrows because there has not been enough transparency, potentially limiting public input on significant decisions affecting the future of Frisco. With limited public awareness and a tight timeline, residents should be calling for more clarity on the changes and how they will influence the local community.
We decided to investigate, and we learned the Charter Review Commission presented the final report from the 2024 charter review to the city council on December 3, 2024. The next step following the report presentation is for the council to have the opportunity to review and revise the recommendations as Council finds desirable. Desirable? What are the changes being suggested?
On February 4th City Council Meeting Item Number 40 reads “Consider and act upon adoption of an Ordinance ordering a Special Election … for the purpose of submitting to the qualified voters of the City of Frisco certain proposed amendments to the existing City of Frisco Home Rule Charter…” there was no discussion by the council on the proposed changes. Instead, Tammy Meinershagen made the motion to approve which was seconded by Bobblehead Bill Woodard. We pulled up the memo associated with the agenda which states there are twelve (12) propositions calling for the Special Charter Amendment Election. The memo references a January 21, 2025, City Council Work session so we pulled up the minutes for that, and as you can guess there is very little info available to the public. Then we went to the October 1, 2024 meeting referenced in the memo and found a large attachment of what the proposed changes are.
Curious yes, what the council wants to change? Words and punctuation proposed to be added are underlined; words and punctuation proposed to be deleted are marked with strikethrough.
Section 3.02 Limitations on Terms: No person shall serve as a Councilmember and Mayor (combined) for more than18sixconsecutive electedyearsterms.
If you read the current Home Rule Charter, it says “The mayor and each councilmember shall serve for a term of three years. Under limitations it reads “No person shall serve as mayor for more than three consecutive elected terms” which is a total of 9 years. Then it goes on to say “no person shall serve as councilmember for more than three consecutive elected terms” which is also 9 years. The last sentence of the limitation reads “No person shall serve as a councilmember and mayor (combined) for more than 18 consecutive years.” 18 YEARS? Do you think they should be able to serve 18 years? How does the city develop new and fresh perspective when someone can serve that long?
Oh yeah did we mention it also recommended adding a provision to the charter to allow the city council to fill a council seat by appointment when a council member vacates their seat with a year or less left on their term? The recommended charter amendment would not apply to the mayor. The appointment would require a supermajority (at least three-fourths) approval from the city council and would have to be made within 30 days of the seat being vacated. NO VOTE on who will fill that seat they get to appoint their friends who agree with them.
Section 3.04 Compensation: The Mayor shall receive compensation in the amount of $1,500.00850.00 per month. Each Councilmember shall receive compensation in the amount of $1,200.00 700.00 per month. On October 1, 2025 and annually thereafter on the same date, the amount of compensation shall be adjusted by an amount equal to the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) over the prior, one-year period.
READ THAT AGAIN! READ IT CAREFULLY! The first issue we have is the council just asked us to raise their pay in 2019 which the voters passed raising the mayor’s pay from $500 per month to $850 and raising council members’ pay from $350 per month to $700. Now they are back for more! With the new proposed payout, King Cheney would make $18,000 a year to be Mayor. Our council Members would be making $14,400 per year. That does not include all the perks of box seats at events or paid city travel.
Issue number two is the blue sentence (read it carefully)! The amendment includes a note requiring compensation to be adjusted by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) going forward to take inflation into account. This ensures that future compensation amendments will not be necessary as it will change automatically. That means our right as voters to determine if they should be paid more is taken away from us because it “can change automatically.”
We are curious, what do other city council leaders across North Texas make? We found the answer in a 2021 Dallas Morning News article which pulled the information from a 2020 U.S. Census Bureau.
Plano – Population 285,494: City Council $1000 per month and Mayor $2000 per month
Arlington – Population: 394,266: Mayor: $250 per month & Council members: $200 per month
Dallas – Population: 1,304,379: Mayor: $80,000 & Council members: $60,000 a year
Fort Worth – Population: 918,915: Mayor: $29,000 & Council members: $25,000 a year
Garland – Population: 246,018: Mayor: $575 per month, plus $72 for regular meetings and $72 for work sessions preceding meetings. Council members: $288 base pay, plus $72 for regular meetings, $72 for work sessions preceding meetings.
Irving – Population: 256,684: Mayor: $1,200 per month & Council members: $900 per month
McKinney – Population: 195,308: Mayor: $50 per city council meeting (which comes to $1200 per year), $100 monthly phone stipend and $100 monthly stipend. Council members: $50 per council meeting (which comes to $1200 per year) and $100 monthly stipend
Mesquite –Population: 150,108: Mayor: $100 per month & Council members: $50 per month
Richardson – Population: 119,469: Mayor: $100 per meeting & Council members: $100 per meeting. Yearly pay is capped at $5,200.
We also found this totally monthly pay comparison chart in the City of Grand Praire from a review they did in March 2024.
Section 3.09 Meetings of the City Council: (1) The City Council shall hold at least two regular meetings each month and as many additional meetings as it deems necessary to transact the business of the City; provided, however, the City Council may, in its sole discretion, determine to hold one regular monthly meeting four two months out of the calendar year. The City Council shall fix the date and time of the regular meetings by ordinance. What does that mean? They want more pay and the ability to opt out of 4 meetings instead of only two. More money less work! They need this because of the number of public events they must do for a political picture grab.
Well, the intermission is over so it is time to get back in to the theater and wait for the rest. Yes, there are more changes you need to know about because we will be voting on them so stay tuned!
Frisco, Texas—where the city council somehow can ask citizens to vote on an EDC Bond for millions of dollars for a sparkling new performing arts center but can’t allow citizens to vote on a bond for an animal shelter or scrape together a dime for a much-needed animal shelter. It’s almost like the Mayor and City Council think the arts deserve a standing ovation while our four-legged friends get a pathetic round of applause… from the overcrowded parking lot outside paid for by citizens’ tax dollars. After all, who needs a haven for abandoned animals when you can have a state-of-the-art performing arts center hosting countless performances, funded city breweries, and a kid’s theme park that no one will remember in 10 years? Priorities, right?
In 2019, Community Impact did a story about how local pet advocates called Frisco’s Pet Project were advocating for Frisco to construct its own animal shelter. The article highlighted Marla Fields, one of the original organizers of the Frisco Pet Project who is quoted saying, “She said she saw a need for a Frisco-based animal shelter while rescuing cats from local organizations. Good Ole King Cheney (Mayor of Frisco) said, “city staffers have considered allocating funding to build an animal shelter in the past but determined the benefits of partnering with the county outweighed the negatives. We have a partnership with Collin County along with other cities to collaborate as a region to try to provide the most cost-effective services for this need.” The article went on to say that building an animal shelter would likely be funded through bonds, but the city did not include a shelter among the projects in the 2019 bond election.
In 2023, the citizens bond committee presented a recommendation for an animal shelter to be voted on by the residents. A DMN article noted that Frisco animal advocates made one last push for City Council to include an animal shelter in the May 6 bond election, but they did not prevail. The article quoted Marla Fields, founder of Frisco’s Pet Project, “It just seems like the finish line just keeps moving on us. You told us to be patient … we’ve done everything that you’ve told us to do. We followed your leadership and your advice. You said, ‘Wait for the bond. You have to speak to each member of the city council. Come to the winter sessions. Show us the data. Show us the plans. Show that you can do this with a return on investment.’ We did all that.”
The City Council’s vote on the bond package was unanimous, with council members Laura Rummel and Brian Livingston requesting a note be added to the record they support an animal shelter. Two votes stand out from that night – Laura Rummel who claims to be the “PET ADVOCATE” and John Keating. Laura voted for obvious reasons as she ran her campaign on animals and supported a shelter. Why Cheating Keating? We have a copy of an email that Councilman Keating sent to a resident where he told the citizen he would allow for it to go before the citizens if it was recommended by the citizens bond committee. But he lied! Are we surprised? No, because he has lied to the Frisco Fire Association and his ex-wife.
What might be even more sad is how the city uses local publishers to sell the community on the same boring, old, tired and worn message in hopes residents will buy the bull they are selling. After getting hit with questions at the Feb 3rd town hall regarding an animal shelter, Community Impact miraculously writes an article on February 5 titled, “Frisco identifies animal shelter site no timeline for project.” The article stated that the City Manager, Wes Pierson, confirmed the city has been trying to find a private public partner to help bring an animal shelter inside the city limits. “We’ve been working with a partner to try and find a model that would allow the city to have a public-private partnership for the operation of an animal shelter,” Pierson said. “We are still in the process of trying to develop that partnership.”
For the first time the city released a potential site located in north Frisco near PGA Parkway and Preston Road on the southwest corner called Luminant Tract. Then the city offers “another excuse” saying the animal shelter would go there once they had a partner and after they developed the North Texas Municipal Water district transfer station and commercial recycling center. Pierson goes on to say only then can they discuss timing of the facility construction. The hidden message we believe he is saying is delay, delay, and more delay because we don’t want an animal shelter here.
The article also states King Mayor Cheney as saying the Frisco Center for the Arts and animal shelter are unrelated. Unrelated? To pet advocates, they are related because for years the city has used “funding” as an excuse, but we can fund the arts with a simple vote from the public for an EDC bond. The same could be said for an animal shelter, OH WAIT, you won’t let the public vote on that which is why you pulled it from the 2023 bond even after it was recommended by the citizens bond committee. King Cheney only wants you to vote on what he wants!
The best comment came from the “So-Called Pet Advocate” on council Laura Rummel. “There are things that city government is not good at or doesn’t have the expertise at,” she said. “We do not have the expertise to have an animal shelter of our own, which is why we have been searching for a partner.” Based on our research THAT IS A NEW EXCUS and in our opinion, that was the dumbest comment we have ever heard. Do you think the thousands of cities across America that have an animal shelter had “animal expertise” when they opened their city-run and funded shelters? Ms. Rummel, what expertise do we have in Health Clinics, Performing Arts, Code Enforcement, Engineering Services, and Parks and Rec? None!!! That is why you hire someone to run the department that “HAS THE EXPERTISE” just like you have done in all the other city departments.
The article goes on to talk about “In The Meantime” the city has a partnership with Collin County Animal Services and how the city supported the November 2023 bond for CCAS to expand the animal shelter’s capacity and services by constructing a one-story, 10,000 square-foot addition to the north side of the CCAS building. What happened after the bond was approved?
Ask Ben Brezina one of the Assistant City Managers who led a crusade to gather other cities like Prosper, Celina, and McKinney to question “the billings statements” and how the impact fees and cost allocations were being split among the different cities. In an email from Ben Brezina to Wes Pierson, Chief Shilson, Henry Hill, and Ryan Pitman dated October 3, 2023, Brezina stated “Regarding future payments, Collin County Administrator verbally committed to updating the cost allocation amongst the Members (population-based). So, it is unknown yet the future costs for Frisco or any other Member, Prosper and Celina have grown significantly, and they will need to pay their fair share, same as unincorporated Collin County. We will advocate for a usage-based fee.” Frisco doesn’t want to pay their fair share based on population even though it was laid out that way from the get-go! They want to change the name of the game. Does that sound supportive to you?
In our final Paw Patrol blog, we are going to share with you the emails sent to us from a recent PIR filed by a resident. They sent us everything and based on those emails it is clear Laura Rummel has not been actively involved in conversations with the city on the animal shelters so-called public-private partnership. Yet, she has continued to tell residents how involved she is. It will also be obvious where the city stands on an animal shelter. Lastly, it will show how dumb John Keating is that he cannot even answer a resident’s questions posed to him in an email without getting an exact word-for-word statement from city management because he is clueless.
In closing, as Laura said we are not experts in running an animal shelter. Advocates have heard over and over the annual operating expenses are just too high year over year for an animal shelter, so it doesn’t make sense. HOWEVER, based on the moves this week at city council, Rummel and the rest of the council (minus Livingston) believe WE ARE EXPERTS IN THE ARTS which is why they voted to put an EDC bond on the ballet in the upcoming election. It appears we can afford the annual operating expenses for a PAC which ranges from $5 to $6 million, and we can HIRE EXPERTS TO RUN IT! King Cheney when you say the Performing Arts Center and Animal Shelter are unrelated …. THEY ARE RELATED! It just comes down to what YOU WANT MIGHTY KING!
Welcome to Frisco, Texas – a city known for its rapid growth, shiny new developments, and state-of-the-art amenities… except when it comes to an animal shelter for its four-legged residents. It is amazing how many residents here love pets and want an animal shelter. We hear about it on every town hall and often see comments online asking leaders…when, when it will be time for animal shelter? Frisco has been absolutely stellar at coming up with new and creative excuses for why that still hasn’t happened. It’s almost as if the city’s leadership has coined the term “We’ll get to it eventually” into an art form.
We have heard all the excuses, or should I say reasons – “We’re focusing on other priorities,” “We don’t have enough space,” “It’s a complicated project.” Blah, blah, blah. Because obviously, with all those new luxury apartments, multi-million-dollar sports complexes, and pristine retail centers, there’s no room for something as quaint as a place where animals can be safe and cared for. Why waste money on a shelter when you can keep building urban development centers, Performing Arts Centers, give a facelift to a soccer field, revitalize downtown into a Meca for the Mayors photo ops. Who needs compassion when you’ve got a sparkling new upscale grocery store when milk is already too costly for some households, right?
Each of our council members and Mayor has their “passion project” and the reason they ran for office! Regarding pets, Laura Rummel ran for her seat claiming to be the “passion paw patrol leader” for an animal shelter. She has been on council for a few years, but have we seen any changes? From what we can tell, no, and based on the countless emails we get from animal advocates across this city asking us to write about pets – they agree that nothing has changed.
We have been sent many things over the last two years by animal lovers since the conception of our page but because we didn’t know too much about the issue, we held of covering it until now. We know for years residents have been told that the city would prefer a public/private partnership instead of building its own animal shelter but what have they done to move the needle forward?
Rummel will argue she has started a private 501c and originally, she said it was to help raise funds for an animal shelter. However nowhere on the website for this 501c does it mention anything about an animal shelter. It says the mission is to perpetually support the City of Frisco, Texas, its citizens, and its pets by providing animal education, support low-cost veterinarian options, and help reduce the homeless pet population. We think the second half of that mission statement is great, but it is the first part that leaves us concerned.
According to the dictionary “perpetually” means ALWAYS or in a way that will never end or change. When the mission statement says they will perpetually support the City of Frisco – well that means if the city doesn’t want an animal shelter, then Laura will ALWAYS support that. Yet that is not what she continues to tell her supporters! She tells voters she is advocating regularly for pets and that we have the land and money to fund it. She is “all in” for pets but is she actually “all-in” however the city wants it?
Our question for Ms. Rummel is do you agree with Mayor Cheney and what he said at the mid-year 2024 Townhall where he essentially said Frisco has more sophisticated communication tools to handle lost pets and that the city’s position is to REHOME pets, so they never end up at the shelter? Essentially if you agree with that, you are saying to residents that if your dog gets out you don’t deserve the pet back so we will rehome it instead of taking it to a shelter.
In the second half of his comment, he says those communication tools are Facebook Community Pages and apps such as Nextdoor and those are tools that don’t exist in other communities. Would you agree Ms. Rummel since you will always perpetually support the city, and Cheney is the Mayor of our city? No other city or community in America has the sophisticated communication tools of Facebook Lost and Found pages and neighborhood groups? The Nextdoor app was created for Frisco and does not exist in other cities? I had no idea those were exclusive sophisticated communication tools for Frisco, only!
We are also curious if Ms. Rummel perpetually agrees when Cheney says the city’s approach that “WE DO NOT WANT TO RUN OUR OWN SHELTER” and we are open to a public/private partnership option only.
Most importantly we are curious if Ms. Rummel agrees with Cheney attacking Animal Advocates in a public form saying that they are a case study in how NOT to advocate for a position? He continues his rambling by schooling them publicly in the PROPER way to advocate for a position and accusing them of tearing people down and spreading misinformation.
The pet voters would like to know if you agree Ms. Rummel. Is going to a city council meeting and speaking during citizens’ input, emailing council members presentations, thoughts and asking questions the improper way to handle it? If you perpetually agree with that Ms. Rummel then it sounds like what you are saying is that they should kiss the City of Frisco’s Ring, support the click campaigns, and bow down to their agenda or else they are doing it wrong.
My wife and I follow the city very closely and we often hear them say they are “exploring options” at the council meetings, work sessions and town hall sessions. The city leadership responses are PERPETUALLY THE SAME every time. We are exploring options but have no updates. Maybe that is why when Ms. Rummel is questioned online or in the comments of her posts about the status of an animal shelter (the platform she choose to run on) she gets defensive.
In fact, recently she snapped back at one resident who comments on one of her Facebooks posts stating nothing has changed and she has not moved the needle by sending him a private message that reads, “SO YOU THINK IVE DONE NOTHING” to which he responds “NO ANIMAL SHELTER. Is there one being built that I don’t know about?” They go back and forth, and she says we have the land, we have how we’d pay for it and we are still negotiating with a potential partner.
How much does our “Regional Partnership” cost? Do they have land? Do they know how they would pay for it? And who are they negotiating with as a private partner? We know the one they were talking to in 2024 is dead in the water based on the emails we have. Stay tuned for Part 2
Welcome to the dinner table where you thought the only thing spicy was the food. Have you ever felt like mustard fights with mayo and ketchup hold a grudge against ranch? You can have a classic ketchup and mustard coalition but beware the rise of the new contender: sriracha!
The reality is the table is full of a world of condiments and political debates! The next few months will be filled with a heated political election and your condiment choices are shaping the future—of your sandwich. So, grab your napkins, folks, because we’re about to dive into the bizarre, messy world where sauces aren’t just about flavor—they’re about power. Let the condiment campaign begin!
You’re probably wondering why we are talking about condiments! Now we are going to confuse you a little more! Have you ever heard of The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)? The FERC is an independent agency, that is a part of the U.S. Department of Energy, and it regulates the interstate transmission of electricity, natural gas, and oil. We had never heard of them until we read a yahoo finance article. The more confusing thing about this article was the Commission ordered a company called Ketchup Caddy (Ketchup Who?) and its owner to pay about $27 million for using bogus demand response resources to make offers in the Midcontinent Independent System Operator’s capacity market.
What is Ketchup Caddy and what does the FERC have to do with Frisco, Texas? Ketchup Caddy is a company originally created in Frisco, Texas and they sell an in-car ketchup holder invented by Phillip Mango. On December 5th the FERC decided that the company and its owner engaged in Market Manipulation using a fraudulent device, scheme, or artifice to defraud the MISO market according to the FERC.
To do this they co-founder Todd MEINERSHAGEN, a computer programmer, registered customers using a random number generator on a website to cull data so Mango could contact them about enrolling in Ketchup Caddy’s DR program. Meinershagen AGREED in late 2022 to pay more than $525,000, including interest, for his role in the market manipulation. According to FERC, Ketchup Caddy “regularly distributed” MISO capacity payments to Mango’s and Meinershagen’s personal bank accounts totaling more than $500,000 apiece.
Have you made the connection yet? Todd Meinershagen is the husband of Tammy Meinershagen our city council woman who loves the arts. Seems they both want to use other people’s money to build things! Talk about transparency and honesty to the public. My mom once told me, you are who you associate with and if that is true Tammy is standing by her man and that means her character is questionable.
Tammy Meinershagen is now asking citizens to Re-Elect her to office when they NEVER ELECTED HER THE FIRST TIME. A Community Impact article from Feb 28, 2022, reads, “Tammy Meinershagen to ASSUME Place 2 on Frisco City Council; May election for city to be canceled.” The article states that according to Mayor Jeff Cheney, Meinershagen will FILL THE SEAT of Council Member Huffman. Cheney went on to say they are CANCELING the May 7, 2022, election since both races were uncontested. Bobblehead Bill Woodard had no one run against him so while he assumed the seat for a 3rd term he wasn’t elected for his 3rd term. The same for Meinershagen who was NEVER ELECTED so how can we RE-ELECT HER NOW?
The funny thing about Bobblehead Bill Woodard and Tammy Meinershagen is they both were on the front lines to say Vote No against our Frisco Fire Fighters and yet we never elected them! It’s a little bit Ironic, don’t you think? Frisco Residents need to get involved and have a voice. Who do you want leading our city and who do you want to ELECT TO THE OFFICE? It is time for change, time to have representatives who listen to the residents and don’t show up for just the photo’s ops.
If you were scrolling through social media over the holidays, you may have seen the holiday post from the City of Frisco. When we saw the post we stopped in our tracks, not sure if we were enamored with it like Ralphie in The Christmas Story with the Leg Lamp, or if we were in disbelief of their brazen audacity to say FU to their naysayers. Clearly, it was a message by our Elite Council to the Grinch naysayers who dare question them and what they do. We decided to be like Tammy and write a poem!
The Who of Whoville by FWB
In the City of Frisco, not far from the Square, sat a Whoville of leaders in plush swivel chairs. They believed they were the Who’s Who of Whoville and met every Tuesday to reign superior over those in the land.
“We’ll build a new park!” said Mayor Jeff Maywho with great flair! Thing 1 (Bobblehead Bill) stands up, Mayor Maywho, don’t forget bike lines – they’re only fair!” Thing 2 (Cheating Keating) chimes in, “How, ‘bout we build more roads to relieve the loads!”
Just as the Whoville of Frisco was set to agree, a voice from the chamber rose and said, “Not So Fast!” Martha May Who with a Pelham scowl, said “Have we thought this all through? It’s a real rat race!” The council just nodded, their eyes a blur, when Mayor Jeff Maywho called out “We’re solving it all, of that, I am sure! It will be to my liking, said the greedy and self-serving Mayor Jeff Maywho.
“Oh, Council of Frisco, so grand and wise, could you think for a moment with less compromise? Must every decision be voted through so fast?” Who speaks their bellowed Mayor Jeff Maywho. The light shines upon the voice and Ozzy steps forward and says, “Lets focus on projects that are built to last!”
Sweet little Cindy-Lou Who (Tammy) is undaunted while the Whoville of Frisco debates, talking about zoning and budgets and changing growth rates. She says although we’re not perfect (who really is?), we do our hardest to run this big biz.
Max “The Dog” Rummel stands up to pant and proposes a cheer, “Here’s to the Whoville Council of this great town, she juggles a smile, then shrugs, followed by a little frown. Her only job is to pant, beg, and not step out of line due to loyalty or fear and every now and then Mayor Jeff Maywho will throw her a bone.
Just remember no matter WHO you are, or you celebrate the season, we will be cheering and laughing at your disgust for Whoville because Mayor Jeff Maywho will have a prosperous and joyous New Year. The End.
In closing, when we saw the FU post, we were shocked at the audacity Mayor Jeff Cheney had to dress up as Mayor Augustus Maywho. Here is a Mayor who has been accused of using his position to further his own financial gain and he takes center stage in a city holiday photo to dress up as a character (red sash in all), who puts on a façade to his true nature: that of a rude, greedy, arrogant, and egotistical politician who is willing to exploit anything for his own benefit.
Look closely, the picture speaks volumes! Watch The Grinch and it will all make sense!
Goodbye, 2024, you chaotic overachiever, and hello 2025! Like every New Year, we dive in headfirst and pretend that turning the page in our calendar will suddenly fix our lives! We treat each year like a shiny new model, but are we expecting too much? Gym memberships rise, and vision boards are crafted, and plastered with our new year’s resolutions. Really those “visions” are like drunk promises we know we won’t keep.
By day three or four, we are tired of eating Kale and wish we had the holiday cookies still left in our pantry. One thing that never changes with each new year is that we know whatever promises or commitments we made in good faith will most likely never be met because they are just one of those New Year’s resolutions that fall by the wayside. Cheers to the illusion of change!
As we enter the new year one would hope our City Council members had an epiphany to put the community first over their own self-interests. Soon we will know because a new year also means a new city council election and guess what, it is right around the corner. The first day to file for a place on the ballot is January 15th and the last day to file for a place on the ballot is February 14th. Time will fly and soon it will be April 22nd, the first day to early vote. All of it will come to a close on election day which is May 3rd.
From now through election time, you can expect to hear how the candidates or incumbents will be transparent and represent you the residents. We will hear the same old tired-out slogans such as “We are the #1 this and the #1 that.” You can bet money the incumbents will talk about how “we are the #1 Safest City” and how they have a personal stakeholder position in making that happen. It leaves us wondering if residents will open their eyes to the fact that the city manipulates what we “need to know” versus the truth of what is happening around us! Remember John “Cheating” Keating (who hopes to be our next Mayor) threw the #1, #1, #1 in our face over and over during his election.
Even high-profile NFL athletes are not exempt from being the victims of crime. By now you have heard about the burglaries targeting the homes of NFL players, including Kansas City Chiefs stars Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow. Recently, local DFW news stations reported that on December 27th in the affluent upscale Preston Hollow neighborhood, the home of Dallas Mavericks guard Luka Doncic was broken into. Reports say the thieves got away with $30,000 worth of jewelry. The FBI has gone as far as to warn the NFL and NBA that players need to increase the security of their homes when they are away playing, and they believe they have connected these burglaries to a “transnational South American theft group.”
The good thing is we can rest easy here in Frisco! We are the #1 SAFEST CITY! That means it would never happen here, right? One might think since Frisco is known as Sports City USA, we could be a target! If something like that happened here, surely the city and Frisco PD would put out a crime alert to warn the residents of Frisco. It would have made the local news stations just like Luca Doncic home break-in. Frisco has several affluent neighborhoods, filled with high-profile players, and I am sure their neighbors would want to know if that happened in their community.
FWB received a tip over the holiday break that it did happen here! In fact, based on the police report, the home burglary took place in our very own affluent community of Stonebriar Country Club. According to one website, residents of SCC enjoy a wealth of amenities in the exclusive guard-gated community that epitomizes luxury with elegant homes and a lifestyle of unparalleled sophistication and tranquility. Residents should know they are not exempt from this kind of potential danger.
When did this happen? November 28th just after Thanksgiving, during the Dallas Cowboys game against the New York Giants at AT&T stadium. The home game started at 4:30 pm and the report states the crime was committed 11/28/24 between the times of 15:05 (3:05 pm) and 20:44 (8:44 pm). Ken Wang is listed as the case officer and the Incident Report number is 24143447. The offense code is listed as Burglary of Habitation. The Frisco Police Report states 8 watches totaling $550,000 along with 2 purses totaling $100,000 were stolen. The remarks state unknown suspect forced entry into a home and stole $700,000 worth of miscellaneous jewelry. Luca Doncic got off easy!
To protect the NFL player, we are not going to release his name or address because his family has been through enough! We can tell you we googled the address, and we were surprised to see it on Zillow, Redfin, and Realtor.com. One would assume that Realtors who handle multi-million-dollar listings like this would remove the photos once the listing is sold. The images on the Douglas Elliman listing, show the whole home, and the location and access points of the home. Douglas Elliman is a well-known, respected real estate brokerage which is why we are a little surprised the listing agent did not remove the photos after selling it. We are curious if those images could have helped the criminals figure out how to access the home.
I asked my neighbor, a Frisco Realtor if agents usually remove high-end listing photos after a sale. He said that good Realtors are usually proactive and to protect the privacy of both parties after a sale, they request removal of the images on luxury listings. He also told us while the listing agent can request the removal of photos after a home has been sold, there is no guarantee a third-party website will take them down. I asked him how an owner could request the images be removed and he told me owners can google how to remove the pictures of your home from real estate websites and each one has step-by-step instructions on how a homeowner can remove them.
Residents of Frisco had the right to know about a burglary of a habitation where over $700,000 worth of valuables were stolen in our opinion. Frisco PD could have withheld the player’s name and address but a warning to the community. How is it, that every other high-end pro-athlete burglary made the news, and this one didn’t? Did Frisco PD ask the FBI if this could be related to the other high-end thefts? How come we never heard about this burglary on the news?
The city does not point out we are a safe city, they always say we are the #1 safest city and to be honest, it does not feel very safe here anymore. We have had more crimes, shootings, and God knows what else because leaders manipulate want, they want to share so it fits their narrative. Just like they manipulated the sales presentation of Universal Kids. After it passed, residents learned everything they promised changed from the height of rides, the traffic congestion they claim will not happen, and the times the theme park would be open. In Frisco, the NFL stands for Navigating Frisco Lies!
We came across this post from the Allen Fire Department and felt we needed to share it! It is evident from this video how the Allen FD is committed to helping its firefighters work through mental health challenges. By sharing it, the City of Frisco leadership including the City Manager, Sassy Safranek in HR, and the City Council could learn something if they watch it! After you watch it catch the community follow-up Q & A session where Allen leadership answers the public questions by clicking here.
Why is the city still fighting a lawsuit with Former Assistant Fire Chief Cameron Kraemer? If you have not heard about this case, Frisco leadership tried to deny Kraemer’s PTSD as was work-related injury. Even after the courts confirmed that Frisco Leadership and TML were wrong, they continued to fight Kraemer!
A new lawsuit was filed on 8/2/2024 and involves Cameron Kraemer vs City of Frisco. Filed in Collin County under Case Number 416-05201-2024, Frisco is still fighting its duty and responsibility to care for a man who served in our community for 27+ years. It also defines how our city leadership and management will treat future firefighters when they have work-related mental illnesses. On 12/12/2024 the case was “SCHEDULED FOR TRAIL” by jury and Pre-Trial will begin on 7/24/2024 with a Jury Trial on 7/28/2025.
WHY SHOULD THIS MATTER TO YOU? Ask yourself, how many tax dollars have been spent fighting these multiple court cases? If the city loses the case, how much could the city payout to Kraemer in damages?
The truth is the City of Frisco and the entire leadership who stand up saying they are committed to our Public Safety Departments during elections should be ashamed of themselves for not having fixed this sooner. They should also be embarrassed and explain why they want to continue to spend OUR tax dollars to further show their lack of support for firefighters. By the looks of the docket, the City’s attorneys are going to try to convince a JURY that they did the right thing. Ask yourself, you have Allen FD trying to raise awareness and Frisco leadership who continues to treat those on the front lines of our public safety departments like crap and deny their firefighters can have work-related PTSD! What has to happen in Frisco for them to accept their responsibilities to help their firefighters???
We have been saying for a while that the Frisco City Council is like a group of “Fairweather Friends” meaning they are a good friend when it is easy, or they need something, and they stop being a friend when there are problems. We thought the city should have a new tagline and we came up with The City of Frisco – Home of Fairweather Friendships. You can expect the Frisco Cabal to react swiftly to this blog and say the council members are great, amazing, and stupendous. That is because the Frisco Cabal, The City, and the members of the Frisco City Council often project images of unity and commitment to the community.
However, there’s a growing perception that the council members are more “fairweather friends” than steadfast leaders. Their support and engagement often seem to waver depending on public opinion, personal interests, or political convenience. The inconsistency leaves residents questioning whether council members prioritize the long-term well-being of the city or simply their own political capital.
We saw it firsthand in the May 2024 election when the current city council members turned their back on our men and woman of the Frisco Fire Department. They went as far as standing on the corner of election locations holding “VOTE NO” to civil service and collective bargaining signs against the very men and woman who put their life on the line for the city. The amount of lies and accusations they put out led by Bobblehead Bill Woodard were over the top.
Then after the election was over, the Council, the City Management, and FD Management including Chief Lee Glover tried to do an about-face to show “they care!” That is why FD management began the “healing sessions” which were mandatory in-service meetings that allowed the FD to express their complaints and fears about the FD and the city. The result was that Chief Glover was given a “counselor” to help him do his job better. Did any of it work? Of course not!
The truth hurts, especially when the facts are presented: The current city council members rally around popular initiatives during election cycles, only to back away when challenges arise, or public scrutiny intensifies. While they’re quick to attach their names to high-profile projects or programs that garner praise, their enthusiasm often wanes when those efforts require difficult decisions or sustained support. This pattern of behavior risks undermining trust and stability in local governance. Moreover, their selective advocacy for certain neighborhoods, businesses, or interest groups raises concerns about equity and fairness. The council’s tendency to show up for celebratory events or media-friendly opportunities while avoiding contentious issues is proof of their Fairweather tendencies. The lesson is simple but hard for city leadership to understand which is to build lasting confidence, Frisco’s council members must demonstrate consistent engagement, even when the skies aren’t so sunny.
Thank you for sharing. The clear favoritism of HR shows with so many no evidence of wrongdoing thru this hotline…
I would not say everyone associated with our schools condones violence and murder. We have some amazing teachers. Keep your…
Haven't any of you heard? This school, the board, superintendent- everyone who is affiliated with Frisco schools CONDONES and encourages…
It seems Dr. Waldrip cares very little about his students safety. He is allowing a cold-blooded murderer to graduate!! In…
Great information! Thanks for the Laura Logan/Loomer, Savanah Hernandez, Andy Ngo style investigating. What an absolute embarrassment of a city.…